Efficacy evaluation of anti-DEC-IgY against antibiotic-resistant diarrhoeagenic Escherichia coli.

Introduction. The rise of multi-drug-resistant bacteria poses a global threat. In 2017, the World Health Organization identified 12 antibiotic-resistant 'priority pathogens', including Enterobacteriaceae, highlighting the menace of Gram-negative bacteria. Diarrhoeagenic Escherichia coli (DEC)-induced diarrhoea is particularly problematic for travellers and infants. In contrast to other antibiotic alternatives, passive immunotherapy is showing promise by providing immediate and precise protection. However, mammalian-sourced antibodies are costly, hindering large-scale production. Egg-laying chicken-derived IgY antibodies present a cost-effective, high-yield solution, revolutionizing antibody-based therapeutics compared to mammalian IgG.Hypothesis/Gap Statement. This study hypothesized that developing anti-DEC-IgY could combat DEC infections effectively.Aim. The primary aim was to develop anti-DEC-IgY and assess its potential in DEC-induced diarrhoeal management.Method. Chickens were immunized with DEC antigens to induce an immune response. IgY antibodies were extracted from immune eggs and purified using ion-exchange column chromatography. Anti-DEC-IgY's ability to inhibit DEC growth was evaluated through growth inhibition assays. Anti-DEC-IgY's capacity to prevent E. coli adhesion was assessed using mice intestinal mucosa. In vivo experiments measured pathogen colonization reduction and infection severity reduction. P values were calculated to confirm statistical significance.Result. The antibacterial efficacy of anti-DEC-IgY by growth inhibition assay demonstrated that 25 mg ml-1 of IgY could inhibit the DEC growth. The anti-adherence-property was tested using mice intestinal mucosa and found that anti-DEC-IgY could prevent the E. coli adhesion. In vivo results suggest that 12 mg ml-1 of IgY will reduce the pathogen colonization in intestine and reduce the severity of the infection. The P values between the experimental groups confirm the statistical significance of the findings.Conclusion. The study findings suggest that IgY-based passive immunotherapy could be a potential strategy for managing the risks associated with antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections. Additionally, this study paves the way for the development of IgY-related research and applications in India.

The concept of Big Four: Road map from snakebite epidemiology to antivenom efficacy.

Snake envenomation is a life-threatening disease caused by the injection of venom toxins from the venomous snake bite. Snakebite is often defined as the occupational or domestic hazard mostly affecting the rural population. India experiences a high number of envenoming cases and fatality due to the nation's diversity in inhabiting venomous snakes. The Indian Big Four snakes namely Russell's viper (Daboia russelii), spectacled cobra (Naja naja), common krait (Bungarus caeruleus), and saw-scaled viper (Echis carinatus) are responsible for majority of the snake envenoming cases and death. The demographic characteristics including occupation, stringent snake habitat management, poor healthcare facilities and ignorance of the rural victims are the primary influencers of high mortality. Biogeographic venom variation greatly influences the clinical pathologies of snake envenomation. The current antivenoms against the Big Four snakes are found to be less immunogenic against the venom toxins emphasizing the necessity of alternative approaches for antivenom generation. This review summarizes the burden of snake envenomation in India by the Big Four snakes including the geographic distribution of snake species and biogeographic venom variation. We have provided comprehensive information on snake venom proteomics that has aided the better understanding of venom induced pathological features, summarized the impact of current polyvalent antivenom therapy highlighting the need for potential antivenom treatment for the effective management of snakebites.

Amalgamation of nanotechnology with chicken IgY to enrich therapeutic and diagnostic applications: a systematic review.

Aim: The article explores the possibility of using nanoparticles and IgY technology together for biosensing and antibody delivery to fight mammalian infections. The use of IgG in passive immunotherapy has drawbacks; however, nanoparticles and IgY technology offer new opportunities for diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Methods: The primary selection of reports was based on the title and abstract, and potential studies were selected based on predefined inclusion criteria such as nanoparticle/nanomaterials and IgY, studies that have employed nanoparticles-IgY for diagnostic and therapeutic applications and animal experiments. Results: Nanoparticle-IgY conjugates have great potential in diagnostics and therapeutics, but translation of nanotechnology-based IgY technology from laboratory settings to clinical setup is still a challenge. As science advances, nanoimmunotherapy can be explored in modern-day medicine.

The human body makes proteins, called antibodies, that fight germs. Scientists use chickens and their eggs to make these proteins for treating diseases. If antibodies are used to treat diseases in the stomach, they can get damaged, but they can be protected with nanoparticles. They protect the proteins from degradation and deliver them safely to the target place. Thus, scientists use this combination to treat infections. The same combination also helps detect the germs.

Passive immunotherapy using chicken egg yolk antibody (IgY) against diarrheagenic E. coli: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Animal diarrhea due to diarrheagenic Escherichia coli (E. coli) has been a major concern in the field of livestock farming leading to a severe loss of domesticated animals. This systematic review aims to analyze medical shreds of evidence available in the literature and to discover the effect of IgY in treatment and protection against E. coli diarrhea. METHODS AND RESULTS: Research reports that aimed to evaluate the effect of IgY against E. coli diarrhea were searched and collected from several databases (Science Direct, Springer link, Wiley, T&F). The collected studies were screened based on the inclusion criteria. 19 studies were identified and included in the meta-analysis. The pooled relative risk ratios were calculated for the studies and found to be statistically significant to support the therapeutic effect of IgY against E. coli diarrhea but the 95% confidence interval of a majority of studies includes a relative risk of 1. This variability between the effect of IgY in the overall estimate and individual studies accounts due to the presence of methodological heterogeneity. In addition, subgroup analysis revealed the grounds for heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis provide concrete evidence for the favorable effect of IgY as a prophylactic and therapeutic modality against E. coli diarrhea. Yet, more research pieces of evidence with standardized animal studies aimed to utilize IgY against E. coli are vital. Further studies and trials on human subjects could open new perspectives in the application IgY as a therapeutic agent.