Prevalence of Central Venous Stenosis among Black and White ESKD Patients with Dysfunctional Dialysis Access.

In the United States, significant racial and ethnic disparities exist in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and its management. Hemodialysis constitutes the main stay of renal replacement therapy for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), which is initiated using central venous catheters (CVC) in most CKD patients in the United States. Black ESKD patients have higher usage and greater time on CVC for hemodialysis compared to White patients. This trend places Black patients at a potentially higher risk for CVC-related complications such as central venous stenosis (CVS). We posited that Black patients would have a higher prevalence and a greater risk of CVS. A retrospective review was performed of ESKD patients who underwent a fistulogram for dialysis access malfunction. CVS was defined as > 50% stenosis in the central veins. Fistulograms of 428 ESKD patients were adjudicated, and CVS was noted in 167 of these patients. Of the entire cohort, 370 fistulograms belonged to self-reported unique Black and White ESKD patients, of whom 137 patients were noted to have CVS. There was no difference in the of CVS between Black (40%) and White (41%) ESKD patients. However, a higher severity of stenosis (>70%) (P = 0.03) was noted in White ESKD patients. An unadjusted model showed a significant association between CVS and cardiovascular disease and the use of CVCs. The risk-adjusted model showed a significant association between diabetes and CVS. Unlike arterial stenotic lesions, this work for the first time demonstrated higher prevalence of severe venous stenotic lesions in White ESKD patients and linked diabetes to stenotic venous disease. This work paves the way for future studies investigating the risk and influence of race and ethnicity on CVS using a larger and diverse data set.

Cost analysis of two modalities of continuous renal replacement therapy.

BACKGROUND: Continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) and continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (CVVHD) are costly therapies reserved for use in critically ill patients with kidney failure. DESIGN: Quality improvement study at St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Members of nephrology and pharmacy department, working alongside intensive care unit nursing staff and hospital administration, undertook an initiative to transition from CVVH to CVVHD, to simplify therapy administration, lessen need for electrolyte repletion, and reduce total treatment-related costs. QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN: We postulated that conversion from CVVH to CVVHD would result in fewer filter clotting events, longer filter use (up to 72 hours), lower resource utilization, and confer overall cost benefit. Over 12 months, patients initiated on CVVH were identified. Following conversion to CVVHD, patients initiated on CVVHD over 9 months were identified. Patient characteristics, comorbidities, and hospital-related outcomes, as well as CRRT-related information including treatment modality, treatment duration, and treatment-related costs were obtained. MEASURES: Daily treatment-related costs, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay (LOS), and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: During the baseline period, 77 patients were initiated on CVVH, and during the intervention period, 60 patients were initiated on CVVHD. Following conversion from CVVH to CVVHD, mean (±SD) daily total treatment cost decreased from $1813 ± $2143 to $775 ± $766 (P < 0.001). Conversion from CVVH to CVVHD had no impact on intensive care unit LOS (11.8 ± 9.7 vs. 12.4 ± 9.5 days; P = 0.53), hospital LOS (15.0 ± 11.1 vs. 16.4 ± 14.0 days; P = 0.89), or in-hospital mortality (58% vs. 60%; P = 0.85). LIMITATIONS: Nursing costs, costs of dialysis machine utilization, phosphate repletion, and systemic anti-coagulation were not studied. CONCLUSION: Transition from CVVH to CVVHD resulted in a significant cost benefit and reduced resource utilization. There was no difference in LOS and in-hospital mortality between the two treatment modalities.

Hemodialysis for treatment of levofloxacin-induced neurotoxicity.

Levofloxacin, a third-generation fluoroquinolone antibiotic, is rarely associated with neurotoxicity. Patients with advanced kidney disease are particularly vulnerable to this adverse effect. We present two elderly patients with kidney failure who developed levofloxacin-induced neurotoxicity, which was successfully treated with frequent hemodialysis, resulting in the full resolution of their symptoms. Neurotoxicity is a well-known side effect of fluoroquinolone antibiotics. Postulated mechanisms include inhibition of the gamma-aminobutyric acid A receptors and activation of the excitatory N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. Risk factors include older age, kidney disease, pre-existing neurological disorders, and drug-drug interactions. While management of levofloxacin-induced neurotoxicity includes discontinuation of the drug and supportive care, hemodialysis is not recommended, despite available pharmacokinetic data in support of its dialyzability. The successful use of hemodialysis for the treatment of levofloxacin-induced neurotoxicity observed in our two patients with kidney failure should be further considered for rapid resolution of this rare fluoroquinolone-related adverse effect in patients with impaired kidney function.