RESUMO
Artificial intelligence (AI) holds significant potential for enhancing quality of gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy, but the adoption of AI in clinical practice is hampered by the lack of rigorous standardisation and development methodology ensuring generalisability. The aim of the Quality Assessment of pre-clinical AI studies in Diagnostic Endoscopy (QUAIDE) Explanation and Checklist was to develop recommendations for standardised design and reporting of preclinical AI studies in GI endoscopy.The recommendations were developed based on a formal consensus approach with an international multidisciplinary panel of 32 experts among endoscopists and computer scientists. The Delphi methodology was employed to achieve consensus on statements, with a predetermined threshold of 80% agreement. A maximum three rounds of voting were permitted.Consensus was reached on 18 key recommendations, covering 6 key domains: data acquisition and annotation (6 statements), outcome reporting (3 statements), experimental setup and algorithm architecture (4 statements) and result presentation and interpretation (5 statements). QUAIDE provides recommendations on how to properly design (1. Methods, statements 1-14), present results (2. Results, statements 15-16) and integrate and interpret the obtained results (3. Discussion, statements 17-18).The QUAIDE framework offers practical guidance for authors, readers, editors and reviewers involved in AI preclinical studies in GI endoscopy, aiming at improving design and reporting, thereby promoting research standardisation and accelerating the translation of AI innovations into clinical practice.
RESUMO
Background Artificial intelligence (AI) has made remarkable progress in image recognition using deep learning systems and has been used to detect esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, all previous reports were not investigated in clinical settings, but in a retrospective design. Therefore, we conducted this trial to determine how AI can help endoscopists detect ESCC in clinical settings. Methods This was a prospective, single-center, exploratory, and randomized controlled trial. High-risk patients with ESCC undergoing screening or surveillance esophagogastroduodenoscopy were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the AI or control group. In the AI group, the endoscopists watched both the AI monitor detecting ESCC with annotation and the normal monitor simultaneously, whereas in the control group, the endoscopists watched only the normal monitor. In both groups, the endoscopists observed the esophagus using white-light imaging (WLI), followed by narrow-band imaging (NBI) and iodine staining. The primary endpoint was the enhanced detection rate of ESCC by non-experts using AI. The detection rate was defined as the ratio of WLI/NBI-detected ESCCs to all ESCCs detected by iodine staining. Results A total of 320 patients were included in this analysis. The detection rate of ESCC in non-experts was 47% in the AI group and 45% in the control group (p=0.93), with no significant difference, was similar to that in experts (87% vs. 57%, p=0.20) and all endoscopists (57% vs. 50%, p=0.70). Conclusions This study could not demonstrate an improvement in the esophageal cancer detection rate using the AI diagnostic support system for ESCC.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The practice of endoscopic diagnosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) often diverges from evidence-based standards due to various factors, including inadequate dissemination of evidence or a mismatch between evidence and real-world contexts. This survey aimed to identify discrepancies between evidence-based standard practices and community standard practices for ESCC among endoscopists. METHODS: An online survey targeting endoscopists who perform upper gastrointestinal endoscopy at least weekly was conducted to collect data on clinical practices related to ESCC diagnosis. The survey, comprising 20 questions, was disseminated through multiple professional networks. Descriptive statistical analysis and logistic regression were performed to analyze the data. RESULTS: Data from 819 endoscopists were included in the analyses. Notably, a significant proportion employed narrow-band imaging/blue-laser imaging over iodine staining, and preferences varied based on risk assessment for ESCC. In total, 64.0% of endoscopists primarily used iodine solution at a concentration of 1% or less, while 96.5% of endoscopists performed an observation of the oral cavity and the pharynx when conducting upper gastrointestinal endoscopies on individuals at high risk of ESCC. The surveillance interval for metachronous multiple ESCCs was most commonly every 6 months, followed by every 12 months. In addition, most physicians conducted surveillance of metastatic recurrence at 6-month intervals. CONCLUSIONS: This survey highlights significant gaps between evidence-based and community standard practices in the endoscopic diagnosis of ESCC. These findings underscore the need for enhanced dissemination of evidence-based guidelines and consideration of real-world clinical contexts to bridge these gaps and optimize patient care.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: In familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) patients, fundic gland polyps (FGPs) have been considered a risk factor for gastric neoplasms. We speculated that FGPs in FAP patients spread directionally from the greater to the lesser curvature of the gastric body and investigated the relationship between the distribution of FGPs and gastric neoplasm development. METHODS: We extracted 195 FAP patients from two institutions and reviewed their medical records. Gastric polyposis was classified based on the FGP distribution (P0, no FGPs; P1, localized in the fundus or greater curvature of the gastric body; P2, spreading to the anterior or posterior wall; P3, involving the proximal half of the lesser curvature; and P4, spreading from P3 to the anal side of the lesser curvature). RESULTS: The 195 eligible patients were divided into the neoplasm group (n = 54, 28%) and the non-neoplasm group (n = 141, 72%). Overall, 24% of the patients were Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori)-positive. In the FGP distribution, the rate of patients with gastric neoplasm tended to increase significantly with each step towards an increasingly wide distribution from P0 to P4 in H. pylori-negative patients, but not in H. pylori-positive ones. In addition, in H. pylori-negative patients, the likelihood of neoplasm increased consistently from P0 to P4, with the highest odds ratio (95% confidence interval) at P4 of 14.1 (2.5-154.4). Furthermore, multivariate analysis showed P4 and Spigelman stage ≥III were significantly associated with gastric neoplasm development. CONCLUSION: FGP distribution was correlated with gastric neoplasm development in FAP patients.
Assuntos
Polipose Adenomatosa do Colo , Infecções por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/microbiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Polipose Adenomatosa do Colo/patologia , Polipose Adenomatosa do Colo/microbiologia , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções por Helicobacter/complicações , Infecções por Helicobacter/patologia , Infecções por Helicobacter/microbiologia , Fundo Gástrico/patologia , Fundo Gástrico/microbiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Adulto Jovem , Pólipos/patologia , Pólipos/microbiologia , Fatores de Risco , AdolescenteRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Effective treatment of lesions that develop in the irradiated area of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is a major concern. This study aimed to clarify the efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection for such lesions. METHODS: Among consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic resection for histologically proven head and neck squamous cell carcinoma between January 2014 and December 2021, those who received definitive radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy before endoscopic resection were included in this single-center, retrospective study. Short- and long-term outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Among 422 patients who underwent endoscopic resection for 615 lesions, 43 patients with 57 lesions were eligible. All 57 lesions were treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection and en bloc resection was achieved in all lesions. Grade 3 of Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0 occurred in eight (19%) patients (dysphagia, seven; stricture, three; aspiration pneumonia, two; and pharyngeal necrosis, one [some cases overlapped]), but no grade ≥ 4 events occurred. Enteral nutrition by gastrostomy was temporarily required in two patients owing to dysphagia and laryngeal necrosis. During the median follow-up of 40 (interquartile range, 29.5-61) months after endoscopic submucosal dissection for the lesions developed in the irradiated area, local recurrence and metachronous lesions developed in two (5%) and nine (21%) patients, respectively. However, total laryngectomies and tracheostomies were avoided in all patients. The 3-year overall and disease-specific survivals were 81% (95% confidence interval, 64%-91%) and 94% (95% confidence interval, 79%-99%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Favorable local control and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection were demonstrated.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic resection (ER) is a minimally invasive treatment for esophageal cancer that sometimes causes complications. To understand the real-world incidence and risk factors for these complications, a nationwide survey was conducted across Japan. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study included patients who underwent ER for esophageal cancer from April 2017 to March 2018 (2017 complication analysis) and April 2021 to March 2022 (2021 complication analysis). The study assessed the complication rates and conducted risk factor analyses for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) using data for these patients, with exclusions based on specific criteria to ensure data accuracy. RESULTS: In the 2021 complication analysis, there were two mortalities highly likely attributable (0.03%) to ER and one mortality possibly attributable (0.01%) to ER. Intraoperative perforation, delayed bleeding, and pneumonia occurred in 137 cases (1.8%), 44 cases (0.6%), and 130 cases (1.7%), respectively. In the multivariate analysis for complications after ESD, low ER volume of the facility was an independent risk factor for perforation, while lesion location in the cervical or upper thoracic esophagus was an independent factor for reduced risk of perforation. Age ≥ 80 years was a risk factor for pneumonia, while use of traction techniques was a factor for reduced risk of pneumonia. Lesions located in the middle thoracic esophagus had a lower risk of stricture, and the risk of stricture increased as the circumferential extent of the lesion increased. CONCLUSIONS: This large-scale study provided detailed insights into the complications associated with esophageal ER and identified significant risk factors.
