Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Am J Infect Control ; 50(8): 963-965, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35158015

RESUMO

A retrospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate the bundle of techniques developed by the multidisciplinary team to minimize infections in an adult intensive care unit over a 22-year span. Two periods were analyzed: 1996-2006 and 2007-2017. Bloodstream infections, urinary tract infections, and ventilator-associated pneumonia declined 58.6%, 56.7%, and 82.6%, respectively (P < .05) from 2007 to 2017 compared with these same infections during 1996-2006.


Assuntos
Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter , Infecção Hospitalar , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica , Adulto , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Arch Microbiol ; 203(4): 1683-1690, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33459815

RESUMO

Clostridioides difficile infection is a public health problem because of it is easily spread; with harmful consequences, it is essential to reduce hospital costs and prevent its dissemination by having a precise diagnosis. The gold standard for its diagnosis is polymerase chain reaction (PCR); however, the technique is not available for all laboratories due to the high cost. New approaches using non-molecular tests to detect C. difficile and toxin A/B production has been proposed to improve cost benefits. The objective of this study is to compare molecular methods (PCR) and rapid methods (immunochromatographic test and enzymatic immunoassay). A series of tests comprising these diagnostic techniques was performed with 50 patients with a clinical diagnosis for Clostridioides difficile on GeneXpert® devices test; a calculation of the sensitivity was executed, followed by a comparison of the efficiency of all techniques. Greater sensitivity was observed in the PCR-based methods (BD MAX™ and BioFire FilmArray®) and the GDH-based assays (RIDASCREEN® and Alere Techlab®). The proposed algorithm represents minor monetary disadvantages but a significant temporal optimization of 10%. Future studies concerning both positive and negative results could be advantageous because of the possibility of calculating more method concordance indexes, such as the specificity and Kappa index, in addition to being able to indicate a monetary profit if the proposed algorithm was applied due to the nonproceeding PCR cases.


Assuntos
Proteínas de Bactérias/análise , Toxinas Bacterianas/análise , Infecções por Clostridium/diagnóstico , Enterotoxinas/análise , Imunoensaio/métodos , Técnicas Imunoenzimáticas/métodos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Algoritmos , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Clostridioides difficile/genética , Clostridioides difficile/isolamento & purificação , Fezes/microbiologia , Feminino , Glutamato Desidrogenase/análise , Humanos , Laboratórios , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA