Protocol digest of a randomized controlled adaptive Phase II/III trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for Japanese patients with oesophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG2203 (NEO-JPEG).

Treatment strategies for oesophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma have not been standardized despite its poor prognosis due to differences in the incidence rates between Western countries and Asia. This randomized Phase II/III trial was initiated in June 2023 to determine which neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen, docetaxel, oxaliplatin and S-1 or fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and docetaxel, is a more promising treatment in Phase II and confirm the superiority of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, oxaliplatin and S-1 or fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and docetaxel followed by surgery and postoperative chemotherapy over upfront surgery and postoperative chemotherapy in terms of overall survival in patients with Clinical Stage III or IVA oesophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma in Phase III. A total of 460 patients, including 150 patients in Phase II and 310 patients in Phase III, are planned to be enrolled from 85 hospitals in Japan over 5 years. This trial has been registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials as jRCTs031230182 (https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCTs031230182).

Usefulness of an S-1 dosage formula: an exploratory analysis of randomized clinical trial (JCOG1001).

BACKGROUND: The blood concentration of S-1 and adverse events are affected by renal function. Herein, an S-1 dosage formula was developed based on renal function, indicating the dose for a target blood concentration. This study aimed to explore the usefulness of the formula in adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer. METHODS: In this ad hoc analysis of the JCOG1001 trial, which evaluated the role of bursectomy for resectable gastric cancer, the recommended dose of S-1 was calculated using the following formula: 1447.8 × (14.5 + 0.301 × CLcr + 8.23 × SEX [male = 1, female = 0]) × body surface area (BSA) (mg/day). Patients were divided into three groups by comparing the initial S-1 dose determined using BSA with the dose recommended by the formula: underdose (UD), equal dose (ED), and overdose (OD). RESULTS: Among 686 eligible patients, 58, 304, and 324 patients were classified into the UD, ED, and OD groups. The patients' characteristics in the UD/ED/OD groups were median age (53.5/64.0/67.5 years), male sex (98.3%/75.3%/58.0%), and median BMI (24.8/22.8/22.3), respectively. The planned 1-year adjuvant S-1 therapy was completed in 74.1%/73.7%/68.5%, dose reduction was required in 8.6%/21.1%/30.6%, and treatment schedule was altered in 8.6%/17.1/19.8% in the UD/ED/OD groups, resulting in the 5-year overall survival rates of 77.3%/74.3%/77.0%, respectively. The incidences of grade > 3 anemia, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, stomatitis, and anorexia were significantly higher in the OD group than in the ED and UD groups. CONCLUSIONS: Dose optimization using an S-1 dosage formula can potentially reduce grade ≥ 3 adverse events for overdosed patients.

Targeting AURKA in treatment of peritoneal tumor dissemination in gastrointestinal cancer.

Intraperitoneal (i.p.) tumor dissemination and the consequent malignant ascites remain unpredictable and incurable in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer, and practical advances in diagnosis and treatment are urgently needed in the clinical settings. Here, we explored tumor biological and immunological mechanisms underlying the i.p. tumor progression for establishing more effective treatments. We established mouse tumor ascites models that murine and human colorectal cancer cells were both i.p. and subcutaneously (s.c.) implanted in mice, and analyzed peritoneal exudate cells (PECs) obtained from the mice. We then evaluated anti-tumor efficacy of agents targeting the identified molecular mechanisms using the ascites models. Furthermore, we validated the clinical relevancy of the findings using peritoneal lavage fluids obtained from gastric cancer patients. I.p. tumor cells were giant with large nuclei, and highly express AURKA, but less phosphorylated TP53, as compared to s.c. tumor cells, suggesting polyploidy-like cells. The i.p. tumors impaired phagocytic activity and the consequent T-cell stimulatory activity of CD11b+Gr1+PD1+ myeloid cells by GDF15 that is regulated by AURKA, leading to treatment resistance. Blocking AURKA with MLN8237 or siRNAs, however, abrogated the adverse events, and induced potent anti-tumor immunity in the ascites models. This treatment synergized with anti-PD1 therapy. The CD11b+PD1+ TAMs are also markedly expanded in the PECs of gastric cancer patients. These suggest AURKA is a determinant of treatment resistance of the i.p. tumors. Targeting the AURKA-GDF15 axis could be a promising strategy for improving clinical outcome in the treatment of GI cancer.

CD11b+DIP2A+LAG3+ cells facilitate immune dysfunction in colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide, and tumor metastasis is the leading cause of death. Targeting immune inhibitory checkpoint inhibitory pathways has attracted great attention, since the therapeutic efficacy induced by the specific blocking antibodies has been demonstrated even in metastatic CRC patients. However, the clinical outcome is low in many cases, and thus more effective treatments are needed in the clinical settings. A SPARC family member follistatin-like 1 (FSTL1) is known as a key driver of tumor metastasis in various types of cancer. However, the immunological roles of the FSTL1 in the CRC pathogenesis remain to be elucidated. In this study, we investigated the molecular mechanisms underlying the refractory FSTL1+ CRC using murine and human FSTL1-transduced CRC cells. Also, based on the results, we evaluated anti-tumor efficacy induced by agents targeting the identified molecules using murine CRC metastasis models, and validated the clinical relevancy of the basic findings using tumor tissues and peripheral blood obtained from CRC patients. FSTL1 transduction conferred EMT-like properties, such as low proliferative (dormant) and high invasive abilities, on tumor cells. When the transfectants were subcutaneously implanted in mice, CD11b+DIP2A+LAG3+ cells were abundantly expanded locally and systemically in the mice. Simultaneously, apoptotic T cells increased and were lastly excluded from the tumor tissues, allowing tumor aggravation leading to resistance to anti-PD1/PDL1 treatment. Blocking FSTL1 and LAG3, however, significantly suppressed the apoptosis induction, and successfully induced anti-tumor immune responses in the CRC metastasis models. Both treatments synergized in providing better prognosis of the mice. FSTL1 was significantly upregulated in tumor tissues and peripheral blood of CRC patients, and the CD11b+DIP2A+LAG3+ cells were significantly expanded in the PBMCs as compared to those of healthy donors. The expansion level was significantly correlated with decrease of potent Ki67+GZMB+ CTLs. These results suggest that the FSTL1-induced CD11b+DIP2A+LAG3+ cells are a key driver of immune dysfunction in CRC. Targeting the FSTL1-LAG3 axis may be a promising strategy for treating metastatic CRC, and anti-FSTL1/LAG3 combination regimen may be practically useful in the clinical settings.

Tumor growth rate during re-challenge chemotherapy with previously used agents as salvage treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: In clinical practice, the same chemotherapeutic agents are occasionally reused (re-challenge) after failure of all available standard chemotherapy options for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the benefits of re-challenge chemotherapy (Re-Cx) are unclear. This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy of Re-Cx, focusing on the tumor growth rate (TGR). METHODS: The study included mCRC patients with measurable lesions who received Re-Cx from November 2011 to October 2018 at National Cancer Center Hospital. Re-Cx was defined as re-administration of agents which had been used in prior lines of chemotherapy and discontinued due to disease progression. We compared the TGR immediately after initiating Re-Cx regimens with that observed at the time of disease progression during prior chemotherapy (Prior-Cx) immediately before Re-Cx. RESULTS: Of the 25 patients who received Re-Cx, five patients received two Re-Cx regimens. Therefore, a total of 30 cases of Re-Cx were analyzed in this study. The regimens of Re-Cx were oxaliplatin based (19 cases), irinotecan based (8 cases), and others (3 cases). Although the objective response rate to Re-Cx was 0%, the disease control rate was 60% (18 cases), and 40% (12 cases) showed some tumor shrinkage. We compared the effects of Re-Cx and Prior-Cx by the TGR and found that the TGR of Re-Cx was slower than that recorded in Prior-Cx in 26 of 30 cases (87%). In particular, the ratio of% TGR <0, which indicates tumor shrinkage, was obtained in 13 of 30 cases (43.3%). The median progression-free survival and overall survival after Re-Cx were 3.8 and 6.57 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: We found that Re-Cx may have some anti-tumor efficacy as salvage treatment for mCRC and these results also suggested the clinical benefits of Re-Cx.

CD11b+CTLA4+ myeloid cells are a key driver of tumor evasion in colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Tumor metastasis is the major cause of death of colorectal cancer (CRC), and metastatic CRC remains incurable in many cases despite great advances in genetic and molecular profiling, and clinical development of numerous drugs, including immune checkpoint inhibitors. Thus, more effective treatments are urgently needed for the patients in clinical settings. METHODS: We used mouse CRC metastasis models that murine Colon26 cells were subcutaneously and intravenously implanted and attempted to elucidate the tumor biological and immunological mechanisms underlying cancer metastasis. Then, we evaluated in vivo antitumor efficacy induced by agents targeting the identified molecular mechanisms using the mouse models. We validated the clinical relevancy of the findings using peripheral blood mononuclear cells obtained from stage IV metastatic CRC patients. RESULTS: CD11b+CTLA4+ myeloid cells were systemically expanded in the metastatic settings and facilitated tumor progression and metastasis directly via generating lipid droplets in tumor cells and indirectly via inducing immune exhaustion. These events were mediated by IL1B produced via the CTLA4 signaling from the increased myeloid cells. Blocking CTLA4 and IL1B with the specific mAbs significantly suppressed tumor progression and metastasis in the mouse models resistant to anti-PD1 therapy, and the therapeutic efficacy was optimized by blocking cyclooxygenases with aspirin. CONCLUSIONS: The CD11b+CTLA4+ cells are a key driver of tumor evasion, and targeting the CTLA4-IL1B axis could be a promising strategy for treating metastatic CRC. The triple combination regimen with anti-CTLA4/IL1B mAbs and aspirin may be useful in clinical settings.

Targeting Oncoimmune Drivers of Cancer Metastasis.

Residual metastasis is a major cause of cancer-associated death. Recent advances in understanding the molecular basis of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and the related cancer stem cells (CSCs) have revealed the landscapes of cancer metastasis and are promising contributions to clinical treatments. However, this rarely leads to practical advances in the management of cancer in clinical settings, and thus cancer metastasis is still a threat to patients. The reason for this may be the heterogeneity and complexity caused by the evolutional transformation of tumor cells through interactions with the host environment, which is composed of numerous components, including stromal cells, vascular cells, and immune cells. The reciprocal evolution further raises the possibility of successful tumor escape, resulting in a fatal prognosis for patients. To disrupt the vicious spiral of tumor-immunity aggravation, it is important to understand the entire metastatic process and the practical implementations. Here, we provide an overview of the molecular and cellular links between tumors' biological properties and host immunity, mainly focusing on EMT and CSCs, and we also highlight therapeutic agents targeting the oncoimmune determinants driving cancer metastasis toward better practical use in the treatment of cancer patients.

Development of chemotherapeutics for unresectable advanced esophageal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The prognosis of unresectable advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has gradually improved due to efforts for the development of systemic chemotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy. AREAS COVERED: Chemotherapeutic agents such as cytotoxic agents, molecular-targeted agents, and immune checkpoint inhibitors, sometimes used with irradiation, lead in the treatment of unresectable advanced ESCC. Here, we review the latest treatment strategies for unresectable advanced ESCC and discuss future perspectives. EXPERT OPINION: Immunotherapeutic agents will be part of the treatment of unresectable advanced ESCC in the near future. However, definitive predictive biomarkers to determine good patient candidates remain unclear for immunotherapy in patients with ESCC. Further research is warranted to identify those biomarkers working individually and in combination. Moreover, genome-based therapeutics enable individualized and patient-specific treatment. The development of molecular-targeted drugs against actionable or druggable genes is in progress.

IL33 Is a Key Driver of Treatment Resistance of Cancer.

Recurrence and treatment resistance are major causes of cancer-associated death. There has been a growing interest in better understanding epithelial-mesenchymal transition, stemness of cancer cells, and exhaustion and dysfunction of the immune system for which numerous genomic, proteomic, microenvironmental, and immunologic mechanisms have been demonstrated. However, practical treatments for such patients have not yet been established. Here we identified IL33 as a key driver of polyploidy, followed by rapid proliferation after treatment. IL33 induction transformed tumor cells into polyploid giant cells, showing abnormal cell cycle without cell division accompanied by Snail deregulation and p53 inactivation; small progeny cells were generated in response to treatment stress. Simultaneously, soluble IL33 was released from tumor cells, leading to expansion of receptor ST2-expressing cells including IL17RB+GATA3+ cells, which promoted tumor progression and metastasis directly and indirectly via induction of immune exhaustion and dysfunction. Blocking IL33 with a specific mAb in murine IL33+ metastatic tumor models abrogated negative consequences and successfully elicited antitumor efficacy induced by other combined treatments. Ex vivo assays using tumor tissues and peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with cancer validated the clinical relevancy of these findings. Together, these data suggest that targeting the IL33-ST2 axis is a promising strategy for diagnosis and treatment of patients likely to be resistant to treatments in the clinical settings. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings indicate that the functional role of IL33 in cancer polyploidy contributes to intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms underlying treatment failure.

