Cytochrome P450 inhibitor/inducer treatment patterns among patients in the United States with advanced ovarian cancer who were prescribed or were eligible for poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase inhibitors in the first-line maintenance setting.

Poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) are metabolized either via carboxylesterase (niraparib) or cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes (olaparib and rucaparib). Patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (aOC) who receive concomitant medication metabolized by the CYP system may be at risk of drug-drug interactions impacting PARPi efficacy and tolerability. This study investigated CYP inhibitor/inducer treatment patterns in the first-line maintenance (1Lm) setting for patients with aOC. This retrospective cohort study used de-identified databases of US patients with aOC. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years, diagnosed with aOC between January 2015-March 2021, and received CYP inhibitors/inducers during 1Lm PARPi initiation or the eligibility window (90 days before to 120 days after first-line platinum-based therapy ended [index]). Patients were either prescribed 1Lm PARPi monotherapy (PARPi cohort) or were not prescribed any 1Lm therapy within 120 days post-index (PARPi-eligible cohort). Strong/moderate CYP inhibitors/inducers were defined as area under the plasma concentration-time curve ratio (AUCR) ≥2 or clearance ratio (CL) ≤0.5 (inhibitors), and AUCR ≤0.5 or CL ratio ≥2 (inducers). Of 1411 patients (median age 63), 158 were prescribed PARPis and 1253 were PARPi-eligible. Among the PARPi cohort, 46.2%, 48.7%, and 5.1% were prescribed niraparib, olaparib, and rucaparib, respectively. For patients prescribed olaparib or rucaparib, 42.4% also received strong and/or moderate CYP inhibitors/inducers. This real-world study indicated a considerable proportion of patients received strong and/or moderate CYP inhibitors/inducers and were prescribed PARPis metabolized by the CYP system. Understanding potential impacts of concomitant CYP inhibitors/inducers on PARPi efficacy and safety is warranted.

Optimizing disease progression assessment using blinded central independent review and comparing it with investigator assessment in the PRIMA/ENGOT-ov26/GOG-3012 trial: challenges and solutions.

OBJECTIVE: Progression-free survival is an established clinically meaningful endpoint in ovarian cancer trials, but it may be susceptible to bias; therefore, blinded independent centralized radiological review is often included in trial designs. We compared blinded independent centralized review and investigator-assessed progressive disease performance in the PRIMA/ENGOT-ov26/GOG-3012 trial examining niraparib monotherapy. METHODS: PRIMA/ENGOT-ov26/GOG-3012 was a randomized, double-blind phase 3 trial; patients with newly diagnosed stage III/IV ovarian cancer received niraparib or placebo. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] v1.1), determined by two independent radiologists, an arbiter if required, and by blinded central clinician review. Discordance rates between blinded independent centralized review and investigator assessment of progressive disease and non-progressive disease were routinely assessed. To optimize disease assessment, a training intervention was developed for blinded independent centralized radiological reviewers, and RECIST refresher training was provided for investigators. Discordance rates were determined post-intervention. RESULTS: There was a 39% discordance rate between blinded independent centralized review and investigator-assessed progressive disease/non-progressive disease in an initial patient subset (n=80); peritoneal carcinomatosis was the most common source of discordance. All reviewers underwent training, and as a result, changes were implemented, including removal of two original reviewers and identification of 10 best practices for reading imaging data. Post-hoc analysis indicated final discordance rates between blinded independent centralized review and investigator improved to 12% in the overall population. Median progression-free survival and hazard ratios were similar between blinded independent centralized review and investigators in the overall population and across subgroups. CONCLUSION: PRIMA/ENGOT-ov26/GOG-3012 highlights the need to optimize blinded independent centralized review and investigator concordance using early, specialized, ovarian-cancer-specific radiology training to maximize validity of outcome data.

Treatment Patterns and Outcomes Among Patients With Advanced or Recurrent Endometrial Cancer Initiating First-Line Therapy in the United States.

Background: Patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) typically have limited treatment options and poor long-term survival outcomes following first-line therapy. Real-world treatment patterns and survival outcomes data are limited for patients in this setting. Objectives: The objective of this retrospective study was to describe real-world demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and overall survival among patients in the United States with primary advanced or recurrent EC who initiated at least 1 line of therapy (LOT). Methods: Patients with a diagnosis of primary advanced or recurrent EC in a real-world database from January 1, 2013, to July 31, 2021, were included. The date for inclusion was the date of EC diagnosis documentation; patients were indexed for treatment patterns and outcomes at the start of the first LOT and at the start of each subsequent LOT they initiated. Data were stratified by subgroups of patients who had mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors. Results: A total of 1961 patients who received at least 1 LOT were included. Most patients in this cohort, and the dMMR/MSI-H subgroup, received a platinum combination as first-line treatment, with carboplatin-paclitaxel being the most common regimen. Only 53% of patients who received first-line treatment subsequently received second-line therapy. Of the patients who received at least 1 LOT, use of immunotherapy in the second-line setting was more common in the dMMR/MSI-H subgroup. Median overall survival ranged from 14.1 to 31.8 months across the 5 most frequently used first-line treatment regimens in the ≥1 LOT cohort and became shorter with each subsequent LOT. Discussion: The use of platinum-based chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced or recurrent EC predominates in the real-world setting, despite the poor long-term survival outcomes associated with most of these regimens. Conclusions: Patients with recurrent/advanced EC have a poor prognosis, highlighting the need for therapies with more durable benefits.

Real-world Outcomes Associated With Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitor Monotherapy Maintenance in Patients With Primary Advanced Ovarian Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This study used real-world population data to assess the trends of first-line (1L) poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) maintenance treatment uptake and outcomes in patients with primary advanced ovarian cancer (AOC). METHODS: Patients diagnosed with AOC between January 1, 2017, and June 30, 2021, who completed 1L chemotherapy were selected from a real-world database. Descriptive analyses were performed to evaluate patient demographics, clinicopathological characteristics, and 1L treatment patterns. Time to next treatment or death was used as a proxy for real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS). Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox models were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: Of 705 patients who completed 1L chemotherapy, 166 received PARPi monotherapy and 539 underwent active surveillance (AS). Median follow-up was 10.9 months for PARPi monotherapy and 20.6 months for AS. PARPi monotherapy use increased from 6% in 2017 to 53% in 2021. Overall, patients receiving PARPi monotherapy had longer rwPFS than those who underwent AS (not reached vs 9.53 mo) respectively. rwPFS was also longer in patients who received PARPi monotherapy compared with AS in patients with BRCA- mutated disease (not reached vs 11.4 mo), BRCA- wild-type disease (13.5 vs 9.1 mo), homologous recombination-deficient tumors (not reached vs 10.2 mo), and homologous recombination-proficient or unknown status tumors (13.5 vs 9.3 mo). CONCLUSIONS: Our real-world analysis suggested that 47% of patients with primary AOC did not receive PARPi maintenance in the year 2021. PARPi use was associated with significantly improved outcomes compared with AS.

Real-world utilization and outcomes of systemic therapy among patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate systemic therapy utilization patterns and outcomes by line of therapy among patients with advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) treated in the United States. METHODS: This retrospective observational study used the Optum Clinformatics Extended Data Mart Date of Death database (1 January 2004-31 December 2019) and included de-identified data from adult patients with advanced/recurrent EC who were treated with first-line (1L) platinum-based chemotherapy and initiated second-line (2L) anti-neoplastic therapy. The index date was the date of 1L therapy initiation. The number and sequence of treatments received and the proportion of patients who received each type of treatment for each line of therapy were evaluated. To account for new drug approvals, patients first treated in 2018 or 2019 were also assessed separately. RESULTS: Among the 1317 patients who met all eligibility criteria, 520 (39.5%) and 235 (17.8%) patients received 3 or 4+ lines of treatment, respectively, during a median total follow-up time of 25.2 months (range, 2.5-173.3 months) following the index date. Chemotherapy, including platinum- and non-platinum-based regimens, was the most common treatment across all lines of therapy: 2L, 80.0%; 3L, 66.2%; 4L+, 80.4%. Overall, 2.5%, 2.3%, and 8.9% of 2L, 3L, and 4L + patients, respectively, received anti-program death 1 (anti-PD-1) immunotherapies. In patients first treated in 2018 and 2019 (n = 163), 9.8% of patients received anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in the 2L. In the overall population, median time to next treatment (TTNT) was 19.3, 10.5, and 8.1 months for patients undergoing 2L, 3L, and 4L treatment, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with advanced/recurrent EC treated with 1L platinum-based therapy in clinical practice, chemotherapy was the most common treatment choice across all lines of therapy. Immunotherapy use was low overall but increased in patients who started treatment in 2018 or 2019. Overall, median TTNT decreased as lines of therapy increased.

Budget impact analysis of niraparib for first-line maintenance therapy in advanced ovarian cancer from a US payer perspective.

BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer (OC) is the fifth leading cause of cancer death in women and has the highest mortality rate of gynecological cancers. Niraparib was recently approved by the FDA for the maintenance treatment of adult patients with advanced epithelial OC in complete or partial response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) regardless of biomarker status. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the direct economic impact on US payers of adding niraparib as a first-line maintenance therapy for patients with advanced OC. METHODS: The model considered 2 scenarios: a current scenario in which niraparib does not have regulatory approval for first-line maintenance therapy and a future scenario in which niraparib has regulatory approval for first-line maintenance therapy. The budget impact was calculated as the difference in cost between the 2 scenarios. The budget impact model (BIM) considered 2 different US health care payer perspectives: a commercial health plan and a Medicare plan. Both payer perspectives were assumed to have a hypothetical 1 million affiliates that were covered. Epidemiological data was used to estimate the eligible incident population of patients with OC. Active surveillance, bevacizumab (as a monotherapy), and olaparib (as a monotherapy restricted to patients with the breast cancer gene [BRCA] mutation) were included in the model as alternative maintenance treatment options (maintenance treatment options required 1% market share for inclusion). Cost categories considered in the BIM included diagnostic testing, treatment acquisition and administration, treatment-emergent adverse events, and subsequent therapy. Results were presented as an incremental budget impact to payers over 3 years. RESULTS: For a commercial health plan of 1 million affiliates, the estimated impact of adding niraparib as a first-line maintenance treatment option for advanced epithelial OC was calculated as $87,906, $93,106, and $87,037 for years 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The average budget impact per member per month was $0.007. For a Medicare health plan of 1 million affiliates, the estimated impact was calculated as $206,785, $219,017, and $204,739 for years 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The average budget impact per member per month was $0.018. One-way sensitivity analyses suggested that budget impact was most sensitive to the treatment duration and market share of niraparib, the non-treatment-specific data on overall survival rates, and the treatment duration of bevacizumab. Treatment of drug-specific adverse events had little impact on the budget model. CONCLUSIONS: The model estimated a minimal budget impact to both a commercial or Medicare health plan following the introduction of niraparib as a first-line maintenance therapy for patients with advanced epithelial OC who are in complete or partial response to first-line PBC regardless of biomarker status. DISCLOSURES: This study was financially supported by GlaxoSmithKline. Liu, Hawkes, Maiese, and Hurteau are employees of GlaxoSmithKline. Travers was employed by GlaxoSmithKline at the time of this study. Spalding and Walder are employees of FIECON Ltd., which was contracted by GlaxoSmithKline to develop the budget impact model used in this study.

Outcomes after targeted treatment based on somatic tumor genetic testing for women with gynecologic cancers.

OBJECTIVE: Molecular tumor profiling and next-generation sequencing are being increasingly utilized, but there are limited data on the therapeutic implications and potential benefits of targeted treatments. We aim to characterize gynecologic oncology patients referred for somatic tumor genetic mutation testing and assess survival outcomes, efficacy, and toxicities of those receiving targeted therapy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of gynecologic oncology patients referred for somatic tumor testing by next generation sequencing between 1/1/2012-8/23/2019. The primary objective was to compare overall and progression free survival between those treated with targeted therapy (group 1) versus traditional treatment (group 2). RESULTS: Most patients (70%) had additional treatment options available based on actionable mutations. The median number of somatic mutations identified was 5 (range 0-53). Patients in group 1 had more actionable somatic mutations (median 2 versus 0, p < 0.001). There was no difference in OS (median 64 versus 76 months, p = 0.97) or PFS (median 2 versus 8 months, p = 0.05) between the groups. While fewer patients in group 1 experienced neuropathy (0 versus 5, p = 0.02), grade I/II thrombocytopenia (7 versus 13, p = 0.03), grade III/IV thrombocytopenia (0 versus 4, p = 0.02), and grade III/IV neutropenia (1 versus 9, p = 0.002), all other non-hematologic toxicities were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Most gynecologic cancer patients have actionable mutations and may benefit from a personalized targeted therapy treatment plan. Next generation sequencing can be used to identify clinically actionable mutations in gynecologic cancers and guide the selection of treatments, thereby expanding treatment options without worsening survival or toxicity.

Phase II Trial of Cabozantinib in Recurrent/Metastatic Endometrial Cancer: A Study of the Princess Margaret, Chicago, and California Consortia (NCI9322/PHL86).

PURPOSE: The relevance of the MET/hepatocyte growth factor pathway in endometrial cancer tumor biology supports the clinical evaluation of cabozantinib in this disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PHL86/NCI#9322 (NCT01935934) is a single arm study that evaluated cabozantinib (60 mg once daily) in women with endometrial cancer with progression after chemotherapy. Coprimary endpoints were response rate and 12-week progression-free-survival (PFS). Patients with uncommon histology endometrial cancer (eg, carcinosarcoma and clear cell) were enrolled in a parallel exploratory cohort. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were accrued. Among 36 endometrioid histology patients, response rate was 14%, 12-week PFS rate was 67%, and median PFS was 4.8 months. In serous cohort of 34 patients, response rate was 12%, 12-week PFS was 56%, and median PFS was 4.0 months. In a separate cohort of 32 patients with uncommon histology endometrial cancer (including carcinosarcoma), response rate was 6% and 12-week PFS was 47%. Six patients were on treatment for >12 months, including two for >30 months. Common cabozantinib-related toxicities (>30% patients) included hypertension, fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, and hand-foot syndrome. Gastrointestinal fistula/perforation occurred in four of 70 (6%) patients with serous/endometrioid cancer and five of 32 (16%) patients in exploratory cohort. We observed increased frequency of responses with somatic CTNNB1 mutation [four partial responses (PRs) in 10 patients, median PFS 7.6 months] and concurrent KRAS and PTEN/PIK3CA mutations (three PRs in 12 patients, median PFS 5.9 months). CONCLUSIONS: Cabozantinib has activity in serous and endometrioid histology endometrial cancer. These results support further evaluation in genomically characterized patient cohorts.

Clinical outcomes in ovarian cancer patients receiving three versus more cycles of chemotherapy after neoadjuvant treatment and interval cytoreductive surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To compare clinical outcomes for stage IIIC and IV ovarian cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval cytoreductive surgery followed by up to three versus more cycles of post-operative chemotherapy. METHODS: We conducted a multi-institution retrospective cohort study of patients treated from January 2005 to February 2016 with neoadjuvant platinum-based therapy followed by interval surgery and post-operative chemotherapy. The following were exclusion criteria: more than four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, bevacizumab with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, non-platinum therapy, prior chemotherapy, and elevated CA125 values after three post-operative chemotherapy cycles. Progression-free and overall survival and toxicity profiles were compared between groups receiving up to three cycles versus more that three cycles post-operatively. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients met inclusion criteria: 41 received up to three cycles and 59 received more than three cycles. The groups were similar in terms of age, body mass index, performance status, tumor histology, optimal cytoreduction rates, and median number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles. Median progression-free survival was 14 vs 16.6 months in those receiving up to three cycles versus more than three cycles, respectively (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.68, p=0.97). Similarly, median overall survival was not different at 47.1 vs 69.4 months, respectively (HR 1.96, 95% CI 0.87 to 4.42, p=0.10). There were no differences in grade 2 or higher chemotherapy-related toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: Extending post-operative chemotherapy beyond three cycles in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval cytoreductive surgery with normalization of CA125 levels was not associated with improved survival or greater toxicity. Future study in a larger cohort is warranted to define optimal length of cytotoxic treatment.

Malignant bowel obstruction due to uterine or ovarian cancer: Are there differences in outcome?

OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare treatments and outcomes of patients with malignant bowel obstructions (MBO) due to uterine or ovarian cancer. METHODS: Retrospective chart review from two institutions of women admitted 1/1/2005-12/31/2016 with a MBO from recurrent/progressive uterine or ovarian cancer. Data collected includes patient characteristics, cancer-directed treatments before and after MBO, MBO management strategies, and survival after MBO. RESULTS: Women with MBO from uterine cancer (n = 46) and ovarian cancer (n = 130) underwent similar inpatient interventions such as inpatient chemotherapy and surgery. Median overall survival (OS) after admission for MBO for all patients was 105 days and was shorter for uterine cancer patients (57 vs 131 days, p = 0.0013). Uterine and ovarian cancer patients who had surgery had similar survival (182 vs 210 days, p = 0.6), as did those discharged on hospice from their first admission for MBO (26 vs 38 days, p = 0.1). Uterine and ovarian cancer patients had similar rates of post-discharge chemotherapy (37% vs 50%, p = 0.12), but uterine cancer patients who had chemotherapy still had shorter survival (151 vs 225 days, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: MBO has a relatively poor prognosis. Ovarian and uterine cancer patients whose interventions included surgery or hospice had similar outcomes. Among patients managed medically without hospice, uterine cancer patients experienced worse survival, even when candidates for subsequent chemotherapy. Patient counseling regarding goals of care at this difficult juncture can be informed by these findings and will be enhanced by patient-reported and qualitative data on the patient experience with MBO.

Phase II Trial of Chemopreventive Effects of Levonorgestrel on Ovarian and Fallopian Tube Epithelium in Women at High Risk for Ovarian Cancer: An NRG Oncology Group/GOG Study.

A large body of epidemiologic evidence has shown that use of progestin-containing preparations lowers ovarian cancer risk. The purpose of the current study was to gather further preclinical evidence supporting progestins as cancer chemopreventives by demonstrating progestin-activation of surrogate endpoint biomarkers pertinent to cancer prevention in the genital tract of women at increased risk of ovarian cancer. There were 64 women enrolled in a multi-institutional randomized trial who chose to undergo risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) and to receive the progestin levonorgestrel or placebo for 4 to 6 weeks prior to undergoing BSO. The ovarian and fallopian tube epithelia (FTE) were compared immunohistochemically for effects of levonorgestrel on apoptosis (primary endpoint). Secondary endpoints included TGFß isoform expression, proliferation, and karyometric features of nuclear abnormality. In both the ovary and fallopian tube, levonorgestrel did not confer significant changes in apoptosis or expression of the TGFß1, 2, or 3 isoforms. In the ovarian epithelium, treatment with levonorgestrel significantly decreased the proliferation index. The mean ovarian Ki-67 value in the placebo arm was 2.027 per 100 cells versus 0.775 per 100 cells in the levonorgestrel arm (two-sided P value via Mann-Whitney U test = 0.0114). The karyometric signature of nuclei in both the ovarian and FTE deviated significantly from normal controls (women at average risk of ovarian cancer), but was significantly less abnormal in women treated with levonorgestrel. These karyometric data further support the idea that progestins may clear genetically abnormal cells and act as chemopreventive agents against ovarian and fallopian tube cancer.

Is carboplatin-based chemotherapy as effective as cisplatin-based chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced-stage dysgerminoma in children, adolescents and young adults?

OBJECTIVE: Dysgerminoma is the most common malignant ovarian germ cell tumor (GCT) with peak incidence during adolescence and young adulthood. Current standard of care for patients with disease that has spread outside of the ovary (advanced-stage) utilizes platin-based chemotherapy regimens. The study objective was to compare clinical outcomes between platin-based (carboplatin versus cisplatin) strategies across all age groups (children < 11 years (y), adolescents = 11-25 y and young adult women > 25 y) for advanced-stage dysgerminoma. METHODS: The Malignant Germ Cell Tumor International Consortium (MaGIC) pooled data from six GCT trials (3 = pediatric, 3 = adult) conducted internationally by pediatric and gynecologic oncology clinical trial organizations (CTOs) between 1983 and 2009. Newly diagnosed patients, with advanced-stage (FIGO IC-IV) dysgerminoma, who received either carboplatin- or cisplatin-based chemotherapy were eligible for analysis. RESULTS: 126 eligible patients were identified; 56 patients (38 = pediatric, 18 = adult) received carboplatin-based and 70 patients (50 = pediatric, 20 = adult) received cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Mean age was 20 y (range = 6-46 y). The median follow-up was 10.3 y (range = 0.17-21.7 y). The five-year event-free survival (EFS5) and overall survival (OS5) was 0.94 (95%CI, 0.88-0.97) and 0.96 (95%CI, 0.91-0.99) respectively. Survival outcomes were comparable between carboplatin-(EFS5 = 0.96 (95%CI, 0.85-0.99), OS5 = 0.96 (95%CI, 0.85-0.99)) and cisplatin-(EFS5 = 0.93 (95%CI, 0.83-0.97), OS5 = 0.96 (95%CI, 0.87-0.99)) based regimens. Across three age groups, comparison of the EFS5 (<11 y = 0.1, 11-25 y = 0.91 (95%CI, 0.82-0.96), >25 y = 0.97 (95%CI, 0.81-0.99)) and OS5 (<11 y = 0.1, 11-25 y = 0.95 (95%CI, 0.87-0.99), >25 y = 0.97 (95%CI, 0.81-0.99)) did not demonstrate any statistically significant differences in outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Patients diagnosed with dysgerminoma have an excellent OS, across all ages, even in the context of metastatic disease. Data from three large CTOs supports the investigation of carboplatin-based regimens in the frontline treatment of all patients with advanced-stage dysgerminoma to minimize treatment-related toxicities.

Bilateral salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy for ovarian cancer risk reduction: A pilot study in women with BRCA1/2 mutations.

OBJECTIVE: Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) reduces ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, but the adverse effects of the associated early-onset surgical menopause are problematic. Despite suggestive evidence, no data demonstrate whether bilateral salpingectomy alone lowers the risk of developing ovarian cancer in BRCA mutation carriers. We conducted a pilot study of bilateral salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy (BS/DO) in BRCA mutation carriers to determine the safety and acceptability of the procedure. METHODS: In this prospective, multicenter, non-randomized pilot study, pre-menopausal BRCA1/2 mutation carriers aged 30 to 47 years chose screening, RRSO, or BS/DO. For those undergoing BS/DO, the delayed oophorectomy was recommended at age 40 years for BRCA1 and age 45 years for BRCA2 patients. We compared surgical and psychosocial outcomes between time points and between arms. RESULTS: Of the 43 patients enrolled, 19 (44%) chose BS/DO, 12 (28%) chose RRSO, and 12 (28%) chose screening. The cohort was 37% BRCA1 carriers and 63% BRCA2 carriers. One serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) was found in an RRSO patient, and no cases of occult ovarian cancers were found. There were no surgical complications. Twelve months after surgery, responses on the Cancer Worry Scale indicated decreased worry in the BS/DO (P < 0.0001) and RRSO (P = 0.01) arms, while responses on the State Anxiety Inventory indicated decreased anxiety in the BS/DO arm (P = 0.02) compared with preoperative responses. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, BRCA mutation carriers who underwent bilateral salpingectomy had no intraoperative complications, were satisfied with their procedure choice, and had decreased cancer worry and anxiety after the procedure.

Ovarian Yolk Sac Tumors; Does Age Matter?

BACKGROUND: Whereas among pediatric oncologists, ovarian yolk sac tumor (O-YST) is considered a chemosensitive tumor, it is often cited as an adverse prognostic factor in adult women with ovarian germ cell tumors. METHODS: The Malignant Germ Cell International Consortium data set included 6 pediatric clinical trials (United States, United Kingdom, and France) and 2 adult gynecology clinical trials (United States). Any patient with an O-YST that was International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IC or higher and treated with a platinum-based chemotherapy was eligible. Age was modeled as a continuous and a categorical variable (children, 0-10 years; adolescents, 11-17 years; and adults, ≥18 years). In addition, analyses to establish the optimal cut point for age were conducted. Tumors were coded as pure YST (YST +/- teratoma), mixed YST (YST + other malignant germ cell component), or putative YST ("mixed" germ cell tumor + alpha-fetoprotein >1000 ng/mL). Histology, stage (II/III vs IV), preoperative alpha-fetoprotein levels (<1000; 1000-10,000, or >10,000 ng/mL), and chemotherapeutic regimen (carboplatin vs cisplatin) were analyzed as covariates. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-one patients (median age, 13 years; range, 0-38 years) were identified (78 children, 139 adolescents, and 34 adults). Histology was pure, mixed, and putative in 129, 56, and 66 cases, respectively. Twenty-six patients had stage IV disease, similarly distributed in the 3 age groups. Median follow-up was 5.8 years. The overall 5-year event-free survival and overall survival was 91% (95% confidence interval, 87%-94%) and 96% (92%-98%), respectively. Age did not affect risk of event or death, modeled either as a categorical or continuous variable. Analysis failed to identify an age cut point that affected risk. None of the other covariates investigated had a prognostic impact on event-free survival or overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Ovarian yolk sac tumors have an excellent outcome across all age-groups. Age has no apparent impact on the probability of event or death, allowing pediatric and gynecologic oncologists to enroll patients onto joint pediatric and adult trials.

Surgical outcomes among elderly women with endometrial cancer treated by laparoscopic hysterectomy: a NRG/Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

OBJECTIVE: Tolerance of and complications caused by minimally invasive hysterectomy and staging in the older endometrial cancer population is largely unknown despite the fact that this is the most rapidly growing age group in the United States. The objective of this retrospective review was to compare operative morbidity by age in patients on the Gynecologic Oncology Group Laparoscopic Surgery or Standard Surgery in Treating Patients With Endometrial Cancer or Cancer of the Uterus (LAP2) trial. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective analysis of patients from Gynecologic Oncology Group LAP2, a trial that included clinically early-stage uterine cancer patients randomized to laparotomy vs laparoscopy for surgical staging. Differences in the rates and types of intraoperative and perioperative complications were compared by age. Specifically complications between patients <60 vs ≥60 years old were compared caused by toxicity analysis showing a sharp increase in toxicity starting at age 60 years in the laparotomy group. RESULTS: LAP2 included 1477 patients ≥60 years old. As expected, with increasing age there was worsening performance status and disease characteristics including higher rates of serous histology, high-stage disease, and lymphovascular space invasion. There was no significant difference in lymph node dissection rate by age for the entire population or within the laparotomy or laparoscopy groups. Toxicity analysis showed a sharp increase in toxicity seen in patients ≥60 years old in the laparotomy group. Further analysis showed that when comparing laparotomy with laparoscopy in patients <60 years old vs ≥60 years old and controlling for race, body mass index, stage, grade, and performance status, patients <60 years old undergoing laparotomy had more hospital stays >2 days (odds ratio, 17.48; 95% confidence interval, 11.71-27.00, P < .001) compared with patients <60 years old undergoing laparoscopy. However, when comparing laparotomy with laparoscopy in patients ≥60 years old, in addition to hospital stay >2 days (odds ratio, 12.77; 95% confidence interval, 8.74-19.32, P < .001), there were higher rates of the following postoperative complications: antibiotic administration (odds ratio, 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-2.14, P < .001), ileus (odds ratio, 2.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.42-3.31, P <0.001), pneumonias (odds ratio, 2.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-5.66, P = .048), deep vein thromboses (odds ratio, 2.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-8.03, P = .035), and arrhythmias (odds ratio, 3.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.60-6.65, P = .001) in the laparotomy group. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic staging for uterine cancer is associated with decreased morbidity in the immediate postoperative period in patients ≥60 years old. These results allow for more accurate preoperative counseling. A minimally invasive approach to uterine cancer staging may decrease morbidity that could affect long-term survival.

