Association of Type and Frequency of Postsurgery Care with Revision Surgery after Total Joint Replacement.

CONTEXT: Postmarket surveillance is limited in the ability to detect medical device problems. Electronic health records can provide real-time information that might help with device surveillance. Specifically, the frequency of postsurgery care might indicate early problems and determine high-risk patients requiring more active surveillance. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether intensity of postsurgery care is associated with revision risk after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). DESIGN: Using an integrated health care system's TJA registry, we identified primary TJA performed between April 2001 and July 2013 (22,953 knees and 9904 hips). Survival analyses evaluated the frequency of specific types of outpatient and inpatient utilization 0 to 90 and 91 to 180 days postoperatively and revision risk. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Revision surgery occurring at least 6 months after primary TJA. RESULTS: Knee arthroplasty recipients with 3 or more outpatient orthopedic allied health/nurse visits within 90 days had a 2.2 times (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.6-2.9) higher risk of revision within the first 2 years postoperatively and 10.1 times higher risk (95% CI = 7.6-13.3) after 2 years. Compared with hip arthroplasty recipients who had 0 to 3 visits, patients with 6 or more outpatient orthopedic office visits within 90 days had a 15.7 times (95% CI = 5.7-42.9) higher risk of revision. Similar results were observed for 91-day to 180-day visits. CONCLUSION: Future studies are needed to determine if more specific data on reasons for the higher frequency of outpatient visits can refine these findings and elicit more specific recommendations for TJA devices.

Do Obese and Extremely Obese Patients Lose Weight After Lumbar Spine Fusions? Analysis of a Cohort of 7303 Patients from the Kaiser National Spine Registry.

MINI: The outcome of interest was ≥ 5% weight change 1 year postoperative from baseline. Seven thousand three hundred three lumbar fusions in the Kaiser Permanente Spine Registry between 2009 and 2013 were analyzed. Weight loss occurred in: body mass index < 30, 11.1%; obese, BMI 30 to 39, 16.6%, odds ratio = 1.42; extremely obese, body mass index ≥40, 21.1%, odds ratio = 1.73. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study from the Kaiser Permanente Spine Registry. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether obese and extremely obese patients with lumbar spine fusions lost a clinically significant amount of weight (≥5%) 1 year after their surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Obesity in the United States has a prevalence of 35% and is a global health issue. Obesity is associated with lumbar spine disease. There is limited evidence regarding postsurgical weight loss after spine surgery. METHODS: Adult patients in the Kaiser Permanente Spine Registry with lumbar fusions performed between 2009 and 2013 were included in the study sample (n = 7303). The outcome of interest was ≥5% weight change 1 year postoperative from baseline. Three body mass index (BMI) groups were analyzed (BMI < 30; 30-39 obese; ≥40 extremely obese). Covariate analysis, multivariable logistic regression, odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) are provided. RESULTS: At the time of spine surgery, 4456 (61%) had a BMI < 30, 2519 (34.5%) had a BMI between 30 and 39, 232 (3.2%) had a BMI ≥40, and 96 (1.3%) were missing their intraoperative BMI. We observed the following weight loss pattern: BMI < 30, 11.1%; BMI 30 to 39, 16.6%; BMI ≥40, 21.1%. We observed the following weight gain pattern: BMI < 30, 15.6%; BMI 30 to 39, 12.7%; BMI ≥40, 9.5%. After risk-adjustment, obese and extremely obese patients were more likely to lose a clinically significant amount of weight 1 year after surgery (BMI 30-39: OR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.22-1.65; BMI ≥40: OR = 1.73, 95% CI 1.21-2.47) compared with nonobese patients. CONCLUSION: In this large cohort of patients with lumbar spinal fusions, we observed more significant weight loss in obese and extremely obese patients than nonobese patients. Additional research is needed to determine whether this weight loss is due to improvements in back pain and increased physical activity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

A retrospective cohort study from the Kaiser Permanente Spine Registry. The aim of this study was to determine whether obese and extremely obese patients with lumbar spine fusions lost a clinically significant amount of weight (≥5%) 1 year after their surgery. Obesity in the United States has a prevalence of 35% and is a global health issue. Obesity is associated with lumbar spine disease. There is limited evidence regarding postsurgical weight loss after spine surgery. Adult patients in the Kaiser Permanente Spine Registry with lumbar fusions performed between 2009 and 2013 were included in the study sample (n = 7303). The outcome of interest was ≥5% weight change 1 year postoperative from baseline. Three body mass index (BMI) groups were analyzed (BMI < 30; 30­39 obese; ≥40 extremely obese). Covariate analysis, multivariable logistic regression, odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) are provided. At the time of spine surgery, 4456 (61%) had a BMI < 30, 2519 (34.5%) had a BMI between 30 and 39, 232 (3.2%) had a BMI ≥40, and 96 (1.3%) were missing their intraoperative BMI. We observed the following weight loss pattern: BMI < 30, 11.1%; BMI 30 to 39, 16.6%; BMI ≥40, 21.1%. We observed the following weight gain pattern: BMI < 30, 15.6%; BMI 30 to 39, 12.7%; BMI ≥40, 9.5%. After risk-adjustment, obese and extremely obese patients were more likely to lose a clinically significant amount of weight 1 year after surgery (BMI 30­39: OR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.22­1.65; BMI ≥40: OR = 1.73, 95% CI 1.21­2.47) compared with nonobese patients. In this large cohort of patients with lumbar spinal fusions, we observed more significant weight loss in obese and extremely obese patients than nonobese patients. Additional research is needed to determine whether this weight loss is due to improvements in back pain and increased physical activity. Level of Evidence: 3.

Weight patterns before and after total joint arthroplasty and characteristics associated with weight change.

CONTEXT: Although prevalence of obesity and incidence of total joint arthroplasty (TJA) have dramatically increased over the last two decades in the U.S., little is known of the preoperative and postoperative weight patterns of patients undergoing TJA. OBJECTIVE: To describe the preoperative and postoperative weight patterns of patients undergoing TJA and evaluate characteristics associated with these patterns. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. A cohort of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2010, was identified. Using weight obtained at patient encounters, patients were categorized into gainers (increased weight by 5%), losers (decreased weight by 5%), or remained the same (changed < 5%) for the preoperative and postoperative periods. Patients were characterized by sex, age, and race. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Weight change before and after TJA. RESULTS: Of 30,632 patients with TJA identified, 34.5% underwent THA and 65.5% had TKA. Most patients remained the same weight during the year before (THA, 71.5%; TKA, 75.7%) and after the procedure (64.0% and 68.5%, respectively). Before and after THA, men were less likely to lose or gain weight than were women. Older patients were less likely to gain weight. Among patients undergoing TKA, men were less likely to lose weight preoperatively or postoperatively, or gain weight postoperatively, and older patients were less likely to gain weight before or after arthroplasty. Some racial associations with weight patterns were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Specific groups are more susceptible to weight change and could benefit from weight management interventions.

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction for the treatment of patellofemoral instability.

Patellofemoral instability can be a disabling problem. Numerous techniques are employed for its treatment. Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction in combination with other procedures has been explored by many orthopedic surgeons. The purpose of the study was to determine the effectiveness of isolated MPFL reconstruction in treating the symptoms associated with patellofemoral instability, preventing recurrence of patella dislocation, and returning patients to preinjury level of activity. This is a case series study. We conducted a clinical follow-up study on 56 knees (49 patients) after MPFL reconstruction for recurrent patellar instability with a mean follow-up of 4.3 years (range, 1.1-6.8). A single MPFL reconstruction technique was performed in all cases. Patient outcomes were evaluated using: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee form, Tegner activity score, functional hop test, and radiographs. Mean age at time of surgery was 24 years old (range, 13-49). Females comprised 75% of the sample. Mean interval from injury to surgery was 7.2 ± 8.6 years (range, 51 days-37 years). At follow-up, there were no recurrent dislocations reported, patella subluxation in 6 (11%) cases, and radiographic degenerative changes were none to mild in all patients. The series mean IKDC scores at follow-up was 76.3 ± 19.2 (range, 30-99), and Tegner activity scores were 5.6 ± 2.5. MPFL reconstruction is an option for treating the symptoms of patellar instability, preventing recurrent dislocation, and returning patients near to their preinjury level of activity. The level of evidence is IV.

The Kaiser Permanente implant registries: effect on patient safety, quality improvement, cost effectiveness, and research opportunities.

INTRODUCTION: Considering the high cost, volume, and patient safety issues associated with medical devices, monitoring of medical device performance is critical to ensure patient safety and quality of care. The purpose of this article is to describe the Kaiser Permanente (KP) implant registries and to highlight the benefits of these implant registries on patient safety, quality, cost effectiveness, and research. METHODS: Eight KP implant registries leverage the integrated health care system's administrative databases and electronic health records system. Registry data collected undergo quality control and validation as well as statistical analysis. RESULTS: Patient safety has been enhanced through identification of affected patients during major recalls, identification of risk factors associated with outcomes of interest, development of risk calculators, and surveillance programs for infections and adverse events. Effective quality improvement activities included medical center- and surgeon-specific profiles for use in benchmarking reports, and changes in practice related to registry information output. Among the cost-effectiveness strategies employed were collaborations with sourcing and contracting groups, and assistance in adherence to formulary device guidelines. Research studies using registry data included postoperative complications, resource utilization, infection risk factors, thromboembolic prophylaxis, effects of surgical delay on concurrent injuries, and sports injury patterns. CONCLUSIONS: The unique KP implant registries provide important information and affect several areas of our organization, including patient safety, quality improvement, cost-effectiveness, and research.