Retrospective comparison of nab-paclitaxel plus ramucirumab and paclitaxel plus ramucirumab as second-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer focusing on peritoneal metastasis.

Background Ramucirumab (RAM) plus solvent-based (sb)-paclitaxel (PTX) is the standard second-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). The subset analysis of the ABSOLUTE trial, which confirmed non-inferiority of weekly nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-PTX to weekly sb-PTX, suggested that nab-PTX might have better efficacy than sb-PTX in patients with peritoneal metastasis. We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of RAM plus sb-PTX and nab-PTX in patients with peritoneal metastasis of AGC. Methods AGC patients who received RAM plus sb-PTX or nab-PTX as second-line chemotherapy from June 2015 to February 2019 were included in the study. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), response rate, and safety were assessed. Results A total of 128 patients were included in this study (93 in the RAM plus sb-PTX group and 35 in the RAM plus nab-PTX group). PFS was 4.1 months in the RAM plus sb-PTX group and 4.6 months in the RAM plus nab-PTX group (HR 0.90; 95%CI 0.58-1.41, p = 0.643). OS was 8.9 months in the RAM plus sb-PTX group and 11.4 months in the RAM plus nab-PTX group (HR 0.95; 95%CI 0.56-1.62, p = 0.847). A total of 62 and 31 patients had peritoneal metastasis in the RAM plus sb-PTX and the RAM plus nab-PTX groups, respectively. RAM plus nab-PTX showed a slightly longer survival compared to RAM plus sb-PTX in patients with peritoneal metastasis (PFS 5.8 vs 3.5 months, HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.40-1.10, p = 0.109). Conclusion This study suggests that RAM plus nab-PTX might be a more effective treatment for peritoneal metastasis of AGC.

[Nivolumab Treatment for the Patients with Gastric Cancer-Present and Future].

Nivolumab, anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, has innovated treatment ofpatients with gastric cancer. Nivolmab has been indicated forBthird-line treatment ofgastric cancer patients in September 2017. Although it has been more than 1 year after nivolumab being widely used in practice, we still have many clinical questions in this population. We leverage evidence obtained from other types of cancer where we have more experience to use nivolumab to answer these questions step by step, but it is still far from enough with some complexities unique to gastric cancer. While nivolumab monotherapy has shown long term survival in some patients, more than halfofpatients experience disease progression right after treatment initiation with nivolumab. Because we have other treatment options, it is urgent to identify biomarkers to predict its efficacy. Now clinical trials ofimmune -checkpoint inhibitors in various treatment line are ongoing with translational research including biomarker analysis and we highly expect those outcome.

Correlation between immune-related adverse events and prognosis in patients with gastric cancer treated with nivolumab.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that immune-related adverse events (irAEs) caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors were associated with clinical benefit in patients with melanoma or lung cancer. In advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients, there have been few reports about the correlation between irAEs and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. In this study, we retrospectively investigated the correlation between irAEs and efficacy in AGC patients treated with nivolumab. METHODS: The subjects of this study were AGC patients received nivolumab monotherapy between January 2015 and August 2018. IrAEs were defined as those AEs having a potential immunological basis that required close follow-up, or immunosuppressive therapy and/or endocrine therapy. We divided the patients who received nivolumab into two groups based on occurrence of irAEs; those with irAEs (irAE group) or those without (non-irAE group). We assessed the efficacy in both groups. RESULTS: Of the 65 AGC patients that received nivolumab monotherapy, 14 developed irAEs. The median time to onset of irAEs was 30.5 days (range 3-407 days). Median follow-up period for survivors was 32 months (95% CI, 10.8 to 34.5). The median progression-free survival was 7.5 months (95% CI, 3.6 to 11.5) in the irAE group and 1.4 months (95% CI, 1.2 to 1.6) in the non-irAE group (HR = 0.11, p < 0.001). The median overall survival was 16.8 months (95% CI, 4.4 to not reached) in the irAE group and 3.2 months (95% CI, 2.2 to 4.1) in the non-irAE group (HR = 0.17, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that number of metastatic sites ≥2 (HR = 2.15; 95% CI, 1.02 to 4.54), high ALP level (HR = 2.50; 95% CI, 1.27 to 4.54), and absence of irAEs (HR = 9.54, 95% CI, 3.34 to 27.30 for yes vs. no) were associated with a poor prognosis. The most frequent irAEs was diarrhea/colitis (n = 5). Grade 3 adverse events were observed in 6 patients; hyperglycemia (n = 2), diarrhea/colitis (n = 1), adrenal insufficiency (n = 1), aspartate aminotransferase increased (n = 1), peripheral motor neuropathy (n = 1). There were no grade 4 or 5 adverse events related to nivolumab. CONCLUSIONS: Development of irAEs was associated with clinical benefit for AGC patients receiving nivolumab monotherapy.

Hyperprogressive disease during nivolumab or irinotecan treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Nivolumab showed a survival benefit for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). However, an acceleration of tumour growth during immunotherapy, (hyperprogressive disease, HPD) has been reported in various cancers. This study reviewed the HPD in patients with AGC treated with nivolumab or irinotecan. METHODS: The subjects of this retrospective study were patients with AGC with measurable lesions, and their tumour growth rates (TGR) during nivolumab or irinotecan were compared with those during prior therapy. HPD was defined as an increase in TGR more than twofold. RESULTS: 34 and 66 patients received nivolumab and irinotecan in third or later line between June 2009 and September 2018 at our hospital; 22 patients receiving nivolumab had prior treatment with irinotecan, and one patient received irinotecan after nivolumab. Nivolumab and irinotecan showed no differences in disease control rates (38.2% and 34.8%) and in progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.7 to 1.6, p=0.802). The incidence of HPD was slightly higher after nivolumab (29.4%) than after irinotecan (13.5%) (p=0.0656), showing no differences in background between the patients with and without HPD. Compared between HPD and PD other than HPD after nivolumab, the HRs for PFS and overall survival (OS) were 1.1 (95% CI 0.5 to 2.7; p=0.756), and 2.1 (95% CI 0.7 to 5.8; p=0.168), but such clear difference in OS was not observed after irinotecan. CONCLUSIONS: HPD was observed more frequently after nivolumab compared with irinotecan, which was associated with a poor prognosis after nivolumab but not so clearly after irinotecan.

Linked color imaging improves the endoscopic visibility of gastric mucosal cancers.

Background and study aims As a newly developed endoscopy technique, linked color imaging (LCI) provides very bright images with enhanced color tones. With the objective of improving the detection rate of gastric mucosal cancers, which are often difficult to detect, we examined the utility of LCI from the viewpoint of visibility. Patients and methods The current study used 100 consecutive gastric mucosal cancers ≤ 20 mm in diameter. For each lesion, we selected one endoscopic image acquired by white-light imaging (WLI), blue-laser imaging (BLI) -bright, and LCI modes. Four endoscopists interpreted the images; using a previously reported scale, we scored the visibility level on a scale of 1 - 4. Results The mean (±â€ŠSD) visibility scores were 2.54 ±â€Š1.10 for WLI, 3.02 ±â€Š1.07 for BLI-bright, and 3.28 ±â€Š0.97 for LCI. The score was significantly higher for BLI-bright compared with WLI ( P  < .001) and again higher for LCI compared with BLI-bright ( P  < .001). For the experts, the scores for BLI-bright and LCI were similar, but both were significantly higher than the score for WLI. For the trainees, there was no significant difference between the WLI and BLI-bright scores, but LCI score was significantly higher than those for WLI and BLI-bright scores. With regard to clinical characteristics, LCI particularly enhanced visibility of normochromic, flat and depressed lesions, which had the lowest visibility scores of all three modalities compared with those of the other lesions. Conclusion LCI increased visibility and may contribute to early detection of gastric mucosal cancers.