Asciminib Monotherapy as Frontline Treatment of Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Results from the ASCEND Study.

Asciminib is a myristoyl site BCR::ABL1 inhibitor approved for chronic phase chronic myeloid leukaemia (CP-CML) patients failing ≥2 prior lines of therapy. The Australasian Leukaemia & Lymphoma Group (ALLG) conducted the ASCEND study to assess efficacy of asciminib for newly-diagnosed CP-CML. Patients commenced asciminib 40 mg twice daily (BID) and thereafter were managed according to molecular milestones. Patients with treatment failure, defined as BCR::ABL1 >10% (IS) at 3 or 6 months, or >1% at 12 or 18 months, received either imatinib, nilotinib or dasatinib in addition to asciminib. In patients with suboptimal response, defined as levels of 1-10% at 6 months, >0.1-1% at 12 months, or >0.01%-1% at 18 months, the asciminib dose was increased to 80 mg BID. With a median follow-up of 21 months (range 0-36), 82/101 patients continue asciminib. The most frequent reasons for treatment discontinuation were adverse events (6%), loss of response (4%) and withdrawn consent (5%). There were no deaths; one patient developed lymphoid blast crisis at 6 months. The co-primary endpoints were early molecular response (BCR::ABL1 ≤10% at 3 months), achieved in 93% (96% CI 86-97%), and major molecular response by 12 months achieved in 79%; (95% CI 69.7-86.8%), respectively. The cumulative incidence of MR4.5 was 53% by 24 months. One patient had 2 cerebrovascular events; no other arterial occlusive events were reported. Asciminib as frontline therapy in CP-CML produces high rates of molecular response with excellent tolerance and a low rate of discontinuation for toxicity. (ANZ Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12620000851965).

Asciminib monotherapy in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia with the T315I mutation after ≥1 prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor: 2-year follow-up results.

Asciminib targets the BCR::ABL1 myristoyl pocket, maintaining activity against BCR::ABL1T315I, which is resistant to most approved adenosine triphosphate-competitive tyrosine kinase inhibitors. We report updated phase I results (NCT02081378) assessing safety/tolerability and antileukemic activity of asciminib monotherapy 200 mg twice daily in 48 heavily pretreated patients with T315I-mutated chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP; data cutoff: January 6, 2021). With 2 years' median exposure, 56.3% of patients continued receiving asciminib. Overall, 62.2% of evaluable patients achieved BCR::ABL1 ≤1% on the International Scale (IS); 47.6% and 81.3% of ponatinib-pretreated and -naive patients, respectively, achieved BCR::ABL1IS ≤1%. Of 45 evaluable patients, 48.9% achieved a major molecular response (MMR, BCR::ABL1IS ≤0.1%), including 34.6% and 68.4% of ponatinib-pretreated and -naive patients, respectively. MMR was maintained until data cutoff in 19 of 22 patients who achieved it. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) included increased lipase level (18.8%) and thrombocytopenia (14.6%). Five (10.4%) patients experienced AEs leading to discontinuation, including 2 who discontinued asciminib and died due to COVID-19; these were the only deaths reported. These results show asciminib's effectiveness, including in almost 50% of ponatinib pretreated patients, and confirm its risk-benefit profile, supporting its use as a treatment option for T315I-mutated CML-CP.

Asciminib in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) need long-term therapy with high efficacy and safety. Asciminib, a BCR::ABL1 inhibitor specifically targeting the ABL myristoyl pocket, may offer better efficacy and safety and fewer side effects than currently available frontline ATP-competitive tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). METHODS: In a phase 3 trial, patients with newly diagnosed CML were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either asciminib (80 mg once daily) or an investigator-selected TKI, with randomization stratified by European Treatment and Outcome Study long-term survival score category (low, intermediate, or high risk) and by TKI selected by investigators before randomization (including imatinib and second-generation TKIs). The primary end points were major molecular response (defined as BCR::ABL1 transcript levels ≤0.1% on the International Scale [IS]) at week 48, for comparisons between asciminib and investigator-selected TKIs and between asciminib and investigator-selected TKIs in the prerandomization-selected imatinib stratum. RESULTS: A total of 201 patients were assigned to receive asciminib and 204 to receive investigator-selected TKIs. The median follow-up was 16.3 months in the asciminib group and 15.7 months in the investigator-selected TKI group. A major molecular response at week 48 occurred in 67.7% of patients in the asciminib group, as compared with 49.0% in the investigator-selected TKI group (difference, 18.9 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.6 to 28.2; adjusted two-sided P<0.001]), and in 69.3% of patients in the asciminib group as compared with 40.2% in the imatinib group within the imatinib stratum (difference, 29.6 percentage points; 95% CI, 16.9 to 42.2; adjusted two-sided P<0.001). The percentage of patients with a major molecular response at week 48 was 66.0% with asciminib and 57.8% with TKIs in the second-generation TKI stratum (difference, 8.2 percentage points; 95% CI, -5.1 to 21.5). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher and events leading to discontinuation of the trial regimen were less frequent with asciminib (38.0% and 4.5%, respectively) than with imatinib (44.4% and 11.1%) and second-generation TKIs (54.9% and 9.8%). CONCLUSIONS: In this trial comparing asciminib with investigator-selected TKIs and imatinib, asciminib showed superior efficacy and a favorable safety profile in patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase CML. Direct comparison between asciminib and second-generation TKIs was not a primary objective. (Funded by Novartis; ASC4FIRST ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04971226).

Accelerated-phase CML: de novo and transformed.

Despite the dramatic improvements in outcomes for the majority of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients over the past 2 decades, a similar improvement has not been observed in the more advanced stages of the disease. Blast phase CML (BP-CML), although infrequent, remains poorly understood and inadequately treated. Consequently, the key initial goal of therapy in a newly diagnosed patient with chronic phase CML continues to be prevention of disease progression. Advances in genomic investigation in CML, specifically related to BP-CML, clearly demonstrate we have only scratched the surface in our understanding of the disease biology, a prerequisite to devising more targeted and effective therapeutic approaches to prevention and treatment. Importantly, the introduction of the concept of "CML-like" acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has the potential to simplify the differentiation between BCR::ABL1-positive ALL from de novo lymphoid BP-CML, optimizing monitoring and therapeutics. The development of novel treatment strategies such as the MATCHPOINT approach for BP-CML, utilizing combination chemotherapy with fludarabine, cytarabine, and idarubicin in addition to dose-modified ponatinib, may also be an important step in improving treatment outcomes. However, identifying patients who are high risk of transformation remains a challenge, and the recent 2022 updates to the international guidelines may add further confusion to this area. Further work is required to clarify the identification and treatment strategy for the patients who require a more aggressive approach than standard chronic phase CML management.

Adverse outcomes for chronic myeloid leukemia patients with splenomegaly and low in vivo kinase inhibition on imatinib.

Variability in the molecular response to frontline tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia may be partially driven by differences in the level of kinase inhibition induced. We measured in vivo BCR::ABL1 kinase inhibition (IVKI) in circulating mononuclear cells after 7 days of therapy. In 173 patients on imatinib 600 mg/day, 23% had low IVKI (<11% reduction in kinase activity from baseline); this was associated with higher rates of early molecular response (EMR) failure; lower rates of major molecular response (MMR), and MR4.5 by 36 months, compared to high IVKI patients. Low IVKI was more common (39%) in patients with large spleens (≥10 cm by palpation). Notably 55% of patients with large spleens and low IVKI experienced EMR failure whereas the EMR failure rate in patients with large spleens and high IVKI was only 12% (p = 0.014). Furthermore, patients with large spleen and low IVKI had a higher incidence of blast crisis, inferior MMR, MR4.5, and event-free survival compared to patients with large spleen and high IVKI and remaining patients. In nilotinib-treated patients (n = 73), only 4% had low IVKI. The combination of low IVKI and large spleen is associated with markedly inferior outcomes and interventions in this setting warrant further studies.

Lineage-specific detection of residual disease predicts relapse in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia stopping therapy.

ABSTRACT: Patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who are eligible for treatment-free remission (TFR) may still relapse after tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) cessation. There is a need for accurate predictors of outcome to enable patients with a favorable profile to proceed while avoiding futile attempts. Sensitive detection of residual disease in total leukocytes at treatment cessation is associated with relapse but is not highly discriminatory, likely because it is a composite measure of residual leukemia derived from different cell lineages, whereas only some lineages are relevant for relapse. We prospectively measured BCR::ABL1 DNA as a predictive yes/no binary test in 5 cellular fractions from 48 patients meeting conventional criteria for TKI discontinuation. The median BCR::ABL1 DNA level was higher in granulocytes and T cells, but not in other lineages, in patients who relapsed. Among the 40 patients undergoing their first TFR attempt, we defined 3 groups with differing relapse risk: granulocyte-positive group (100%), granulocyte-negative/T-cell-positive group (67%), and granulocyte-negative /T-cell-negative group (25%). These data show the critical importance of lineage-specific assessment of residual disease in the selection of patients who can attempt to achieve TFR with a high expectation of success and, concurrently, defer patients who have a high probability of relapse.

