A real-world observational study assessing relationships between excessive daytime sleepiness and patient satisfaction in obstructive sleep apnea.

OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND: To estimate prevalence and severity of excessive daytime sleepiness among patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who were prescribed treatment; assess perception and satisfaction of OSA-related care; describe relationships between excessive daytime sleepiness, treatment adherence, and patient satisfaction. PATIENTS/METHODS: A national population-based cross-sectional sample of US adults with clinician-diagnosed OSA was surveyed in January 2021 via Evidation Health's Achievement App. Patients completed the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, rated satisfaction with healthcare provider and overall OSA care, and reported treatment adherence. Covariates affecting excessive daytime sleepiness (average weekly sleep duration, treatment adherence, sleepiness-inducing medications, age, sex, body mass index, nasal congestion, smoking status, and comorbidities) were adjusted in multivariate regression models. RESULTS: In 2289 participants (50.3 % women; 44.8 ± 11.1 years), EDS was highly prevalent (42 %), and was experienced by 36 % of patients with high positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy adherence. Each additional hour of nightly PAP use was associated with improved sleepiness (a 0.28-point lower Epworth score; p < 0.001). Excessive daytime sleepiness was associated with lower patient satisfaction with healthcare providers and overall care (OR [95 % CI] 0.62 [0.48-0.80] and 0.50 [0.39-0.64], respectively; p < 0.0001), whereas PAP adherence was associated with higher patient satisfaction (OR [95 % CI] 2.37 [1.64-3.43] and 2.91 [2.03-4.17]; p < 0.0001), after adjusting for confounders. CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world population-based study of patients with OSA, excessive daytime sleepiness was highly prevalent and associated with poor patient satisfaction ratings. Better patient-centered care among patients with OSA may require interventions aimed at addressing excessive daytime sleepiness and treatment adherence.

Health-related impact of illness associated with excessive daytime sleepiness in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

OBJECTIVES: This real-world study aimed to characterize the impact of illness of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who are adherent to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). METHODS: This cross-sectional study surveyed participants in Evidation Health's Achievement app (November 2020-January 2021), a mobile consumer platform that encourages users to develop healthy habits and provides incentives to participate in research. Participants were US-resident adults who self-reported a physician diagnosis of OSA and adherence to CPAP (≥4 hours/night, ≥5 nights/week) for≥6 months. The survey included the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire-Short Version (FOSQ-10), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and questions regarding comorbidities, CPAP use, caffeine consumption, and physical activity. EDS was defined as ESS score >10. There were more female than male participants; therefore, data were reported separately for females/males. RESULTS: In total, 476 participants (female, n = 283 [59%]; mean [SD] age, 49.7 [10.8] years; obese, 74.4%) completed the survey; 209 had EDS (mean [SD] ESS, 13.8 [2.5]) and 267 did not (mean [SD] ESS, 6.3 [2.5]). Self-reported duration of CPAP use was consistent between the EDS/no EDS cohorts, with most participants using CPAP for 7 to 9 hours/night, 7 nights/week. Participants with EDS commonly reported anxiety ([EDS/no EDS] males: 31.5%/20.0%; females: 53.7%/39.5%), depression (males: 35.6%/24.2%; females: 55.9%/44.9%), and insomnia (males: 19.2%/6.7%; females: 25.7%/12.9%) and showed impairment on the FOSQ-10 ([EDS/no EDS] males: 80.8%/35.0%; females: 91.9%/53.1%). Participants with EDS reported that sleepiness 'very often' prevented physical activity and influenced dietary choices. CONCLUSION: EDS influences choices related to physical activity, caffeine consumption, and diet in patients who are adherent with CPAP. More research is needed to understand the association between EDS and choices of CPAP-adherent patients. Future research should explore the health-related consequences of residual EDS associated with OSA and whether they can be mitigated by improving EDS.

