How New Regulation of Laboratory-Developed Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests Will Affect Infectious Diseases Clinical Practice.

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) affects 2.8 million Americans annually. AMR is identified through antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), but current and proposed regulatory policies from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) jeopardize the future availability of AST for many microorganisms. Devices that perform AST must be cleared by the FDA using their susceptibility test interpretive criteria, also known as breakpoints. The FDA list of breakpoints is relatively short. Today, laboratories supplement FDA breakpoints using breakpoints published by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, using legacy devices and laboratory-developed tests (LDTs). FDA proposes to regulate LDTs, and with no FDA breakpoints for many drug-bug combinations, the risk is loss of AST for key clinical indications and stifling innovation in technology development. Effective solutions require collaboration between manufacturers, infectious diseases clinicians, pharmacists, laboratories, and the FDA.

Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on the Diagnosis of COVID-19: Serologic Testing.

BACKGROUND: The role of serologic testing for SARS-CoV-2 has evolved during the pandemic as seroprevalence in global populations has increased. The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) convened an expert panel to perform a systematic review of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) serology literature and construct updated best practice guidance related to SARS-CoV-2 serologic testing. This guideline is an update to the fourth in a series of rapid, frequently updated COVID-19 guidelines developed by IDSA. OBJECTIVE: To develop evidence-based recommendations and identify unmet research needs pertaining to the use of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests for diagnosis, decisions related to vaccination and administration of monoclonal antibodies or convalescent plasma in immunocompromised patients, and identification of a serologic correlate of immunity. METHODS: A multidisciplinary panel of infectious diseases clinicians, clinical microbiologists and experts in systematic literature reviewed, identified, and prioritized clinical questions related to the use of SARS-CoV-2 serologic tests. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess the certainty of evidence and make testing recommendations. RESULTS: The panel recommends against serologic testing to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first two weeks after symptom onset (strong recommendations, low certainty of evidence). Serologic testing should not be used to provide evidence of COVID-19 in symptomatic patients with a high clinical suspicion and repeatedly negative nucleic acid amplification test results (strong recommendation, very low certainty of evidence). Serologic testing may assist with the diagnosis of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (strong recommendation, very low certainty of evidence). To seek evidence for prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, the panel suggests testing for IgG, IgG/IgM, or total antibodies to nucleocapsid protein three to five weeks after symptom onset (conditional recommendation, low certainty of evidence). In individuals with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination, we suggest against routine serologic testing given no demonstrated benefit to improving patient outcomes (conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence.) The panel acknowledges further that a negative spike antibody test may be a useful metric to identify immunocompromised patients who are candidates for immune therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The high seroprevalence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 worldwide limits the utility of detecting anti-SARS CoV-2 antibody. The certainty of available evidence supporting the use of serology for diagnosis was graded as very low to low. Future studies should use serologic assays calibrated to a common reference standard.

A multi-species outbreak of VIM-producing carbapenem-resistant bacteria in a burn unit and subsequent investigation of rapid development of cefiderocol resistance.

Carbapenem resistance due to metallo-ß-lactamases (MBLs) such as the Verona integron-encoded metallo-ß-lactamase (VIM) is particularly problematic due to the limited treatment options. We describe a case series of bacterial infections in a tertiary care hospital due to multi-species acquisition of a VIM gene along with our experience using novel ß-lactam antibiotics and antibiotic combinations to treat these infections. Four patients were treated with the combination of ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam, with no resistance to the combination detected. However, cefiderocol-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates were detected in two out of the five patients who received cefiderocol within 3 weeks of having started the antibiotic. Strain pairs of sequential susceptible and resistant isolates from both patients were analyzed using whole-genome sequencing. This analysis revealed that the pairs of isolates independently acquired point mutations in both the cirA and fiu genes, which encode siderophore receptors. These point mutations were remade in a laboratory strain of K. pneumoniae and resulted in a significant increase in the MIC of cefiderocol, even in the absence of a beta-lactamase enzyme or a penicillin-binding protein 3 (PBP3) mutation. While newer ß-lactam antibiotics remain an exciting addition to the antibiotic armamentarium, their use must be accompanied by diligent monitoring for the rapid development of resistance.

Diagnostic Stewardship for Next-Generation Sequencing Assays in Clinical Microbiology: An Appeal for Thoughtful Collaboration.

Next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based assays are primarily available from reference laboratories for diagnostic use. These tests can provide helpful diagnostic data but also can be overused by ordering providers not fully understanding their limitations. At present, there are few best practice guidelines for use. NGS-based assays can carry a high cost to institutions and individual patients, requiring thoughtful use through application of diagnostic stewardship principles. This article provides an overview of diagnostic stewardship approaches as applied to these assays, focusing on principles of collaboration, differential diagnosis formation, and seeking the best patient, syndrome, sample, timing, and test for improved patient care.

False positive congenital cytomegalovirus saliva screening results with an FDA-approved assay at two institutions.

BACKGROUND: Congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a significant cause of childhood hearing loss and developmental delay. Congenital CMV screening was implemented at two large hospital-affiliated laboratories using the FDA-approved Alethia CMV Assay Test System. In July 2022, an increase in suspected false-positive results was noted, leading to implementation of prospective quality management strategies. METHODS: The Alethia assay was performed per manufacturer-provided instructions on saliva swab specimens. After discovery of possible elevated false-positive rates, all positive results were confirmed by repeat Alethia testing on the same specimen, orthogonal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on the same specimen, and/or clinical adjudication. Additionally, root cause analyses were conducted to pinpoint the source of false-positive results. RESULTS: At Cleveland Clinic (CCF), 696 saliva specimens were tested after initiation of the prospective quality management strategy, of which 36 (5.2%) were positive for CMV. Five of 36 (13.9%) were confirmed CMV positive by repeat Alethia testing and orthogonal PCR. Vanderbilt Medical Center (VUMC) tested 145 specimens, of which 11 (7.6%) were positive. Two of 11 (18.2%) confirmed as positive by orthogonal PCR or clinical adjudication. The remaining specimens (31 from CCF and 9 from VUMC) were negative for CMV by repeat Alethia and/or orthogonal PCR testing. DISCUSSION: These findings suggest a false positive rate of 4.5-6.2%, higher than the 0.2% reported for this assay in FDA claims. Laboratories using Alethia CMV may consider prospective quality management to evaluate all positive results. False-positive results can lead to unnecessary follow-up care and testing, and decreased confidence in laboratory testing.

Contemporary Considerations for Establishing Reference Methods for Antibacterial Susceptibility Testing.

Antibacterial susceptibility testing (AST) is performed to guide therapy, perform resistance surveillance studies, and support development of new antibacterial agents. For 5 decades, broth microdilution (BMD) has served as the reference method to assess in vitro activity of antibacterial agents against which both novel agents and diagnostic tests have been measured. BMD relies on in vitro inhibition or killing of bacteria. It is associated with several limitations: it is a poor mimic of the in vivo milieu of bacterial infections, requires multiple days to perform, and is associated with subtle, difficult to control variability. In addition, new reference methods will soon be needed for novel agents whose activity cannot be evaluated by BMD (e.g., those that target virulence). Any new reference methods must be standardized, correlated with clinical efficacy and be recognized internationally by researchers, industry, and regulators. Herein, we describe current reference methods for in vitro assessment of antibacterial activity and highlight key considerations for the generation of novel reference methods.

Re-emergence of Parechovirus: 2017-2022 National Trends of Detection in Cerebrospinal Fluid.

Increasing parechovirus (PeV) infections prompted a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Health Advisory in July 2022. We retrospectively assessed national PeV trends in cerebrospinal fluid and observed unexpected viral dynamics from 2020 to 2022 with regional variance. These findings may be due to mitigation strategies aimed at severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. PeV testing can benefit ill patients, particularly children.

Machine-Learning Model for Prediction of Cefepime Susceptibility in Escherichia coli from Whole-Genome Sequencing Data.

The declining cost of performing bacterial whole-genome sequencing (WGS) coupled with the availability of large libraries of sequence data for well-characterized isolates have enabled the application of machine-learning (ML) methods to the development of nonlinear sequence-based predictive models. We tested the ML-based model developed by Next Gen Diagnostics for prediction of cefepime phenotypic susceptibility results in Escherichia coli. A cohort of 100 isolates of E. coli recovered from urine (n = 77) and blood (n = 23) cultures were used. The cefepime MIC was determined in triplicate by reference broth microdilution and classified as susceptible (MIC of ≤2 µg/mL) or not susceptible (MIC of ≥4 µg/mL) using the 2022 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoints. Five isolates generated both susceptible and not susceptible MIC results, yielding categorical agreement of 95% for the reference method to itself. Categorical agreement of ML to MIC interpretations was 97%, with 2 very major (false, susceptible) and 1 major (false, not susceptible) errors. One very major error occurred for an isolate with blaCTX-M-27 (MIC mode, ≥32 µg/mL) and one for an isolate with blaTEM-34 for which the MIC cefepime mode was 4 µg/mL. One major error was for an isolate with blaCTX-M-27 but with a MIC mode of 2 µg/mL. These preliminary data demonstrated performance of ML for a clinically important antimicrobial-species pair at a caliber similar to phenotypic methods, encouraging wider development of sequence-based susceptibility prediction and its validation and use in clinical practice.

Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli recovered from respiratory and blood specimens from adults: the ATLAS surveillance program in European hospitals, 2018-2020.

The population of people ≥65 years of age is increasing in Europe. Pneumonia is a prominent cause of infection in this age group. These patients may be at heightened risk of infection caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms owing to their frequent and prolonged contact with healthcare facilities as well as frequent exposure to antimicrobials and medical devices. However, ATLAS surveillance data did not demonstrate any difference in the incidence of MDR Gram-negative pathogens among patients ≥65 years of age and those aged <65 years. Higher rates of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa were observed in patients aged 18-64 years (10.7% and 32.3%, respectively) than in patients aged ≥65 years (5.0% and 25.4%, respectively). Significant therapeutic gaps were identified for CRE, carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (65.9% of isolates tested) and MDR P. aeruginosa, which continue to be prevalent in European hospitals. Among the antimicrobials evaluated, only colistin provided >75% in vitro coverage for these pathogens.

Evaluation of Piperacillin-Tazobactam Testing against Enterobacterales by the Phoenix, MicroScan, and Vitek2 Tests Using Updated Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Breakpoints.

In 2022, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) updated piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) breakpoints for Enterobacterales, based on substantial data suggesting that historical breakpoints did not predict treatment outcomes for TZP. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not yet adopted these breakpoints, meaning commercial manufacturers of antimicrobial susceptibility testing devices cannot obtain FDA clearance for the revised breakpoints. We evaluated the Phoenix (BD, Sparks, MD), MicroScan (Beckman Coulter, Sacramento, CA), and Vitek2 (bioMérieux, Durham, NC) TZP MICs compared to reference broth microdilution for a collection of 284 Enterobacterales isolates. Phoenix (n = 167 isolates) demonstrated 84.4% categorical agreement (CA), with 4.2% very major errors (VMEs) and 1.8% major errors (MEs) by CLSI breakpoints. In contrast, CA was 85.0% with 4.3% VMEs and 0.8% MEs for the Phoenix with FDA breakpoints. MicroScan (n = 55 isolates) demonstrated 80.0% CA, 36.4% VMEs, and 4.8% MEs by CLSI breakpoints and 81.8% CA, 44.4% VMEs, and 0.0% MEs by FDA breakpoints. Vitek2 (n = 62 isolates) demonstrated 95.2% CA, 6.3% VMEs, and 0.0% MEs by CLSI and 96.8% CA, 0.0% VMEs, and 2.2% MEs by FDA breakpoints. Overall, the performance of the test systems was not substantially different using CLSI breakpoints off-label than using on-label FDA breakpoints. However, limitations were noted with higher-than-desired VME rates (all three systems) and lower-than-desired CA (MicroScan and Phoenix). Laboratories should consider adoption of the revised CLSI breakpoints with automated test systems but be aware that some performance challenges exist for testing TZP on automated systems, regardless of breakpoints applied.

Universal admission laboratory screening for severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) asymptomatic infection across a large health system.

