Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Patient Saf Surg ; 15(1): 28, 2021 Aug 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34419137

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To describe our experience with outpatient transperineal biopsy (TPB) without antibiotics compared to transrectal biopsy (TRB) with antibiotics and bowel preparation. The literature elicits comparable cancer detection, time, and cost between the two. As antibiotic resistance increases, antimicrobial stewardship is imperative. METHODS: In our retrospective review, we compared the TPB to TRB in our institution for outpatient prostate biopsies with local anesthesia from June 1st, 2017 to June 1st, 2019. Patients had negative urinalysis on day of procedure. Patients presenting with symptoms concerning for UTI followed by positive urine culture were determined to have a UTI. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-two patients met inclusion criteria. Age, race, BMI, pre-procedure PSA, history of UTI, BPH or other GU history were similar between both groups. Two TPB patients (1.8%) had post-procedure UTI; one received oral antibiotics and one received a dose of intravenous and subsequent oral antibiotics. There were no sepsis events or admissions. Six TRB patients (5.4%) had post-procedure UTI; five received oral antibiotics, and one received intravenous antibiotics and required admission for sepsis. One TPB patient (0.9%) had post-procedure retention and required catheterization, while four TRB patients (3.6%) had retention requiring catheterization. No significant difference noted in cancer detection between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Outpatient TPB without antibiotic prophylaxis/bowel prep is comparable to TRB in regard to safety and cancer detection. TPB without antibiotics had a lower infection and retention rate than TRB with antibiotics. Efforts to reduce antibiotic resistance should be implemented into daily practice. Future multi-institutional studies can provide further evidence for guideline changes.

2.
Urology ; 120: 222-230, 2018 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30076944

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors impacting overall survival (OS) in children, adolescents, and young adults with high-risk renal tumors (HRRTs). METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients ≤30 years old diagnosed with anaplastic Wilms tumors (AWT), clear cell sarcoma of the kidney (CCSK), or rhabdoid tumor of the kidney (RTK) between 2004 and 2013. Demographic, clinical, and OS data were abstracted. OS between groups was compared with a Kaplan-Meier curve. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 349 patients were identified meeting criteria; 133 (38.1%) AWT, 120 (34.4%) CCSK, and 96 (27.5%) RTK. Patients with RTK were less likely to undergo surgery than those with AWT or CCSK (77.1% vs 94% vs 99%, P < .001) and less likely to receive chemotherapy (84.4% vs 96.2% vs 95%, P = .013) or radiation (52.1% vs 81.2% vs 86.7%, P < .001). Estimated 5-year OS was 76.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 67.9-84.4) for AWT, 92.7% (95% CI 87.4-97.9) for CCSK, and 33.5% (95% CI 23.1-43.9) for RTK (P < .001). On multivariate analysis, AWT (HR 3.372, P = .032) and RTK histology (HR 12.595, P < .001) were significantly associated with worse OS, while receiving radiation (HR 0.43, P = .006) was associated with improved OS. LN positivity, margin status, and undergoing surgery were not. Analyzing the HRRTs individually, for AWT, undergoing surgery was associated with OS (HR 0.308, P = .031). For RTK, factors associated with OS included undergoing surgery (HR 0.209, P = .007) and radiation (HR 0.411, P = .008). CONCLUSION: Within the HRRTs, RTK is associated with worse outcomes than either AWT or CCSK. Receiving radiation is significantly associated with improved outcomes, and surgery is important for those with AWT and RTK.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Renais/mortalidade , Tumor Rabdoide/mortalidade , Sarcoma de Células Claras/mortalidade , Tumor de Wilms/mortalidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Bases de Dados Factuais , Uso de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Neoplasias Renais/terapia , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Nefrectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Tumor Rabdoide/patologia , Tumor Rabdoide/terapia , Fatores de Risco , Sarcoma de Células Claras/patologia , Sarcoma de Células Claras/terapia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Tumor de Wilms/patologia , Tumor de Wilms/terapia , Adulto Jovem
3.
Urology ; 113: 203-205, 2018 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29196068

RESUMO

Bladder malignancy in patients with congenital bladder anomalies who have undergone bladder augmentation is a rare but well-recognized condition. These patients present with locally advanced or metastatic disease and have poor survival. We report a case of a patient with myelomeningocele who was incidentally found to have a high-grade intestinal type adenocarcinoma of her bladder augment at the time of cystolithotomy. This case highlights the need to continue to follow patients with congenital bladder anomalies and highlights the lack of adequate screening methods available.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Litotripsia/métodos , Meningomielocele/cirurgia , Cálculos da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/diagnóstico , Anormalidades Urogenitais/cirurgia , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Adulto , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Achados Incidentais , Cuidados Intraoperatórios/métodos , Meningomielocele/complicações , Meningomielocele/diagnóstico , Monitorização Intraoperatória/métodos , Medição de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Bexiga Urinária/anormalidades , Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Cálculos da Bexiga Urinária/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Anormalidades Urogenitais/diagnóstico
4.
World J Urol ; 32(6): 1385-92, 2014 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24510158

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Compared to low-grade disease, high-grade prostate cancers exhibit a higher rate of disease progression. As a result, there has been a trend to treat high-risk disease with methods other than surgery. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term survival following radical prostatectomy (RRP) for non-metastatic Gleason 8-10 prostate adenocarcinoma (CaP). METHODS: All patients 75 years or less with Gleason 8-10 CaP that underwent RRP were identified from the SEER 18 database. Patients with metastatic disease, those who underwent other modalities of treatment, or with more than one primary cancer, were excluded. Data were analyzed for demographics, stage at presentation, treatment modality, and overall survival and cancer-specific survival. RESULTS: A total of 30,379 men met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 62.5 years and 82.5 % of patients were white. A total of 52.8 % of patients had T2 disease, and 73.1 % had node-negative disease, 80.2 % of patients underwent pelvic lymph node dissection, and 12.9 % underwent adjuvant radiation therapy. Overall survival for the entire cohort was 92.8, 78.6, 59.5, 38.6, and 20.0 % for 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 years, respectively. Cancer-specific survival was 96.4, 89.5, 82.0, 72.9, and 68.8 % for 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although historically underutilized in patients with poorly differentiated disease, radical prostatectomy provides excellent long-term survival and should be offered to healthy patients.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA