Pretreatment with endothelium-derived nitric oxide synthesis modulators on gastrointestinal microcirculation during NOTES: an experimental study.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: On-demand endoscopic insufflation during natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) adversely affects microcirculatory blood flow (MBF), even with low mean intra-abdominal pressure, suggesting that shear stress caused by time-varying flow fluctuations has a great impact on microcirculation. As shear stress is inversely related to vascular diameter, nitric oxide (NO) production acts as a brake to vasoconstriction. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether pretreatment by NO synthesis modulators protects gastrointestinal MBF during transgastric peritoneoscopy. METHODS: Fourteen pigs submitted to cholecystectomy by endoscope CO2 insufflation for 60 min were randomized into 2 groups: (1) 150 mg/kg of N-acetyl cysteine (NAC, n = 7) and (2) 4 ml/kg of hypertonic saline 7.5 % (HS, n = 7), and compared to a non-treated NOTES group (n = 7). Five animals made up a sham group. Colored microspheres were used to assess changes in MBF. RESULTS: The average level of intra-abdominal pressure was similar in all groups (9 mmHg). In NOTES group microcirculation decrease compared with baseline was greater in renal cortex, mesocolon, and mesentery (41, 42, 44 %, respectively, p < 0.01) than in renal medulla, colon, and small bowel (29, 32, 34, respectively, p < 0.05). NAC avoided the peritoneoscopy effect on renal medulla and cortex (4 and 14 % decrease, respectively) and reduced the impact on colon and small bowel (20 % decrease). HS eliminated MBF changes in colon and small bowel (14 % decrease) and modulated MBF in renal medulla and cortex (19 % decrease). Neither treatment influenced mesentery MBF decrease. CONCLUSIONS: Both pretreatments can effectively attenuate peritoneoscopy-induced deleterious effects on gastrointestinal MBF.

Effect of transgastric natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery peritoneoscopy on abdominal organ microcirculation: an experimental controlled study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: On-demand insufflation during endoscopic peritoneoscopy causes wide variations in intra-abdominal pressure. Its effects on splanchnic microcirculation may differ from those of steady intra-abdominal pressure, because pressure characteristics affect crucial intravascular hemodynamic forces--pressure and shear--adapting flow to local metabolic needs. Our aim was to assess the effect of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) peritoneoscopy on splanchnic microcirculatory blood flow. METHODS: Twenty-one swine were randomized to the following: cholecystectomy by transgastric NOTES (n = 8), cholecystectomy by standard laparoscopy (Lap) (n = 8), and a sham group (n = 5). During NOTES, CO2 was manually insufflated with a maximum allowed pressure of 30 mm Hg. In the Lap group, intra-abdominal pressure was maintained at 14 mm Hg. Systemic hemodynamics were measured, and microcirculatory blood flow was quantified by using colored microspheres. RESULTS: Mean intra-abdominal pressure was lower in NOTES than in the Lap group (P = .038). In both groups, cardiac index and preload remained unchanged, whereas systemic vascular resistances increased over time, with a lesser increase in the Lap group (2-way analysis of variance; P = .041). In pneumoperitoneum groups, microcirculatory blood flow decreased similarly in the renal medulla, stomach, small bowel, colon, and mesocolon by 30%, 45%, 34%, 32%, and 37%, respectively. In NOTES, there was a greater microcirculatory blood flow decrease in the renal cortex (NOTES 41% vs Lap 35%; P = .044) and mesentery (NOTES 44% vs Lap 38%; P = .041). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that both types of pneumoperitoneum have similar physiologic effects on microcirculatory blood flow. However, on-demand pneumoperitoneum (NOTES group) caused a greater microcirculatory blood flow decrease in areas with low metabolic needs, redistributing blood flow toward metabolically active areas.