Measuring Salivary Cortisol to Assess the Effect of Natural Environments on Stress Level in Acute Patients With Severe Brain Injuries: An Exploratory Study.

BACKGROUND: Salivary cortisol is a safe and non-invasive measure of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function and is used as a biomarker of the human stress response. Natural environments are recognized to contribute to help reduce the effect of stress. OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of a salivary cortisol collection protocol for acute severely brain-injured patients, and to explore the influence of exposure to natural settings on salivary cortisol concentration as an index of stress level. METHODS: An exploratory study on 17 acute patients with severe brain injury was performed. We collected salivary samples in a closed hospital ward and a therapeutic garden at the start of the session and after 30 minutes of rest time. Physiological parameters, level of communication, and subjective well-being were also assessed. RESULTS: The primary objectives regarding the feasibility of the protocol were met overall. We found no significant differences in cortisol values when including the whole population. However, cortisol values were significantly higher in the indoor environment in patients with communication attempts. CONCLUSIONS: A salivary collection protocol with brain-injured patients in the acute phase is feasible and safe, and this type of measurement could pave the way for future research supporting the benefits of nature as an additional resource in their neurorehabilitation.

Structural connectivity in recovery after coma: Connectome atlas approach.

AIM: Pathological states of recovery after coma as a result of a severe brain injury are marked with changes in structural connectivity of the brain. This study aimed to identify a topological correlation between white matter integrity and the level of functional and cognitive impairment in patients recovering after coma. METHODS: Structural connectomes were computed based on fractional anisotropy maps from 40 patients using a probabilistic human connectome atlas. We used a network based statistics approach to identify potential brain networks associated with a more favorable outcome, assessed with clinical neurobehavioral scores at the patient's discharge from the acute neurorehabilitation unit. RESULTS: We identified a subnetwork whose strength of connectivity correlated with a more favorable outcome as measured with the Disability Rating Scale (network based statistics: t >3.5, P =.010). The subnetwork predominated in the left hemisphere and included the thalamic nuclei, putamen, precentral and postcentral gyri, and medial parietal regions. Spearman correlation between the mean fractional anisotropy value of the subnetwork and the score was ρ = -0.60 (P <.0001). A less extensive overlapping subnetwork correlated with the Coma Recovery Scale Revised score, consisting mostly of the left hemisphere connectivity between the thalamic nuclei and pre- and post-central gyri (network based statistics: t >3.5, P =.033; Spearman's ρ = 0.58, P <.0001). CONCLUSION: The present findings suggest an important role of structural connectivity between the thalamus, putamen and somatomotor cortex in the recovery from coma as evaluated with neurobehavioral scores. These structures are part of the motor circuit involved in the generation and modulation of voluntary movement, as well as the forebrain mesocircuit supposedly underlying the maintenance of consciousness. As behavioural assessment of consciousness depends heavily on the signs of voluntary motor behaviour, further work will elucidate whether the identified subnetwork reflects the structural architecture underlying the recovery of consciousness or rather the ability to communicate its content.

A Focus on Subtle Signs and Motor Behavior to Unveil Awareness in Unresponsive Brain-Impaired Patients: The Importance of Being Clinical.

Brain-injured patients in a state of cognitive motor dissociation (CMD) exhibit a lack of command following using conventional neurobehavioral examination tools but a high level of awareness and language processing when assessed using advanced imaging and electrophysiology techniques. Because of their behavioral unresponsiveness, patients with CMD may seem clinically indistinguishable from those with a true disorder of consciousness that affects awareness on a substantial level (coma, vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness state, or minimally conscious state minus). Yet, by expanding the range of motor testing across limb, facial, and ocular motricity, we may detect subtle, purposeful movements even in the subset of patients classified as vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness state. We propose the term of clinical CMD to describe patients showing these slight but determined motor responses and exhibiting a characteristic akinetic motor behavior as opposed to a pyramidal motor system behavior. These patients may harbor hidden cognitive capabilities and significant potential for a good long-term outcome. Indeed, we envision CMD as ranging from complete (no motor response) to partial (subtle clinical motor response) forms, falling within a spectrum of progressively better motor output in patients with considerable cognitive capabilities. In addition to providing a decisional flowchart, we present this novel approach to classification as a graphical model that illustrates the range of clinical manifestations and recovery trajectories fundamentally differentiating true disorders of consciousness from the spectrum of CMD.

Early detection of ICU-acquired weakness in septic shock patients ventilated longer than 72 h.

PURPOSE: ICU-acquired weakness, comprising Critical Illness Polyneuropathy (CIP) and Myopathy (CIM) is associated with immobilization and prolonged mechanical ventilation. This study aims to assess feasibility of early detection of CIP and CIM by peroneal nerve test (PENT) and sensory sural nerve action potential (SNAP) screening in patients with septic shock and invasively ventilated for more than 72 h. METHODS: We performed repetitive PENT screening from 72 h after intubation until detecting a pathological response. We tested SNAPs in pathological PENT to differentiate CIP from CIM. We performed muscle strength examination in awake patients and recorded time from intubation to first in-bed and out-of-bed mobilization. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were screened with PENT and 88.9% had abnormal responses. Mean time between intubation and first screening was 94.38 (± 22.41) hours. Seven patients (38.9%) had CIP, two (11.1%) had CIM, one (5.6%) had CIP and CIM, six (33.3%) had a pathological response on PENT associated with ICU-acquired weakness (but no SNAP could be performed to differentiate between CIP and CIM) and two patients had (11.1%) had no peripheral deficit. In patients where it could be performed, muscle strength testing concorded with electrophysiological findings. Twelve patients (66.7%) had out-of-bed mobilization 10.8 (± 7.4) days after admission. CONCLUSION: CIP and CIM are frequent in septic shock patients and can be detected before becoming symptomatic with simple bedside tools. Early detection of CIP and CIM opens new possibilities for their timely management through preventive measures such as passive and active mobilization.

Clinical Cognitive Motor Dissociation: A Case Report Showing How Pitfalls Can Hinder Early Clinical Detection of Awareness.

This study presents the case of a brain-injured patient whose pathological awakening after coma and absence of interaction led to a diagnosis of lack of consciousness when standard clinical scales were administered. However, we were able to demonstrate conscious perception in this patient from initial clinical assessments using the Motor Behaviour Tool in the acute stage, complemented by a systematic search for potential obstacles blocking his execution of motor responses (pitfalls). This refinement of the diagnosis enabled prediction of a favourable outcome despite the severity of the lesions, with the patient's evolution confirming our prediction. Faced with an unresponsive patient, every specialist should go beyond the absence of response with the standard scores, consider the possibility of a hidden consciousness and look for rigorous ways of proving it.

Movement-Related Cortical Potentials in Embodied Virtual Mirror Visual Feedback.

Background: Mirror therapy is thought to drive interhemispheric communication, resulting in a balanced activation. We hypothesized that embodied virtual mirror visual feedback (VR-MVF) presented on a computer screen may produce a similar activation. In this proof-of-concept study, we investigated differences in movement-related cortical potentials (MRCPs) in the electroencephalogram (EEG) from different visual feedback of user movements in 1 stroke patient and 13 age-matched adults. Methods: A 60-year-old right-handed (Edinburgh score >95) male ischemic stroke [left paramedian pontine, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) = 6] patient and 13 age-matched right-handed (Edinburgh score >80) healthy adults (58 ± 9 years; six female) participated in the study. We recorded 16-electrode electroencephalogram (EEG), while participants performed planar center-out movements in two embodied visual feedback conditions: (i) direct (movements translated to the avatar's ipsilateral side) and (ii) mirror (movements translated to the avatar's contralateral side) with left (direct left/mirror left) or right (direct right/mirror right) arms. Results: As hypothesized, we observed more balanced MRCP hemispheric negativity in the mirror right compared to the direct right condition [statistically significant at the FC4 electrode; 99.9% CI, (0.81, 13)]. MRCPs in the stroke participant showed reduced lateralized negativity in the direct left (non-paretic) situation compared to healthy participants. Interestingly, the potentials were stronger in the mirror left (non-paretic) compared to direct left case, with significantly more bilateral negativity at FC3 [95% CI (0.758 13.2)] and C2 [95% CI (0.04 9.52)]. Conclusions: Embodied mirror visual feedback is likely to influence bilateral sensorimotor cortical subthreshold activity during movement preparation and execution observed in MRCPs in both healthy participants and a stroke patient.

Disentangling the percepts of illusory movement and sensory stimulation during tendon vibration in the EEG.

Mechanical vibration of muscle tendons in specific frequencies - termed functional proprioceptive stimulation (FPS) - has the ability to induce the illusion of a movement which is congruent with a lengthening of the vibrated tendon and muscle. The majority of previous reports of the brain correlates of this illusion are based on functional neuroimaging. Contrary to the electroencephalogram (EEG) however, such technologies are not suitable for bedside or ambulant use. While a handful of studies have shown EEG changes during FPS, it remains underinvestigated whether these changes were due to the perceived illusion or the perceived vibration. Here, we aimed at disentangling the neural correlates of the illusory movement from those produced by the vibration sensation by comparing the neural responses to two vibration types, one that did and one that did not elicit an illusion. We recruited 40 naïve participants, 20 for the EEG experiment and 20 for a supporting behavioral study, who received functional tendon co-vibration on the biceps and triceps tendon at their left elbow, pseudo-randomly switching between the illusion and non-illusion trials. Time-frequency decomposition uncovered a strong and lasting event-related desynchronization (ERD) in the mu and beta band in both conditions, suggesting a strong somatosensory response to the vibration. Additionally, the analysis of the evoked potentials revealed a significant difference between the two experimental conditions from 310 to 990ms post stimulus onset. Training classifiers on the frequency-based and voltage-based correlates of illusion perception yielded above chance accuracies for 17 and 13 out of the 20 subjects respectively. Our findings show that FPS-induced illusions produce EEG correlates that are distinct from a vibration-based control and which can be classified reliably in a large number of participants. These results encourage pursuing EEG-based detection of kinesthetic illusions as a tool for clinical use, e.g., to uncover aspects of cognitive perception in unresponsive patients.

Case Report: Behavioral Unresponsiveness in Acute COVID-19 Patients: The Utility of the Motor Behavior Tool-Revised and 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Along with the propagation of COVID-19, emerging evidence reveals significant neurological manifestations in severely infected COVID-19 patients. Among these patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), behavioral unresponsiveness may occur frequently, yet, there are still only a few cases reported and with rare descriptions of their motor behavior after pathological awakening. Several hypotheses regarding central lesions in these patients are conceivable. Here, we describe two acute SARS-CoV-2- infected patients who developed neurological symptoms evoking the condition of clinical cognitive motor dissociation (CMD). This diagnosis could be confirmed first by clinical observation of a dissociation between preserved cognitive abilities and lack of initial motor interaction and second, by performing 18F- FDG PET imaging. Accurate diagnosis led to an appropriate neuro-rehabilitation regimen with long-term neuro-rehabilitation leading to an improved outcome for both patients.

[Neurorehabilitation in the acute and post-acute phase: what did we learn from the first wave of COVID-19?] / Neurorééducation en phases aiguë et postaiguë : qu'avons-nous appris de la première vague de Covid-19 ?

The majority of patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) present mild to moderate illness and recover without hospitalization. Nevertheless, 5 % of cases require hospitalization in the intensive care unit, with 15 % of them showing severe central and peripheral nervous system manifestations. These patients should be considered high risk patients and their management must include prevention of a potential accompanying cascade of negative factors. In order to optimize care, it is essential that signs of neurological damage are searched for as early as in intensive care so that appropriate neurorehabilitation can be started immediately and continued in a specific unit for patients with neurological sequelae at post-acute and outpatient phases.

La majorité des patients atteints par la maladie due au coronavirus 2019 (Covid-19) présente une évolution plutôt favorable. Cependant 5 % nécessitent une hospitalisation aux soins intensifs, dont 15 % présentent des atteintes sévères des systèmes nerveux central et périphérique. Ces patients doivent être considérés comme des personnes à haut risque de développer des séquelles graves et leur plan de traitement doit nécessairement impliquer la prévention d'une potentielle cascade de facteurs négatifs concomitants. Afin d'optimiser une telle prise en charge, il est primordial que les premiers signes d'atteintes neurologiques soient détectés dès les soins intensifs et qu'une neurorééducation puisse être débutée précocement et poursuivie dans une filière de patients neuro-lésés en phase postaiguë, puis en ambulatoire.

Discriminating cognitive motor dissociation from disorders of consciousness using structural MRI.

An accurate evaluation and detection of awareness after a severe brain injury is crucial to a patient's diagnosis, therapy, and end-of-life decisions. Misdiagnosis is frequent as behavior-based assessments often overlook subtle signs of consciousness. This study aimed to identify brain MRI characteristics of patients with residual consciousness after a severe brain injury and to develop a simple MRI-based scoring system according to the findings. We retrieved data from 128 patients and split them into a development or validation set. Structural brain MRIs were qualitatively assessed for lesions in 18 brain regions. We used logistic regression and support vector machine algorithms to first identify the most relevant brain regions predicting a patient's outcome in the development set. We next built a diagnostic MRI-based score and estimated its optimal diagnostic cut-off point. The classifiers were then tested on the validation set and their performance compared using the receiver operating characteristic curve. Relevant brain regions predicting negative outcome highly overlapped between both classifiers and included the left mesencephalon, right basal ganglia, right thalamus, right parietal cortex, and left frontal cortex. The support vector machine classifier showed higher accuracy (0.93, 95% CI: 0.81-0.96) and specificity (0.97, 95% CI: 0.85-1) than logistic regression (accuracy: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.73 - 0.95; specificity: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.75-0.97), but equal sensitivity (0.67, 95% CI: 0.24-0.94 and 0.22-0.96, respectively) for distinguishing patients with and without residual consciousness. The novel MRI-based score assessing brain lesions in patients with disorders of consciousness accurately detects patients with residual consciousness. It could complement valuably behavioral evaluation as it is time-efficient and requires only conventional MRI.

Early discrimination of cognitive motor dissociation from disorders of consciousness: pitfalls and clues.

Bedside assessment of consciousness and awareness after a severe brain injury might be hampered by confounding clinical factors (i.e., pitfalls) interfering with the production of behavioral or motor responses to external stimuli. Despite the use of validated clinical scales, a high misdiagnosis rate is indeed observed. We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 49 patients with severe brain injury admitted to an acute neuro-rehabilitation program. Patients' behavior was assessed using the Motor Behavior Tool and Coma Recovery Scale Revised. All patients underwent systematic assessment for pitfalls including polyneuropathy and/or myopathy and/or myelopathy, major cranial nerve palsies, non-convulsive status epilepticus, aphasia (expressive or comprehensive), cortical blindness, thalamic involvement and frontal akinetic syndrome. A high prevalence (75%) of pitfalls potentially interfering with sensory afference (polyneuropathy, myopathy, myelopathy, and sensory aphasia), motor efference (polyneuropathy, myopathy, motor aphasia, and frontal akinetic syndrome), and intrinsic brain activity (thalamic involvement and epilepsy) was found. Nonetheless, the motor behavior tool identified residual cognition (i.e. a cognitive motor dissociation condition) regardless of the presence of these pitfalls in 70% of the patients diagnosed as unresponsive using the Coma Recovery Scale Revised. On one hand, pitfalls might contribute to misdiagnosis. On the other, it could be argued that they are clues for diagnosing cognitive motor dissociation rather than true disorders of consciousness given their prominent effect on the sensory-motor input-output balance.

Intensive Care Admission and Early Neuro-Rehabilitation. Lessons for COVID-19?

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) requires admission to intensive care (ICU) for the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome in about 5% of cases. Although our understanding of COVID-19 is still incomplete, a growing body of evidence is indicating potential direct deleterious effects on the central and peripheral nervous systems. Indeed, complex and long-lasting physical, cognitive, and functional impairments have often been observed after COVID-19. Early (defined as during and immediately after ICU discharge) rehabilitative interventions are fundamental for reducing the neurological burden of a disease that already heavily affects lung function with pulmonary fibrosis as a possible long-term consequence. In addition, ameliorating neuromuscular weakness with early rehabilitation would improve the efficiency of respiratory function as respiratory muscle atrophy worsens lung capacity. This review briefly summarizes the polymorphic burden of COVID-19 and addresses possible early interventions that could minimize the neurological and systemic impact. In fact, the benefits of early multidisciplinary rehabilitation after an ICU stay have been shown to be advantageous in several clinical conditions making an early rehabilitative approach generalizable and desirable to physicians from a wide range of different specialties.

Recovery in cognitive motor dissociation after severe brain injury: A cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the functional and cognitive outcomes during early intensive neurorehabilitation and to compare the recovery patterns of patients presenting with cognitive motor dissociation (CMD), disorders of consciousness (DOC) and non-DOC. METHODS: We conducted a single center observational cohort study of 141 patients with severe acquired brain injury, consecutively admitted to an acute neurorehabilitation unit. We divided patients into three groups according to initial neurobehavioral diagnosis at admission using the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) and the Motor Behavior Tool (MBT): potential clinical CMD, [N = 105]; DOC [N = 19]; non-DOC [N = 17]). Functional and cognitive outcomes were assessed at admission and discharge using the Glasgow Outcome Scale, the Early Rehabilitation Barthel Index, the Disability Rating Scale, the Rancho Los Amigos Levels of Cognitive Functioning, the Functional Ambulation Classification Scale and the modified Rankin Scale. Confirmed recovery of conscious awareness was based on CRS-R criteria. RESULTS: CMD patients were significantly associated with better functional outcomes and potential for improvement than DOC. Furthermore, outcomes of CMD patients did not differ significantly from those of non-DOC. Using the CRS-R scale only; approximatively 30% of CMD patients did not recover consciousness at discharge. INTERPRETATION: Our findings support the fact that patients presenting with CMD condition constitute a separate category, with different potential for improvement and functional outcomes than patients suffering from DOC. This reinforces the need for CMD to be urgently recognized, as it may directly affect patient care, influencing life-or-death decisions.

Neurosensory stimulation outdoors enhances cognition recovery in cognitive motor dissociation: A prospective crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Neurosensory stimulation is effective in enhancing the recovery process of severely brain-injured patients with disorders of consciousness. Multisensory environments are found in nature, recognized as beneficial to many medical conditions. Recent advances detected covert cognition in patients behaviorally categorized as un- or minimally responsive; a state described as cognitive motor dissociation (CMD). OBJECTIVE: To determine effectiveness of a neurosensory stimulation approach enhanced by outdoor therapy, in the early phases of recovery in patients presenting with CMD. METHODS: A prospective non-randomized crossover study was performed. A two-phase neurosensory procedure combined identical individually goal assessed indoor and outdoor protocols. All sessions were video-recorded and observations rated offline. The frequency of volitional behavior was measured using a behavioral grid. RESULTS: Fifteen patients participated in this study. The outdoor group patients had statistically significant higher number of intentional behaviors than the indoor group on seven features of the grid. Additionally, for all items assessed, total amount of behaviors in the outdoor condition where higher than those in the indoor condition. CONCLUSIONS: Although preliminary, this study provides robust evidence supporting the effectiveness and appropriateness of an outdoor neurosensory intervention in patients with covert cognition, to improve adaptive goal-oriented behavior. This may be a step towards helping to restore functional interactive communication.

Peri-personal space encoding in patients with disorders of consciousness and cognitive-motor dissociation.

Behavioral assessments of consciousness based on overt command following cannot differentiate patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC) from those who demonstrate a dissociation between intent/awareness and motor capacity: cognitive motor dissociation (CMD). We argue that delineation of peri-personal space (PPS) - the multisensory-motor space immediately surrounding the body - may differentiate these patients due to its central role in mediating human-environment interactions, and putatively in scaffolding a minimal form of selfhood. In Experiment 1, we determined a normative physiological index of PPS by recording electrophysiological (EEG) responses to tactile, auditory, or audio-tactile stimulation at different distances (5 vs. 75 cm) in healthy volunteers (N = 19). Contrasts between paired (AT) and summed (A + T) responses demonstrated multisensory supra-additivity when AT stimuli were presented near, i.e., within the PPS, and highlighted somatosensory-motor sensors as electrodes of interest. In Experiment 2, we recorded EEG in patients behaviorally diagnosed as DOC or putative CMD (N = 17, 30 sessions). The PPS-measure developed in Experiment 1 was analyzed in relation with both standard clinical diagnosis (i.e., Coma Recovery Scale; CRS-R) and a measure of neural complexity associated with consciousness. Results demonstrated a significant correlation between the PPS measure and neural complexity, but not with the CRS-R, highlighting the added value of the physiological recordings. Further, multisensory processing in PPS was preserved in putative CMD but not in DOC patients. Together, the findings suggest that indexing PPS allows differentiating between groups of patients whom both show overt motor impairments (DOC and CMD) but putatively distinct levels of awareness or motor intent.

Motor behavior unmasks residual cognition in disorders of consciousness.

Disorders of consciousness (DOC) are a common consequence of severe brain injuries, and clinical evaluation is critical to provide a correct diagnosis and prognosis. The revised Motor Behavior Tool (MBT-r) is a clinical complementary tool aiming to identify subtle motor behaviors that might reflect residual cognition in DOC. In this prospective study including 30 DOC patients in the early stage after brain injury, we show that the revised MBT-r has an excellent inter-rater agreement and has the ability to identify a subgroup of patients, underestimated by the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised, showing residual cognition and a subsequent recovery of consciousness. ANN NEUROL 2019;85:443-447.

Motor Attempt EEG Paradigm as a Diagnostic Tool for Disorders of Consciousness.

To investigate whether a motor attempt EEG paradigm coupled with functional electrical stimulation can detect command following and, therefore, signs of conscious awareness in patients with disorders of consciousness, we recorded nine patients admitted to acute rehabilitation after a brain lesion. We extracted peak classification accuracy and peak session discriminant power (PSDP) and we assessed their correlation to the established coma recovery scale revised (CRS-R) and the agreement with diagnosis based on the novel motor behavior tool (MBT). Only PSDP correlated significantly with CRS-R and it also outperformed peak accuracy regarding the MBT. We conclude that PSDP might be more suitable than accuracy to complement CRS-R and MBT in evaluating ambiguous cases and in detecting cognitive motor dissociation.

Outcome Prediction of Consciousness Disorders in the Acute Stage Based on a Complementary Motor Behavioural Tool.

INTRODUCTION: Attaining an accurate diagnosis in the acute phase for severely brain-damaged patients presenting Disorders of Consciousness (DOC) is crucial for prognostic validity; such a diagnosis determines further medical management, in terms of therapeutic choices and end-of-life decisions. However, DOC evaluation based on validated scales, such as the Revised Coma Recovery Scale (CRS-R), can lead to an underestimation of consciousness and to frequent misdiagnoses particularly in cases of cognitive motor dissociation due to other aetiologies. The purpose of this study is to determine the clinical signs that lead to a more accurate consciousness assessment allowing more reliable outcome prediction. METHODS: From the Unit of Acute Neurorehabilitation (University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland) between 2011 and 2014, we enrolled 33 DOC patients with a DOC diagnosis according to the CRS-R that had been established within 28 days of brain damage. The first CRS-R assessment established the initial diagnosis of Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome (UWS) in 20 patients and a Minimally Consciousness State (MCS) in the remaining13 patients. We clinically evaluated the patients over time using the CRS-R scale and concurrently from the beginning with complementary clinical items of a new observational Motor Behaviour Tool (MBT). Primary endpoint was outcome at unit discharge distinguishing two main classes of patients (DOC patients having emerged from DOC and those remaining in DOC) and 6 subclasses detailing the outcome of UWS and MCS patients, respectively. Based on CRS-R and MBT scores assessed separately and jointly, statistical testing was performed in the acute phase using a non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test; longitudinal CRS-R data were modelled with a Generalized Linear Model. RESULTS: Fifty-five per cent of the UWS patients and 77% of the MCS patients had emerged from DOC. First, statistical prediction of the first CRS-R scores did not permit outcome differentiation between classes; longitudinal regression modelling of the CRS-R data identified distinct outcome evolution, but not earlier than 19 days. Second, the MBT yielded a significant outcome predictability in the acute phase (p<0.02, sensitivity>0.81). Third, a statistical comparison of the CRS-R subscales weighted by MBT became significantly predictive for DOC outcome (p<0.02). DISCUSSION: The association of MBT and CRS-R scoring improves significantly the evaluation of consciousness and the predictability of outcome in the acute phase. Subtle motor behaviour assessment provides accurate insight into the amount and the content of consciousness even in the case of cognitive motor dissociation.

From disorders of consciousness to early neurorehabilitation using assistive technologies in patients with severe brain damage.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to provide an update on the latest challenges addressed by neurorehabilitation initiated very early after the brain damage, such as dealing with disorders of consciousness in terms of diagnosis, prognosis and rehabilitative treatment, or determining best timing for first rehabilitative intervention, best therapeutic approaches and best modalities. RECENT FINDINGS: Early management of patients with severe brain damage requires a multidisciplinary rehabilitative approach that encompasses clinical skills in various fields, standard therapies, and assistive technologies.Despite a high rate of misdiagnosis and poor outcome prediction in disorders of consciousness, the observation of subtle motor signs may be a promising way to reach accurate diagnosis and better outcome prediction. Neurosensory stimulation remains the current treatment to promote emergence from disorders of consciousness.Early timing of neurological rehabilitation is definitively efficient, but a safety period should be respected. Some standard therapies and assistive technologies have demonstrated explicit evidence in neurological recovery and high treatment dose is needed to emphasize the therapeutic effect, but several controversies persist in treatment evidence. SUMMARY: Current advancements have provided growing evidence for early neurorehabilitation, which should be definitively applied, but further studies are explicitly needed to diminish persistent controversies in the field.