RESUMO
BACKGROUND The rarity of ischiopagus tripus conjoined twins complicates the surgical separation, owing to the lack of cases and high complexity. We aim to report our experience in performing orthopedic correction for ischiopagus tripus twins. CASE REPORT A pair of 3-year-old conjoined boys presented with a fused body at the pelvis region and only 1 umbilicus. There were 2 legs separated by shared genitalia and an anus at the midline, and 1 fused leg, which could be felt and moved by both of the patients. The twins also shared internal organs of the bladder, intestine, and rectum, as visualized through angiography computerized tomography scan. After several team discussions with the institutional review board, the hospital ethics committee, and both parents, it was agreed to perform disarticulation of the fused third limb, followed by correction of the trunk alignment by pelvic closed wedge osteotomy and internal fixation. We successfully reconstructed the pelvis using locking plates and additional 3.5-mm cortical screws and 1.2-mm stainless steel wire. CONCLUSIONS This report describes the presentation and surgical management of a case of ischiopagus tripus conjoined twins. It highlights the challenges involved in surgery and the importance of investigating these infants for other congenital abnormalities. Although surgical approaches for different sets of twins should be individually tailored, interventions aimed to provide optimal outcomes should consider ethical issues and parental/patient expectations. Even in situations in which the twins are inseparable, there is still room for surgical correction to be performed.
Assuntos
Gêmeos Unidos , Humanos , Gêmeos Unidos/cirurgia , Masculino , Pré-Escolar , Qualidade de Vida , Osteotomia/métodos , Ossos Pélvicos/cirurgia , Ossos Pélvicos/anormalidades , Ísquio/anormalidades , Ísquio/cirurgia , Pelve/anormalidades , Pelve/cirurgiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Septic arthritis in the neonate is a devastating condition that affects children and causes irreversible limb dysfunction or deformity. Neonatal septic arthritis is harmful and will end with skeletal abnormalities. PRESENTATION OF CASE: Neonate born with ileal atresia and underwent surgical treatment. Postoperatively, the patient experienced sepsis and was accompanied by septic arthritis. The patient was given triple IV antibiotic treatment without surgical debridement. Ten months later the deformity became prominent with physeal destruction of the affected area at distal femur. At age six the patient came to the orthopaedic outpatient clinic and there was a 3 cm limb-length discrepancy of both legs. DISCUSSION: Early diagnosis of septic arthritis is critical for successful treatment, since neonates with delayed proper diagnosis have been shown to have poor long-term prognosis. In our case the patient was only managed by IV antibiotics administration and continued with oral antibiotics. The reason for this decision due to general condition was improved after medication although clinically he still has a small amount of knee swelling. CONCLUSION: Neonatal septic arthritis is dangerous and may have a devastating long term complication. Surgical management should be considered as treatment of choice if there is a lack or no progression from clinical and laboratory examination after antibiotic adiminstration. Growth arrest on the distal femur will result in leg length disparity and angular deformity.
RESUMO
A 16-year-old boy was diagnosed with spondyloptosis of the cervical spine at the C5-6 level with a neurologic deficit following cervical manipulation. He could not move his upper and lower extremities, but the sensory and autonomic function was spared. The pre-operative American Spinal Cord Injury Association (ASIA) Score was B with SF-36 being 25%, and Karnofsky's score was 40%. The patient was disabled and required special care and assistance. We performed anterior decompression, cervical corpectomy at the level of C6 and lower part of C5, deformity correction, cage insertion, bone grafting, and stabilization with an anterior cervical plate. The patient's objective functional score had increased after six months follow up and assessed objectively with the ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) E or Excellent, SF-36 score 94%, and Karnofsky score was 90%. The patient could carry on regular activity with minor signs or symptoms of the disease. This case report highlights severe complications following cervical manipulation, a summary of the clinical presentation, surgical treatment choices, and a review of the relevant literature. In addition, the sequential improvement of the patient's functional outcome after surgical correction will be discussed.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: External fixators are the most common fixation method for fractures with substantial soft tissue compromise. Nonetheless, the frames used are bulky, uncomfortable, and cumbersome to patients. Using locking compression plate (LCP) as an external fixator (low profile external fixation/LPEF) owns the same properties as standard external fixators but may overcome disadvantages because of its low-profile frame. This case series aims to evaluate the results of LPEF for the management of tibia fracture with soft tissue compromise. PRESENTATION OF CASES: We reviewed five patients at our centers who underwent surgery in 2020 with the application of LPEF. These patients had grade IIIA open tibia fracture with respective complications. The follow-up duration was 6 months post-operative in which we assessed Southampton Wound Assessment Scale (SWAS), laboratory infection markers, radiographic evaluation, and the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS). The results showed all wounds healed and cases with infection showed tendency of resolving, alongside varying degree of bone healing. The implant was well tolerated for patients and the functional outcome was overall good (mean LEFS: 71.26%). DISCUSSION: The LPEF is fortuitously lightweight and more convenient for patients to ambulate, thus the compliance of early functional exercise is more likely to happen. CONCLUSION: Application of LPEF can be considered as an option for treating soft tissue compromised tibia fracture. In our experience, it is low profile, more acceptable to the patients, and displayed favorable outcomes especially in terms of soft tissue or skin healing and infection resolution.