Virologic outcomes of antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV-1 following bariatric surgery: A case series and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Selection of an antiretroviral regimen for people living with HIV (PLWH) involves various clinical considerations, such as comorbidities, archived drug resistance mutations, concomitant medications, and potential drug interactions and side effects. Alterations in the surface area and pH of the gastrointestinal tract following bariatric surgery may alter absorption, antiretroviral pharmacokinetics and viral suppression. Data on the efficacy of antiretroviral (ARV) therapy in PLWH who have undergone bariatric surgery are limited or lacking for new antiretrovirals, such as dolutegravir and bictegravir. METHODS: This case series reports virologic outcomes and side effects in eight cases of PLWH receiving ARV therapy who underwent bariatric surgery. A systematic literature review was performed to review the available literature on the efficacy and safety of antiretroviral regimens in PLWH who have undergone bariatric surgery. RESULTS: Virologic suppression was not impacted for obese PLWH who underwent bariatric surgery following failure of life-style modifications and pharmacological therapy. CONCLUSIONS: There were no deleterious effects on HIV progression for PLWH that underwent bariatric surgery. More prospective research is required to validate the effects of bariatric surgery on immunologic and virologic function outcomes. Close involvement of HIV and surgical specialists is recommended to manage ARV therapy in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.

Therapeutic review of cabotegravir/rilpivirine long-acting antiretroviral injectable and implementation considerations at an HIV specialty clinic.

Cabotegravir/rilpivirine (CAB/RPV) was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as the first complete parenteral antiretroviral (ART) regimen for treatment of people living with HIV (PLWH). As a monthly intramuscular (IM) injection, this therapy constitutes a major departure from the traditional paradigm of oral therapy requiring (at least) daily administration that has defined HIV treatment for decades. Composed of a second-generation integrase inhibitor (INSTI) and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), CAB/RPV has achieved high rates of sustained virologic suppression with a favorable safety profile for treatment-experienced PLWH following oral lead-in (OLI) during several clinical trials. In addition to the clinical benefits of this agent, patient-reported outcomes associated with convenience, confidentiality, and the tolerability of the injections have consistently reflected positive perceptions of CAB/RPV. The novel nature of this therapy in the field of HIV presents logistical challenges. Clinics will need to address barriers related to management of clinic workflow, procurement, reimbursement, and nonadherence. The aim of this review was to summarize the available safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) data of this long-acting (LA) injectable regimen as well as discuss some potential considerations for prescribing and operationalization.

Pharmacotherapy considerations in transgender individuals living with human immunodeficiency virus.

Pharmacotherapy considerations are often a concern for transgender individuals who are living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) due to concerns for drug-drug interactions between their hormone and antiretroviral therapies. Many of the first-line therapies offered to patients for the management of HIV have reduced concerns for safety, resistance, and drug-drug interactions. In this review, we highlight common medications and important considerations for caring for transgender people living with HIV.

Incidence and Severity of Drug Interactions Before and After Switching Antiretroviral Therapy to Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide in Treatment-Experienced Patients.

BACKGROUND: Switching antiretroviral therapy (ART) in people with HIV (PWH) can influence their risk for drug-drug interactions (DDIs). The purpose of this study was to assess changes in the incidence and severity of DDIs among PWH who switched their ART to bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF). METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study of PWH on ART and at least 1 concomitant medication (CM) who switched to BIC/FTC/TAF between 3/2018 and 6/2019. Using the University of Liverpool's HIV Drug Interaction Database, 2 DDI analyses were performed for each patient. The first assessed patients' preswitch ART regimens with their CM list. The second assessed the same CM list with BIC/FTC/TAF. Each ART-CM combination was given a score of 0 (no or potential weak interaction), 1 (potential interaction), or 2 (contraindicated interaction). A paired t test analyzed changes in total DDI scores following ART switches, and linear regression examined factors contributing to DDI score reductions. RESULTS: Among 411 patients, 236 (57%) had at least 1 DDI present at baseline. On average, baseline DDI scores (SD) were 1.4 (1.8) and decreased by 1 point (95% CI, -1.1 to -0.8) after patients switched to BIC/FTC/TAF (P < .0001). After adjusting for demographics, baseline ART, and CM categories, switching to BIC/FTC/TAF led to significant DDI score reductions in patients receiving CMs for cardiovascular disease, neurologic/psychiatric disorders, chronic pain, inflammation, gastrointestinal/urologic conditions, and conditions requiring hormonal therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment-experienced PWH eligible to switch their ART may experience significant declines in number and severity of DDIs if switched to BIC/FTC/TAF.

Optimizing Antiretroviral Therapy in Treatment-Experienced Patients Living with HIV: A Critical Review of Switch and Simplification Strategies. An Opinion of the HIV Practice and Research Network of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy.

Simplifying or switching antiretroviral therapy (ART) in treatment-experienced people living with HIV (PLWH) may improve adherence, tolerability, toxicities, and/or drug-drug interactions. The purpose of this review is to critically evaluate the literature for efficacy and safety associated with switching or simplifying ART in treatment-experienced PLWH. A systematic literature search using MEDLINE was performed from January 1, 2010 to April 30, 2018. References within articles of interest, the Department of Health and Human Services guidelines, and conference abstracts were also reviewed. Switch/simplification strategies were categorized as those supported by high-level clinical evidence and those with emerging data. Rates of virologic suppression were noninferior for several switch/simplification strategies when compared to baseline ART. Potential for reducing adverse events was also seen. Additional evidence for some strategies, including most 2-drug regimens, is needed before they can be recommended.

Simplifying ARV Therapy in the Setting of Resistance.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: HIV treatment simplification is typically indicated for virologically suppressed patients with no baseline resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) or prior virologic failure (VF) to the simplification regimen. Simplification can occur to minimize pill burden, toxicities, drug-drug interactions, or costs. As most studies for treatment simplification excluded patients with baseline RAMs or prior VF, this review is aimed to critically analyze data regarding treatment simplification in treatment-experienced patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Antiretroviral (ARV) regimens containing three-, two-, and one-drug(s) have been scarcely studied to assess virologic efficacy in treatment-experienced patients. Three-drug regimens with the most data and highest efficacy are with integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs). Regimens including dolutegravir (DTG) and bictegravir have been shown to maintain efficacy in patients with certain baseline RAMs. Dual therapy regimens include the use of DTG plus either lamivudine (3TC), rilpivirine (RPV), or other ARVs. None of these studies evaluated patients with baseline DTG resistance. Baseline RAMs to 3TC were not a predictor of VF in patients on DTG/3TC. Efficacy was seen with DTG/RPV; however, studies showed high rates of discontinuation. DTG plus boosted-protease inhibitors were studied in smaller but promising studies. Two small studies assessed the use of monotherapy with boosted darunavir or DTG, both showing virologic efficacy. Currently, three- and two-drug ARV regimens may be considered in this population with most studies evaluating the use of DTG and bictegravir without baseline INSTI RAMs. Future studies should include heavily treatment-experienced patients with a variety of baseline RAMs and a larger sample size.

The pharmacological challenges of treating tuberculosis and HIV coinfections.

INTRODUCTION: Tuberculosis (TB) is the most prevalent opportunistic infection among HIV patients, and the leading cause of death among HIV patients worldwide. Simultaneous treatment of both diseases is recommended by current guidelines, but can be challenging due to the potential for drug-drug interactions, overlapping toxicities, difficulty adhering to medications, and an increased risk for immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS). Clinical manifestations of TB can also vary between HIV-infected patients and uninfected patients, which can increase the risk for delayed diagnosis. Areas covered: Topics covered in this review include the following: the inter-related pathophysiology of HIV and TB; clinical manifestations and diagnosis; drug-drug interactions, particularly the rifamycins with the antiretrovirals; IRIS presentation and treatment, as well as a discussion on overlapping toxicity between the two disease states. Expert commentary: The complexity of managing these two disease states simultaneously requires a multidisciplinary approach to care and dedicated resources. If properly funded, TB/HIV co-infection will continue to decline over the coming years.

A HAART-Breaking Review of Alternative Antiretroviral Administration: Practical Considerations with Crushing and Enteral Tube Scenarios.

Selection of an appropriate antiretroviral regimen for the patient infected with human immunodeficiency virus can be challenging, as various considerations must be taken into account including viral resistance mutations, patient comorbidities, drug interactions, and the potential for drug-related adverse effects and toxicities. Treatment is further complicated when a clinical scenario arises requiring an alteration in the dosage form. Factors ranging from dysphagia to administration through an enteral feeding tube can affect decisions regarding antiretroviral dosage forms. Limited pharmacokinetic data exist regarding the alteration of antiretroviral medications from their original form. Bioavailability may vary substantially between dosage forms, which can lead to unpredictable drug concentrations. Supratherapeutic or subtherapeutic antiretroviral drug concentrations can result in increased toxicity, virologic failure, or the emergence of drug resistance. We performed a systematic literature search to review the available antiretroviral literature on the modification of solid dosage forms as well as alternative routes of administration of oral antiretroviral agents and their application to clinical practice.

Antiretroviral Treatment Efficacy and Safety in Older HIV-Infected Adults.