Approximately 1 billion people worldwide have a sleep disorder called obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). People with OSA experience a blockage in their upper airway during sleep, which can lead to snoring, gasping for air, difficulty breathing, and disturbed sleep. As a result, 50%­80% of people with OSA experience excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) ­ the irresistible need to sleep during the daytime. Many people (9%­22%) who are treated for OSA using continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) still experience EDS. Previous studies have described the negative impact EDS has on people, such as decreased work productivity and increased risk of motor vehicle accidents. However, it is unclear if EDS impacts health, behavioral choices, and lifestyle in the real world. This study surveyed people with OSA and collected their Fitbit data using Evidation's Achievement app. People with OSA and EDS reported having anxiety, depression, insomnia, and other health problems more often than people with OSA without EDS. Also, people with OSA and EDS reported having more impairments in daytime functioning than people with OSA without EDS. Furthermore, people with OSA and EDS reported that sleepiness 'very often' prevented them from engaging in physical activity. Women with OSA and EDS said that sleepiness 'very often' influenced their food choices. People with OSA and EDS also used caffeine and 'sometimes' used physical activity to stay awake during the daytime. Findings from this study show people with OSA alter their lifestyle and behavioral choices because of EDS.

Solriamfetol Titration & AdministRaTion (START) in Patients With Narcolepsy.

PURPOSE: Solriamfetol, a dopamine/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, is approved (in the United States and European Union) to treat excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in adults with narcolepsy (75-150 mg/d) or obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) (37.5-150 mg/d). This study characterized real-world titration strategies for patients with narcolepsy (with or without comorbid OSA) initiating solriamfetol therapy. METHODS: This virtual, descriptive study included a retrospective medical record review and qualitative survey. US-based physicians prescribing solriamfetol for EDS associated with narcolepsy or OSA participated. Data are reported for patients with narcolepsy with or without comorbid OSA (OSA alone reported separately). On the basis of medical record review, titration strategies were classified de novo (EDS medication naive), transition (switched or switching from existing EDS medication[s] to solriamfetol), or add-on (adding solriamfetol to current EDS medication[s]). The survey included open-ended questions regarding a hypothetical patient-a 32-year-old woman with narcolepsy (Epworth Sleepiness Scale score of 8) treated with 35 mg/d of amphetamine and 6 g per night of sodium oxybate who experiences non-use-limiting adverse events from amphetamine. FINDINGS: Twenty-six physicians participated: 23 provided data from 70 patients with narcolepsy (type 1, n = 24; type 2, n = 46; mean [SD] age, 40 [11] years; 57% female; 6 with comorbid OSA), and 26 responded to the hypothetical patient scenario. From the medical record review, solriamfetol therapy initiation was de novo for 19 of 70 patients (27%), transition for 31 of 70 patients (44%), and add-on for 20 of 70 patients (29%). Efficacy profile of solriamfetol was the primary reason for de novo (12 of 19 [63%]), transition (18 of 31 [58%]), and add-on (19 of 20 [95%]) initiation. Most (86%) initiated use of solriamfetol at 75 mg/d and were stable at 150 mg/d (76%). Most (67%) had 1 dose adjustment, reaching a stable dose over a median (range) of 14 (1-60) days. Physicians most often considered EDS severity (44%) when titrating. Among transitioning patients, 14 of 22 (64%) using wake-promoting agents discontinued their use abruptly, and 5 of 9 (56%) using stimulants were tapered off. At data collection, 90% continued to take solriamfetol. Regarding the hypothetical patient scenario, most physicians (81%) thought solriamfetol was appropriate, highlighting tolerability issues with current treatment and lack of symptom control as drivers for switching; however, 3 physicians (12%) did not think solriamfetol was appropriate, noting current symptoms were not severe enough and/or symptoms could be managed by increasing sodium oxybate dose; 2 (8%) thought it would depend on other factors. Physicians emphasized managing withdrawal symptoms while maintaining EDS symptom control when titrating off a stimulant and starting solriamfetol therapy. IMPLICATIONS: In a real-world study, physicians initiated solriamfetol therapy at 75 mg/d for most patients with narcolepsy, adjusted dosages once, tapered stimulants, and abruptly discontinued therapy with wake-promoting agents.

Solriamfetol Titration and AdministRaTion (START) in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Retrospective Chart Review and Hypothetical Patient Scenario.

INTRODUCTION: Solriamfetol (Sunosi™), a dopamine/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, is approved (USA and EU) to treat excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in adults with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) (37.5-150 mg/day). Real-world research on solriamfetol initiation is limited. The objective of this study was to describe dosing and titration strategies used when initiating solriamfetol and to assess whether and how patient factors affected these strategies. METHODS: This descriptive study, featuring a quantitative retrospective patient chart review and hypothetical patient scenario, enrolled US-based physicians prescribing solriamfetol for EDS associated with OSA and/or narcolepsy. Initiation of solriamfetol was classified as: (1) de novo (EDS medication-naive); (2) transition (switched/switching from existing EDS medication[s] to solriamfetol), or (3) add-on (adding solriamfetol to current EDS medication[s]). Study fielding occurred 3-19 June 2020. Data were summarized descriptively. RESULTS: Twenty-six physicians participated in the study, of whom 24 provided data from 50 patients with OSA (mean ± standard deviation [SD] age, 51.9 ± 9.1 years; 62% male). Mean apnea-hypopnea index at diagnosis indicated that most patients had severe OSA and 92% were adherent to positive airway pressure therapy. EDS was primarily moderate (56%) or severe (36%). Solriamfetol initiation was de novo for 44% of patients, transition for 52%, and add-on for 4%. Efficacy (including the need for better efficacy) was the primary reason for the initiation of solriamfetol as de novo (82%), transition (58%), and add-on (100%) therapy. Starting doses were predominantly 37.5 mg/day (48%) or 75 mg/day (48%); stable doses were typically 75 mg/day (56%) or 150 mg/day (40%). Most patients (64%) adjusted dosages once, reaching stable doses over a median (range) of 14 (1-74) days. Physicians considered EDS severity (32% of patients) when titrating, but more commonly no specific patient factors caused them to alter their titration (44% of patients). Physicians abruptly discontinued wake-promoting agents (WPAs; 17/18, 94%) and stimulants (6/9, 67%) for transitioning patients. The hypothetical patient scenario showed that physicians discontinuing prior WPAs commonly considered the current dose (23%) and potential adverse events (15%). Most patients (96%) were stable on solriamfetol at data collection. CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world study, most physicians initiated solriamfetol at 37.5 or 75 mg/day and titrated to 75 or 150 mg/day for patients with EDS associated with OSA, adjusted dosages once, and abruptly discontinued prior WPAs. At data collection, most patients remained on solriamfetol.

Test-retest reliability of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale in clinical trial settings.

The present analysis examined the test-retest reliability of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale in participants with excessive daytime sleepiness associated with narcolepsy or obstructive sleep apnea in three clinical trials. Intraclass correlation coefficient estimates for Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores from two solriamfetol 12-week placebo-controlled trials (one narcolepsy, one obstructive sleep apnea) and one long-term open-label extension trial (narcolepsy or obstructive sleep apnea) were calculated using postbaseline time-point pairs for the overall population in each trial, by treatment, and by primary obstructive sleep apnea therapy adherence. In the 12-week narcolepsy trial, intraclass correlation coefficients (95% confidence intervals) were 0.83 (0.79, 0.87) for weeks 4 and 8 (n = 199), 0.87 (0.83, 0.90) for weeks 8 and 12 (n = 196), and 0.81 (0.76, 0.85) for weeks 4 and 12 (n = 196). In the 12-week obstructive sleep apnea trial, intraclass correlation coefficients (95% confidence intervals) were 0.74 (0.69, 0.78) (n = 416), 0.80 (0.76, 0.83) (n = 405), and 0.74 (0.69, 0.78) (n = 405), respectively. In the open-label extension trial, intraclass correlation coefficients (95% confidence intervals) were 0.82 (0.79, 0.85) for weeks 14 and 26/27 (n = 495), 0.85 (0.82, 0.87) for weeks 26/27 and 39/40 (n = 463), and 0.78 (0.74, 0.81) for weeks 14 and 39/40 (n = 463). Placebo/solriamfetol treatment or adherence to primary obstructive sleep apnea therapy did not affect reliability. In conclusion, across three large clinical trials of participants with narcolepsy or obstructive sleep apnea, Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores demonstrated a robust acceptable level of test-retest reliability in evaluating treatment response over time.

Assessing the impact of sodium oxybate treatment on functioning, productivity, and health-related quality of life in patients with narcolepsy: findings from the Nexus Narcolepsy Registry (waves 1-4).

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of different therapy regimens, including sodium oxybate (SXB)-containing regimens, on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in people with narcolepsy. METHODS: Online surveys were used to collect information from persons with narcolepsy in the Nexus Narcolepsy Registry. Surveys contained questionnaires assessing self-reported sleep quality (SQ; via single question), daytime sleepiness and function (Epworth Sleepiness Scale and Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire), health-related quality of life (HRQoL; 36-Item Short Form Health Survey [SF-36]), work productivity and impairment (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem), and history of injuries or motor vehicle accidents. Treatment with SXB (including monotherapy or combination therapy; SXB group) was compared with non-SXB therapy (No SXB group). The P values presented are nominal, as there are no adjustments for multiplicity. RESULTS: From June 2015 through December 2017, 983 participants completed 1760 surveys. SQ and daytime functioning scores were better in the SXB group compared with the No SXB group (all P < 0.001). HRQoL scores were better for the SXB group compared with the No SXB group for the SF-36 Physical Component (P = 0.016), Mental Component (P < 0.001), and all 8 subscales. Additionally, PROs were better for the SXB group for presenteeism, overall work and activity impairment, and risk of motor vehicle accidents (all P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: Based on participants' self-assessments, treatment regimens with SXB were associated with better outcomes than regimens not containing SXB across many PROs, including SQ, HRQoL, work and activities, and risk of traffic accidents. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02769780.

The Nexus Narcolepsy Registry: methodology, study population characteristics, and patterns and predictors of narcolepsy diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: The real-world experience of people with narcolepsy is not well understood. PATIENTS/METHODS: The Nexus Narcolepsy Registry (NCT02769780) is a longitudinal, web-based patient registry of self-reported data from adults with physician-diagnosed narcolepsy. Surveys were electronically distributed every 6 months; the current analysis reports registry population demographics, narcolepsy diagnosis journey, and predictors of diagnostic delays. RESULTS: The registry population included in this analysis (N = 1024) was predominantly female (85%) and White (92%), with a mean age of 37.7 years. Most participants had education/training beyond high school (93%). Mean (median) reported ages at narcolepsy symptom onset, first consultation for symptoms, and narcolepsy diagnosis were 18.1 (16), 26.4 (24), and 30.1 (28) years, respectively. A majority (59%) of participants reported ≥1 misdiagnosis, and 29% reported consulting ≥5 physicians before narcolepsy diagnosis. More than half (56%) of participants' first consultations for narcolepsy symptoms were with a general practitioner, whereas the diagnosing clinician was usually a sleep specialist (64%) or neurologist (27%). Pediatric symptom onset was associated with a longer mean interval to first consultation than adult symptom onset (10.7 and 4.6 years, respectively; P < 0.001) and a longer mean interval between first consultation and diagnosis (4.5 and 2.2 years, respectively; P < 0.001). Overall, mean (95% CI) time from symptom onset to diagnosis was 11.8 (11.1-12.5) years. CONCLUSIONS: The Nexus Narcolepsy Registry data indicate that onset of narcolepsy symptoms frequently occurs in childhood or adolescence. In many individuals, the diagnostic process is long and involves multiple physicians and frequent misdiagnosis.

Characterization of the Neurochemical and Behavioral Effects of Solriamfetol (JZP-110), a Selective Dopamine and Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor.

Excessive sleepiness (ES) is associated with several sleep disorders, including narcolepsy and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). A role for monoaminergic systems in treating these conditions is highlighted by the clinical use of US Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs that act on these systems, such as dextroamphetamine, methylphenidate, modafinil, and armodafinil. Solriamfetol (JZP-110) is a wake-promoting agent that is currently being evaluated to treat ES in patients with narcolepsy or OSA. Clinical and preclinical data suggest that the wake-promoting effects of solriamfetol differ from medications such as modafinil and amphetamine. The goal of the current studies was to characterize the mechanism of action of solriamfetol at monoamine transporters using in vitro and in vivo assays. Results indicate that solriamfetol has dual reuptake inhibition activity at dopamine (DA; IC50 = 2.9 µM) and norepinephrine (NE; IC50 = 4.4 µM) transporters, and this activity is associated in vivo with increased extracellular concentration of DA and NE as measured by microdialysis. Solriamfetol has negligible functional activity at the serotonin transporter (IC50 > 100 µM). Moreover, the wake-promoting effects of solriamfetol are probably owing to activity at DA and NE transporters rather than other neurotransmitter systems, such as histamine or orexin. The dual activity of solriamfetol at DA and NE transporters and the lack of significant monoamine-releasing properties of solriamfetol might explain the differences in the in vivo effects of solriamfetol compared with modafinil or amphetamine. Taken together, these data suggest that solriamfetol may offer an important advancement in the treatment of ES in patients with narcolepsy or OSA.