RESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of chemoembolization for inoperable metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) refractory to re-radiotherapy. METHODS: Nineteen consecutive patients with recurrent MESCC after re-radiotherapy who had undergone chemoembolization were retrospectively analyzed. Outcome measures were pain relief rate, neurological improvement rate, objective response rate, and adverse events. MESCC degree classification was assessed using Bilsky grades. Pain assessment was performed using Numerical Rating Scale, and neurological function was evaluated using the Frankel classification. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 7 (range 2-44) months. All participants had MESCC grade 2 or higher and had severe pain. Fifteen patients (79%) had neurological deficits, and ten had Frankel classification C and five had D. Symptoms were relieved in almost all patients the day following chemoembolization. Pain relief was achieved in 18 of 19 (95%) patients; the median decrease in Numerical Rating Scale score was 8 (range 0-10; p < 0.001). Neurological improvement was achieved in 11 of 15 patients (73%); the median increase in Frankel classification was 1 (range 0-2; p = 0.006). Ten of 19 (53%) patients showed a reduction in MESCC; the median decrease in Bilsky grade was 1 (range 0-2; p = 0.005). There was no correlation between the change in Bilsky grade and pain relief (p = 0.421). However, the decrease in Bilsky grade significantly improved neurological symptoms (p = 0.01). No serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: Chemoembolization may be a useful palliative treatment modality for MESCC refractory to re-radiotherapy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3b, Follow up Study.
Assuntos
Embolização Terapêutica , Compressão da Medula Espinal , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral , Seguimentos , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Compressão da Medula Espinal/terapia , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/complicações , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/radioterapiaRESUMO
Objective: To describe the clinical utility and technical aspects of the candy-plug technique using an Excluder aortic extender (Ex-cuff) for false lumen (FL) occlusion in chronic aortic dissection. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective study analyzing seven consecutive patients (mean age, 63 years; range, 44-78 years; 6 men) with aneurysmal dilatation or rupture in chronic aortic dissection. All patients had undergone thoracic endovascular aortic repair with FL occlusion using this technique. We assessed technical (deployment accuracy) and clinical (no FL backflow on the latest contrast-enhanced computed tomography) success. Results: Technical success was obtained in six patients (86%). Technical failure was caused by the malposition of the candy-plug. The mean follow-up period was 593 days (range, 222-1225 days). Clinical success was obtained in four (57%), and incomplete Amplatzer Vascular Plug (AVP) embolization was seen in two. There was no enlarged FL after the procedure, and all patients are alive during the follow-up periods. Conclusion: The candy-plug technique using an Ex-cuff may be a feasible option; however, it takes time to achieve complete AVP embolization. Therefore, using additional embolic materials should be considered when we use it for the rupture case. (This is a translation of Jpn J Endovasc Interv 2018; 19: 29-35.).
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization for the palliation of radiotherapy (RT)-failure bone metastases (BMs) with those of re-radiotherapy (Re-RT) in achieving pain relief. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients with RT-failure BMs who had undergone Re-RT (23 patients) and transarterial chemoembolization (27 patients) were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was clinical response, and the secondary endpoints were objective response and adverse events. Pain assessment was performed using the numerical rating scale, and tumor response was evaluated using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Pain relief was defined as lack of pain with no analgesic usage (complete pain response) or a decrease in pain score by ≥3 points with analgesic usage (partial pain response). RESULTS: The pain relief rates in the Re-RT and transarterial chemoembolization groups were 57% and 92%, respectively (P = .006). The median pain relief duration was 2 and 3 months in the Re-RT and transarterial chemoembolization groups, respectively (P = .002). The 6-month pain-free survival rates were 30% and 51% in the Re-RT and transarterial chemoembolization groups, respectively (P = .08). The median tumor reduction rates were -4% and 9% in the Re-RT and transarterial chemoembolization groups, respectively (P < .001). The objective response rates were 0% and 11% in the Re-RT and transarterial chemoembolization groups, respectively (P = .29). No serious adverse events or complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Transarterial chemoembolization achieved a superior response rate and longer duration of palliation in symptomatic RT-failure BMs.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas/terapia , Dor do Câncer/terapia , Embolização Terapêutica , Manejo da Dor , Cuidados Paliativos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias Ósseas/complicações , Neoplasias Ósseas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Dor do Câncer/diagnóstico , Dor do Câncer/etiologia , Embolização Terapêutica/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Manejo da Dor/efeitos adversos , Medição da Dor , Tolerância a Radiação , Reirradiação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Purpose: To report 3 patients with infective endocarditis who underwent transcatheter arterial embolization for mycotic aneurysm of the distal superior mesenteric artery (SMA). Case Report: Three men (60, 64, and 65 years old) were diagnosed with infective endocarditis. Antibiotics were initiated immediately after admission and continued for several weeks to months. Distal SMA mycotic aneurysm was identified on computed tomography in the vicinity of the ileocolic artery at 33, 26, and 30 days after admission. In case 1, the ileal artery was occluded distal to the aneurysm, with collateral flow to the ileum. In case 2, the mycotic aneurysm was located below the ileocolic artery, which was stenosed distal to the lesion. In case 3, the aneurysm was located on a branch of the ileal artery. Transarterial embolization using microcoils was successfully performed in all patients. No complications associated with embolotherapy or relapse of infection were observed in these 3 patients at 60, 30, and 15 months, respectively. Conclusion: Transcatheter arterial embolization for distal SMA mycotic aneurysm could provide an alternative to open surgery. Anatomical assessment of collateral flow and preprocedure long-term antibiotic therapy could play important roles in preventing bowel ischemia and minimizing the risk of infection relapse.
Assuntos
Aneurisma Infectado/terapia , Embolização Terapêutica , Endocardite Bacteriana/microbiologia , Artéria Mesentérica Superior , Idoso , Aneurisma Infectado/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma Infectado/microbiologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Embolização Terapêutica/instrumentação , Endocardite Bacteriana/complicações , Endocardite Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Artéria Mesentérica Superior/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Mesentérica Superior/microbiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: We presented a new method of sac embolization using n-butyl-cyanoacrylate (NBCA) with balloon occlusion of the aorta (SEBOA) that can facilitate decreasing flow rate of the involved branches with the goal of type 2 endoleak resolution after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). TECHNIQUE: This technique is demonstrated in six patients who required type 2 endoleak treatment including previous technical failure. A transarterial approach was performed in four patients and transabdominal direct puncture in two. Technical success was defined as complete embolization of both involved branches and sac on postoperative CT. Sacography under balloon occlusion of the aorta demonstrated decreased flow rate of the all involved branches in all patients. SEBOA was performed using 25 or 33% of NBCA diluted with lipiodol. Technical success was obtained in 3 of 6 patients, and one major complication was observed with adhesion of NBCA to the microcatheter resulting in foreign body retention. CONCLUSION: SEBOA may help solve the difficulty of type 2 endoleak treatment after EVAR as decreased flow rate of the involved branches under balloon occlusion of the aorta was achieved in all patients. However, protocols regarding concentration of NBCA or using other embolic materials are needed to improve the success rate.
Assuntos
Aneurisma Aórtico/terapia , Oclusão com Balão/métodos , Embolização Terapêutica/métodos , Endoleak/terapia , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Idoso , Aorta/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma Aórtico/complicações , Aneurisma Aórtico/diagnóstico por imagem , Embucrilato/administração & dosagem , Endoleak/complicações , Endoleak/diagnóstico por imagem , Óleo Etiodado/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Endovascular treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with proximal chronic aortic dissection is challenging as a false and true lumen at the level of the infra-renal neck does not allow a sufficient landing zone. We describe staged endovascular neck stabilization prior to standard endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) for AAA with chronic aortic dissection. TECHNIQUE: To create a stable proximal neck (PN) by closing entry tears, thereby resulting in total false lumen thrombosis (FLT) prior to standard EVAR. Case 1 false lumen fenestrations were present at the descending aorta, the right renal artery orifice and PN. After closing the entry tear by thoracic EVAR, an aortic cuff was placed in the true lumen of the PN and renal stenting for the right renal artery was performed. After 2 months, total FLT was achieved, and EVAR was performed. Case 2 false lumen fenestrations were present at the descending, super celiac aorta and PN. After closing the entry by TEVAR, aortic cuffs were placed at infrarenal aorta to close residual entries. After 1 month of achieving total FLT, EVAR was performed. Both cases had no type 1 endoleak during follow-up. CONCLUSION: The endovascular neck stabilization is a useful treatment option that facilitates standard EVAR for AAA in chronic aortic dissection.