Prevalence and association of oral manifestations with disease severity in patients diagnosed with COVID­19: A cross­sectional study.

Systemic disorders may exhibit early signs when conducting an oral examination. Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, several studies have been published detailing the direct impact of the virus on the oral cavity. The present study aimed to determine whether indeed there are any significant disparities in oropharyngeal manifestations between individuals infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and a control group, and whether the virus has the ability to invade and reproduce inside oral keratinocytes and fibroblasts, resulting in the development of oral ulcerations and superficial lesions. The present study provides an overview of the symptoms that occur at an early stage of the illness, and the most commonly affected regions of the oral cavity, including the tongue, lips, palate and oropharynx are examined. In the present retrospective study, 52 patients infected with COVID-19 were recruited between April, 2021 and October, 2022. In addition, 52 individuals who tested negative for the virus were recruited as the control group. The study was conducted through a thorough examination and questionnaire provided to all participants. The results revealed that among the cohort of patients from the COVID-19 group examined (n=52), a proportion (mean, 16.15) displayed oral manifestations. Specifically, 75% of the patients in the COVID-19 group described oral cavity pain, and 69% of these patients had changes in teeth color or dental caries. In summary, in relation to the control group, the prevalence of oropharyngeal symptoms was generally lower compared to the COVID-19 group, apart from oral cavity pain (30.8%), tonsillitis (17.3%), bleeding (34.6%), teeth color changes (36.5%), recurrence (15.4%) and abscesses (7.7%). Thus, on the whole, the patients without COVID-19 had fewer oral manifestations.

Risk Factors for Pulmonary Embolism in Individuals Infected with SARS-CoV2-A Single-Centre Retrospective Study.

The emergence of SARS-CoV2 has presented itself as a significant global health crisis. The prevalence of thrombotic events is known to be high in these patients, affecting various organ systems, sometimes leading to cutaneous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism (PE), stroke, or coronary thrombosis. The available evidence suggests that thromboembolism, hypercoagulability, and the excessive production of proinflammatory cytokines play a significant role in the development of multiorgan failure. Methodology: This retrospective single-centre study was conducted at "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy from Timisoara, Romania, involving a total of 420 patients diagnosed with COVID-19. We separated them into a CONTROL group that included 319 patients, and an intervention group (PE) with 101 patients that, subsequent to infection with the virus, developed pulmonary embolism. The study included the reporting of demographic data, laboratory findings, and comorbidities. Results: Out of a total of 420 patients, 24% experienced pulmonary embolism, while 21.42% died. Arterial thrombotic events were found to be associated with factors such as age, cardiovascular disease, levels of white blood cells, D-dimers, and albumin in the blood. The findings of the study indicate that there is an independent association between pulmonary thrombosis and hypertension (odds ratio (OR): 1.1; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.7 to 1.7; p = 0.6463), cancer (OR: 1.1; 95% CI: 0.6 to 2.3; p = 0.6014), and COPD (OR: 1.2; 95% CI: 0.6 to 2.3; p = 0.4927). On the other hand, there is a stronger correlation between PE and obesity (OR: 2.8; 95% CI: 1.7 to 4.6; p < 0.0001), diabetes (OR: 3.3; 95% CI: 2 to 5.3; p < 0.0001), and dyslipidemia (OR: 3.6; 95% CI: 2.3 to 5.8; p < 0.0001) in a multivariable regression logistic model. Conclusions: Patients diagnosed with severe forms of COVID-19 display a comparable incidence of arterial thrombotic events, which have been linked to poor survival rates.

Interactions between Gut Microbiota and Oral Antihyperglycemic Drugs: A Systematic Review.

The intestinal microbiota refers to the collection of microorganisms that exist in the human gut. It has been said that bacteria influence the development of metabolic diseases, such as diabetes mellitus, as they have roles in immunomodulation, protection against pathogens, blood vessel growth, repairing the intestinal wall, and the development of the neurological system. In this review, we look at the latest research regarding interactions between gut microbiota and oral antihyperglycemic drugs and we present data suggesting that the microbiome may help counteract the reduced glucose tolerance and insulin resistance associated with metabolic disorders. We found that antidiabetic drugs can have significant impacts on gut microbiota composition and function, potentially influencing both the efficacy and side effects of these medications. Additionally, we discovered that microbial-based therapeutics, including probiotics, prebiotics, and postbiotics, and fecal microbiota can be considered when discussing preventive measures and personalized treatment options for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Understanding how antidiabetic drugs modulate gut microbiota composition and function is essential for optimizing their therapeutic efficacy and minimizing potential adverse effects. The relationship between the gut microbiota and glycemic agents, not fully understood, is currently the subject of increasing research and discussion. It has been proven that the microbiome can impact the effectiveness of the medications, but further research in this field may uncover novel therapeutic strategies for diabetes and other metabolic disorders by targeting the gut microbiota.

Efficiency of Platelet Transfusion in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Kidney Disease and Thrombocytopenia.

There have been relatively few studies revealing a decreased platelet count in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Although this hematological abnormality is not as well documented as renal anemia, platelet functions are altered in the uremic environment and there is an increased risk of bleeding. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of the administration of platelet concentrate in CKD based on how patient prognosis was influenced by platelet transfusion therapy. The study monitored 104 patients with CKD and thrombocytopenia who received platelet transfusion during their hospitalization in the period from 2015 to 2021. The complete blood cell count, serum urea and creatinine, and inflammatory status were tested upon admission. The number of transfused platelet units were considered for each patient. A Kruskal-Wallis H test showed that for one transfused platelet unit, the distribution of the number of platelets (×103/µL) was the same across the categories of associated diagnoses, which was seen as possible risk factors for thrombocytopenia, including liver cirrhosis and urosepsis. With a single exception, all patients exceeded the critical threshold of 20 × 103/µL and 14 patients remained under 50 × 103/µL. Even though our patients exceeded the critical threshold of platelet numbers, in patients with multiple comorbidities, severe, uncontrolled hemorrhages could not be prevented in 4.83% of cases.

Metabolic Disorders, the Microbiome as an Endocrine Organ, and Their Relations with Obesity: A Literature Review.

The etiology of metabolic disorders, such as obesity, has been predominantly associated with the gut microbiota, which is acknowledged as an endocrine organ that plays a crucial role in modulating energy homeostasis and host immune responses. The presence of dysbiosis has the potential to impact the functioning of the intestinal barrier and the gut-associated lymphoid tissues by allowing the transit of bacterial structural components, such as lipopolysaccharides. This, in turn, may trigger inflammatory pathways and potentially lead to the onset of insulin resistance. Moreover, intestinal dysbiosis has the potential to modify the production of gastrointestinal peptides that are linked to the feeling of fullness, hence potentially leading to an increase in food consumption. In this literature review, we discuss current developments, such as the impact of the microbiota on lipid metabolism as well as the processes by which its changes led to the development of metabolic disorders. Several methods have been developed that could be used to modify the gut microbiota and undo metabolic abnormalities. METHODS: After researching different databases, we examined the PubMed collection of articles and conducted a literature review. RESULTS: After applying our exclusion and inclusion criteria, the initial search yielded 1345 articles. We further used various filters to narrow down our titles analysis and, to be specific to our study, selected the final ten studies, the results of which are included in the Results section. CONCLUSIONS: Through gut barrier integrity, insulin resistance, and other influencing factors, the gut microbiota impacts the host's metabolism and obesity. Although the area of the gut microbiota and its relationship to obesity is still in its initial stages of research, it offers great promise for developing new therapeutic targets that may help prevent and cure obesity by restoring the gut microbiota to a healthy condition.

Effectiveness of Continuing Post-Surgery Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Reducing Nosocomial Infections - A Literature Review.

Background: To prevent surgical site infection (SSI), antibiotic prophylaxis is frequently extended for one day or more following surgery. Post-operative, continuing antibiotic prophylaxis may not be advantageous compared to stopping it right away, as it exposes patients to the hazards of taking antibiotics. Although it is routinely recommended, post-procedural prophylaxis is sometimes not necessary. To optimize the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) in preventing SSIs, healthcare providers should adhere to evidence-based guidelines, such as those provided by the World Health Organization (WHO) or the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP). These guidelines provide recommendations on the appropriate selection, timing, and duration of antibiotic prophylaxis for various surgical procedures. In this literature review we looked if the data available support these recommendations. Methods: We searched PubMed database for articles written between 1st of January 2012 up to 31st of December 2022. We looked at randomized control trials (RCTs) of patients hospitalized in surgical departments, who were given postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis comparing them with those that did not receive it. Results: Out of a total of 566 randomized control trials, 15 were included in this literature review, totalling 11,728 patients. We found indications that in many cases it makes a significant difference in continuing antibiotic prophylaxis postoperatively. However, in some cases, this will result in a similar incidence of post-surgery nosocomial infections between the intervention and control groups. Conclusion: While antibiotic prophylaxis is an important strategy to prevent surgical site infections, the decision to extend antibiotic prophylaxis beyond the intraoperative period should be made on a case-by-case basis and led by guidelines.