A randomized placebo-controlled trial of convalescent plasma for adults hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia.

Passive immunotherapy with convalescent plasma may be the only available agent during the early phases of a pandemic. Here, we report safety and efficacy of high-titer convalescent plasma for COVID-19 pneumonia. Double-blinded randomized multicenter placebo-controlled trial of adult patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia. The intervention was COVID-19 convalescent plasma and placebo was saline allocated 2:1. The primary outcome was clinical status 14 days after the intervention evaluated on a clinical ordinal scale. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.Gov, NCT04345289, 14/04/2020. The CCAP-2 trial was terminated prematurely due to futility. Of 147 patients randomized, we included 144 patients in the modified intention-to-treat population. The ordinal clinical status 14 days post-intervention was comparable between treatment groups (odds ratio (OR) 1.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72-2.09). Results were consistent when evaluating clinical progression on an individual level 14 days after intervention (OR 1.09; 95% CI 0.46-1.73). No significant differences in length of hospital stay, admission to ICU, frequency of severe adverse events or all-cause mortality during follow-up were found between the intervention and the placebo group. Infusion of convalescent plasma did not influence clinical progression, survival or length of hospitalization in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.

A cluster of type II interferon-regulated genes associates with disease activity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Upregulation of interferon-regulated genes (IRGs), denoted IFN signature, in peripheral blood has been used as an indirect measure of IFN pathway activation in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, it has not been determined, which IFN signatures that optimally reflect clinical disease activity. In this study, we determined an IFN signature based on the expression of 128 IRGs in whole blood from 34 SLE patients in a cross-sectional (CS) study, 11 with active lupus nephritis followed longitudinally (LS) and 15 healthy controls. Blood samples were collected in PAXgene tubes and RNA was extracted and purified using a PAXgene blood RNA kit (Qiagen). Gene expression was measured using the NanoString nCounter Gene Expression platform. The CS SLE patients with higher disease activity displayed thrice as many upregulated IRGs (n = 46) as the rest. These IRGs clustered in three groups, consisting of IRGs known to be predominantly stimulated by type I (gene cluster K1) and type II (gene clusters K2 and 3) IFNs. SLEDAI-2K scores associated with the K2 and K3 gene scores (ß = 0.372 and ß = 0.419, both p < 0.015) but not with K1. In the longitudinal study, the mean SLEDAI-2K score decreased after an average follow-up of 360 days (ß = -2.08, P = 5.09 × 10-12). The mean K1, K2 and K3 gene scores did not change over time, however longitudinal changes in SLEDAI-2K and K3 scores were associated (ß = 0.814, p = 0.007). This study validates the presence of type I IRG subsets that do not associate with disease activity in SLE patients. The novel finding in this study is the association between a type II IRG subset and disease activity. Both findings may have significant implications for choosing IRGs defining clinically relevant IFN signatures.

Characteristics of cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction and association with quality of life in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVES: Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) may affect the clinical course of SLE leading to reduced quality of life. CAN is assessed by heart rate variability (HRV) measures and cardiovascular autonomic reflex tests (CARTs). In patients with SLE, we aimed to determine the characteristics of CAN and if CAN associates with health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHODS: Patients with SLE and healthy controls (HCs) were CAN tested with 5 min HRV and three CARTs to determine parameters reflecting parasympathetic and mixed sympathetic-parasympathetic function. Subjects were classified as having no, early or definitive CAN by having none, one or more than one abnormal CART, respectively. HRQoL as determined by the Short Form 12 (SF-12) was assessed in SLE. RESULTS: Of 111 patients with SLE, 92 answered the SF-12 and 54 were matched with 54 HCs for characterisation of CAN. Definitive CAN was present in 24.1% (95% CI 15% to 37%) patients with SLE and 1.9% (95% CI 0.3% to 9.8%) HCs (OR 16.8, 95% CI 2.1 to 133.8, p=0.008). The corresponding prevalences of any CAN were 53.7% (95% CI 41% to 66%) and 22.6% (95% CI 13% to 35%). SLE patients with definitive CAN showed signs of mixed sympathetic-parasympathetic dysfunction, whereas patients without CAN primarily presented with impaired parasympathetic activity. Signs of parasympathetic as well as sympathetic-parasympathetic dysfunction were associated with low physical SF-12 component score (all: ß>0.211, p<0.05). The mental SF-12 component score was not associated with any CAN indices. CONCLUSIONS: CAN was a frequent finding in SLE and associated to self-report on impaired physical HRQoL. Even patients without CAN showed signs of impaired parasympathetic function compared with controls.