Regulatory T Cells in the Context of New-Onset Diabetes After Renal Transplant: A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: New-onset diabetes mellitus after transplant (NODAT) is a well-known complication of renal transplant that severely affects graft and patient survival. It is necessary to explore further risk factors and reveal the underlying pathomechanism. METHODS: Renal transplants performed between January 2010 and June 2018 were involved. Exclusion criteria were the recipient age younger than 18 years, follow-up period less than 6 months, and patients with diabetes at the time of transplant. Only primary kidney transplants were involved in our study, which totaled 223 cases. Besides donor and recipient demographic data, the type of immunosuppression, the average fasting glucose level, and T-subset profiles were compared. RESULTS: Of 223 cases there were 33 patients (14.8%) with NODAT (17 female; mean age, 54.2 [SD, 10.3] years; mean body mass index [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared], 27.8 [SD, 5.1]; mean follow-up, 43.3 [SD, 25.5] months). The control group consisted of 190 patients. The average fasting blood glucose level was higher in the NODAT group vs the control group (P < .001). The average fasting blood glucose level above diabetic threshold (≥7 mmol/L) was in association with a 6-fold higher risk of NODAT (odds ratio, 5.86; 95% CI, 2.46-13.97; P < .001). Absolute value of CD4+CD25brightCD127dim regulatory T cells was lower in the NODAT group at the first month after transplant (P = .048) Immunosuppressive protocol and survival data did not differ. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive management of the carbohydrate excursions during the early post-transplant period may decrease the incidence of NODAT. Further investigations will be required to decide whether the reduced CD4+CD25brightCD127dim/regulatory T-cell count contributes the development of NODAT.

Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease Transplant Recipients After Kidney Transplantation: A Single-center Experience.

Kidney transplantation is indicated for end-stage renal disease. Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) causes structural degeneration of the kidney and eventually becomes end-stage renal disease. ADPKD patients usually have several renal and nonrenal complications. We analyzed our kidney transplantation activities between 1991 and 2010 regarding ADPKD. We followed up with patients to December 31, 2016. Data were collected as patient and graft survival rates, the prevalence of polycystic manifestation of the gastrointestinal tract and other organs, and the attendance of urinary tract infection. Among the 734 kidney transplantations, 10.9% (n = 80) had an ADPKD. Four patients (5%) had diverticulum perforation. The prevalence of post-transplantation urinary tract infection was higher in ADPKD patients (55.9%) compared to non-ADPKD patients (44.1%). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates in ADPKD recipients versus non-ADPKD patients are 77.5%, 70.0%, and 67.5% versus 86.4%, 83.0%, and 80.1%, respectively. Patients with ADPKD were transplanted at an elder age compared to others (median: 47.5 years vs. 39.9 years). Female patients had longer graft survival times than males. ADPKD implies multiple cystic degeneration of the kidneys; however, it can cause structural degeneration in other organs. It is typical for ADPKD patients to have an acute abdominal-like syndrome. Immunosuppressive drugs can hide the clinical picture, which makes early diagnosis difficult.

Bacterial Infections After Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Bacterial infections significantly affect graft loss and mortality after kidney transplantation (KT). We reviewed the frequencies, risk factors, and sources of bacterial infections after KT and their impact on graft and patient survivals. METHODS: The data of 154 kidney recipients who underwent transplantation from 2010 to 2015 were explored. Donor, recipient, and surgical parameters were collected, and source, type, and frequency of infectious complications, number of infective episodes, multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria, and the bacterial spectrum were established. RESULTS: The most common infection was urinary tract infection, which is in line with the literature. Out of the 154 recipients, 72.1% (n = 111) had at least 1 occasion of a bacterial infection episode with clinical symptoms. It occurred 0-43 months (mean, 19.5 mo) after transplantation. Ninety-three KT recipients (67.9%) developed 274 episodes of infection in the postoperative 1st year (1.8 episodes/patient/y), and 42 patients had admission to the hospital ward (5.2 d/patient/y). MDR was detected in 19.8% of the infections. CONCLUSIONS: A bacterial infection had no significant impact on survival by itself. However, in case of sepsis graft and patient survivals were lower compared with normal control subjects.

A Single-center Experience of Allograft Nephrectomies Following Kidney Transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Approximately 10% of renal allografts fail during the first year after kidney transplantation (KT) and 3%-5% thereafter yearly. The indication and timing of allograft nephrectomy (AN) is still uncertain in some cases. The aim of this study was to reveal the ratio, etiology, and complications of AN at our center. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of all patients who underwent KT at our center between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2014. We analysed the frequency, indications, timing, and complications of ANs. Also early and late ANs were compared. RESULTS: From 417 renal transplantations 49 ANs were performed (11.7%). The most frequent indications were chronic allograft nephropathy (25; 51%), arterial blood supply complications, like arterial thrombosis and stenosis (7; 15%), treatment-resistant acute rejection (3; 6%), and nonreparable ureter complications (3; 6%). The average time of AN since KT was 28 months. ANs were performed as an urgent setting in 16 (33%) cases, whereas it was elective in 33 cases (67%). The AN was executed within 30 days (early) in 11 (22%) cases, and thereafter (late) in 38 (78%) cases. The main indication for early AN was renal artery thrombosis (4; 37%) and chronic allograft nephropathy (25; 66%) for late AN. Surgical complications occurred in 10 cases (20; 4%). The most common was hematoma. CONCLUSION: The majority of the ANs were elective and late (more than 30 days; average time, 47 months). Leading indication was chronic allograft nephrectomy. Early ANs were urgent and life-saving in all cases.

Surgical Complications Following Kidney Transplantations: A Single-Center Study in Hungary.

Surgical complications (SCs) are still high potential causes of graft loss. The incidence has a huge amount of variations depending on many factors. Our aim was to study the postoperative technical complications following kidney transplantations (KTs) during a 5-year period between 2011 and 2015. In the observed time frame there were 47 SCs occurring in 32 (19.4%) patients of 165 KTs. Every complication was classified into 3 groups: vascular (11; 6.6%), urologic (16; 9.7%), and any others (20; 12.1%). The most common postoperative SCs in our center were hemorrhage (14; 8.5%), urinary leakage (12; 7.2%), and renal artery stenosis (6; 3.6%). Twenty-seven patients, 84% of those having had a SC, needed an intervention, mainly a surgical correction (28; 62%). Half of these interventions (21; 51%) were performed due to urologic reasons. As possible predicting factors, we studied the type of arterial and ureter anastomosis in relation to onset of vascular and urologic complications. There was no significant correlation. The same was true for any donor and/or recipient demographic parameters. However, the presence of SCs impaired both patient and graft survival. The cumulative 6-month, 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient survival rates were 97% versus 99%, 93% versus 99%, 84% versus 97%, and 84% versus 97% for patients with/without (w/wo) a SC, respectively (P = .028). The cumulative 6-month, 1-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival rates were 81% versus 96%, 77% versus 94%, 68% versus 86%, and 54% versus 86% for the same 2 groups, respectively (P = .003).