Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Pediatr ; 23(1): 33, 2023 01 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36670403

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of studies are evaluating the safety of intravenous sedation compared with that of general anesthesia; however, data on bleeding complications after pediatric percutaneous renal biopsy performed under intravenous sedation or general anesthesia are lacking. We aimed to examine differences in bleeding complications between intravenous sedation and general anesthesia in pediatric patients. METHODS: Data of pediatric patients aged ≤ 15 years undergoing percutaneous kidney biopsy for kidney disease between July 2007 and March 2019 were retrieved from a national inpatient database in Japan. We examined differences in bleeding complications after renal biopsy performed under intravenous sedation, defined by the absence of the record of general anesthesia with intubation but by the presence of intravenous sedation during biopsy, and general anesthesia, defined by the presence of the record of general anesthesia with intubation during biopsy, among pediatric patients admitted for percutaneous renal biopsy. We performed binomial regression using overlap weights based on propensity scores for patients receiving intravenous sedation. Analyses stratified by age or sex, a sensitivity analysis using generalized estimating equations considering cluster effects by hospital among a propensity score-matched cohort, and another sensitivity analysis using the instrumental variable method were performed to confirm the robustness of the results. RESULTS: We identified 6,560 biopsies performed in 5,999 children aged 1-15 years from 328 hospitals and 178 events. Only three severe complications and no death were observed. No significant difference in the proportion of bleeding complications was observed between procedures performed under intravenous sedation and those performed under general anesthesia (unadjusted proportions, 2.8% and 2.3%; adjusted proportions, 2.5% and 2.2%), with an unadjusted relative risk of 1.21 (95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.81) and adjusted relative risk of 1.13 (95% confidence interval, 0.74-1.73). Both age- and sex-stratified analyses yielded similar results. The analysis using generalized estimating equation and the instrumental variable method showed relative risks of 0.95 (95% confidence interval, 0.48-1.88) and 1.18 (95% confidence interval, 0.74-1.89), respectively. CONCLUSION: This retrospective cohort study using a national database revealed that the risk of biopsy-related bleeding was comparable between intravenous sedation and general anesthesia during pediatric percutaneous kidney biopsy, suggesting that intravenous sedation alone and general anesthesia may have a similar bleeding risk in pediatric percutaneous kidney biopsies.


Assuntos
Anestesia Geral , Sedação Consciente , Humanos , Criança , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sedação Consciente/métodos , Anestesia Geral/efeitos adversos , Rim , Biópsia/efeitos adversos
2.
BMC Geriatr ; 22(1): 950, 2022 12 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36494609

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Low body mass index (BMI) in older individuals with decreased kidney function is important because of its association with poor prognosis and frailty. Herein, we aimed to clarify the association between BMI and in-hospital mortality among older patients with non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD) stratified by kidney function. METHODS: Using data from the Medical Vision Database, this multicentre cohort study included people aged ≥ 60 years with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 but without dialysis dependency, hospitalised for bacterial pneumonia during 2014-2019. We compared the risk of in-hospital death between patients with BMI categories based on the quartiles (low, medium-low, medium-high, and high) setting medium-high BMI as a reference. We further assessed the association with BMI using a cubic spline, setting BMI as a nonlinear continuous variable and a BMI of 22 kg/m2 as a reference. We also evaluated the association between BMI and kidney function using a generalised additive model adjusted for interaction terms between nonlinear continuous BMI and kidney function. RESULTS: We obtained data for 3,952 patients, with 350 (8.9%) in-hospital deaths. When compared with medium-high BMI, low BMI was associated with an increased risk of death and longer hospital stay, whereas the other two categories were comparable. Models using a cubic spline showing an association between BMI and in-hospital death showed an L-shaped curve; BMI < 22.0 kg/m2 was associated with an increased risk for mortality, and at a BMI of 18.5 kg/m2, the odds ratio was 1.43 with a 95% confidence interval of 1.26-1.61 when compared with a BMI of 22.0 kg/m2. Analysis of the interactive effects of kidney function using the generalised additive model showed that a protective association of high BMI tapered along with decreased kidney function. CONCLUSIONS: This cohort study suggests not only that lower BMI and low kidney function are associated with in-hospital mortality independently but also that the protective effects of high BMI weaken as kidney function decreases via the analysis of the interaction terms. This study highlights the necessity for the prevention of underweight and demonstrates the interaction between BMI and kidney function in older patients with non-dialysis-dependent CKD.


Assuntos
Pneumonia Bacteriana , Insuficiência Renal Crônica , Humanos , Idoso , Índice de Massa Corporal , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/diagnóstico , Pneumonia Bacteriana/complicações
3.
BMJ Open ; 12(4): e060390, 2022 04 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35466081

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the impact of the first and second waves of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare service use by non-COVID-19 patients. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Hospital-based claims database from anonymised hospitals in Japan. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (n=785 495) who visited and/or were hospitalised in 26 anonymised hospitals in Japan between January 2017 and November 2020. OUTCOME MEASURES: We compared changes in the monthly number of hospitalisations (overall or by diagnosis), outpatient visits, endoscopic fibrescopies (EFs), rehabilitations, outpatient chemotherapy treatments, maintenance haemodialysis treatments and outpatient prescriptions between pre-COVID-19 years and the same period in 2020. RESULTS: The overall number of hospitalisations and outpatient visits decreased by 27% and 22%, respectively, in May 2020, of which the most substantial decrease was observed in the paediatrics department (65% and 51%, respectively). The number of hospitalisations for respiratory diseases, circulatory diseases, malignant neoplasms and digestive diseases decreased by a maximum of 55%, 32%, 10% and 26%, respectively, in 2020. The number of hospitalisations for non-COVID-19 pneumonia in patients aged <16 years, patients aged ≥16 years and patients with asthma decreased by 93%, 43% and 80%, respectively, in May 2020. EFs and outpatient rehabilitations decreased by >30%. In contrast, outpatient chemotherapy and maintenance haemodialysis treatments decreased by <10%, if at all. Outpatient prescriptions decreased by a maximum of 20% in 2020, with the largest decrease observed in drugs for obstructive airway diseases and cough and cold preparations. CONCLUSIONS: The use of healthcare services by non-COVID-19 patients was most affected during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in May 2020. The number of hospitalisations for respiratory diseases, particularly non-COVID-19 pneumonia and asthma, drastically decreased, while the number of hospitalisations and outpatient chemotherapies for malignant neoplasms or maintenance haemodialysis was less affected.


Assuntos
Asma , COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Criança , Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Japão/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Diabetes Care ; 45(6): 1346-1354, 2022 06 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35435949

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Reportedly, two-thirds of the patients who were positive for diabetes during screening failed to attend a follow-up visit for diabetes care in Japan. We aimed to develop a machine-learning model for predicting people's failure to attend a follow-up visit. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults with newly screened diabetes at a national screening program using a large Japanese insurance claims database (JMDC, Tokyo, Japan). We defined failure to attend a follow-up visit for diabetes care as no physician consultation during the 6 months after the screening. The candidate predictors were patient demographics, comorbidities, and medication history. In the training set (randomly selected 80% of the sample), we developed two models (previously reported logistic regression model and Lasso regression model). In the test set (remaining 20%), prediction performance was examined. RESULTS: We identified 10,645 patients, including 5,450 patients who failed to attend follow-up visits for diabetes care. The Lasso regression model using four predictors had a better discrimination ability than the previously reported logistic regression model using 13 predictors (C-statistic: 0.71 [95% CI 0.69-0.73] vs. 0.67 [0.65-0.69]; P < 0.001). The four selected predictors in the Lasso regression model were lower frequency of physician visits in the previous year, lower HbA1c levels, and negative history of antidyslipidemic or antihypertensive treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The developed machine-learning model using four predictors had a good predictive ability to identify patients who failed to attend a follow-up visit for diabetes care after a screening program.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus , Aprendizado de Máquina , Adulto , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Seguimentos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Estudos Retrospectivos
5.
BMC Geriatr ; 21(1): 374, 2021 06 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34154556

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Long-term care (LTC) prevention is a pressing concern in ageing societies. To understand the risk factors of LTC, it is vital to consider psychological and social factors in addition to physical factors. Owing to a lack of relevant data, we aimed to investigate the social, physical and psychological factors associated with LTC using large-scale, nationally representative data to identify a high-risk population for LTC in terms of multidimensional frailty. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study using anonymised data from the 2013 Comprehensive Survey of Living Conditions conducted by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan. Among the 23,730 eligible people aged 65 years or older and those who were not in hospitals or care facilities during the survey, 1718 stated that they had LTC certification. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the factors associated with LTC certification. RESULTS: Factors positively associated with LTC certification in the multivariate analyses included older age, the interaction term between sex and age group at age 85-89 years, limb movement difficulties, swollen/heavy feet, incontinence, severe psychological distress (indicated by a Kessler Psychological Distress Scale [K6] score ≥ 13), regular hospital visits for dementia, stroke, Parkinson's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, fracture, rheumatoid arthritis, kidney disease, diabetes and osteoporosis. Factors negatively associated with LTC certification included the presence of a spouse, regular hospital visits for hypertension and consulting with friends or acquaintances about worries and stress. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, we identified the physical, psychological and social factors associated with LTC certification using nationally representative data. Our findings highlight the importance of the establishment of multidimensional approaches for LTC prevention in older adults.


