Efficacy and Safety of Oral GnRh Antagonists in Patients With Uterine Fibroids: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of GnRH antagonists in patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids. DATA SOURCES: A literature search was performed on PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov using the MeSH and Emtree terms "leiomyoma" and "gonadotropin-releasing hormone." STUDY SELECTION: All clinical trials that provided efficacy and safety data in clinical terms (i.e., reduction in menstrual bleeding and discomfort, changes in the size of leiomyoma and uterine volume, etc.) were included. We excluded all preclinical studies, case reports, meta-analyses, review articles, and clinical studies irrelevant to the study question. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two authors extracted data from 9 clinical studies. The extracted data included the study's characteristics, participants' baseline characteristics, treatment drugs, efficacy measures, and toxicity. CONCLUSION: Among oral GnRH antagonists, relugolix, elagolix, and linzagolix were safe in patients with uterine fibroids. These drugs, alone and in combination with E2/NETA (estradiol/norethindrone acetate), showed significantly better efficacy than placebo in improving bleeding, discomfort, uterine/leiomyoma sizes, and quality of life in premenopausal patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids. However, more randomized, double-blind, multicentre clinical trials are needed to confirm these results and to see long-term benefits.

Current Status of Monoclonal Antibodies-Based Therapies in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.

Background Multiple patients with prostate cancer become resistant to castration therapies, which is termed castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Purpose The purpose of this review is to assess the status of efficacy (≥50% decline in prostate-specific antigen (PSA), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS)) and safety (grade 3-4 adverse effects) of monoclonal antibodies in CRPC. Data source We searched databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Results Hazard ratios of PFS and OS were 0.77 (95% CI = 0.69-0.87, I2 = 53%) and 0.98 (95% CI = 0.86-1.11, I2 = 40%), respectively, in the favor of monoclonal antibodies as compared to placebo. Risk ratio (RR) of >50% decline in PSA was 1.99 (95% CI = 0.97-4.08, I2 = 53%) in favor of monoclonal antibodies. Pooled incidence of >50% decline in PSA levels was 15% (95% CI = 0.1-0.23, I2 = 83%), 29% (95% CI = 0.14-0.51, I2 = 93%), 63% (95% CI = 0.49-0.76, I2 = 77%), and 88% (95% CI = 0.81-0.93, I2 = 0%) in single, two, three, and four-drug regimens, respectively. Conclusion Monoclonal antibodies are well tolerated and showed better PFS as compared to placebo. However, OS was only improved with ipilimumab. Denosumab delayed skeletal-related adverse events as compared to zoledronic acid. More multicenter double-blind clinical trials may be needed to confirm these results.