Influences of the Social Media Continuum Model in Radiology: Theory and Reality.

Social media utilization has been growing exponentially worldwide and has created a thriving venue for radiologists and the profession of radiology to engage in on both the academic and social levels. The aim of this article is to conduct updated literature review and address a gap in the literature by introducing a simple classification for social media utilization and a new theoretical model to outline the role and potential value of social media in the realm of radiology. We propose classifying social media through usage-driven and access-driven indices. Furthermore, we discuss the interdependency of radiologists, other physicians and non-physician stakeholders, scientific journals, conferences/meetings and the general public in an integrated social media continuum model. With the ongoing sub-specialization of radiology, social media helps mitigate the physical barriers of making connections with peers and audiences which would have otherwise been unfeasible. The constant evolution and diversification of social media platforms necessitates a novel approach to better understand its role through a radiological lens. With the looming fear of 'ancillary service' labelling, social media could be the golden plate to halt the path towards commoditization of radiology.

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: A unique case of chronic disease with atypical features.

We present a unique case of diffusely extensive Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP). Typically affecting the peripheral nervous system and manifesting with muscle weakness, breakdown or paresthesia, we present a case that additionally demonstrates; cranial nerve involvement, central nervous system parenchymal lesions, and chronic osseous remodeling of the nerve tracts. Cranial nerve involvement to this extent has only been described in one other case report to our knowledge. Central nervous system parenchymal lesions are extremely rare in CIDP and no discrete discussion about osseous remodeling has been presented, thus far, in the literature. The findings illustrated in this case may spur further understanding of imaging characteristics most associated with chronic CIDP disease and care measures that could help stratify patients most at risk for severe symptomologies.

Striatal dominant lupus encephalitis-Is it vasculitis or an autoimmune process? Literature review & new case report with vessel wall imaging.

Neurological and psychiatric symptoms are highly prevalent in the initial manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and is classified as neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE). Despite the high prevalence rate of this condition, it is still very poorly understood and often delayed in its diagnosis due to its variety in clinical manifestations. For our case, an eighteen-year-old male who was recently diagnosed with SLE presented with progressive confusion, visual and auditory hallucinations, in addition to high fevers, diarrhea, abdominal and flank pain. Upon initial presentation, he was treated for sepsis while trying to identify a source of infection. However, with the help of laboratory tests like CSF analysis and autoantibody serum studies as well as neuroradiologic imaging, we were able to rule out infectious causes and diagnose our patient with lupus induced striatal encephalitis. We present the first case of striatal encephalitis with vessel wall imaging to ultimately rule out lupus associated vasculitis. The importance of MRI imaging and identification of specific patterns associated with autoimmune encephalitis allowed rapid diagnosis and initiated immediate treatment in the hopes of reducing long term affects from neuroinflammation in our young patient.

Diagnostic Errors in Neuroradiology: A Message to Emergency Radiologists and Trainees.

Diagnostic errors in neuroradiology are inevitable, yet potentially avoidable. Through extensive literature search, we present an up-to-date review of the psychology of human decision making and how such complex process can lead to radiologic errors. Our focus is on neuroradiology, so we augmented our review with multiple explanatory figures to show how different errors can reflect on real-life clinical practice. We propose a new thematic categorization of perceptual and cognitive biases in this article to simplify message delivery to our target audience: emergency/general radiologists and trainees. Additionally, we highlight individual and organizational remedy strategies to decrease error rate and potential harm.

Evaluation of Radiology Reports by the Emergency Department Clinical Providers: A Message to Radiologists [Formula: see text].

OBJECTIVES: This study is an evaluation of the emergency department (ED) satisfaction with the current radiologic reporting system used at a major Northeastern academic medical center. The radiology reports are the main form of communication and usually the final product of any radiological investigation delivered to clinicians. The aim of this study was to improve current radiology reporting practices and to better tailor reports to match the needs and expectations of ED clinicians. METHODS: A 9-question online survey was sent to ED residents, fellows, faculty, and nurse practitioners/advanced practice providers at a major Northeastern academic medical center in the United States. For the open-ended section, coding and emergent theme categorization was conducted for quantification of responses. The survey was designed to evaluate the attitudes toward the structure, style, form, and wording used in reports. RESULTS: The response rate was 48.6% (68/140). The ED respondents were generally satisfied with radiology reports, their language, vocabulary, and clarity. They preferred the impression section to be before the findings in simple examinations and to stratify the reports according to emergency status for complex examinations. They did not like extended differential, hedge terms, and delayed reporting. Additionally, ED respondents recommended focused, fast reporting with considerable changes toward a more standardized report. CONCLUSIONS: This evaluation delivered a list of actionable recommendations. The top recommendation is to standardize reporting structure, style, and lexicon, in addition to being focused, timely, and brief.