Diagnostic accuracy of optic nerve head and macula OCT parameters for detecting glaucoma in eyes with and without high axial myopia.

PURPOSE: To characterize structural differences and assess the diagnostic accuracy of optic nerve head (ONH) and macula optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters to detect glaucoma in eyes with and without high axial myopia. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study METHODS: 368 glaucoma and 411 healthy eyes with no axial myopia, 393 glaucoma and 271 healthy eyes with mild axial myopia and 124 glaucoma and 85 healthy eyes with high axial myopia were included. Global and sectoral peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (pRNFLT), Bruch's membrane opening minimum rim width (BMO-MRW), ganglion cell inner plexiform layer thickness (GCIPLT), and macula RNFLT (mRNFLT) were compared and the diagnostic accuracy for glaucoma detection was evaluated using adjusted area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: Diagnostic accuracy for ONH and macula parameters to detect glaucoma was generally high and differed by myopia group. For ONH parameters the diagnostic accuracy was highest for global (AUC=0.95) and inferotemporal (AUC=0.91) pRNFLT for high myopes and global BMO-MRW for non-myopes (AUC=1.0) and mild myopes (AUC=0.97). For macula parameters, the diagnostic accuracy was higher in high myopes with 6 of the 11 GCIPLT global/sectors having adjusted AUCs > 0.90 compared to non-high myopes with no AUCs > 0.90. In all myopia groups, mRNFLT had lower AUCs than GCIPLT. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic accuracy for pRNFL and GCIPL was high for high axial myopic eyes and shows promise for glaucoma detection in high myopes. Further analysis is needed to determine whether the high diagnostic accuracy can be confirmed in other populations.

Thyroid Eye Disease: Pilot Study Comparison Between Patients in United States-Based and India-Based Practices.

PURPOSE: Thyroid eye disease (TED) phenotype varies by ethnicity/race and genetic/environmental factors. This study compared demographic and clinical characteristics of TED patients from the US and India. DESIGN: Observational pilot study . METHODS: Sixty-four patients with TED ages ≥18 years old with active disease (onset of symptoms ≤18 months or presenting clinical activity score (CAS) ≥4) were recruited between March and October 2021 from clinical practices in the United States (Philadelphia, PA) (n = 30) and India (Hyderabad, India) (n = 34). Data collection at baseline and 3 months included clinical measurements, thyroid disease history, and photographs. Ocular symptoms and quality of life data were obtained by phone interview. CAS was calculated using the standard 7-point scale. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in age, TED duration, or smoking status between patient groups. Both groups had good vision, a low rate of optic neuropathy, and comparable exophthalmometry. US patients were predominantly female (86.7% [26/30]), with a history of hyperthyroidism (96% 29/30). In comparison, Indian patients were 52.9% (18/34, P = .004) female; underlying thyroid disease was distributed between hyperthyroidism (52%), hypothyroidism (17.6%) and euthyroid (9.7%). Mean (SD) CAS in the US cohort was double the score in the India cohort (4.2 (1.7) vs 1.65 (1.7), respectively) (P < .0001). However, patients at both sites experienced subjective symptoms of TED at a similar frequency. CONCLUSIONS: Observed differences in TED between US and Indian patients warrant further investigation to elucidate differences in pathogenesis, disease expression, or other factors that may influence TED in diverse populations.

Trends and Sociodemographic Patterns in Keratoconus Management 2015-2020: An American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS® Registry Analysis.

