The Long and Complicated Relationship between Epstein-Barr Virus and Epithelial Cells.

The roles of epithelial cells in infection and persistence of the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) have long been difficult to resolve. However, recent developments have reinforced the conclusion that these cells are a major site of virus replication and raised the possibility that, like papillomaviruses, EBV has evolved to take advantage of epithelial differentiation to ensure survival, persistence, and spread.

The BDLF3 gene product of Epstein-Barr virus, gp150, mediates non-productive binding to heparan sulfate on epithelial cells and only the binding domain of CD21 is required for infection.

The cell surface molecules used by Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) to attach to epithelial cells are not well-defined, although when CD21, the B cell receptor for EBV is expressed epithelial cell infection increases disproportionately to the increase in virus bound. Many herpesviruses use low affinity charge interactions with molecules such as heparan sulfate to attach to cells. We report here that the EBV glycoprotein gp150 binds to heparan sulfate proteoglycans, but that attachment via this glycoprotein is not productive of infection. We also report that only the aminoterminal two short consensus repeats of CD21 are required for efficient infection, This supports the hypothesis that, when expressed on an epithelial cell CD21 serves primarily to cluster the major attachment protein gp350 in the virus membrane and enhance access of other important glycoproteins to the epithelial cell surface.

The Epstein-Barr Virus Glycoprotein gp150 Forms an Immune-Evasive Glycan Shield at the Surface of Infected Cells.

Cell-mediated immunity plays a key role in host control of viral infection. This is exemplified by life-threatening reactivations of e.g. herpesviruses in individuals with impaired T-cell and/or iNKT cell responses. To allow lifelong persistence and virus production in the face of primed immunity, herpesviruses exploit immune evasion strategies. These include a reduction in viral antigen expression during latency and a number of escape mechanisms that target antigen presentation pathways. Given the plethora of foreign antigens expressed in virus-producing cells, herpesviruses are conceivably most vulnerable to elimination by cell-mediated immunity during the replicative phase of infection. Here, we show that a prototypic herpesvirus, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), encodes a novel, broadly acting immunoevasin, gp150, that is expressed during the late phase of viral replication. In particular, EBV gp150 inhibits antigen presentation by HLA class I, HLA class II, and the non-classical, lipid-presenting CD1d molecules. The mechanism of gp150-mediated T-cell escape does not depend on degradation of the antigen-presenting molecules nor does it require gp150's cytoplasmic tail. Through its abundant glycosylation, gp150 creates a shield that impedes surface presentation of antigen. This is an unprecedented immune evasion mechanism for herpesviruses. In view of its likely broader target range, gp150 could additionally have an impact beyond escape of T cell activation. Importantly, B cells infected with a gp150-null mutant EBV displayed rescued levels of surface antigen presentation by HLA class I, HLA class II, and CD1d, supporting an important role for iNKT cells next to classical T cells in fighting EBV infection. At the same time, our results indicate that EBV gp150 prolongs the timespan for producing viral offspring at the most vulnerable stage of the viral life cycle.

Epstein-Barr virus glycoprotein gM can interact with the cellular protein p32 and knockdown of p32 impairs virus.

The Epstein-Barr virus glycoprotein complex gMgN has been implicated in assembly and release of fully enveloped virus, although the precise role that it plays has not been elucidated. We report here that the long predicted cytoplasmic tail of gM is not required for complex formation and that it interacts with the cellular protein p32, which has been reported to be involved in nuclear egress of human cytomegalovirus and herpes simplex virus. Although redistribution of p32 and colocalization with gM was not observed in virus infected cells, knockdown of p32 expression by siRNA or lentivirus-delivered shRNA recapitulated the phenotype of a virus lacking expression of gNgM. A proportion of virus released from cells sedimented with characteristics of virus lacking an intact envelope and there was an increase in virus trapped in nuclear condensed chromatin. The observations suggest the possibility that p32 may also be involved in nuclear egress of Epstein-Barr virus.

Alcelaphine herpesvirus 1 glycoprotein B: recombinant expression and antibody recognition.

The gammaherpesvirus alcelaphine herpesvirus 1 (AlHV-1) causes fatal malignant catarrhal fever (MCF) in susceptible species including cattle, but infects its reservoir host, wildebeest, without causing disease. Pathology in cattle may be influenced by virus-host cell interactions mediated by the virus glycoproteins. Cloning and expression of a haemagglutinin-tagged version of the AlHV-1 glycoprotein B (gB) was used to demonstrate that the AlHV-1-specific monoclonal antibody 12B5 recognised gB and that gB was the main component of the gp115 complex of AlHV-1, a glycoprotein complex of five components identified on the surface of AlHV-1 by immunoprecipitation and radiolabelling. Analysis of AlHV-1 virus particles showed that the native form of gB was detected by mAb 12B5 as a band of about 70 kDa, whilst recombinant gB expressed by transfected HEK293T cells appeared to be subject to additional cleavage and incomplete post-translational processing. Antibody 12B5 recognised an epitope on the N-terminal furin-cleaved fragment of gB on AlHV-1 virus particles. It could be used to detect recombinant and virus-expressed gB on western blots and on the surface of infected cells by flow cytometry, whilst recombinant gB was detected on the surface of transfected cells by immunofluorescence. Recombinant gB has potential as an antigen for ELISA detection of MCF virus infection and as a candidate vaccine antigen.

Viral Entry.

Epstein-Barr virus primarily, though not exclusively, infects B cells and epithelial cells. Many of the virus and cell proteins that are involved in entry into these two cell types in vitro have been identified, and their roles in attachment and fusion are being explored. This chapter discusses what is known about entry at the cellular level in vitro and describes what little is known about the process in vivo. It highlights some of the questions that still need to be addressed and considers some models that need further testing.

Nonmuscle myosin heavy chain IIA mediates Epstein-Barr virus infection of nasopharyngeal epithelial cells.

EBV causes B lymphomas and undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Although the mechanisms by which EBV infects B lymphocytes have been extensively studied, investigation of the mechanisms by which EBV infects nasopharyngeal epithelial cells (NPECs) has only recently been enabled by the successful growth of B lymphoma Mo-MLV insertion region 1 homolog (BMI1)-immortalized NPECs in vitro and the discovery that neuropilin 1 expression positively affects EBV glycoprotein B (gB)-mediated infection and tyrosine kinase activations in enhancing EBV infection of BMI1-immortalized NPECs. We have now found that even though EBV infected NPECs grown as a monolayer at extremely low efficiency (<3%), close to 30% of NPECs grown as sphere-like cells (SLCs) were infected by EBV. We also identified nonmuscle myosin heavy chain IIA (NMHC-IIA) as another NPEC protein important for efficient EBV infection. EBV gH/gL specifically interacted with NMHC-IIA both in vitro and in vivo. NMHC-IIA densely aggregated on the surface of NPEC SLCs and colocalized with EBV. EBV infection of NPEC SLCs was significantly reduced by NMHC-IIA siRNA knock-down. NMHC-IIA antisera also efficiently blocked EBV infection. These data indicate that NMHC-IIA is an important factor for EBV NPEC infection.

EBV glycoproteins: where are we now?

Glycoproteins are critical to virus entry, to spread within and between hosts and can modify the behavior of cells. Many viruses carry only a few, most found in the virion envelope. EBV makes more than 12, providing flexibility in how it colonizes its human host. Some are dedicated to getting the virus through the cell membrane and on toward the nucleus of the cell, some help guide the virus back out and on to the next cell in the same or a new host. Yet others undermine host defenses helping the virus persist for a lifetime, maintaining a presence that is mostly tolerated and serves to perpetuate EBV as one of the most common infections of man.

Association between human papilloma virus/Epstein-Barr virus coinfection and oral carcinogenesis.

BACKGROUND: The recent epidemic of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas associated with human papilloma virus (HPV) has not addressed its association with lymphoid tissue in the oropharynx or the potential role of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)/HPV coinfection. METHODS: The prevalence of HPV and EBV infection/coinfection and CD21 mRNA expression were determined in normal and cancerous tissues from the oropharynx using in situ hybridization (ISH), p16, and quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR). The effects of coinfection on tumorigenicity were evaluated using proliferation and invasion assays. RESULTS: Normal oropharynx, tonsil, non-cancer base of tongue (BOT), and BOT from sleep apnea patients demonstrated EBV positivity ranging from 7% to 36% depending on the site and methods of detection used (qRT-PCR or ISH). Among non-malignant BOT samples, HPV positivity was noted only in 20%. The percent of tonsil and BOT cancers positive for HPV (up to 63% and 80%, respectively) or coinfected with HPV/EBV (up to 25% and 70%, respectively) were both significantly associated with cancer status. Notably, HPV/EBV coinfection was observed only in malignant tissue originating in lymphoid-rich oropharynx sites (tonsil, BOT). CD21 mRNA (the major EBV attachment receptor) was detected in tonsil and BOT epithelium, but not in soft-palate epithelium. Coinfected cell lines showed a significant increase in invasiveness (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: There is a high prevalence of HPV/EBV infection and coinfection in BOT and tonsil cancers, possibly reflecting their origins in lymphoid-rich tissue. In vitro, cells modeling coinfection have an increased invasive potential.

Epstein-Barr virus infection mechanisms.

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection occurs by distinct mechanisms across different cell types. EBV infection of B cells in vitro minimally requires 5 viral glycoproteins and 2 cellular proteins. By contrast, infection of epithelial cells requires a minimum of 3 viral glycoproteins, which are capable of interacting with one or more of 3 different cellular proteins. The full complement of proteins involved in entry into all cell types capable of being infected in vivo is unknown. This review discusses the events that occur when the virus is delivered into the cytoplasm of a cell, the players known to be involved in these events, and the ways in which these players are thought to function.

Epstein-Barr virus glycoprotein gB and gHgL can mediate fusion and entry in trans, and heat can act as a partial surrogate for gHgL and trigger a conformational change in gB.

UNLABELLED: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) fusion with an epithelial cell requires virus glycoproteins gHgL and gB and is triggered by an interaction between gHgL and integrin αvß5, αvß6, or αvß8. Fusion with a B cell requires gHgL, gp42, and gB and is triggered by an interaction between gp42 and human leukocyte antigen class II. We report here that, like alpha- and betaherpesviruses, EBV, a gammaherpesvirus, can mediate cell fusion if gB and gHgL are expressed in trans. Entry of a gH-null virus into an epithelial cell is possible if the epithelial cell expresses gHgL, and entry of the same virus, which phenotypically lacks gHgL and gp42, into a B cell expressing gHgL is possible in the presence of a soluble integrin. Heat is capable of inducing the fusion of cells expressing only gB, and the proteolytic digestion pattern of gB in virions changes in the same way following the exposure of virus to heat or to soluble integrins. It is suggested that the Gibbs free energy released as a result of the high-affinity interaction of gHgL with an integrin contributes to the activation energy required to cause the refolding of gB from a prefusion to a postfusion conformation. IMPORTANCE: The core fusion machinery of herpesviruses consists of glycoproteins gB and gHgL. We demonstrate that as in alpha- and betaherpesvirus, gB and gHgL of the gammaherpesvirus EBV can mediate fusion and entry when expressed in trans in opposing membranes, implicating interactions between the ectodomains of the proteins in the activation of fusion. We further show that heat and exposure to a soluble integrin, both of which activate fusion, result in the same changes in the proteolytic digestion pattern of gB, possibly representing the refolding of gB from its prefusion to its postfusion conformation.

αvß6- and αvß8-integrins serve as interchangeable receptors for HSV gH/gL to promote endocytosis and activation of membrane fusion.

Herpes simplex virus (HSV)--and herpesviruses in general--encode for a multipartite entry/fusion apparatus. In HSV it consists of the HSV-specific glycoprotein D (gD), and three additional glycoproteins, gH/gL and gB, conserved across the Herpesviridae family and responsible for the execution of fusion. According to the current model, upon receptor binding, gD propagates the activation to gH/gL and to gB in a cascade fashion. Questions remain about how the cascade of activation is controlled and how it is synchronized with virion endocytosis, to avoid premature activation and exhaustion of the glycoproteins. We considered the possibility that such control might be carried out by as yet unknown receptors. Indeed, receptors for HSV gB, but not for gH/gL, have been described. In other members of the Herpesviridae family, such as Epstein-Barr virus, integrin receptors bind gH/gL and trigger conformational changes in the glycoproteins. We report that αvß6- and αvß8-integrins serve as receptors for HSV entry into experimental models of keratinocytes and other epithelial and neuronal cells. Evidence rests on loss of function experiments, in which integrins were blocked by antibodies or silenced, and gain of function experiments in which αvß6-integrin was expressed in integrin-negative cells. αvß6- and αvß8-integrins acted independently and are thus interchangeable. Both bind gH/gL with high affinity. The interaction profoundly affects the route of HSV entry and directs the virus to acidic endosomes. In the case of αvß8, but not αvß6-integrin, the portal of entry is located at lipid microdomains and requires dynamin 2. Thus, a major role of αvß6- or αvß8-integrin in HSV infection appears to be to function as gH/gL receptors and to promote virus endocytosis. We propose that placing the gH/gL activation under the integrin trigger point enables HSV to synchronize virion endocytosis with the cascade of glycoprotein activation that culminates in execution of fusion.

αvß3-integrin is a major sensor and activator of innate immunity to herpes simplex virus-1.

Pathogens are sensed by Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and a growing number of non-TLR receptors. Integrins constitute a family of signaling receptors exploited by viruses and bacteria to access cells. By gain- and loss-of-function approaches we found that αvß3-integrin is a sensor of and plays a crucial role in the innate defense against herpes simplex virus (HSV). αvß3-integrin signaled through two pathways. One concurred with TLR2, affected activation/induction of interferons type 1 (IFNs-1), NF-κB (nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells), and a polarized set of cytokines and receptors. The virion glycoproteins gH/gL sufficed to induce IFN1 and NF-κB via this pathway. The other pathway was TLR2-independent, involved sarcoma (SRC)-spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK)-Caspase recruitment domain-containing protein 9 (CARD9)-TRIF (TIR-domain-containing adapter-inducing interferon-ß), and affected interferon regulatory factor 3 and 7 (IRF3-IRF7). The importance of αvß3-integrin-mediated defense is reflected in the observation that HSV evolved the immediate-early infected cellular protein 0 (ICP0) protein to counteract it. We propose that αvß3-integrin is considered a class of non-TLR pattern recognition receptors, a role likely exerted toward viruses and bacteria that interact with integrins and mount an innate response.

Oral dysplasia and squamous cell carcinoma: correlation between increased expression of CD21, Epstein-Barr virus and CK19.

OBJECTIVES: Epstein-Barr virus is an orally transmitted human gammaherpesvirus that infects B lymphocytes and epithelial cells. Although most primary infections are asymptomatic, long term carriage of the virus can be associated with either lymphoid or epithelial malignancies. The association of EBV with oral squamous cell carcinomas is sporadic and it is uncertain if the virus is involved in initiation of the tumor or, possibly, in its progression. Complement receptor type 2, CR2 or CD21, is a receptor for the major attachment protein of EBV, which significantly enhances epithelial cell infection, but its expression on normal tissues is restricted to tonsil and adenoid epithelium. As cells become dysplastic they are reported to express higher levels of CK19. We sought to evaluate whether CD21 and CK19 expression change as oral epithelial cells outside Waldeyer's ring become dysplastic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Epithelial cells were isolated by laser capture microdissection and levels of CD21, CK19 and EBV RNA were measured by quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR. RESULTS: We report that expression of CD21 increases in frequency and intensity as oral epithelial cells become more dysplastic and that expression correlates with an increase in infection by EBV. Tumors or dysplastic lesions that carry EBV also generally express higher levels of CK19 than those that do not. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that dysplasia may make cells more susceptible to infection by EBV and that infection by the virus may alter the phenotype of the infected cell in a manner which could affect prognosis.