Assuntos
Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Humanos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Japão/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Fatores de Risco , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa/efeitos adversos , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Incidência , Pneumonia/epidemiologia , Pneumonia/etiologia , Esofagoscopia/efeitos adversos , Esofagoscopia/métodos , Perfuração Esofágica/epidemiologia , Perfuração Esofágica/etiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is a high incidence of stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for cervical esophageal cancer. We aimed to elucidate the risk factors for stricture and to evaluate the efficacy of steroid injection for stricture prevention in the cervical esophagus. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 100 patients who underwent ESD for cervical esophageal cancer to (1) identify the factors associated with stricture among patients who did not receive steroid injection, and (2) compare the incidence of stricture between patients with and without steroid injection. RESULTS: Among 48 patients who did not receive steroid injection, there were significant differences in tumor size (P = .026), resection time (P = .028), and circumferential extent of the mucosal defect (P = .005) between patients with stricture (n = 5) and without stricture (n = 43). Compared with patients without steroid injection, patients with steroid injection had a significantly lower incidence of stricture when the post-ESD mucosal defect was <3/4 and ≥1/2 (40% versus 8%; P = .039). For the patients with a post-ESD mucosal defect of ≥3/4 (n = 13), local steroid injection was performed for all of them, and 6 (46%) developed stricture. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent ≥1/2 circumferential resection were at high risk of cervical esophageal stricture. Steroid injection had a stricture prevention effect in patients with <3/4 and ≥1/2 circumferential resection, but seemed to be insufficient in preventing stricture in patients with ≥3/4 circumferential resection.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Paget's disease (PD) is a carcinoma, in which irregular atypical cells with abundant cytoplasm proliferate mainly within the epithelium and is classified into PD occurring in the breast and extramammary Paget's disease (EMPD) occurring outside the breast. Essentially, extramammary PD is reported as a tumor for which it is difficult for surgeons to properly determine the line of resection. CASE PRESENTATION: An 83-year-old male was admitted to our hospital because of roughness of the esophageal epithelium during the follow-up examination for a gastric ulcer. A preoperative biopsy revealed squamous cell carcinoma; therefore, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was performed. CONCLUSIONS: The characteristic feature in this patient was the distribution of tumor cells and, accordingly, the difficulty in identifying the neoplastic distribution. In this patient, the odd distribution and growth pattern of the tumor cells made it difficult for the operator to identify the distribution of the lesion preoperatively.
RESUMO
The literature pertaining to surveillance following treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) was reviewed and summarized, encompassing the current status and future perspectives. Analysis of the standardized mortality and incidence ratios for these cancers indicates an elevated risk of cancer in the oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, and lungs among patients with esophageal SCC compared to the general population. To enhance the efficacy of surveillance for these metachronous cancers, risk stratification is needed. Various factors, including multiple Lugol-voiding lesions, multiple foci of dilated vascular areas, young age, and high mean corpuscular volume, have been identified as predictors of metachronous SCCs. Current practice involves stratifying the risk of metachronous esophageal and head/neck SCCs based on the presence of multiple Lugol-voiding lesions. Endoscopic surveillance, scheduled 6-12 months post-endoscopic resection, has demonstrated effectiveness, with over 90% of metachronous esophageal SCCs treatable through minimally invasive modalities. Narrow-band imaging emerges as the preferred surveillance method for esophageal and head/neck SCC based on comparative studies of various imaging techniques. Innovative approaches, such as artificial intelligence-assisted detection systems and radiofrequency ablation of high-risk background mucosa, may improve outcomes in patients following endoscopic resection.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: First-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (pembrolizumab-chemotherapy) demonstrated improved efficacy and a manageable safety profile versus placebo plus chemotherapy (placebo-chemotherapy) in the subgroup analysis of Japanese patients with advanced/metastatic esophageal cancer in KEYNOTE-590 at a median follow-up of 24.4 months. Longer-term data from the Japanese subgroup analysis of KEYNOTE-590 are reported. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo every 3 weeks for ≤ 35 cycles plus chemotherapy (cisplatin 80 mg/m2 and 5-fluorouracil 800 mg/m2/day). Endpoints included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS; investigator-assessed per RECIST v1.1; dual primary) and safety (secondary). Early tumor shrinkage (ETS) and depth of response (DpR) were assessed post hoc. RESULTS: Overall, 141 patients were enrolled in Japan. As of July 9, 2021, median follow-up was 36.6 months (range, 29.8-45.7). Pembrolizumab-chemotherapy showed a trend toward favorable OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47-1.03) and PFS (0.57; 0.39-0.83) versus placebo-chemotherapy. In the pembrolizumab-chemotherapy group, patients with ETS ≥ 20% (55/74; 74.3%) versus < 20% (19/74; 25.7%) had favorable OS (HR, 0.23; 95% CI 0.12-0.42) and PFS (0.24; 0.13-0.43). Patients with DpR ≥ 60% (31/74; 41.9%) versus < 60% (43/74; 58.1%) had favorable OS (HR, 0.37; 95% CI 0.20-0.68) and PFS (0.24; 0.13-0.43). Grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 55/74 patients (74.3%) with pembrolizumab-chemotherapy and 41/67 patients (61.2%) with placebo-chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: With longer-term follow-up of Japanese patients with advanced/metastatic esophageal cancer, efficacy continued to favor pembrolizumab-chemotherapy compared with placebo-chemotherapy, with no new safety signals observed. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03189719.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Cisplatino , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Fluoruracila , Humanos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Seguimentos , Japão/epidemiologia , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Cisplatino/uso terapêutico , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Adulto , Resultado do Tratamento , Método Duplo-Cego , Metástase Neoplásica , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , População do Leste AsiáticoAssuntos
Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa , Tumores Neuroendócrinos , Neoplasias Retais , Terapia de Salvação , Humanos , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa/métodos , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/cirurgia , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/patologia , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Terapia de Salvação/métodosRESUMO
In Japan, standard of care of the patients with resectable esophageal cancer is neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by esophagectomy. Patients unfitted for surgery or with unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer are generally indicated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Local disease control is undoubtful important for the management of patients with esophageal cancer, therefore endoscopic evaluation of local efficacy after non-surgical treatments must be essential. The significant shrink of primary site after NAC has been reported as a good indicator of pathological good response as well as favorable survival outcome after esophagectomy. And patients who could achieve remarkable shrink to T1 level after CRT had favorable outcomes with salvage surgery and could be good candidates for salvage endoscopic treatments. Based on these data, "Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer, 12th edition" defined the new endoscopic criteria "remarkable response (RR)", that means significant volume reduction after treatment, with the subjective endoscopic evaluation are proposed. In addition, the finding of local recurrence (LR) at primary site after achieving a CR was also proposed in the latest edition of Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer. The findings of LR are also important for detecting candidates for salvage endoscopic treatments at an early timing during surveillance after CRT. The endoscopic evaluation would encourage us to make concrete decisions for further treatment indications, therefore physicians treating patients with esophageal cancer should be well-acquainted with each finding.