The acquisition order of leukemic drug resistance mutations is directed by the selective fitness associated with each resistance mechanism.

In Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, the transition from drug sensitive to drug resistant disease is poorly understood. Here, we used exploratory sequencing of gene transcripts to determine the mechanisms of drug resistance in a dasatinib resistant cell line model. Importantly, cell samples were collected sequentially during drug exposure and dose escalation, revealing several resistance mechanisms which fluctuated over time. BCR::ABL1 overexpression, BCR::ABL1 kinase domain mutation, and overexpression of the small molecule transporter ABCG2, were identified as dasatinib resistance mechanisms. The acquisition of mutations followed an order corresponding with the increase in selective fitness associated with each resistance mechanism. Additionally, it was demonstrated that ABCG2 overexpression confers partial ponatinib resistance. The results of this study have broad applicability and help direct effective therapeutic drug usage and dosing regimens and may be useful for clinicians to select the most efficacious therapy at the most beneficial time.

Immune modulation in chronic myeloid leukaemia patients treated with nilotinib and interferon-alpha.

The addition of interferon to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), to improve deep molecular response (DMR) and potentially treatment-free remission (TFR) rates in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukaemia (CP-CML) patients is under active investigation. However, the immunobiology of this combination is poorly understood. We performed a comprehensive longitudinal assessment of immunological changes in CML patients treated with nilotinib and interferon-alpha (IFN-α) within the ALLG CML11 trial (n = 12) or nilotinib alone (n = 17). We demonstrate that nilotinib+IFN transiently reduced absolute counts of natural killer (NK) cells, compared with nilotinib alone. Furthermore, CD16+ -cytolytic and CD57+ CD62L- -mature NK cells were transiently reduced during IFN therapy, without affecting NK-cell function. IFN transiently increased cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) responses to leukaemia-associated antigens (LAAs) proteinase-3, BMI-1 and PRAME; and had no effect on regulatory T cells, or myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Patients on nilotinib+IFN who achieved MR4.5 by 12 months had a significantly higher proportion of NK cells expressing NKp46, NKp30 and NKG2D compared with patients not achieving this milestone. This difference was not observed in the nilotinib-alone group. The addition of IFN to nilotinib drives an increase in NK-activating receptors, CTLs responding to LAAs and results in transient immune modulation, which may influence earlier DMR, and its effect on long-term outcomes warrants further investigation.

Asciminib monotherapy in patients with CML-CP without BCR::ABL1 T315I mutations treated with at least two prior TKIs: 4-year phase 1 safety and efficacy results.

Asciminib is approved for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) who received ≥2 prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors or have the T315I mutation. We report updated results of a phase 1, open-label, nonrandomized trial (NCT02081378) assessing the safety, tolerability, and antileukemic activity of asciminib monotherapy 10-200 mg once or twice daily in 115 patients with CML-CP without T315I (data cutoff: January 6, 2021). After ≈4-year median exposure, 69.6% of patients remained on asciminib. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) included increased pancreatic enzymes (22.6%), thrombocytopenia (13.9%), hypertension (13.0%), and neutropenia (12.2%); all-grade AEs (mostly grade 1/2) included musculoskeletal pain (59.1%), upper respiratory tract infection (41.7%), and fatigue (40.9%). Clinical pancreatitis and arterial occlusive events (AOEs) occurred in 7.0% and 8.7%, respectively. Most AEs occurred during year 1; the subsequent likelihood of new events, including AOEs, was low. By data cutoff, among patients without the indicated response at baseline, 61.3% achieved BCR::ABL1 ≤ 1%, 61.6% achieved ≤0.1% (major molecular response [MMR]), and 33.7% achieved ≤0.01% on the International Scale. MMR was maintained in 48/53 patients who achieved it and 19/20 who were in MMR at screening, supporting the long-term safety and efficacy of asciminib in this population.

Impact of additional genetic abnormalities at diagnosis of chronic myeloid leukemia for first-line imatinib-treated patients receiving proactive treatment intervention.