Assuntos
Certificação , Assistência de Longa Duração , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Japão/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários
6.
J Diabetes Investig ; 12(9): 1619-1631, 2021 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33459533

RESUMO

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Discontinuation of diabetes care has been studied mostly in patients with prevalent diabetes and not in patients with newly diagnosed diabetes, whose dropout risk is highest. Because enrolling patients in a prospective study will influence adherence, we retrospectively examined whether guideline-recommended practices, defined as nutritional guidance or ophthalmological examination, can prevent patient discontinuation of diabetes care after its initiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified adults with newly screened diabetes during checkups using a large Japanese administrative claims database (JMDC, Tokyo, Japan) that contains laboratory data and lifestyle questionnaires. We defined discontinuation of physician visits as a follow-up interval exceeding 6 months. We divided the patients into those who received guideline-recommended practices (nutritional guidance or ophthalmology consultation) within the same month as the first visit and those who did not. We calculated propensity scores and carried out inverse probability of treatment weighting analyses to compare discontinuation between the two groups. RESULTS: We identified 6,508 patients with at least one physician consultation for diabetes care within 3 months after their checkup, including 4,574 patients without and 1,934 with guideline-recommended practices. After inverse probability of treatment weighting, patients with guideline-recommended practices had a significantly lower proportion of discontinuation than those without (17.2% vs 21.8%; relative risk 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.69-0.91). CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to show that after adjustment for both patient and healthcare provider factors, guideline-recommended practices within the first month of physician consultation for diabetes care can decrease subsequent discontinuation of physician visits in patients with newly diagnosed diabetes.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus/prevenção & controle , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Oftalmológico/estatística & dados numéricos , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Estilo de Vida , Apoio Nutricional , Visita a Consultório Médico/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oftalmologia , Consultórios Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
7.
Pancreas ; 49(10): 1321-1326, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33122520

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Acute pancreatitis (AP) guidelines for adult patients do not recommend routine prophylactic use of antibiotics because of no clinical merit on mortality, infectious complications, or length of stay. Although the mortality of pediatric AP is low, no studies have explored the rationale for antibiotic use in pediatric patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of early prophylactic antibiotics on length of stay and total costs in pediatric patients. METHODS: Using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database from 2010 to 2017, we used the stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting method using propensity scores to balance the background characteristics in the antibiotics group and the control group, and compared length of stay and total costs between the groups. RESULTS: We found significant differences between the antibiotics group (n = 652) and the control group (n = 467) in length of stay (11 days vs 9 days; percent difference, 15.4%; 95% confidence interval, 5.0%-26.8%) and total costs (US $4085 vs US $3648; percent difference, 19.8%; 95% confidence interval, 8.0%-32.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic antibiotics were associated with longer length of stay and higher total costs. Our results do not support routine use of prophylactic antibiotics in pediatric AP populations.


Assuntos
Antibioticoprofilaxia/economia , Custos de Medicamentos , Custos Hospitalares , Tempo de Internação/economia , Pancreatite/tratamento farmacológico , Pancreatite/economia , Adolescente , Fatores Etários , Antibioticoprofilaxia/efeitos adversos , Criança , Análise Custo-Benefício , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Japão , Masculino , Pancreatite/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
Hepatol Res ; 50(6): 693-703, 2020 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31943593

RESUMO

AIM: Previous randomized controlled trials of branched-chain amino acid infusion for hepatic encephalopathy involved a small number of patients, and the effectiveness of branched-chain amino acid infusion has not been clarified. We evaluated whether branched-chain amino acid infusion in addition to lactulose treatment was associated with short-term outcomes in a large population of patients. METHODS: Using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, we retrospectively identified inpatients with hepatic encephalopathy who received lactulose within 2 days of admission from July 2011 to March 2017. We divided the patients into those who received branched-chain amino acid infusion within 2 days of admission in addition to lactulose treatment and those who did not. We conducted propensity-score inverse probability of treatment weighting analyses to compare in-hospital mortality, consciousness at discharge, in-hospital complications, length of stay, and total hospitalization costs between the groups. RESULTS: We identified 8051 patients with hepatic encephalopathy treated with lactulose, including 7560 patients who received lactulose plus branched-chain amino acid infusion and 491 who received lactulose alone. The lactulose plus branched-chain amino acid infusion group had a significantly lower mortality than the lactulose alone group (9.6% vs. 15.0%, odds ratio 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.44-0.82). The lactulose plus branched-chain amino acid infusion group also had a lower proportion of patients with impaired mental status at discharge, and lower total hospitalization costs than the lactulose alone group. CONCLUSIONS: Branched-chain amino acid infusion together with lactulose may improve the prognosis of hepatic encephalopathy.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA