Retrospective review of antimicrobial use for gastroschisis patients in Kigali, Rwanda: can improved stewardship reduce late inpatient deaths?

Gastroschisis mortality is 75-100% in low-resource settings. In Rwanda, late deaths are often due to sepsis. We aimed to understand the effect of antimicrobial use on survival. We conducted a retrospective review of gastroschisis patients at a tertiary hospital in Kigali, Rwanda between January 2016-June 2019. Demographics, antimicrobial use, microbiology, and outcomes were abstracted. Descriptive and univariate analyses were conducted to assess factors associated with improved survival. Among 92 gastroschisis patients, mortality was 77%(n = 71); 23%(n = 21) died within 48 h. 98%(n = 90) of patients received antibiotics on arrival. Positive blood cultures were obtained in 41%(n = 38). Patients spent 86%(SD = 20%) of their hospital stay on antibiotics and 38%(n = 35) received second-line agents. There was no difference in age at arrival, birth weight, gestational age, silo complications, or antimicrobial selection between survivors and non-survivors. Late death patients spent more total hospital days and post-abdominal closure days on antibiotics (p < 0.001) compared to survivors. There was no difference in the proportion of hospital stay on second-line antibiotics (p = 0.1). CONCLUSION: We identified frequent late deaths, prolonged antibiotic courses, and regular use of second-line antibiotic agents in this retrospective cohort of Rwandan gastroschisis patients. Future studies are needed to evaluate antimicrobial resistance in pediatric surgical patients in Rwanda. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Global disparities in gastroschisis outcomes are extreme, with <4% mortality in high-income settings and 75-100% mortality in low-income settings. • Antimicrobial surveillance data is sparse across Africa, but existing evidence suggests high levels of resistance to first-line antibiotics in Rwanda. WHAT IS NEW: • In-hospital survival for gastroschisis was 23% from 2016-2019 and most deaths occurred late (>48hrs after admission) due to sepsis. • Rwandan gastroschisis patients received prolonged courses of antibiotics and second-line antibiotics were frequently used without culture data, raising concern for antimicrobial resistance.

Experience of Rwanda on COVID-19 Case Management: From Uncertainties to the Era of Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibodies.

The management of COVID-19 in Rwanda has been dynamic, and the use of COVID-19 therapeutics has gradually been updated based on scientific discoveries. The treatment for COVID-19 remained patient-centered and entirely state-sponsored during the first and second waves. From the time of identification of the index case in March 2020 up to August 2021, three versions of the clinical management guidelines were developed, with the aim of ensuring that the COVID-19 patients treated in Rwanda were receiving care based on the most recent therapeutic discoveries. As the case load increased and imposed imminent heavy burdens on the healthcare system, a smooth transition was made to enable that the asymptomatic and mild COVID-19 cases could continue to be closely observed and managed while they remained in their homes. The care provided to patients requiring facility-based interventions mainly focused on the provision of anti-inflammatory drugs, anticoagulation, broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy, management of hyperglycemia and the provision of therapeutics with a direct antiviral effect such as favipiravir and neutralizing monoclonal antibodies. The time to viral clearance was observed to be shortest among eligible patients treated with neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (bamlanivimab). Moving forward, as we strive to continue detecting COVID-19 cases as early as possible, and promptly initiate supportive interventions, the use of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies constitutes an attractive and cost-effective therapeutic approach. If this approach is used strategically along with other measures in place (i.e., COVID-19 vaccine roll out, etc.), it will enable us to bring this global battle against the COVID-19 pandemic under full control and with a low case fatality rate.

Predictors of Survival: A Retrospective Review of Gastroschisis and Intestinal Atresia in Rwanda.

INTRODUCTION: Neonatal surgical diseases are prime examples of the global disparity in surgical access and outcomes, with survival for conditions like gastroschisis reaching above 95% in high-income settings but usually fatal in low-income settings. This study aims to examine outcomes and predictors of mortality in patients with two specific neonatal surgical conditions that often require early transfer and prolonged inpatient care (gastroschisis and intestinal atresia) at Rwanda's main pediatric referral hospital. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective chart review of neonates with gastroschisis and intestinal atresia was conducted between January 2016 and June 2019. Abstracted data included demographics, referral history, admission interventions, operative details, in-hospital complications, nutrition patterns, length of stay, and mortality. Daily logs were created to evaluate feeding status, infection status, and antibiotic usage. Descriptive and univariate analysis was conducted, with the primary outcome being survival to hospital discharge. RESULTS: A total of 112 patients met inclusion criteria (82% gastroschisis [n = 92] and 18% intestinal atresia [n = 20]). Median age at arrival was 0 d (GS) [IQR 0-1 d] and 8.5 d (IA) [IQR 4-10 d] (P < 0.0001). Survival to discharge was 22.8% (GS) (n = 21) and 60% (IA) (n = 12) with a mean length of stay of 28.3 d (GS) and 18.4 d (IA). The median number of days to initiation of oral feeds was 8.5 d [IQR 7-11] for gastroschisis survivors. CONCLUSIONS: Neonatal surgical conditions that require early transfer and prolonged nutritional intervention are challenging in low-resource settings, but through treatment by a comprehensive pediatric surgical service, improving survival is possible.

Should We Offer Surgery for Biliary Atresia in Low-Resource Settings? Surgical Outcomes in Rwanda.

BACKGROUND: In many resource-limited settings, patients with biliary atresia present too late for surgical correction to be offered, and the diagnosis is fatal. As pediatric surgical and anesthesia capabilities have improved, patients in Rwanda have been offered surgical exploration. This study explores initial outcomes. METHODS: Patients presenting with direct hyperbilirubinemia and clinical suspicion of biliary atresia were identified at the main university teaching hospital in Kigali, Rwanda, from January 2016 to June 2019. Patient demographics, referral history, geographic location, preoperative imaging, preoperative laboratory studies, operative details, postoperative laboratory studies, in-hospital complications, length of stay, and survival were abstracted from retrospective chart review. Descriptive analysis was performed, and univariate analysis evaluated survival and complications. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were identified with biliary atresia, and thirteen were offered surgery. The median age of admission was 77 d (interquartile range [IQR] 63-92 d), with the median time wait for the operation being 19 d (IQR 9-27 d). The median age at operation was 93 d (IQR 76-123 d). In-hospital postoperative mortality was 15.4% (n = 2) and postoperative complications occurred in 46.2% (n = 6). Eleven patients survived to hospital discharge (84.6%), with a median length of stay of 8 d (IQR 6-13 d). CONCLUSIONS: While future studies are needed to evaluate the long-term outcomes, this series shows that surgical treatment of biliary atresia can be safely performed in Rwanda. Early referral of direct hyperbilirubinemia is essential, particularly as limited resources and personnel may impact the time from diagnosis to operation.