The BCR::ABL1 gene fusion initiates chronic myeloid leukemia (CML); however, evidence has accumulated from studies of highly selected cohorts that variants in other cancer-related genes are associated with treatment failure. Nevertheless, the true incidence and impact of additional genetic abnormalities (AGA) at diagnosis of chronic phase (CP)-CML is unknown. We sought to determine whether AGA at diagnosis in a consecutive imatinib-treated cohort of 210 patients enrolled in the TIDEL-II trial influenced outcome despite a highly proactive treatment intervention strategy. Survival outcomes including overall survival, progression-free survival, failure-free survival, and BCR::ABL1 kinase domain mutation acquisition were evaluated. Molecular outcomes were measured at a central laboratory and included major molecular response (MMR, BCR::ABL1 ≤0.1%IS), MR4 (BCR::ABL1 ≤0.01%IS), and MR4.5 (BCR::ABL1 ≤0.0032%IS). AGA included variants in known cancer genes and novel rearrangements involving the formation of the Philadelphia chromosome. Clinical outcomes and molecular response were assessed based on the patient's genetic profile and other baseline factors. AGA were identified in 31% of patients. Potentially pathogenic variants in cancer-related genes were detected in 16% of patients at diagnosis (including gene fusions and deletions) and structural rearrangements involving the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph-associated rearrangements) were detected in 18%. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that the combined genetic abnormalities plus the EUTOS long-term survival clinical risk score were independent predictors of lower molecular response rates and higher treatment failure. Despite a highly proactive treatment intervention strategy, first-line imatinib-treated patients with AGA had poorer response rates. These data provide evidence for the incorporation of genomically-based risk assessment for CML.

Molecular response in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: prediction modeling and pathway analysis.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy revolutionized chronic myeloid leukemia treatment and showed how targeted therapy and molecular monitoring could be used to substantially improve survival outcomes. We used chronic myeloid leukemia as a model to understand a critical question: why do some patients have an excellent response to therapy, while others have a poor response? We studied gene expression in whole blood samples from 112 patients from a large phase III randomized trial (clinicaltrials gov. Identifier: NCT00471497), dichotomizing cases into good responders (BCR::ABL1 ≤10% on the International Scale by 3 and 6 months and ≤0.1% by 12 months) and poor responders (failure to meet these criteria). Predictive models based on gene expression demonstrated the best performance (area under the curve =0.76, standard deviation =0.07). All of the top 20 pathways overexpressed in good responders involved immune regulation, a finding validated in an independent data set. This study emphasizes the importance of pretreatment adaptive immune response in treatment efficacy and suggests biological pathways that can be targeted to improve response.

Asciminib vs bosutinib in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia previously treated with at least two tyrosine kinase inhibitors: longer-term follow-up of ASCEMBL.

Asciminib, the first BCR::ABL1 inhibitor that Specifically Targets the ABL Myristoyl Pocket (STAMP), is approved worldwide for the treatment of adults with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) treated with ≥2 prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). In ASCEMBL, patients with CML-CP treated with ≥2 prior TKIs were randomized (stratified by baseline major cytogenetic response [MCyR]) 2:1 to asciminib 40 mg twice daily or bosutinib 500 mg once daily. Consistent with previously published primary analysis results, after a median follow-up of 2.3 years, asciminib continued to demonstrate superior efficacy and better safety and tolerability than bosutinib. The major molecular response (MMR) rate at week 96 (key secondary endpoint) was 37.6% with asciminib vs 15.8% with bosutinib; the MMR rate difference between the arms, after adjusting for baseline MCyR, was 21.7% (95% CI, 10.53-32.95; two-sided p = 0.001). Fewer grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) (56.4% vs 68.4%) and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation (7.7% vs 26.3%) occurred with asciminib than with bosutinib. A higher proportion of patients on asciminib than bosutinib remained on treatment and continued to derive benefit over time, supporting asciminib as a standard of care for patients with CML-CP previously treated with ≥2 TKIs.

Association of TIM-3 checkpoint receptor expression on T cells with treatment-free remission in chronic myeloid leukemia.

Dysregulation of immune-checkpoint receptors has been reported at diagnosis of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), however, their role in the maintenance of remission after tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) cessation is unclear. We assessed programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), T-cell immunoglobulin, and mucin-domain containing protein-3 (TIM-3), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (CTLA-4), lymphocyte-activation gene-3 (LAG-3), and T-cell immunoreceptor with immunoglobulin and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif (ITIM) domains (TIGIT) expression on T-cell subsets, regulatory T cells (T-regs), and natural killer (NK) cells at the time of TKI cessation in 44 patients (22 patients sustained treatment-free remission [TFR] and 22 experienced molecular relapse [MolR]). We confirmed our previous finding that absolute numbers of T-regs are increased in patients who experienced MolR compared with those who sustained TFR. The immune-checkpoint receptors PD-1, CTLA-4, LAG-3, and TIGIT on T or NK cells were not differentially expressed between the MolR and TFR groups. However, TIM-3 was consistently upregulated on bulk T cells (CD3+) and T-cell subsets including, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and T-regs, in patients who relapsed in comparison with those who maintained TFR after discontinuation. Furthermore, gene expression analysis from publicly available data sets showed increased TIM-3 expression on CML stem cells compared with normal hematopoietic stem cells. These findings suggest that among the targetable immune-checkpoint molecules, TIM-3 blockade may potentially improve effector immune response in patients with CML stopping TKI, while concomitantly targeting leukemic stem cells and could be a promising therapeutic strategy for preventing relapse after cessation of TKI in patients with CML.

Asciminib monotherapy for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: the ASC4FIRST phase III trial.

Asciminib is the first BCR::ABL1 inhibitor that works by Specifically Targeting the ABL Myristoyl Pocket (STAMP). Asciminib has shown favorable efficacy and safety in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase without the T315I mutation who have received ≥2 prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in phase I and III clinical trials and in patients with the T315I mutation who have received ≥1 prior TKI in phase I. ASC4FIRST (NCT04971226) is a phase III, multicenter, open-label, randomized study of asciminib versus investigator-selected TKI in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. The primary end point is major molecular response at week 48. Secondary end points include responses at and by scheduled time points, safety, pharmacokinetics and patient-reported outcomes. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04971226 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Management of TKI-resistant chronic phase CML.

Chronic phase CML (CP-CML) patients who are resistant to 2 or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have limited therapeutic options and are at significant risk for progression to the blast phase. Ponatinib has been the drug of choice in this setting for the past decade, but when given at full dose (45 mg/d), the risk of serious vascular occlusive events is substantial. Lower doses mitigate this risk but also reduce the efficacy. Emerging data suggest that a high dose of ponatinib is important to achieve response, but a lower dose is usually sufficient to maintain response, introducing a safer therapeutic pathway for many patients. The recent development and approval of the novel allosteric ABL1 inhibitor, asciminib, for CP-CML patients with resistant disease provides another potentially safe and effective option in this setting. These recent therapeutic advances mean that for most resistant CP-CML patients who have failed 2 or more TKIs, 2 excellent options are available for consideration-dose modified ponatinib and asciminib. Patients harboring the T315I mutation are also candidates for either ponatinib or asciminib, but in this setting, higher doses are critical to success. Lacking randomized comparisons of ponatinib and asciminib, the best choice for each clinical circumstance is often difficult to determine. Here we review emerging evidence from recent trials and make some tentative suggestions about which drug is preferable and at what dose in different clinical settings using case studies to illustrate the key issues to consider.

Mechanisms of Resistance and Implications for Treatment Strategies in Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have revolutionised the management of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML), with the disease now having a five-year survival rate over 80%. The primary focus in the treatment of CML has been on improving the specificity and potency of TKIs to inhibit the activation of the BCR::ABL1 kinase and/or overcoming resistance driven by mutations in the BCR::ABL1 oncogene. However, this approach may be limited in a significant proportion of patients who develop TKI resistance despite the effective inhibition of BCR::ABL1. These patients may require novel therapeutic strategies that target both BCR::ABL1-dependent and BCR::ABL1-independent mechanisms of resistance. The combination treatment strategies that target alternative survival signalling, which may contribute towards BCR::ABL1-independent resistance, could be a successful strategy for eradicating residual leukaemic cells and consequently increasing the response rate in CML patients.

Asciminib for chronic myeloid leukaemia: Next questions.

Recent approval of asciminib, a novel "specifically targeting the ABL myristoyl pocket" (STAMP) BCR-ABL1 inhibitor, for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients who have either failed ≥2 lines of therapy or have the T315I mutation, has provided clinicians with a wider selection of potentially effective treatment options. Asciminib has the attractive twin attributes of high potency directed against BCR-ABL1 and good tolerability based on its limited off-target effects. However, it is unclear exactly where asciminib will be positioned amongst the other available tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), especially ponatinib which is also available for the same indications. There are many questions yet to be answered with regard to the optimal use of asciminib which include its role in the first- and second-line settings, combination therapy with other TKIs, and effectiveness in advanced phase CML. In this review, we discuss the available data on asciminib while exploring a number of clinical trials in progress. Finally, we provide our opinion based on the current data about where asciminib is most likely to be the optimal choice, which will hopefully assist clinicians with therapy selection.

Asciminib: a new therapeutic option in chronic-phase CML with treatment failure.

Asciminib, a first-in-class allosteric inhibitor of BCR::ABL1 kinase activity, is now approved for the treatment of patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia who failed 2 lines of therapy or in patients with the T315I mutation. Promising attributes include high specificity and potency against BCR::ABL1, activity against most kinase domain mutations, and potential for combination therapy with ATP-competitive tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Clinicians now have expanded third-line options, which in most cases will involve a choice between asciminib and ponatinib.