Imaging modality for left ventricular ejection fraction estimation and effect of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator on mortality in patients with heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) improve outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%. Less is known about whether outcomes varied between the 2 noninvasive imaging modalities used to estimate LVEF-2-dimensional echocardiography (2DE) and multigated acquisition radionuclide ventriculography (MUGA)-which use different principles (geometric vs count-based, respectively). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine whether the effect of ICD on mortality in patients with HF and LVEF ≤35% varied on the basis of LVEF measured by 2DE or MUGA. METHODS: Of the 2521 patients with HF with LVEF ≤35% in the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial, 1676 (66%) were randomized to either placebo or ICD, of whom 1386 (83%) had LVEF measured by 2DE (n = 971) or MUGA (n = 415). Hazard ratios (HRs) and 97.5% confidence intervals (CIs) for mortality associated with ICD were estimated overall, checking for interaction, and within the 2 imaging subgroups. RESULTS: Of the 1386 patients in the present analysis, all-cause mortality occurred in 23.1% (160 of 692) and 29.7% (206 of 694) of patients randomized to ICD or placebo, respectively (HR 0.77; 97.5% CI 0.61-0.97), which is consistent with that in 1676 patients in the original report. HRs (97.5% CIs) for all-cause mortality in the 2DE and MUGA subgroups were 0.79 (0.60-1.04) and 0.72 (0.46-1.11), respectively (P = .693 for interaction). Similar associations were observed for cardiac and arrhythmic mortalities. CONCLUSION: We found no evidence that in patients with HF and LVEF ≤35%, the effect of ICD on mortality varied by the noninvasive imaging method used to measure LVEF.

A quick glance at selected topics in this issue.

"A quick glance at selected topics in this issue" aims to highlight contents of the Journal and provide a quick review to the readers.

A quick glance at selected topics in this issue.

"A quick glance at selected topics in this issue" aims to highlight contents of the Journal and provide a quick review to the readers.

A quick glance at selected topics in this issue.

"A quick glance at selected topics in this issue" aims to highlight contents of the Journal and provide a quick review to the readers.

A quick glance at selected topics in this issue.

"A quick glance at selected topics in this issue" aims to highlight contents of the Journal and provide a quick review to the readers.

Prognostic value of silent myocardial infarction in patients with chronic kidney disease after kidney transplantation.

We have shown that silent myocardial infarction (SMI) on 12-lead ECG is associated with increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in patients awaiting renal transplantation (RT). In this study, we evaluated the prevalence of SMI in patients undergoing RT and their prognostic value after RT. MI was determined by automated analysis of ECG. SMI was defined as ECG evidence of MI without a history of clinical MI (CMI). The primary outcome was a composite of CVD death, non-fatal MI and coronary revascularization after RT. Of the 1189 patients who underwent RT, a 12-lead ECG was available in >99%. Of the entire cohort 6% had a history of CMI while 7% had SMI by ECG. During a median follow-up of 4.6 years, 147 (12%) experienced the primary outcome (8% CVD death, 4% MI, 4% coronary revascularization) and 12% died. Both SMI and CMI were associated with an increased risk of CVD events and all-cause deaths. In a multivariable adjusted Cox-regression model, both SMI (adjusted hazard ratio 2.03 [1.25-3.30], p = .004) and CMI (2.15 [1.24-3.74], p = .007) were independently associated with the primary outcome. SMI detected by ECG prior to RT is associated with increased risk of CVD events after RT.

Evolution of symptoms in patients with stable angina after normal regadenoson myocardial perfusion imaging: The Radionuclide Imaging and Symptomatic Evolution study (RISE).

BACKGROUND: Assessment of quality of life in patients with stable angina and normal gated single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) remains undefined. Symptom evolution in response to imaging findings has important implications on further diagnostic testing and therapeutic interventions. METHODS: Prospective cohort study was conducted at the University of Alabama at Birmingham enrolling 87 adult participants with stable chest pain from the emergency room, hospital setting, and outpatient clinics. Patients underwent MPI with technetium-99m Sestamibi and had a normal study. Participants filled out Seattle Angina Questionnaires initially and at 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: Among the 87 participants (60 ± 12 years; 40% African American, 70% women, 29% diabetes), the mean score increased by an absolute value of 14.2 [95% CI 10.4-18.7, P < .001] in physical limitation, 23.2 [95% CI 17.1-29.4, P < .001] in angina stability, 10.9 [95% CI 7.6-14.1, P < .001] in angina frequency, and 20.6 [95% CI 16.5-24.7, P < .001] in disease perception. There was no significant change in the mean score of treatment satisfaction [- 1.4, 95% CI - 4.7 to 1.8, P = .38]. At 3-month follow-up, 28 of 87 participants (32%) were angina free. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with stable chest pain and normal MPI experience significant improvement in functional status, quality of life, and disease perception in the short term.

Right Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Beta-Blocker Effect in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: A low right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) is a marker of poor outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Beta-blockers improve outcomes in HFrEF, but whether this effect is modified by RVEF is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of the 2798 patients in Beta-Blocker Evaluation of Survival Trial (BEST), 2008 had data on baseline RVEF (mean 35%, median 34%). Patients were categorized into an RVEF of less than 35% (n = 1012) and an RVEF of 35% or greater (n = 996). We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) within each RVEF subgroup and formally tested for interactions between bucindolol and RVEF. The effect of bucindolol on all-cause mortality in 2008 patients with baseline RVEF (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.75-1.02) is consistent with that in 2798 patients in the main trial (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.78-1.02). Bucindolol use was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality in patients with an RVEF of 35% or greater (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.55-0.89), but not in those with an RVEF of less than 35% (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.83-1.24, P for interaction = .022). Similar variations were observed for cardiovascular mortality (P for interaction = .009) and sudden cardiac death (P for interaction = .018), but not for pump failure death (P for interaction = .371) or HF hospitalization (P for interaction = .251). CONCLUSIONS: The effect of bucindolol on mortality in patients with HFrEF was modified by the baseline RVEF. If these hypothesis-generating findings can be replicated using approved beta-blockers in contemporary patients with HFrEF, then RVEF may help to risk stratify patients with HFrEF for optimization of beta-blocker therapy.