Association of Retinal Thickness at Month 1 Post-Treatment with Later Thickness and Visual Acuity in Central Vein Occlusion.

PURPOSE: To investigate the association of retinal thickness 1 month post-randomization (1 month after first study injection with aflibercept or bevacizumab) with later retinal thickness, visual acuity, and number of treatments in eyes with central or hemiretinal vein occlusion enrolled in the SCORE2 trial. DESIGN: Cohort study using data from a randomized multicenter clinical trial. METHODS: Analysis included 350 SCORE2 participants through 2 years of follow-up. Main outcome measures are central subfield thickness (CST) on spectral domain optical coherence tomography, best-corrected visual acuity letter score (VALS), and number of treatments for macular edema. CST was classified as thin (≤216µm), medium (>216µm and ≤300µm), or thick (>300µm). RESULTS: At Month 1, 15% (51/350) of study eyes were in the thin CST class, 57% (199/350) in the medium CST class, and 29% (100/350) in the thick CST class. Of eyes with thin CST at Month 1, 89-96% were also thin during Months 2-12. Over all visits studied, the VALS of eyes in the medium Month 1 CST class was significantly greater than the Month 1 thin class. During Months 6-12 (p<0.001) and 12-24 (p <0.001), but not during Months 0-6 (p=0.36) when monthly treatment was protocol-specified, the mean number of treatments for macular edema per study eye was highest in the thick CST class and lowest in the thin CST class. The thin CST class is significantly more likely to have disorganization of the retinal inner layers inside the central subfield, more paracentral acute middle maculopathy at Month 1, and a history of anti-VEGF treatment prior to trial enrollment. CONCLUSIONS: Eyes with a thin CST at Month 1 were more likely to be in their Month 1 CST class during Months 2-12 than eyes in the thick or medium Month 1 CST classes. Eyes in the medium CST class had the best VALS, with fewest treatments in the thin class after Month 6. These findings suggest that having a post-treatment thin CST can be as detrimental to visual acuity as having a post-treatment thick CST.

The Wisconsin silicone oil study (report #1): anatomical and functional outcomes of repair of retinal detachment with proliferative vitreoretinopathy.

BACKGROUND: Silicone oil (SO) is a long-term tamponade for repair of complex retinal pathology but has limitations including late redetachment. This study describes our experience with SO tamponade for repair of retinal detachment with proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR), with attention to anatomic and functional outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective consecutive case series of eyes with retinal detachment (RD) complicated by proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) receiving SO tamponade at the University of Wisconsin between 2013 and 2019. Group 1 defined as primary SO placement; Group 2 had SO placed after failing prior retinal detachment repair. RESULTS: Inclusion criteria of SO placement for repair of RD with PVR was met for 117 eyes. The final reattachment rate was 84% for all eyes, with no difference between Groups 1 and 2. Vision improvement was 2.1 lines for Group 1 (p = 0.06 from baseline) and 4.6 lines for Group 2 (p < 0.0001). The mean number of silicone oil placements was 1.4. Less improvement in vision was noted with repeat SO placement, though overall functional vision of 5/200 or better was achieved in 63.2% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: SO tamponade allows long-term anatomical stabilisation and substantial vision recovery in eyes with retinal detachment complicated by PVR. Rates of anatomic and functional success have improved significantly when compared to prior studies using oil tamponade for repair of PVR.

Real-World Safety Outcomes with Brolucizumab in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Findings from the IRIS® Registry.

INTRODUCTION: To assess real-world safety outcomes for adults with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated with brolucizumab from the US-based IRIS® (Intelligent Research in Sight) Registry. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 18,312 eyes (15,998 patients) treated with ≥ 1 intravitreal brolucizumab injections between 8 October 2019 (US launch date for brolucizumab) and 7 October 2021 were followed up for ≤ 2 years after first injection (index date). The study assessed the predefined incident ocular adverse events of intraocular inflammation (IOI), retinal vasculitis (RV), and retinal vascular occlusion (RO). RESULTS: Overall, 614/18,312 eyes (3.4%) experienced any IOI, RV, and/or RO event. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) time to an event was 84 (42-167) days; 77.4% of events (475/614) occurred within 6 months after index date. Median (IQR) number of brolucizumab injections before an event was 2 (1-4). For eyes with an adverse event and visual acuity (VA) data (n = 406), median (IQR) change in Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters from pre-event VA was 0 (- 7 to + 5) at the 6-month follow-up; 50 eyes (12.3%) had a VA loss of 10 or more ETDRS letters. Risk of an event (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]) was decreased in eyes from male patients (0.61 [0.53-0.71]), from older patients (0.83 [0.76-0.90]), from treatment-naive patients (0.51 [0.38-0.69]), and from patients who started brolucizumab in the second year after launch (0.68 [0.53-0.86] vs. first year). CONCLUSION: In this large real-world brolucizumab safety study, 3.4% of eyes experienced an IOI, RV, and/or RO event. Among eyes that experienced an adverse event for which VA data were available, median ETDRS vision change was 0 letters (IQR - 7 to + 5).

Considerations for the Identification and Management of Geographic Atrophy: Recommendations from an Expert Panel.

Newly approved treatments for patients with geographic atrophy are changing the treatment paradigm, highlighting the need for eye care providers (ECPs) to have a set of recommendations on how to best manage GA patients. Here, we outline how to identify various stages of age-related macular degeneration including geographic atrophy (GA) by examining optimal management scenarios implicating various ECPs and reviewing treatment considerations for patients with GA. Early identification of GA will lead to optimal patient outcomes, while a standardized management scenario will reduce clinical burden among ECPs treating patients with GA.

Month 60 Imaging Findings and Relationship to Treatment Outcomes Following Anti-VEGF Therapy for Macular Edema Due to Central or Hemi-Retinal Vein Occlusion.

PURPOSE: To evaluate imaging findings from SCORE2 participants through 60 months, to describe the degree of resolution or progression of these variables, and to correlate changes in these imaging findings to treatment outcomes such as visual acuity and the number of treatments administered. METHODS: SCORE2 participants were followed for up to 60 months. Visual acuity, injection frequency and imaging tests color fundus photography (CFP), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography [UWFA]) were performed throughout this period. RESULTS: Less than 6% of eyes had subretinal fluid at month 60. Disorganization of the retinal inner layers (DRIL) was the most likely finding to persist, present in 96% of eyes at baseline and unchanged at 95% at month 60. For UWFA, at baseline, there was a mean of 5.0% non-perfusion area (95% CI: 3.3%-6.8%) in the NETWORC grid with little change to month 60. For the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) grid, at baseline, there was a mean of 2.3% non-perfusion area (95% CI: 0.7%-3.9%) with little change to month 60. There was no correlation between any of the imaging variables at baseline and change in visual acuity to month 60 or in the number of injections following the variable treatment timeframe (month 12 to month 60). CONCLUSIONS: These analyses provide an anatomic explanation for persistent functional deficits many years following initial treatment. Clinical practice patterns should consider evaluation with these imaging tests to help explain persistent functional deficits in many eyes. Additionally, these 8 baseline imaging variables generally should not be relied on to predict visual acuity or intensity of treatment. NOTE: Publication of this article is sponsored by the American Ophthalmological Society.

Intraocular Pressure in Eyes With Retinal Vein Occlusion Compared With Fellow Eyes: Study of Comparative Treatments for Retinal Vein Occlusion 2 (SCORE2) Report 27.

This cohort study investigates intraocular pressure (IOP) in eyes with retinal vein occlusion (RVO) compared with fellow, unaffected eyes.

Efficacy and Safety of Brolucizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema: The KINGFISHER Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Despite the effectiveness of existing anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapies, a need remains for further treatment options to improve response rates and/or reduce injection or monitoring frequency in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab vs aflibercept dosed every 4 weeks in participants with DME. Design, Participants, and Setting: This 52-week, double-masked, phase 3 randomized clinical trial included treatment-naive adults and adults who had previously received anti-VEGF therapy. Data were collected from September 2019 to March 2020, and data were analyzed from April 2020 to February 2021. Intervention: Brolucizumab, 6 mg, intravitreal injection every 4 weeks or aflibercept, 2 mg, intravitreal injection every 4 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: Participants were randomized 2:1 to brolucizumab, 6 mg, or aflibercept, 2 mg. The primary end point was change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity at week 52. Secondary end points were the proportion of participants with a 2-step improvement or greater from baseline in Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale score, the proportion of eyes with absence of both subretinal fluid and intraretinal fluid, change from baseline in central subfield thickness, and safety at week 52. Results: A total of 517 participants were randomized to brolucizumab (n = 346) or aflibercept (n = 171); 299 (57.8%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 60.7 (10.2) years. Brolucizumab was noninferior to aflibercept in best-corrected visual acuity (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letter score) change from baseline at week 52 (brolucizumab, 12.2-letter improvement; aflibercept, 11.0-letter improvement; difference, 1.1; 95% CI, -0.6 to 2.9; noninferiority margin, 4; P < .001). Brolucizumab was superior to aflibercept for the proportion of eyes without subretinal and intraretinal fluid (brolucizumab, 144 of 346 [41.6%]; aflibercept, 38 of 171 [22.2%]; difference, 20.0%; 95% CI, 12.5to 28.6; P < .001) and mean central subfield thickness change from baseline at week 52 (brolucizumab, -237.8 µm; aflibercept, -196.5 µm; difference, -41.4; 95% CI, -58.9 to -23.8; P < .001). Incidence of intraocular inflammation was 4.0% (14 of 346) in the brolucizumab arm and 2.9% (5 of 171) in the aflibercept arm, incidence of retinal vasculitis was 0.9% (3 of 346) and 0.6% (1 of 171), respectively, and incidence of retinal vascular occlusion was 0.3% (1 of 346) and 0.6% (1 of 171). One participant in the brolucizumab arm had retinal artery occlusion. Conclusions and Relevance: In these study participants with DME, no clinically meaningful differences in visual outcomes were noted between the brolucizumab and aflibercept arms; some superior anatomic improvements were noted in the brolucizumab arm. No new safety concerns were identified. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03917472.

Geographic Atrophy Management Consensus (GA-MAC): a Delphi panel study on identification, diagnosis and treatment.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: With a paradigm shift in geographic atrophy (GA) treatments now available, establishing consensus on the identification and diagnosis of the disease along with considerations for management of patients with GA will assist eye care professionals (ECP) in their day-to-day practices, leading to improved patient outcomes. METHODS: A modified Delphi panel process (Geographic Atrophy Management Consensus) consisting of three total surveys and one virtual live meeting held between survey 2 and survey 3. Data were collected from July to October 2022. Participants included expert members of the eye care community that have demonstrated outstanding leadership among peers: a steering committee with three ECPs and a 15-member panel divided between five optometrists, five comprehensive ophthalmologists and five retina specialists. Consensus on statements related to the management of patients with GA was calculated using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. RESULTS: At the conclusion of the third survey, consensus was reached on 91% of the 77 statements. Critical consensus topics include: (1) optical coherence tomography as the favoured method to diagnose and monitor GA, (2) preferred practice patterns regarding referral of patients to retina specialists and (3) treatment criteria given the advent of emerging therapeutics for GA. CONCLUSIONS: Generating awareness of early signs of disease development, progression and identifying the best tools to evaluate GA establishes ideal management and referral strategies. Given the paradigm shift in GA management driven by approved therapies, coupled with the fact that the disease is progressive resulting in devastating vision loss, these strategies are critical to ensure best overall outcomes.

High Variation in Inner Retinal Reflectivity Predicts Poor Visual Outcome in Patients With Central Retinal Vein Occlusion: SCORE2 Report 21.

Purpose: To assess the association of a novel spectral domain optical coherence tomography biomarker with 6-month visual acuity in in the Study of COmparative Treatments for REtinal Vein Occlusion 2. Methods: Spectral domain optical coherence tomography volume scans were evaluated for inner retinal hyperreflectivity, quantified by optical intensity ratio (OIR) and OIR variation. Baseline visual acuity letter score (VALS), baseline OCT biomarkers, and month 1 OIR were correlated with VALS at month 6. Regression trees, a machine learning technique yielding readily interpretable models, were used to assess for variable interaction. Results: Only baseline VALS correlated positively with month 6 VALS in multivariate regression. Regression trees detected a novel functional and anatomical interaction in a subgroup. Among patients with a baseline VALS worse than 43, those with an OIR variation at month 1 of more than 0.09 had a mean of 13 fewer letters of vision at 6 months compared with patients with an OIR variation of 0.09 or less. Conclusions: Baseline VALS was the strongest predictor of month 6 VALS. Regression tree analysis detected an interaction effect, in which higher OIR variation at month 1 predicted worse 6-month VALS in patients with low VALS at baseline. OIR variation may serve as a predictor for poor visual outcome despite treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion in patients with poor vision at baseline. Translational Relevance: Pixel heterogeneity in three-dimensional OCT data may serve as measure of disruption of the retinal laminations, and this factor may carry visually prognostic value.

Cost-Utility Comparison of Bevacizumab and Aflibercept in the Treatment of Central or Hemiretinal Vein Occlusion in the SCORE2 Trial.

Importance: Retinal vein occlusion is the second most common retinal vascular disease. Bevacizumab was demonstrated in the Study of Comparative Treatments for Retinal Vein Occlusion 2 (SCORE2) to be noninferior to aflibercept with respect to visual acuity in study participants with macular edema due to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) or hemiretinal vein occlusion (HRVO) following 6 months of therapy. In this study, the cost-utility of bevacizumab vs aflibercept for treatment of CRVO is evaluated. Objective: To investigate the relative cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab vs aflibercept for treatment of macular edema associated with CRVO or HRVO. Design, Setting, and Participants: This economic evaluation study used a microsimulation cohort of patients with clinical and demographic characteristics similar to those of SCORE2 participants and a Markov process. Parameters were estimated and validated using a split-sample approach of the SCORE2 population. The simulated cohort included 5000 patients who were evaluated 100 times, each with a different set of characteristics randomly selected based on the SCORE2 trial. SCORE2 data were collected from September 2014 October 2019, and data were analyzed from October 2019 to July 2021. Interventions: Bevacizumab (followed by aflibercept among patients with a protocol-defined poor or marginal response to bevacizumab at month 6) vs aflibercept (followed by a dexamethasone implant among patients with a protocol-defined poor or marginal response to aflibercept at month 6). Main Outcomes and Measures: Incremental cost-utility ratio. Results: The simulation demonstrated that patients treated with aflibercept will have an expected cost $18 127 greater than those treated with bevacizumab in the year following initiation. When coupled with the lack of clinical superiority over bevacizumab (ie, patients treated with bevacizumab had a gain over aflibercept in visual acuity letter score of 4 in the treated eye and 2 in the fellow eye), these results demonstrate that first-line treatment with bevacizumab dominated aflibercept in the simulated cohort of SCORE2 participants. At current price levels, aflibercept would be considered the preferred cost-effective option only if treatment restored the patient to nearly perfect health. Conclusions and Relevance: While there will be some patients with CRVO-associated or HRVO-associated macular edema who will benefit from first-line treatment with aflibercept rather than bevacizumab, given the minimal differences in visual acuity outcomes and large cost differences for bevacizumab vs aflibercept, first-line treatment with bevacizumab is cost-effective for this condition.

SCORE2 Report 24: Nonlinear Relationship of Retinal Thickness and Visual Acuity in Central Retinal and Hemiretinal Vein Occlusion.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether a nonlinear association between central subfield thickness (CST) on spectral-domain OCT and concurrent visual acuity letter score (VALS) exists in eyes treated initially with aflibercept or bevacizumab for macular edema associated with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) or hemiretinal vein occlusion (HRVO) in the Study of Comparative Treatments for Retinal Vein Occlusion 2 (SCORE2). DESIGN: Long-term follow-up after a randomized clinical trial from 64 centers in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were followed up to 60 months and treated at investigator discretion after completing the 12-month treatment protocol. METHODS: Two-segment linear regression models were compared with simple linear regression models of VALS on CST. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to assess strength of CST and VALS associations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Central subfield thickness was measured by OCT and VALS by the electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study methodology. RESULTS: Estimated inflection points, reflecting turning points at which the CST and VALS association changes from positive to negative, calculated at 7 postbaseline visits, range from 217 to 256 µm. A strongly positive correlation exists to the left of each estimated inflection point, ranging from 0.29 (P < 0.01 at month 60) to 0.50 (P < 0.01 at month 12), and a strongly negative correlation exists to the right of each estimated inflection point, ranging from -0.43 (P < 0.01 at month 1) to -0.74 (P < 0.01 at month 24). Randomization statistical tests showed that 2-segment models are favored over 1-segment models for all postbaseline months (P < 0.001 for all tests performed). CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between CST and VALS in eyes with CRVO or HRVO after treatment with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy is not simply linear. The usually modest correlations between OCT-measured CST and visual acuity belie strong left and right correlations present in 2-segment models. Post-treatment CST close to the estimated inflection points showed the best expected VALS. The SCORE2 participants with a post-treatment CST after treatment close to the estimated inflection points of 217 to 256 µm showed the best VALS. In patients treated with anti-VEGF for macular edema associated with CRVO or HRVO, a thinner retina is not always associated with better VALS. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

One-Year Brolucizumab Outcomes in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration from a Large United States Cohort in the IRIS® Registry.

PURPOSE: To evaluate visual acuity (VA) and injection intervals in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) after 12 months of brolucizumab therapy in clinical practice. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Adults in the United States-based IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) with nAMD who received brolucizumab exclusively for 12 months (2308 eyes of 2079 patients). METHODS: Observational study of eyes with a first injection of brolucizumab (index), followed by 2 or more brolucizumab injections over the following 12 months without switching to another anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agent. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were change in best recorded VA and, for eyes receiving prior anti-VEGF therapy (treatment-experienced eyes), the difference between the brolucizumab injection interval at 12 months and the anti-VEGF injection interval before switching. The interval before switching was defined as the time between the prior anti-VEGF and index brolucizumab injections; brolucizumab interval was the time between the closest injection to day 365 and the preceding injection. Secondary outcomes included incident adverse events. RESULTS: Overall VA at index was 61.6 ± 18.4 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters; 83.7% of treatment-naive eyes (184/220) and 86.1% of treatment-experienced eyes (1797/2088) showed stable (< 10 letters gained or lost) or improved (≥ 10 letters gained) VA at 12 months. Among treatment-experienced eyes receiving a prior anti-VEGF injection within 365 days before index, 29.5% (594/2015) showed an interval before switching of 8 weeks or more (mean, 7.6 ± 5.5 weeks), whereas 83.1% (1734/2015) showed a brolucizumab injection interval at 12 months of 8 weeks or more (mean, 10.3 ± 4.0 weeks). In all, 77.1% of treatment-experienced eyes (1554/2015) showed an interval extension of 1 week or more; of these, 55.4% (861/1554) showed an extension of 4 weeks or more. CONCLUSIONS: In this community-based study, at 12 months, brolucizumab treatment prolonged the interval between anti-VEGF injections for most treatment-experienced eyes, particularly those with shorter intervals before switching, while maintaining or improving VA. With careful balancing of the benefits and risks, switching to brolucizumab treatment may offer the advantage of extending the treatment interval for patients with a high anti-VEGF therapy burden. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Factors Linked to Injection Interval Extension in Eyes with Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration Switched to Brolucizumab.

PURPOSE: To evaluate factors associated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injection interval extension in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) switched to brolucizumab treatment. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Adults in the United States-based IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) with nAMD who switched from another anti-VEGF agent to brolucizumab-only treatment for ≥ 12 months from October 8, 2019, through November 26, 2021. METHODS: Univariable and multivariable analyses examined associations of demographic and clinical characteristics with the likelihood of interval extension after switching to brolucizumab therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Eyes were classified as either extenders or nonextenders at 12 months. Extenders were eyes that achieved (1) an extension of ≥ 2 weeks in the brolucizumab injection interval at 12 months versus the interval before switching (time between the last known prior anti-VEGF injection and first [index] brolucizumab injection) and (2) stable (< 10 letters gained or lost) or improved (≥ 10 letters gained) visual acuity (VA) at 12 months versus VA at index injection. RESULTS: Of 2015 eyes among 1890 patients who switched to brolucizumab treatment, 1186 (58.9%) were extenders. In univariable analyses, demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between extenders and nonextenders, except that extenders had shorter intervals before switching versus nonextenders (mean, 5.9 ± 2.1 weeks vs. 10.1 ± 7.6 weeks, respectively). In multivariable logistic regression modeling, a shorter interval before switching was associated significantly and positively with interval extension with brolucizumab therapy (adjusted odds ratio, 5.6 for interval before switching of < 8 weeks versus ≥ 8 weeks; 95% confidence interval, 4.5-6.9; P < 0.001), and eyes with an index VA of 40 to 65 letters were significantly less likely to be extenders than eyes in the higher (better) index VA categories. CONCLUSIONS: Length of the treatment interval before switching was the characteristic associated most strongly with successful interval extension with brolucizumab. Treatment-experienced patients who required more frequent injections (i.e., shorter intervals before switching) showed the greatest extensions when switching to brolucizumab. With careful consideration of benefits and risks, brolucizumab may be a valuable option for patients with higher treatment burdens because of the need for frequent injections. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

In Vivo Longitudinal Measurement of Cone Photoreceptor Density in Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

PURPOSE: To evaluate cone photoreceptor density in clinically unremarkable retinal regions in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) using adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO). DESIGN: Prospective case series with normal comparison group. METHODS: Ten eyes of 7 patients with intermediate AMD were studied, including 4 with predominantly subretinal drusenoid deposits (SDD) and 3 without SDD. Macular regions with a clinical absence of AMD-associated lesions were identified by cone packing structure on AOSLO and optical coherence tomography. Cone density was measured in 1174 clinically unremarkable regions within the central subfield (CSF), the inner (IR), and outer rings (OR) of the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study grid over 39.6 ± 3.3 months and compared with age-matched normal values obtained in 17 participants. RESULTS: Cone density decreased at 98.3% of the examined locations over time in the eyes with AMD. In the CSF, IR, and OR, cones declined by -255 ± 135, -133 ± 45, and -59 ± 24 cones/degree2/year, respectively, in eyes with SDD, and by -212 ± 89, -83 ± 37, and -27 ± 18 cones/degree2/year, respectively, in eyes without SDD. The percentage of retinal loci with cone density lower than normal (Z score < -2) increased over the follow-up: from 42% at the baseline to 80% at the last visit in eyes with SDD and from 31% to 70% in eyes without SDD. CONCLUSIONS: AOSLO revealed cone photoreceptor loss in regions that appear otherwise unremarkable clinically. These findings may help explain the loss of mesopic sensitivity reported in these areas in eyes with intermediate AMD.

SCORE2 Report 20: Relationship of Treatment Discontinuation With Visual Acuity and Central Subfield Thickness Outcomes.

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment discontinuation with baseline factors and outcomes in eyes treated initially with aflibercept or bevacizumab for macular edema from central or hemiretinal vein occlusion. DESIGN: Long-term follow-up after a randomized clinical trial from 64 US centers. METHODS: Analysis included 150 SCORE2 Month 60 completers classified into 3 groups: discontinued treatment early, treated intermittently, and treated continuously. Outcomes included visual acuity (VA) and central subfield thickness (CST). RESULTS: Patients who discontinued treatment early were younger (60.9 years, vs 66.7 and 70.5 for the treated intermittently and treated continuously groups; P = .001), and 17.4% were Black, compared to 19.5% and 4.7% for the treated intermittently and treated continuously groups (P = .006). At Month 60, the discontinued treatment early group had a higher proportion with complete resolution of macular edema (69.6%) than those treated intermittently (15.0%) and treated continuously (15.7%) (P < .001). Least-squares means analyses over follow-up demonstrated that the discontinued treatment early group had a lower mean CST (257 µm) than the treated intermittently (CST = 303 µm, P = .02) and treated continuously (CST = 300 µm, P = .01) groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to those treated continuously, those who discontinued treatment early were younger and more likely Black. The discontinued treatment early group had a higher proportion with complete resolution of macular edema at Month 60, and a lower mean CST over follow-up, but not better VA, than the treated continuously and treated intermittently groups. Results support the need for continued monitoring and individualized treatment for patients treated with anti-VEGF for macular edema from central or hemiretinal vein occlusion.

Anatomic Biomarkers of Macular Edema Associated with Retinal Vein Occlusion.

PURPOSE: To assess the relationship between best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and anatomic features in patients with macular edema (ME) related to retinal vein occlusion (RVO). DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of 3 clinical trials, which included verified diagnoses, protocol refractions, and the assessment of OCT and fluorescein angiography (FA) images at a masked reading center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients diagnosed with RVO-ME. METHODS: Correlation analyses were performed to determine the correlation between BCVA and macular anatomy at baseline and at 12 and 24 weeks and between changes from baseline to 12 and 24 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The correlations between BCVA and central subfield thickness (CST), ellipsoid zone (EZ) integrity, intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid, central leakage, and ischemia were assessed. RESULTS: In a total of 828 eyes with RVO-ME, the mean age, BCVA, and CST at baseline was 64.7 years, 51.1 letters, and 656.9 µm, respectively. At baseline, a moderate negative correlation was observed between BCVA and CST (r = - 0.56, P < 0.001). At weeks 12 and 24, the mean BCVA of eyes with definitely abnormal (absent) EZ was statistically significantly worse than that of eyes with normal EZ. At week 12, a moderate negative correlation was observed between changes in BCVA and changes in CST (r = - 0.35, P < 0.001), with a similar degree of association noted at week 24 (r = - 0.35, P < 0.001). At weeks 12 and 24, eyes that showed any improvement in central IRF showed a greater improvement in BCVA than eyes that showed no improvement worsening (week 12: 463 eyes, 18.3 letters vs. 177 eyes, 13.0 letters, respectively, P < 0.001) and (week 24: 332 eyes, 20.2 letters vs. 131 eyes, 13.3 letters, respectively, P < 0.001). With respect to the correlation between baseline BCVA and fluorescein leakage or capillary nonperfusion, the Pearson correlation coefficients were - 0.41 (P < 0.001) and - 0.16 (P = 0.060), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to CST, there are important clinically relevant relationships between BCVA and both OCT and FA anatomic features in patients with RVO-ME.

Month 60 Outcomes After Treatment Initiation With Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Macular Edema Due to Central Retinal or Hemiretinal Vein Occlusion.

PURPOSE: To investigate 5-year outcomes in eyes initially treated with aflibercept or bevacizumab for macular edema due to central retinal or hemiretinal vein occlusion. METHODS: Long-term follow-up (LTF) after a randomized clinical trial from 64 centers in the United States. Participants were followed up to 60 months and treated at investigator discretion after completing the 12-month treatment protocol. Main outcomes were visual acuity letter score (VALS) and central subfield thickness (CST) on optical coherence tomography. RESULTS: Seventy-five percent (248/330) of eligible participants completed at least 1 visit between months 24 and 60, and 45% completed the month 60 visit. Among participants completing month 60, overall mean VALS improvement over baseline was 13.5 (95% CI: 9.6, 17.5), less than the mean improvement of 20.6 (95% CI: 18.7, 22.4) observed at month 12, with no significant differences between originally assigned study groups. Further, 66% (99/150) had at least 1 treatment between months 48 and 60 with a mean (SD) of 3.41 (3.69) treatments over this period. Mean CST was 671 µm at baseline and 261 µm (95% CI: 241.2, 280.9) at month 60. CONCLUSIONS: Although VALS improved substantially when patients were treated per protocol through month 12, improvement lessened when treatment was at investigator discretion and fewer treatments were received although VALS remained markedly improved over baseline through year 5. Most patients continued to receive treatment in year 5. This suggests that continued monitoring and, if warranted, treatment with anti-VEGF therapy benefits patients with macular edema associated with central retinal or hemiretinal vein occlusion. Publication of this article is sponsored by the American Ophthalmological Society.

Baseline Characteristics and Outcomes After Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Macular Edema in Participants With Hemiretinal Vein Occlusion Compared With Participants With Central Retinal Vein Occlusion: Study of Comparative Treatments for Retinal Vein Occlusion 2 (SCORE2) Report 18.

Importance: Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections are commonly used to treat eyes with macular edema secondary to hemiretinal vein occlusion (HRVO) or central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). Information on whether differences exist in outcomes after anti-VEGF therapy can help guide treatment for each of the different disease types. Objective: To compare baseline characteristics, treatment burden, and outcomes of macular edema treatment in participants with HRVO with those of participants with CRVO. Design, Setting, and Participants: This post hoc outcome analysis from the Study of Comparative Treatments for Retinal Vein Occlusion 2 randomized clinical trial included 362 participants with macular edema caused by HRVO or CRVO treated at 66 US sites. Randomization began in September 2014, and the last month 24 follow-up visit occurred in February 2018. Data were analyzed from April 2020 to May 2021. Interventions: Eyes were initially randomized to 6 monthly intravitreal injections of aflibercept or bevacizumab and were treated according to protocol between months 6 to 12 depending on 6-month outcome. After month 12, patients were treated per investigator discretion and observed through month 60. Main Outcomes and Measures: Mean visual acuity letter score (VALS). Results: Of 362 included patients, 157 (43.4%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 68.9 (12.0) years. Outcome data were analyzed up to month 24 owing to substantial missing data at later visits. A significantly greater proportion of participants with HRVO than those with CRVO were Black (37% vs 11%). Treatment rates between months 12 to 23 were 0.36 (95% CI, 0.32-0.40) injections per month for patients with CRVO and 0.28 (95% CI, 0.19-0.36) for patients with HRVO (P = .11). The mean VALS from months 1 to 24 of an HRVO study eye exceeded that of a CRVO study eye by 5.5 (95% CI, 1.5-9.5; P = .01), consistent with the magnitude of the VALS difference between eyes with CRVO and HRVO at baseline. Eyes with CRVO presented at baseline with more macular edema than eyes with HRVO (difference in central subfield thickness [CST], 86 µm; 95% CI, 48-124; P < .001), with no difference in CST between the groups throughout months 1 to 24. Conclusions and Relevance: Black race was more prevalent among participants with HRVO than CRVO, and no differences were observed in the frequency of treatments for macular edema between eyes with CRVO and HRVO. Although eyes with CRVO presented with worse visual acuity and more macular edema on average than did eyes with HRVO, the magnitude of VALS improvement, central retinal thickness in response to anti-VEGF therapy, and treatment burden were similar between the groups.

Final Outcomes from the Randomized RECOVERY Trial of Aflibercept for Retinal Nonperfusion in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy.

PURPOSE: Retinal nonperfusion (RNP) is an important biomarker for diabetic retinopathy (DR). Data suggest that consistent anti-VEGF pharmacotherapy can slow RNP development. The RECOVERY trial evaluated the impact of aflibercept (Eylea, Regeneron) on RNP among eyes with proliferative DR (PDR). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized clinical trial with treatment crossover in the second year. SUBJECTS: Eyes with PDR and RNP. METHODS: At baseline, the subjects were randomized 1:1 to monthly (arm 1) or quarterly (arm 2) intravitreal 2 mg aflibercept. At the beginning of year 2, the treatment arms were crossed over so that the monthly-dosed subjects subsequently received quarterly dosing and the quarterly-dosed subjects subsequently received monthly dosing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in total RNP area (mm2) through year 2. Secondary outcomes included Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) scores; best-corrected visual acuity; central subfield thickness; additional measures of RNP, including ischemic index (ISI); and adverse event incidence. Means and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: Among all subjects, from baseline to year 2, the mean RNP increased from 235 mm2 to 402 mm2 (P < 0.0001), and the ISI increased from 25.8% to 50.4% (P < 0.0001). Increases in the mean RNP (P < 0.0001) and ISI (P < 0.0001) were also observed from year 1 to year 2. The mean total RNP increased from 264 mm2 at baseline to 386 mm2 (P < 0.0001) at year 2 in arm 1 and from 207 mm2 at baseline to 421 mm2 (P < 0.0001) at year 2 in arm 2 (P = 0.023, arm 1 vs. arm 2). Increases in the mean RNP for both treatment arms (P < 0.0001) were also specifically observed within year 2 (P = 0.32, arm 1 vs. arm 2). Compared with baseline, the DRSS scores at the end of year 2 improved in 82% (n = 27) of subjects and remained stable in 18% (n = 6), with no subjects experiencing worsening; at 2 years, the DRSS scores had improved by 2 or more steps in 65% (n = 11) and 81% (n = 13) of subjects in arms 1 and 2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Through year 2 of the RECOVERY trial, both treatment arms experienced significant increases in RNP. Despite the expansion of the RNP area in nearly all subjects, 82% of subjects demonstrated an improvement in DRSS levels from baseline, with no subjects experiencing worsening in DRSS scores.