BACKGROUND: Admission laboratory screening for asymptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been utilized to mitigate healthcare-associated severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission. An understanding of the impact of such testing across a variety of patient populations is needed. METHODS: SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification admission testing results for all asymptomatic patients across 4 distinct inpatient facilities between April 20, 2020, and June 14, 2021, were analyzed. Positivity rates and the number needed to test (NNT) to identify 1 asymptomatic infected patient were calculated. Admission results were compared to COVID-19 community incidence rates for the system's surrounding metropolitan service area. Using a national survey of hospital epidemiologists, a clinically meaningful NNT of 1:100 was identified. RESULTS: In total, 51,187 tests were collected (positivity rate, 1.8%). During periods of high transmission, the NNT met the clinically relevant threshold in all populations. The NNT approached or met the threshold for most locations during periods of lower transmission. For all transmission levels, the NNT for fully vaccinated patients did not meet the threshold. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing an asymptomatic patient admission testing program can provide clinically relevant data based on the NNT, even during periods of lower transmission and among different patient populations. Limiting admission testing to non-fully vaccinated patients during periods of lower transmission may be a strategy to address resource concerns around this practice. Although the impact of such testing on healthcare-associated COVID-19 among patients and healthcare workers could not be clearly determined, these data provide important information as facilities weigh the costs and benefits of such testing.

Evaluation of the Performance of Manual Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Methods and Disk Breakpoints for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia are an emerging cause of serious infections with high associated mortality in immunocompromised patients. Treatment of S. maltophilia infections is complicated by intrinsic resistance to many antimicrobials, including carbapenems, aminoglycosides, and some cephalosporins. Despite this, >90% of isolates are susceptible to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT), which is front-line therapy for this organism. Side-effects of SXT include bone marrow suppression, which precludes its use for many neutropenic patients. In this population, levofloxacin (LEV), minocycline (MIN), ceftazidime (CAZ), ciprofloxacin (CIP) and tigecycline (TIG) are used as alternative therapies - all of which require testing to inform susceptibilities. The reference standard method for testing S. maltophilia is broth microdilution (BMD), but very few clinical laboratories perform reference BMD. Furthermore, interpretive criteria are not available for CIP or TIG for S. maltophilia, although generic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) MIC breakpoints are available for these drugs. We assessed performance of disk and gradient diffusion tests relative to BMD for 109 contemporary isolates of S. maltophilia Categorical agreement for SXT, LEV and MIN disk diffusion was 93%, 89%, and 95%, respectively. Categorical agreement for SXT, LEV, MIN and CAZ gradient strips was 98%, 85%, 93%, 71%, respectively by Etest (bioMerieux), and 98%, 83%, 99%, and 73%, by MTS (Liofilchem). CIP and TGC, two clinically valuable alternatives to SXT, did not demonstrate promising disk to MIC correlates using CLSI M100 P. aeruginosa or PK/PD breakpoints. Manual commercial tests perform well for S. maltophilia, with the exception of tests for LEV and CAZ, where high error rates were observed.

Breaking Down the Breakpoints: Rationale for the 2022 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Revised Piperacillin-Tazobactam Breakpoints Against Enterobacterales.

Piperacillin-tazobactam (PTZ) is one of the most common antibiotics administered to hospitalized patients. Its broad activity against gram-negative, gram-positive, and anaerobic pathogens; efficacy in clinical trials across diverse infection types and patient populations; and generally favorable toxicity profile make it a particularly appealing antibiotic agent. PTZ susceptibility interpretive criteria (ie, breakpoints) for the Enterobacterales were initially established in 1992, as the drug was undergoing approval by the US Food and Drug Administration. In the ensuing 30 years, changes in the molecular epidemiology of the Enterobacterales and its impact on PTZ susceptibility testing, mounting pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data generated from sophisticated techniques such as population pharmacokinetic modeling and Monte Carlo simulation, and disturbing safety signals in a large clinical trial prompted the Clinical Laboratory and Standards Institute (CLSI) to review available evidence to determine the need for revision of the PTZ breakpoints for Enterobacterales. After an extensive literature review and formal voting process, the susceptibility criteria were revised in the 2022 CLSI M100 document to the following: ≤8/4 µg/mL (susceptible), 16/4 µg/mL (susceptible dose-dependent), and ≥32/4 µg/mL (resistant). Herein, we provide a brief overview of the CLSI process of antibiotic breakpoint revisions and elaborate on the available data that ultimately led to the decision to revise the PTZ breakpoints.