Venous Thromboembolism in Patients Receiving Extended Pharmacologic Prophylaxis After Robotic Surgery for Endometrial Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine the rate of postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) in endometrial cancer patients undergoing robotic hysterectomy with or without extended pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis. METHODS/MATERIALS: A retrospective chart review of women undergoing robotic hysterectomy with or without other procedures for endometrial cancer from January 2010 to February 2015 was conducted at 2 institutions. Charts were manually abstracted, and rates of VTE within 30 and 60 days after surgery were determined. Patients were then stratified by those who did and did not receive extended VTE prophylaxis. RESULTS: A total of 403 patients were included, of which 367 patients (91%) received extended pharmacologic prophylaxis and 36 patients (9%) did not. Low molecular weight heparin prescriptions ranged from 7 to 30 days. Patients receiving extended prophylaxis (EP) were older (63 ± 11 vs 57 ± 12; P = 0.004), more frequently underwent lymphadenectomy (67% vs 34%; P < 0.001), and had higher-grade tumors compared with patients not receiving EP. Overall 30-day and 60-day VTE rates were 0.7% and 1.2%, respectively. There were no significant differences in 30-day and 60-day VTE rates among patients that did and did not receive EP, although a trend toward lower VTE rates in the EP group was observed (30-day rates 0.5% vs 2.8% respectively, P = 0.25; 60-day rates 0.8% vs 5.6%, P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, 30-day and 60-day VTE rates after minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer were low. Rates were also similar to those of previous reports in this setting in which the majority of patients did not receive extended VTE prophylaxis. Given the consistent finding that postoperative VTE in this population is rare regardless of prophylaxis use and the variability in practice patterns for VTE prophylaxis, the development of best practice guidelines for EP use specific to this setting is warranted.

Association of Metformin Use with Outcomes in Advanced Endometrial Cancer Treated with Chemotherapy.

There is increasing evidence that metformin, a commonly used treatment for diabetes, might have the potential to be repurposed as an economical and safe cancer therapeutic. The aim of this study was to determine whether stage III-IV or recurrent endometrial cancer patients who are using metformin during treatment with chemotherapy have improved survival. To test this we analyzed a retrospective cohort of subjects at two independent institutions who received chemotherapy for stage III-IV or recurrent endometrial cancer from 1992 to 2011. Diagnosis of diabetes, metformin use, demographics, endometrial cancer clinico-pathologic parameters, and survival duration were abstracted. The primary outcome was overall survival. The final cohort included 349 patients, 31 (8.9%) had diabetes and used metformin, 28 (8.0%) had diabetes but did not use metformin, and 291 (83.4%) did not have diabetes. The results demonstrate that the median overall survival was 45.6 months for patients with diabetes who used metformin compared to 12.5 months for patients with diabetes who did not use metformin and 28.5 months for patients without diabetes (log-rank test comparing the three groups P = 0.006). In a model adjusted for confounders, the difference in survival between the three groups remained statistically significant (P = 0.023). The improvement in survival among metformin users was not explained by better baseline health status or more aggressive use of chemotherapy. Overall, the findings in this retrospective cohort of endometrial cancer patients with stage III-IV or recurrent disease treated with chemotherapy indicate that patients with diabetes who were concurrently treated with metformin survived longer than patients with diabetes who did not use metformin.