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (ART) and its widespread availability have revolutionized the landscape of HIV care and patient outcomes, transforming infection with HIV into a manageable chronic condition rather than a life-limiting disease. This transformation has created an older patient demographic. The effect that older age has on the outcomes of ART is not completely understood. Limited data are available in older individuals due to underrepresentation in clinical trials. To better understand this relationship, we conducted a literature search to assess the impact of older age on the outcomes of ART in the older HIV-infected population, including immunologic and virologic outcomes, mortality, disease progression, toxicity of ART, and pharmacokinetic considerations. In addition, package inserts of antiretroviral (ARV) medications were reviewed for efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetic information pertaining to the older population. Most studies in older adults (50 yrs or older) demonstrated slower and blunted CD4 immune recovery but better virologic suppression in response to ART. Higher rates of mortality and faster disease progression have been observed in adults 50 years and older, particularly during the first year after ART initiation. HIV-infected patients aged 50 years and older appear to be at greater risk for certain ART-associated toxicities including nephrotoxicity, decline in bone mineral density and bone fracture, symptomatic peripheral neuropathy, and cardiovascular disease including myocardial infarction. The available literature suggests that clinicians should consider avoiding agents such as tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in older patients with risk factors for renal impairment and/or osteoporosis. If TDF is used in patients aged 50 years or older, more frequent monitoring should be considered. Older age was a significant predictor for higher atazanavir exposure and higher lopinavir trough concentration at 24 weeks. The clinical implications of these findings are unknown. It is imperative that future development of novel ARV drug therapies includes a greater proportion of older subjects in clinical trials.

Renal Function Recovery and HIV Viral Suppression Following Tenofovir Discontinuation for Renal Impairment.

BACKGROUND: Tenofovir associated nephrotoxicity (TDFN) is well recognized. This study describes the trend of renal function recovery and virologic consequences after cessation of tenofovir (TDF) for suspected TDFN. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of 241 patients who underwent HLA-B*5701 allele testing between January 2007-December 2010. Demographics and clinical characteristics were compared at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 month between patients that continued and discontinued TDF. Factors associated with renal function recovery were assessed by multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Eighty patients were identified with TDFN; 84% male, 74% African American (AA) with a median age of 55 years, and median length of TDF use for 122 weeks. Renal recovery at 12 months differed in those who stopped versus (vs.) continued TDF (83% vs. 57% p=0.03). In a crude analysis, baseline chronic kidney disease was negatively associated with renal recovery (p=0.01). An adjusted analysis showed that those who stopped TDF had 3.76 higher odds of renal recovery compared to those who did not stop TDF (95% CI: 1.26-11.27, p=0.02). There were no significant differences in virologic response after switching TDF to an alternative agent. CONCLUSION: In this mostly AA male population with suspected TDFN, discontinuation of TDF was strongly associated with renal function recovery without affecting viral suppression.

Severe dyslipidaemia after the addition of raltegravir to a lopinavir/ritonavir-containing regimen.

We describe a 55-year-old HIV-1-infected male who developed severe dyslipidaemia (total cholesterol 600 mg/dl, triglycerides >5,000 mg/dl, high density lipoprotein <5 mg/dl) after raltegravir was added to his lopinavir/ritonavir-containing regimen. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of severe dyslipidaemia associated with the addition of raltegravir to a lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimen, suggestive of a possible drug interaction. The lipid profile quickly normalized following discontinuation of lopinavir/ritonavir and continuation of raltegravir, suggesting that lopinavir/ritonavir was the primary driver for the adverse event. With increasing interest in nucleoside-sparing regimens, knowledge of clinically significant adverse events such as this is important for HIV clinicians when selecting regimens for patients with highly resistant virus or drug tolerability issues.

Fidaxomicin: a novel macrocyclic antibiotic for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection.

PURPOSE: The pharmacology, clinical efficacy, safety, dosage and administration, and place in therapy of fidaxomicin for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) are reviewed. SUMMARY: Fidaxomicin, a macrocyclic antibiotic, has a narrow spectrum of activity against gram-positive anaerobes and is bactericidal against C. difficile. It has no activity against gram-negative bacteria. Fidaxomicin has minimal activity against Bacteroides species, which may be advantageous in maintaining colonization resistance and protecting the gastrointestinal tract from colonization by C. difficile. The minimum inhibitory concentration for 90% of organisms for fidaxomicin against C. difficile ranged from 0.0078 to 2 µg/mL in in vitro studies. After oral administration, fecal concentrations are detected and are directly proportional to the dose administered. Fidaxomicin resistance in vivo has not been reported. In clinical trials, fidaxomicin has been shown to be noninferior to vancomycin in the management of mild-to-moderately severe CDI. The adverse-effect profile of fidaxomicin is comparable to that of vancomycin. The recommended dosage for treatment of CDI is fidaxomicin 200 mg orally twice daily for 10 days. Fidaxomicin should be considered for patients who previously received treatment with metronidazole or vancomycin for CDI and who are diagnosed with recurrent CDI in which a non-NAP1/BI/027 strain is isolated. At institutions where strain typing is not available, fidaxomicin may be considered in patients with recurrent CDI who have not responded to treatment with the regimen used for the first episode of CDI. CONCLUSION: Fidaxomicin is a well-tolerated agent for the treatment of CDI and has been shown to be noninferior to vancomycin in the management of mild-to-moderately severe CDI.