PURPOSE: Investigate trends in keratoconus (KCN) treatment patterns and diagnosis age from 2015 to 2020 and evaluate sociodemographic associations with the treatment approach. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with a new KCN diagnosis from 2015 to 2020 were identified in the Academy IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight). METHODS: Associations between sociodemographic factors and treatment were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes included percentages and rates of each treatment (collagen crosslinking [CXL], keratoplasty, or no procedure) from 2015 to 2020, age at diagnosis during this period, and sociodemographic factors associated with treatment type. RESULTS: A total of 66 199 patients with a new diagnosis of KCN were identified. The percentage of patients undergoing CXL increased from 0.05% in 2015 to 29.5% in 2020 (P = 0.008). The average age (standard deviation) of KCN patients decreased from 44.1 (±16.9) years in 2015 to 39.2 (±16.9) years in 2020 (P < 0.001). In multivariable analyses comparing CXL versus no procedure and keratoplasty versus no procedure, patients undergoing CXL tended to be younger with the odds of having CXL decreasing with increasing age, for example, comparing CXL and no procedure patients, using ages 0-20 years as reference, the odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval [CI]) decreased from 0.62 (0.57-0.67; P < 0.0001) for patients aged 21-40 years to 0.03 (0.02-0.04; P < 0.0001) for patients aged > 60 years. Men were more likely than women to have CXL (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.23-1.40; P < 0.0001) and keratoplasty (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.19-1.42; P < 0.0001). Black patients were less likely than White patients to have CXL (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.63-0.77; P < 0.0001) and more likely to have keratoplasty (OR, 2.24; 95% CI, 2.01-2.50; P < 0.0001). Likewise, Hispanic patients had higher odds of CXL (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.00-1.24; P < 0.05) and keratoplasty (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.12-1.50; P < 0.001) compared with non-Hispanic patients. Collagen crosslinking and keratoplasty also varied by region and insurance status. CONCLUSIONS: A significant increase in use of CXL was noted from 2015 to 2020. Sociodemographic differences in treatment among KCN patients may reflect differences in access, use, or care patterns, and future studies should aim to identify strategies to improve access for all patients. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Disparities in Retinal Vein Occlusion Presentation and Initiation of Anti-VEGF Therapy: An Academy IRIS® Registry Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Investigate disparities in retinal vein occlusion (RVO) presentation and initiation of anti-VEGF treatment. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SUBJECTS: Patients in the American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS® (Intelligent Research in Sight) Registry database (2015-2021) with branch or central RVO and macular edema (ME). METHODS: The association of demographic characteristics and presenting visual acuity (VA) with anti-VEGF treatment initiation were quantified using multivariable logistic regression. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Treatment with ≥ 1 anti-VEGF injection within 12 months after RVO diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 304 558 eligible patients with RVO and ME were identified. Age at presentation varied by race, ethnicity, sex, and RVO type (all P values < 0.001). Within the first year after RVO presentation, 192 602 (63.2%) patients received ≥ 1 anti-VEGF injection. In a multivariable regression model adjusting for relevant covariates, female (vs. male) patients had lower odds of receiving injections (odds ratio [OR], 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-0.96; P < 0.0001) as did Black/African American (vs. White) patients (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.88-0.92; P < 0.0001) and Asian (vs. White) patients (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.91-0.99; P = 0.02), whereas older patients (vs. patients aged < 51 years) had higher odds (61-70 years: OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.16-1.24; 71-80 years: OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.16-1.24; > 80 years: OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.11-1.18; all P values < 0.0001). Hispanic (vs. non-Hispanic) patients had a small increased odds of treatment initiation (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.04-1.11; P < 0.0001). Results were similar in the subset of 226 143 patients with VA data. In this subset, patients with presenting VA < 20/40 to 20/200 were most frequently treated in the first year after diagnosis (∼ 70%) and patients with light perception/no light perception (LP-NLP) vision or VA of 20/20 or better were treated least frequently (36.9% and 41.9%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this large national clinical registry, 37% of RVO patients with ME had no anti-VEGF treatment documented in the first year after diagnosis. Black/African American, Asian, and female patients and patients with VA of LP-NLP were least likely to receive treatment. Awareness of this undertreatment and these disparities highlight the need for initiatives to ensure all RVO patients receive timely anti-VEGF injections for optimized visual outcomes. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Evaluating Visual Acuity in the American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS® Registry.

Objective: To describe visual acuity data representation in the American Academy of Ophthalmology Intelligent Research in Sight (IRIS) Registry and present a data-cleaning strategy. Design: Reliability and validity study. Participants: Patients with visual acuity records from 2018 in the IRIS Registry. Methods: Visual acuity measurements and metadata were identified and characterized from 2018 IRIS Registry records. Metadata, including laterality, assessment method (distance, near, and unspecified), correction (corrected, uncorrected, and unspecified), and flags for refraction or pinhole assessment were compared between Rome (frozen April 20, 2020) and Chicago (frozen December 24, 2021) versions. We developed a data-cleaning strategy to infer patients' corrected distance visual acuity in their better-seeing eye. Main Outcome Measures: Visual acuity data characteristics in the IRIS Registry. Results: The IRIS Registry Chicago data set contains 168 920 049 visual acuity records among 23 001 531 unique patients and 49 968 974 unique patient visit dates in 2018. Visual acuity records were associated with refraction in 5.3% of cases, and with pinhole in 11.0%. Mean (standard deviation) of all measurements was 0.26 (0.41) logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), with a range of - 0.3 to 4.0 A plurality of visual acuity records were labeled corrected (corrected visual acuity [CVA], 39.1%), followed by unspecified (37.6%) and uncorrected (uncorrected visual acuity [UCVA], 23.4%). Corrected visual acuity measurements were paradoxically worse than same day UCVA 15% of the time. In aggregate, mean and median values were similar for CVA and unspecified visual acuity. Most visual acuity measurements were at distance (59.8%, vs. 32.1% unspecified and 8.2% near). Rome contained more duplicate visual acuity records than Chicago (10.8% vs. 1.4%). Near visual acuity was classified with Jaeger notation and (in Chicago only) also assigned logMAR values by Verana Health. LogMAR values for hand motion and light perception visual acuity were lower in Chicago than in Rome. The impact of data entry errors or outliers on analyses may be reduced by filtering and averaging visual acuity per eye over time. Conclusions: The IRIS Registry includes similar visual acuity metadata in Rome and Chicago. Although fewer duplicate records were found in Chicago, both versions include duplicate and atypical measurements (i.e., CVA worse than UCVA on the same day). Analyses may benefit from using algorithms to filter outliers and average visual acuity measurements over time. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Sympathetic Ophthalmia in Patients with Enucleation or Evisceration: Pathology Laboratory and IRIS® Registry Experience.

Introduction: Sympathetic ophthalmia (SO) is a rare bilateral granulomatous panuveitis that can follow surgical or nonsurgical ocular trauma in one eye. Because its diagnosis requires clinical-pathologic correlation, the true incidence of SO is unknown, and there is a need to understand the recent trends in risk factors and frequency of this condition. Methods: Pathology records of all enucleated or eviscerated (ENEV) eyes at three pathology laboratories were reviewed. Data collected included patient demographics, procedure indication, pathology diagnosis, and clinical history of trauma and uveitis. IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) was searched for all patients with SO, acquired absence of eye (AAE), and/or ENEV. Data obtained included patient demographics, ocular procedures, and preoperative diagnoses within 30 days of AAE/ENEV. Results: In the pathology laboratory setting, the incidence of SO over a 36-year period in patients who underwent ENEV was 0.2% (20/9,092); the 5-year incidence ranged from 0.0 to 0.3%. Among the 20 eyes with SO, the inciting event was surgical trauma in 50% (10/20), nonsurgical trauma in 45% (9/20), and missing/undetermined in 5% (1/20). SO was suspected preoperatively in 7/20 (35%) patients. Clinical concern for SO and ruptured globe were indications for ENEV in 50/9,092 (0.5%) and 872/9,092 (10%) patients, respectively. In the IRIS Registry, 0.7% (199/27,830) of patients with AAE/ENEV had diagnosis of SO. The frequency of SO between 2015 and 2020 was 0.01% (7,371/62,318,249); of these 7,371 cases, 199 (3%) had AAE/ENEV. In 25,975 patients with available data, injury and SO were listed as diagnoses less than 30 days prior to AAE/ENEV in 909 (4%) and 63 (0.2%) cases, respectively. Conclusion: The frequency of SO in recent decades has been low. Most cases of SO are not managed with eye removal. In histopathology-confirmed SO, surgical trauma is as frequent as nonsurgical trauma as an inciting etiology of disease.

Is Artificial Intelligence the Cost-Saving Lens to Diabetic Retinopathy Screening in Low- and Middle-Income Countries?

Diabetes is a rapidly growing global health crisis disproportionately affecting low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The emergence of diabetes as a global pandemic is one of the major challenges to human health, as long-term microvascular complications such as diabetic retinopathy (DR) can lead to irreversible blindness. Leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) technology may improve the diagnostic accuracy, efficiency, and accessibility of DR screenings across LMICs. However, there is a gap between the potential of AI technology and its implementation in clinical practice. The main objective of this systematic review is to summarize the currently available literature on the health economic assessments of AI implementation for DR screening in LMICs. The review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. We conducted an extensive systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Web of Science on July 15, 2023. Our review included full-text English-language articles from any publication year. The Joanna Briggs Institute's (JBI) critical appraisal checklist for economic evaluations was used to rate the quality and rigor of the selected articles. The initial search generated 1,423 records and was narrowed to five full-text articles through comprehensive inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of the five articles included in our systematic review, two used a cost-effectiveness analysis, two used a cost-utility analysis, and one used both a cost-effectiveness analysis and a cost-utility analysis. Across the five articles, LMICs such as China, Thailand, and Brazil were represented in the economic evaluations and models. Overall, three out of the five articles concluded that AI-based DR screening was more cost-effective in comparison to standard-of-care screening methods. Our systematic review highlights the need for more primary health economic analyses that carefully evaluate the economic implications of adopting AI technology for DR screening in LMICs. We hope this systematic review will offer valuable guidance to healthcare providers, scientists, and legislators to support appropriate decision-making regarding the implementation of AI algorithms for DR screening in healthcare workflows.

Multimodal Deep Learning Classifier for Primary Open Angle Glaucoma Diagnosis Using Wide-Field Optic Nerve Head Cube Scans in Eyes With and Without High Myopia.

PRCIS: An optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based multimodal deep learning (DL) classification model, including texture information, is introduced that outperforms single-modal models and multimodal models without texture information for glaucoma diagnosis in eyes with and without high myopia. BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a multimodal DL classifier using wide OCT optic nerve head cube scans in eyes with and without axial high myopia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred seventy-one primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) eyes and 86 healthy eyes, all without axial high myopia [axial length (AL) ≤ 26 mm] and 92 POAG eyes and 44 healthy eyes, all with axial high myopia (AL > 26 mm) were included. The multimodal DL classifier combined features of 3 individual VGG-16 models: (1) texture-based en face image, (2) retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness map image, and (3) confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope (cSLO) image. Age, AL, and disc area adjusted area under the receiver operating curves were used to compare model accuracy. RESULTS: Adjusted area under the receiver operating curve for the multimodal DL model was 0.91 (95% CI = 0.87, 0.95). This value was significantly higher than the values of individual models [0.83 (0.79, 0.86) for texture-based en face image; 0.84 (0.81, 0.87) for RNFL thickness map; and 0.68 (0.61, 0.74) for cSLO image; all P ≤ 0.05]. Using only highly myopic eyes, the multimodal DL model showed significantly higher diagnostic accuracy [0.89 (0.86, 0.92)] compared with texture en face image [0.83 (0.78, 0.85)], RNFL [0.85 (0.81, 0.86)] and cSLO image models [0.69 (0.63, 0.76)] (all P ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Combining OCT-based RNFL thickness maps with texture-based en face images showed a better ability to discriminate between healthy and POAG than thickness maps alone, particularly in high axial myopic eyes.

United States Population Disparities in Ophthalmic Care: Blindness and Visual Impairment in the IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight).

PURPOSE: To evaluate associations of patient characteristics with United States eye care use and likelihood of blindness. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (19 546 016) with 2018 visual acuity (VA) records in the American Academy of Ophthalmology's IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight). METHODS: Legal blindness (20/200 or worse) and visual impairment (VI; worse than 20/40) were identified from corrected distance acuity in the better-seeing eye and stratified by patient characteristics. Multivariable logistic regressions evaluated associations with blindness and VI. Blindness was mapped by state and compared with population characteristics. Eye care use was analyzed by comparing population demographics with United States Census estimates and proportional demographic representation among blind patients versus a nationally representative US population sample (National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey [NHANES]). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence and odds ratios for VI and blindness; proportional representation in the IRIS® Registry, Census, and NHANES by patient demographics. RESULTS: Visual impairment was present in 6.98% (n = 1 364 935) and blindness in 0.98% (n = 190 817) of IRIS patients. Adjusted odds of blindness were highest among patients ≥ 85 years old (odds ratio [OR], 11.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10.33-13.59 vs. those 0-17 years old). Blindness also was associated positively with rural location and Medicaid, Medicare, or no insurance vs. commercial insurance. Hispanic (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.46-1.74) and Black (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.63-1.84) patients showed a higher odds of blindness versus White non-Hispanic patients. Proportional representation in IRIS Registry relative to the Census was higher for White than Hispanic (2- to 4-fold) or Black (11%-85%) patients (P < 0.001). Blindness overall was less prevalent in NHANES than IRIS Registry; however, prevalence in adults aged 60+ was lowest among Black participants in the NHANES (0.54%) and second highest among comparable Black adults in IRIS (1.57%). CONCLUSIONS: Legal blindness from low VA was present in 0.98% of IRIS patients and associated with rural location, public or no insurance, and older age. Compared with US Census estimates, minorities may be underrepresented among ophthalmology patients, and compared with NHANES population estimates, Black individuals may be overrepresented among blind IRIS Registry patients. These findings provide a snapshot of US ophthalmic care and highlight the need for initiatives to address disparities in use and blindness. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Retinal Detachment and Retinal Tear after Cataract Surgery: IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) Analysis.

Objective: To report the incidence of and evaluate demographic, ocular comorbidities, and intraoperative factors for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) and retinal tear (RT) after cataract surgery in the American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight). Design: Retrospective cohort study. Participants: Patients aged ≥ 40 years who underwent cataract surgery between 2014 and 2017. Methods: Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate demographic, comorbidity, and intraoperative factors associated with RRD and RT after cataract surgery. Main Outcome Measures: Incidence and risk factors for RRD or RT within 1 year of cataract surgery. Results: Of the 3 177 195 eyes of 1 983 712 patients included, 6690 (0.21%) developed RRD and 5489 (0.17%) developed RT without RRD within 1 year after cataract surgery. Multivariable logistic regression odds ratios (ORs) showed increased risk of RRD and RT, respectively, among men (OR 3.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.99-3.32; P < 0.001 and 1.79; 95% CI, 1.70-1.89; P < 0.001), and younger ages compared with patients aged > 70, peaking at age 40 to 50 for RRD (8.61; 95% CI, 7.74-9.58; P < 0.001) and age 50 to 60 for RT (2.74; 95% CI, 2.52-2.98; P < 0.001). Increased odds of RRD were observed for procedure eyes with lattice degeneration (LD) (10.53; 95% CI, 9.82-11.28; P < 0.001), hypermature cataract (1.61; 95% CI, 1.06-2.45; P = 0.03), complex cataract surgery (1.52; 95% CI, 1.4-1.66; P < 0.001), posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) (1.24; 95% CI, 1.15-1.34; P < 0.001), and high myopia (1.2; 95% CI, 1.14-1.27; P < 0.001). Lattice degeneration conferred the highest odds of RT (43.86; 95% CI, 41.39-46.49; P < 0.001). Conclusion: In the IRIS Registry, RRD occurs in approximately 1 in 500 cataract surgeries in patients aged > 40 years within 1 year of surgery. The presence of LD conferred the highest odds for RRD and RT after surgery. Additional risk factors for RRD included male gender, younger age, hypermature cataract, PVD, and high myopia. These data may be useful during the informed consent process for cataract surgery and help identify patients at a higher risk of retinal complications. Financial Disclosures: The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Thyroid Eye Disease and its Vision-Threatening Manifestations in the Academy IRIS Registry: 2014-2018.

PURPOSE: To evaluate prevalence of thyroid eye disease (TED) and associated factors in the American Academy of Ophthalmology IRISⓇ Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight). DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of the IRIS Registry. METHODS: IRIS Registry patients (18-90 years old) were classified as TED (ICD-9: 242.00, ICD-10: E05.00 on ≥2 visits) or non-TED cases, and prevalence was estimated. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) were estimated using logistic regression. RESULTS: 41,211 TED patients were identified. TED prevalence was 0.09%, showed a unimodal age distribution (highest prevalence in ages 50-59 years (y) (0.12%)), higher rates in females than males (0.12% vs. 0.04%) and in non-Hispanics than Hispanics (0.10% vs. 0.05%). Prevalence differed by race (from 0.08% in Asians to 0.12% in Black/African-Americans), with varying peak ages of prevalence. Factors associated with TED in multivariate analysis included age: ((18-<30y (reference), 30-39y: OR (95%CI) 2.2 (2.0, 2.4), 40-49y: 2.9 (2.7,3.1), 50-59y: 3.3 (3.1, 3. 5), 60-69y: 2.7 (2.54, 2.85), 70+: 1.5 (1.46, 1.64)); female sex vs male (reference), 3.5 (3.4,3.6), race: White (reference), Blacks: 1.1 (1.1,1.2), Asian: 0.9 (0.8,0.9), Hispanic ethnicity vs not Hispanic (reference), 0.68 (0.6,0.7), smoking status: (never (ref), former: 1.64 (1.6,1.7), current 2.16: (2.1,2.2)) and Type 1 diabetes (yes vs no (reference): 1.87 (1.8, 1.9). CONCLUSIONS: This epidemiologic profile of TED includes new observations such as a unimodal age distribution and racial variation in prevalence. Associations with female sex, smoking, and Type 1 diabetes are consistent with prior reports. These findings raise novel questions about TED in different populations.

Open-Globe Injury Repairs in the American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS® Registry 2014 - 2018: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Visual Outcomes.

PURPOSE: To estimate incidence and evaluate demographic risk factors and visual acuity (VA) outcomes of open-globe injuries requiring surgical repair in the IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with open-globe injury repairs (OGRs) were identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes (65275, 65280, 65285, 65286, 65235, 65260, and 65265) from 2014 through 2018 in the IRIS Registry. METHODS: Logistic regression models adjusting for age, sex, race, ethnicity, United States region, concurrent and subsequent surgeries, and baseline VA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes included annual and 5-year incidence rates per 100 000 people and factors associated with OGR, VA better than 20/40, and VA of 20/200 or worse at final follow-up (3-12 months after OGR). RESULTS: Thirteen thousand seven hundred sixty-six OGRs were identified; 5-year cumulative incidence was 28.0 per 100 000 patients. Open-globe repair was associated with age 21 to 40 years compared with younger than 21 years (odds ratio [OR], 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-1.7]), male sex (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 2.7-2.9), Black versus White race (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.2-1.4), Hispanic versus non-Hispanic ethnicity (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.6-1.8), and South (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.3-1.5) and West (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.2-1.4) versus Midwest regions and associated inversely with Asian versus White race (OR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.6-0.7). Visual acuity outcomes, analyzed in a subset of 2966 patients with VA data available, showed vision impairment (VA < 20/40) at final follow-up was associated with VA of 20/200 or worse at presentation (20/200 better than 20/40; OR, 11.1; 95% CI, 8.0-15.7), older age (e.g., > 80 years vs. < 21 years; OR, 5.8; 95% CI, 3.2-10.7), and Black versus White race (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3-2.6). Risk factors were similar for VA of 20/200 or worse after OGR. Among the 1063 patients undergoing OGR with VA of 20/200 or worse at presentation, VA did not improve to better than 20/200 at follow-up in 35% of patients (1063/2996). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings bring to light racial disparities in risk of OGR and poor visual outcomes that warrant further exploration. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Prevalence of and Associated Factors for Eyelid Cancer in the American Academy of Ophthalmology Intelligent Research in Sight Registry.

Purpose: To estimate the prevalence of eyelid cancers in the American Academy of Ophthalmology Intelligent Research in Sight (IRIS) Registry and evaluate the associated factors. Design: Retrospective IRIS Registry database study. Participants: All patients in the IRIS Registry between December 1, 2010, and December 1, 2018, with International Classification of Disease, ninth and 10th revisions, codes for eyelid cancers (basal cell carcinoma [BCC], squamous cell carcinoma [SCC], malignant melanoma [MM], sebaceous carcinoma/other specified malignant neoplasm [SBC], melanoma in situ [MIS], and unspecified malignant neoplasm [UMN]). Methods: The prevalence of each eyelid cancer type was estimated overall and by age group, sex, race, ethnicity, and smoking status. The associations between any eyelid cancer (AEC) or each cancer type and possible risk factors were examined using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. Main Outcome Measures: Prevalence of and associated factors for each eyelid cancer type. Results: There were 82 136 patients with eyelid cancer identified. The prevalence of AEC was 145.1 per 100 000 population. The cancer-specific prevalence ranged from 87.9 (BCC) to 25.6 (UMN), 11.1 (SCC), 5.0 (SBC), 4.1 (MM), and 0.4 (MIS) per 100 000 population. The prevalence of AEC and each cancer type increased with increasing age (all P < 0.0001), and the prevalence of AEC, BCC, SCC, and MM was higher in males (all P < 0.0001), MIS (P = 0.02). The prevalence of BCC, SCC, MM, SBC, and AEC was highest in Whites versus that in patients of any other race (all P < 0.0001). In the multivariate logistic regression model with associated risk factors (age, sex, race, ethnicity, and smoking status), AEC was associated with older age groups ([< 20 years reference {ref.}]; odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 20-39 years: 3.35 [1.96-5.72]; 40-65 years: 24.21 [14.80-39.59]; and > 65 years: 42.78 [26.18-69.90]), male sex (female [ref.]; 1.40 [1.33-1.48]), White race (inverse associations with African Americans [0.12 {0.09-0.16}], Asians [0.19 {0.13-0.26}], others [0.59 {0.40-0.89}]), and ethnicity (non-Hispanic [ref.]; Hispanic: 0.38 [0.33-0.45]; unknown: 0.81 [0.75-0.88]). Active smoking (never smoker [ref.]) was associated with AEC (1.11 [1.01-1.21]), BCC (1.27 [1.23-1.31]), SCC (1.59 [1.46-1.73]), and MM (1.26 [1.08-1.46]). Conclusions: This study reports the overall and cancer-specific prevalence of eyelid cancers using a large national clinical eye disease database. Smoking was found to be associated with AEC, BCC, SCC, and MM, which is a new observation. This epidemiologic profile of on-eyelid cancers is valuable for identifying patients at a higher risk of malignancy, allocating medical resources, and improving cancer care.

Macula structural and vascular differences in glaucoma eyes with and without high axial myopia.

AIMS: To identify clinically relevant parameters for identifying glaucoma in highly myopic eyes, an investigation was conducted of the relationship between the thickness of various retinal layers and the superficial vessel density (sVD) of the macula with axial length (AL) and visual field mean deviation (VFMD). METHODS: 270 glaucoma patients (438 eyes) participating in the Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma cross-sectional study representing three axial myopia groups (non-myopia: n=163 eyes; mild myopia: n=218 eyes; high myopia (AL>26 mm): n=57 eyes) who completed macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT-angiography imaging were included. Associations of AL and VFMD with the thickness of the ganglion cell inner plexiform layer (GCIPL), macular retinal nerve fibre layer (mRNFL), ganglion cell complex (GCC), macular choroidal thickness (mCT) and sVD were evaluated. RESULTS: Thinner Global GCIPL and GCC were significantly associated with worse VFMD (R2=34.5% and R2=32.9%; respectively p<0.001), but not with AL (all p>0.1). Thicker mRNFL showed a weak association with increasing AL (R2=2.4%; p=0.005) and a positive association with VFMD (global R2=19.2%; p<0.001). Lower sVD was weakly associated with increasing AL (R2=1.8%; p=0.028) and more strongly associated with more severe glaucoma VFMD (R2=29.6%; p<0.001). Thinner mCT was associated with increasing AL (R2=15.5% p<0.001) and not associated with VFMD (p=0.194). mRNFL was thickest while mCT was thinnest in all sectors of high myopic eyes. CONCLUSIONS: As thinner GCIPL and GCC were associated with increasing severity of glaucoma but were not significantly associated with AL, they may be useful for monitoring glaucoma in highly myopic eyes.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Macular Thickness Map and Texture En Face Images for Detecting Glaucoma in Eyes With Axial High Myopia.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a novel optical coherence tomography texture-based en face image analysis (SALSA-Texture) that requires segmentation of only 1 retinal layer for glaucoma detection in eyes with axial high myopia, and to compare SALSA-Texture with standard macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness, macular retinal nerve fiber layer (mRNFL) thickness, and ganglion cell complex (GCC) thickness maps. DESIGN: Comparison of diagnostic approaches. METHODS: Cross-sectional data were collected from 92 eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and 44 healthy control eyes with axial high myopia (axial length >26 mm). Optical coherence tomography texture en face images, developed using SALSA-Texture to model the spatial arrangement patterns of the pixel intensities in a region, were generated from 70-µm slabs just below the vitreal border of the inner limiting membrane. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) and areas under the precision recall curves (AUPRCs) adjusted for both eyes, axial length, age, disc area, and image quality were used to compare different approaches. RESULTS: The best parameter-adjusted AUROCs (95% confidence intervals) for differentiating between healthy and glaucoma high myopic eyes were 0.92 (0.88-0.94) for texture en face images, 0.88 (0.86-0.91) for macular RNFL thickness, 0.87 (0.83-0.89) for macula GCIPL thickness, and 0.87 (0.84-0.89) for GCC thickness. A subset analysis of highly advanced myopic eyes (axial length ≥27 mm; 38 glaucomatous eyes and 22 healthy eyes) showed the best AUROC was 0.92 (0.89-0.94) for texture en face images compared with 0.86 (0.84-0.88) for macular GCIPL, 0.86 (0.84-0.88) for GCC, and 0.84 (0.81-0.87) for RNFL thickness (P ≤ .02 compared with texture for all comparisons). CONCLUSION: The current results suggest that our novel en face texture-based analysis method can improve on most investigated macular tissue thickness measurements for discriminating between highly myopic glaucomatous and highly myopic healthy eyes. While further investigation is needed, texture en face images show promise for improving the detection of glaucoma in eyes with high myopia where traditional retinal layer segmentation often is challenging.

Endophthalmitis Rate in Immediately Sequential versus Delayed Sequential Bilateral Cataract Surgery within the Intelligent Research in Sight (IRIS®) Registry Data.

PURPOSE: To compare the rate of postoperative endophthalmitis after immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS) versus delayed sequential bilateral cataract surgery (DSBCS) using the American Academy of Ophthalmology Intelligent Research in Sight (IRIS®) Registry database. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients in the IRIS Registry who underwent cataract surgery from 2013 through 2018. METHODS: Patients who underwent cataract surgery were divided into 2 groups: (1) ISBCS and (2) DSBCS (second-eye surgery ≥1 day after the first-eye surgery) or unilateral surgery. Postoperative endophthalmitis was defined as endophthalmitis occurring within 4 weeks of surgery by International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code and ICD code with additional clinical criteria. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rate of postoperative endophthalmitis. RESULTS: Of 5 573 639 IRIS Registry patients who underwent cataract extraction, 165 609 underwent ISBCS, and 5 408 030 underwent DSBCS or unilateral surgery (3 695 440 DSBCS, 1 712 590 unilateral surgery only). A total of 3102 participants (0.056%) met study criteria of postoperative endophthalmitis with supporting clinical findings. The rates of endophthalmitis in either surgery eye between the 2 surgery groups were similar (0.059% in the ISBCS group vs. 0.056% in the DSBCS or unilateral group; P = 0.53). Although the incidence of endophthalmitis was slightly higher in the ISBCS group compared with the DSBCS or unilateral group, the odds ratio did not reach statistical significance (1.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-1.31; P = 0.47) after adjusting for age, sex, race, insurance status, and comorbid eye disease. Seven cases of bilateral endophthalmitis with supporting clinical data in the DSBCS group and no cases in the ISBCS group were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Risk of postoperative endophthalmitis was not statistically significantly different between patients who underwent ISBCS and DSBCS or unilateral cataract surgery.

Age, Gender, and Laterality of Retinal Vascular Occlusion: A Retrospective Study from the IRIS® Registry.

PURPOSE: Retinal vascular occlusion is a leading cause of profound irreversible visual loss, but the understanding of the disease is insufficient. We systematically investigated the age, gender, and laterality at the onset of retinal artery occlusion (RAO) and retinal vein occlusion (RVO) in the Intelligent Research in Sight (IRIS®) Registry. DESIGN: Retrospective registry cohort. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with retinal vascular occlusion participating in the IRIS® Registry. METHODS: Patients who received a diagnosis of retinal vascular occlusion between 2013 and 2017 were included. Those with unspecified gender or laterality were excluded when conducting the relevant analyses. Patients were categorized into RAO, with subtypes transient retinal artery occlusion (TRAO), partial retinal artery occlusion (PRAO), branch retinal artery occlusion (BRAO), and central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO), and into RVO, with subtypes venous engorgement (VE), branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO), and central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). Age was evaluated as a categorical variable (5-year increments). We investigated the association of age, gender, and laterality with the onset frequency of retinal vascular occlusion subtypes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The frequency of onset of RAO and RVO subtypes by age, gender and laterality. RESULTS: A total of 1 251 476 patients with retinal vascular occlusion were included, 23.8% of whom had RAO, whereas 76.2% had RVO. Of these, 1 248 656 and 798 089 patients were selected for analyses relevant to gender and laterality, respectively. The onset frequency of all subtypes increased with age. PRAO, BRAO, CRAO, and CRVO presented more frequently in men (53.5%, 51.3%, 52.6%, and 50.4%, respectively), whereas TRAO, VE, and BRVO presented more frequently in women (54.9%, 56.0%, and 54.5% respectively). All RAO subtypes and BRVO showed a right-eye onset preference (TRAO, 51.7%; PRAO, 54.4%; BRAO, 53.5%; CRAO, 53.4%; and BRVO, 51.0%), whereas VE and CRVO exhibited a left-eye onset preference (53.3% and 50.9%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Although retinal vascular occlusion incidence increases with age regardless of subtypes, we found various subtype-specific disease-onset differences related to gender and, in particular, ocular laterality. These findings may improve understanding of the specific cause of retinal vascular occlusions of different subtypes and their relationships with structural and anatomic asymmetries of the vascular system.

Does Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) Treatment Influence Patient Falls and Mobility? A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD), a leading cause of irreversible blindness, increases fall risk through impaired central vision. Falls place an enormous economic burden on healthcare systems. We hypothesized that AMD treatments may reduce patients' falls risk. This systematic review (ID #: 172623) synthesized the current understanding of wet and dry AMD treatments' impact on patient falls and mobility, connecting these two public health issues. METHODS: On April 17, 2020, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were queried. Clinical trials and observational studies were included, while non-English and non-primary studies were excluded. Two authors screened, extracted data, and assessed bias using RoB-2 and ROBINS-I. A third author served as a tie breaker. RESULTS: This database search resulted in 3,525 studies, with an additional 112 identified through bibliography review. Ten articles met eligibility criteria. Most studies featured the outcome of interest as a secondary outcome (n = 4) and patient-reported adverse events (n = 5), rather than a primary focus (n = 2). Ten out of the 11 outcomes had a moderate to serious risk of bias. No two studies used the same instrument to measure falls or mobility. CONCLUSION: Despite the potential positive impact of AMD treatments on patient falls and mobility, quality data on this relationship are lacking. This work underscores the need to broaden ophthalmologic research outcomes beyond visual parameters to include patient-centred, functional measures. Incorporating standardized methods to track falls and screen for difficulty with walking and balance would enable evaluation of AMD treatments on functional outcomes, potentially helping guide management.