Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulator in the Active Duty Population: Military Readiness and Satisfaction.

INTRODUCTION: Because inadequate sleep impairs mission performance, the U.S. Army regards sleep as a core pillar of soldier readiness. There is an increasing incidence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) among active duty (AD) service members, which is a disqualifying condition for initial enlistment. Moreover, a new diagnosis of OSA in the AD population often prompts a medical evaluation board, and if symptomatic OSA proves refractory to treatment, this may result in medical retirement. Hypoglossal nerve stimulator implantation (HNSI) is a newer implantable treatment option, which requires minimal ancillary equipment to function and may provide a useful treatment modality to support AD service members while maintaining readiness in appropriate candidates. Because of a perception among AD service members that HNSI results in mandatory medical discharge, we aimed to evaluate the impact of HNSI on military career progression, maintenance of deployment readiness, and patient satisfaction. METHODS: The Department of Research Programs at the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center provided institutional review board approval for this project. This is a retrospective, observational study and telephonic survey of AD HNSI recipients. Military service information, demographics, surgical data, and postoperative sleep study results were collected from each patient.Additional survey questions assessed each service member's experience with the device. RESULTS: Fifteen AD service members who underwent HNSI between 2016 and 2021 were identified. Thirteen subjects completed the survey. The mean age was 44.8 years (range 33-61), and all were men. Six subjects (46%) were officers. All subjects maintained AD status following HNSI yielding 14.5 person-years of continued AD service with the implant. One subject underwent formal assessment for medical retention. One subject transferred from a combat role to a support role. Six subjects have since voluntarily separated from AD service following HNSI. These subjects spent an average of 360 (37-1,039) days on AD service. Seven subjects currently remain on AD and have served for an average of 441 (243-882) days. Two subjects deployed following HNSI. Two subjects felt that HSNI negatively affected their career. Ten subjects would recommend HSNI to other AD personnel. Following HNSI, of the eight subjects with postoperative sleep study data, five achieved surgical success defined as >50% reduction of apnea-hypopnea index and absolute apnea-hypopnea index value of <20. CONCLUSIONS: Hypoglossal nerve stimulator implantation for AD service members offers an effective treatment modality for OSA, which generally allows for the ability to maintain AD status, however: The impact on deployment readiness should be seriously considered and tailored to each service member based on their unique duties before implantation. Seventy-seven percent of HNSI patients would recommend it to other AD service members suffering from OSA.

Relation of Vitamin D Level, BMI, and Location of Lower Extremity Stress Fractures in Military Trainees.

INTRODUCTION: Military trainees are at an increased risk of stress fractures. Vitamin D availability is known to play an important role in both fracture prevention and healing. The purpose of this investigation was to assess 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25(OH)D) levels in soldiers with confirmed lower extremity stress fractures and assess the predictors of fracture location. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following Institutional Review Board approval, military trainees at a large training base presenting to the orthopedic clinic with a radiographically verified stress fracture were identified. Demographic data and 25(OH)D levels were collected. A descriptive analysis was performed in regard to patient age, body mass index (BMI), and 25(OH)D level. Interactions between variables were assessed using one-way analysis of variance for four fracture location groups (femoral neck, femoral shaft, tibial shaft, and foot and ankle). Bivariate correlations were examined between age, BMI, and vitamin D level. RESULTS: A total of 155 lower extremity stress fractures were identified in 144 males and 11 females over 30 months. The mean age was 22.7 ± 4.85 years. The majority (60.7%) of fractures were located in the femoral neck. The average 25(OH)D level was 26.8 ± 8.37 ng/mL. Overall, 26% (N = 41) of enrolled patients had normal 25(OH)D levels, 48% (N = 74) had insufficient 25(OH)D levels, and 26% (N = 40) had deficient 25(OH)D levels. Patients with femoral neck fractures and tibial shaft fractures had significantly lower BMI than patients with foot and ankle fractures (23.3 vs. 27.7, P < .001 and 24.2 vs. 27.7, P = .003, respectively). Patients with foot and ankle fractures had significantly lower 25(OH)D levels than patients with femoral shaft fractures (21.1 vs. 30.1, P = .02). There were no significant findings regarding age and fracture location. Age correlated positively (but weakly) with BMI (0.338, P < .001). There was no correlation between age and vitamin D level or BMI and vitamin D level. CONCLUSION: Overall, 74% of patients in military training with lower extremity stress fractures had insufficient or deficient levels of 25(OH)D, highlighting a persistent area of concern in this population. Patients with femoral neck and tibial shaft stress fractures had significantly lower BMI than patients with foot and ankle stress fractures. This suggests that in stress fracture-prone patients, BMI may play a role in predicting fracture location.