Important but differential roles for actin in trafficking of Epstein-Barr virus in B cells and epithelial cells.

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) uses different virus and cell proteins to enter its two major targets, B lymphocytes and epithelial cells. The routes that the virus takes into the two cell types are also different. To determine if these differences extend to movement from the cell surface to the nucleus, we examined the fate of incoming virus. Essentially all virus that entered a B cell remained stable for at least 8 h. In contrast, up to 80% of virus entering an epithelial cell was degraded in a compartment sensitive to inhibitors of components involved in autophagy. Inhibitors of actin remodeling blocked entry into a B cell but had no effect or enhanced entry into an epithelial cell. Inhibitors of the microtubule network reduced intracellular transport in both cell types, but movement to the nucleus in an epithelial cell also required involvement of the actin cytoskeleton. Deletion of the cytoplasmic tail of CR2, which in an epithelial cell interacts with the actin nucleator FHOS/FHOD when cross-linked by EBV, had no effect on infection. However, inhibitors of downstream signaling by integrins reduced intracellular transport. Cooperation of the microtubule and actin cytoskeletons, possibly activated by interaction with integrin binding proteins in the envelope of EBV, is needed for successful infection of an epithelial cell.

Fusion of Epstein-Barr virus with epithelial cells can be triggered by αvß5 in addition to αvß6 and αvß8, and integrin binding triggers a conformational change in glycoproteins gHgL.

Fusion of herpesviruses with their target cells requires a minimum of three glycoproteins, namely, gB and a complex of gH and gL. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) fusion with an epithelial cell requires no additional virus glycoproteins, and we have shown previously that it can be initiated by an interaction between integrin αvß6 or αvß8 and gHgL. We now report that integrin αvß5 can also bind to gHgL and trigger fusion. Binding of gHgL to integrins is a two-step reaction. The first step, analyzed by surface plasmon resonance, was fast, with high association and low dissociation rate constants. The second step, detected by fluorescence spectroscopy of gHgL labeled at cysteine 153 at the domain I-domain II interface with the environmentally sensitive probes acrylodan and IANBD, involved a slower conformational change. Interaction of gHgL with neutralizing monoclonal antibodies or Fab' fragments was also consistent with a two-step reaction involving fast high-affinity binding and a subsequent slower conformational change. None of the antibodies bound to the same epitope, and none completely inhibited integrin binding. However, binding of each decreased the rate of conformational change induced by integrin binding, suggesting that neutralization might involve a conformational change that precludes fusion. Overall, the data are consistent with the interaction of gHgL with an integrin inducing a functionally important rearrangement at the domain I-domain II interface.

Laser capture microdissection for analysis of gene expression in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue.

A combination of laser capture microdissection and reverse transcriptase real-time quantitative PCR -provides a powerful tool for the analysis of relative gene expression in archived tissue specimens. This chapter describes standard methodologies that can be used to determine the relative levels of gene expression in individual cells captured from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues.

Integrins as triggers of Epstein-Barr virus fusion and epithelial cell infection.

Epstein-Barr virus is a ubiquitous orally-transmitted human herpesvirus that is carried by most of the adult population. It establishes latent infections in B lymphocytes, reactivates periodically from latency and can be amplified in epithelial cells where it is thought more commonly to undergo lytic replication. Entry into either cell involves fusion of the virus envelope with a cell membrane. Fusion with a B cell requires four envelope glycoproteins, gB and a ternary complex of gHgLgp42. Fusion is triggered by an interaction between gp42 and HLA class II. Fusion with an epithelial cell requires three envelope glycoproteins, gB and a binary complex of gHgL. The presence of gp42 blocks infection and blocks the interaction of gHgL with a specific receptor on the epithelial cell surface. We recently demonstrated that both integrins αvß6 and αvß8 can serve as specific receptors for gHgL and that on binding to gHgL, even in a soluble form, can provide the trigger for direct virus fusion with the epithelial cell plasma membrane. It reveals yet another way in which an integrin can be used by a pathogen to invade a cell.