Evaluation of Intraoperative Fluoroscopic Techniques to Estimate Femoral Rotation: A Cadaveric Study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare three fluoroscopic methods for determining femoral rotation. METHODS: Native femoral version was measured by computed tomography in 20 intact femurs from 10 cadaveric specimens. Two Steinmann pins were placed into each left femur above and below a planned transverse osteotomy which was completed through the diaphysis. Four surgeons utilized the true lateral (TL), neck-horizontal angle (NH), and lesser trochanter profile (LTP) techniques to correct the injured femur's rotation using the intact right femur as reference, yielding 120 measurements. Accuracy was assessed by comparing the angle subtended by the two Steinmann pins before and after manipulation and comparing against version measurements of the right femur. RESULTS: Absolute mean rotational error in the fractured femur compared to its uninjured state was 6.0° (95% CI, 4.6-7.5), 6.6° (95% CI, 5.0-8.2), and 8.5° (95% CI, 6.5-10.6) for the TL, NH, and LTP techniques, respectively, without significant difference between techniques ( p = 0.100). Compared to the right femur, absolute mean rotational error was 6.6° (95% CI, 1.0-12.2), 6.4° (95% CI, 0.1-12.6), and 8.9° (95% CI, 0.8-17.0) for the TL, NH, and LTP techniques, respectively, without significant difference ( p = 0.180). Significantly more femurs were malrotated by >15° using the LTP method compared to the TL and NH methods (20.0% vs 2.5% and 5.0%, p = 0.030). Absolute mean error in estimating femoral rotation of the intact femur using the TL and NH methods compared to CT was 6.6° (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.1-8.2) and 4.4° (95% CI, 3.4-5.4), respectively, with significant difference between the two methods ( p = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: The true lateral (TL), neck-horizontal angle (NH), and the lesser trochanter profile (LTP) techniques performed similarly in correcting rotation of the fractured femur, but significantly more femurs were malrotated by >15° using the LTP technique. This supports preferential use of the TL or NH methods for determining femoral version intraoperatively.

Using machine-learning to decode postoperative hip mortality Trends: Actionable insights from an extensive clinical dataset.

BACKGROUND: Hip fractures are one of the most common injuries experienced by the general population. Despite advances in surgical techniques, postoperative mortality rates remain high. identifying relevant clinical factors associated with mortality is essential to preoperative risk stratification and tailored post-surgical interventions to improve patient outcomes. The purpose of this study aimed to identify preoperative risk factors and develop predictive models for increased hip fracture-related mortality within 30 days post-surgery, using one of the largest patient cohorts to date. METHODS: Data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, comprising 107,660 hip fracture patients treated with surgical fixation was used. A penalized regression approach, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator was employed to develop two predictive models: one using preoperative factors and the second incorporating both preoperative and postoperative factors. RESULTS: The analysis identified 68 preoperative factor outcomes associated with 30-day mortality. The combined model revealed 84 relevant factors, showing strong predictive power for determining postoperative mortality, with an AUC of 0.83. CONCLUSIONS: The study's comprehensive methodology provides risk assessment tools for clinicians to identify high-risk patients and optimize patient-specific care.

Prognostic Value of Routine Biomarkers in the Early Stage of COVID-19.

Various biomarkers like certain complete blood cell count parameters and the derived ratios including neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio are commonly used to evaluate disease severity. Our study aimed to establish if baseline levels of complete blood cell count-derived biomarkers and CRP, measured before any treatment which can interfere with their values, could serve as a predictor of development of pneumonia and the need for hospitalization requiring oxygen therapy. We retrospectively analyzed the laboratory data of 200 consecutive patients without comorbidities, who denied usage of medications prior to blood analysis and visited a COVID-19 ambulance between October and December 2021. Multivariate regression analysis extracted older age, elevated CRP and lower eosinophil count as significant independent predictors of pneumonia (p = 0.003, p = 0.000, p = 0.046, respectively). Independent predictors of hospitalization were higher CRP (p = 0.000) and lower platelet count (p = 0.005). There was no significant difference in the neutrophil-lymphocyte and platelet-lymphocyte ratios between examined groups. Individual biomarkers such as platelet and eosinophil count might be better in predicting the severity of COVID-19 than the neutrophil-lymphocyte and platelet-lymphocyte ratios.

Selecting a high-dose antibiotic-laden cement knee spacer.

Prosthetic joint infection [PJI] after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a common and challenging problem for joint replacement surgeons and patients. Once the diagnosis of PJI has been made, patient goals and characteristics as well as the infection timeline dictate treatment. Most commonly, this involves a two-stage procedure with the removal of all implants, debridement, and placement of a static or dynamic antibiotic spacer. Static spacers are commonly indicated for older, less healthy patients that would benefit from soft tissue rest after initial debridement. Mobile spacers are typically used in younger, healthier patients to improve quality of life and reduce soft-tissue contractures during antibiotic spacer treatment. Spacers are highly customizable with regard to antibiotic choice, cement variety, and spacer design, each with reported advantages, drawbacks, and indications that will be covered in this article. While no spacer is superior to any other, the modern arthroplasty surgeon must be familiar with the available modalities to optimize treatment for each patient. Here we propose a treatment algorithm to assist surgeons in deciding on treatment for PJI after TKA.

Patient Satisfaction Scores Are a Poor Metric of Orthopedic Care.

Patient satisfaction scores are a popular metric used to evaluate orthopedic care. There is little consistency with how satisfaction is described in the orthopedic literature. Online physician reviews are a growing trend that directly and indirectly affect a surgeon's reputation. There is little correlation of higher satisfaction with improved surgical outcomes, so rating surgical care may be misguided and possibly dangerous. Patient satisfaction is an important part of the patient-centered care model, so rating systems should directly reflect quality. More research is needed to determine the relationship between patient satisfaction and the delivery of quality care. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(3):e127-e133.].

Triceps Tenotomy as an Alternative Exposure for Fixation of OTA/AO 13-C Fractures: A Technical Trick.

SUMMARY: Intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus present challenges to treating physician and patient alike. The olecranon osteotomy is accepted as the standard exposure for intra-articular distal humerus fractures; nevertheless, complications such as nonunion and implant prominence are common. In this article, we describe the clinical outcomes and anatomic features of the triceps tenotomy as an alternative method of exposure for internal fixation of intra-articular distal humerus fractures. The olecranon osteotomy approach affords greater exposure of the distal humerus articular surface; however, there was no difference in quality of fracture reduction, progression to fracture union, posttraumatic arthrosis, or implant failure between approaches in our series. The osteotomy approach resulted in a greater need for reoperation (15% vs. 46%, respectively); largely as a result of olecranon implant-related complications. In summary, the triceps tenotomy offers an alternative exposure for intra-articular distal humerus fracture fixation with comparable clinical outcomes to the olecranon osteotomy technique.

Low-Cost Virtual Reality Headsets Reduce Perceived Pain in Healthy Adults: A Multicenter Randomized Crossover Trial.

Objectives: Recent studies have established the usage of virtual reality (VR) to help alleviate acute and chronic pain. VR technology can be cost prohibitive and cheaper alternatives are desired. In this study, a Google Cardboard headset ($15) combined with a smartphone was used as a low-cost VR device to assess efficacy in altering the perception of pain. Materials and Methods: The cold pressor test, a minimal-risk method, was used to simulate pain. Participants immersed their hands into ice water, with and without VR, in a crossover manner, and their pain perception data were recorded. Results: Forty-eight healthy volunteer participants completed the study between 2017 and 2018. Participants were randomized to right hand control, left control, right experimental, and left experimental groups, respectively, before the crossover. Data collected included pain threshold (time at which participants first reported pain), pain tolerance (time at which participants removed their hand), and pain intensity (highest reported pain level on a [1-10] scale). Approximately two-thirds of participants had improvements in pain threshold and pain tolerance with a mean improvement of +13.0 seconds (P = 0.0045) for pain threshold and +29.8 seconds (P = 0.0003) for pain tolerance. Pain intensity had a reduction of 0.43 points (P = 0.0371). Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that inexpensive VR devices, such as the Google Cardboard headset used in this study, may be a safe, portable, and cost-effective way to alter the perception and improve tolerance of pain.

The Cost of Malnutrition in Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition is a known risk factor for complications and adverse outcomes after elective total joint arthroplasty (TJA), but little is known about the burden this risk factor places on the healthcare system. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 90-day impact of malnutrition on medical and surgical complications and understand the increase in global reimbursements associated with TJA in malnourished patients. METHODS: We queried a combined private-payer and Medicare database from 2007 to 2016 for TJA using International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision and Current Procedural Terminology codes. Patients with serum albumin level of <3.5 g/dL were gender, age, and mean Elixhauser Comorbidity Index matched against a cohort with a normal serum albumin level. Odds ratios and confidence intervals were calculated for complications at 90 days postoperatively. Mean index and 90-day global reimbursements were calculated for the two matched groups and compared using P-values. RESULTS: 3053 protein malnourished patients receiving TJA were identified, and 12,202 matched protein nourished patients receiving TJA served as controls. At 90 days, the malnourished groups had increased risk for failure of multiple organ systems, periprosthetic joint infection, and reoperation. The mean 90-day increase in reimbursement was $3875 associated with performing a TJA on a protein malnourished patient (P < .001). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates an association between malnourished patients and postoperative complications as well as significantly increased reimbursements. Understanding the reimbursement increases at 90 days for TJA in protein malnourished patients is important in the era of bundled payments.

Outcomes of ulnotriquetral split tear repair: a report of 96 patients.

Ninety-six wrists (56 right and 40 left) in 96 patients (36 males and 60 females, mean age 38, range 15-77 years) underwent repair of ulnotriquetral ligament split tears between 2007 and 2016. Mayo wrist scores, visual analogue scale pain scores, and objective measures including grip strength and range of motion were obtained. Patients were assessed after a mean follow-up of 21 months (range 6-112 months). Ulnotriquetral split tear repair resulted in substantial improvements in pain and function. The mean Mayo wrist score improved from 57 preoperatively to 81 postoperatively, with 84% of patients achieving a good or excellent outcome. Pain scores decreased from 5.8 to 1.2. Grip improved from 25 kg to 29 kg. There was no significant change in range of motion of the wrist. Complications were noted in eight patients, with three experiencing continued pain, four with dysaesthesia of the dorsal sensory ulnar nerve, and one superficial infection. Arthroscopic ulnotriquetral split tear repair significantly reduced pain and improved Mayo wrist scores. Level of evidence: IV.

Does the Coexistence of Multiple Segmental Rib Fractures in Polytrauma Patients Presenting With "Major" Vertebral Fracture Affect Care and Acute Outcomes?

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether operating on "major" vertebral fractures leads to premature abortion of surgery and/or other acute cardiopulmonary complications. DESIGN: Retrospective review. CLINICAL SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTION: We retrospectively queried our institutional Trauma Rregistry for all cases presenting with concomitant rib fractures and surgically managed vertebral fractures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The main outcomes included the surgical outcome (aborted vs. successfully performed), total and Intensive Care Unit length of stay (LOS), adverse discharge, mortality, and functional outcomes. RESULTS: We found 57 cases with concomitant segmental rib fractures and surgically managed vertebral fractures. Seven patients (12%) received a rib fixation, of which 1 received before vertebral fixation and 6 after. Importantly, 4 vertebral fixation cases (7.02%) had to be aborted intraoperatively because of the inability to tolerate prone positioning for surgery. For case-control analysis, we performed propensity score matching to obtain matched controls, that is, cases of vertebral fixation but no rib fractures. On matched case-control analysis, patients with concomitant segmental rib fractures and vertebral fractures were found to have higher Intensive Care Unit LOS [median = 3 days (Inter-Quartile Range = 0-9) versus. 8.4 days, P = 0.003], whereas total LOS, frequency of complete, incomplete or functional spinal cord injury, discharge to rehab, and discharge to nursing home were found to be similar between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that segmental rib fractures with concomitant vertebral fractures undergoing surgical treatment represent a subset of patients that may be at increased risk of intraoperative cardio-pulmonary complications and rib fixation before prone spine surgery for cases in which the neurological status is stable is reasonable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.