Phase I/II trial of plinabulin in combination with nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with recurrent small cell lung cancer (SCLC): Big ten cancer research consortium (BTCRC-LUN17-127) study.

BACKGROUND: Plinabulin is a GEF-H1 releasing agent with an immune-enhancing function. We report results from a multicenter Phase I/II study (NCT03575793) assessing plinabulin in combination with nivolumab and ipilimumab for the treatment of recurrent SCLC. METHODS: In Phase I, patients were enrolled using a 3 + 3 design to determine dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). Patients received nivolumab (1 mg/kg), ipilimumab (3 mg/kg), and plinabulin (in escalating doses) on day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles followed by maintenance with plinabulin and nivolumab. In phase II, patients with recurrent PD(L)1 inhibitor resistant SCLC were enrolled. The primary objective was median progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Between 9/2018 and 2/2023, 39 patients were enrolled, and 36 patients received study treatment and were evaluable for safety (16 in Phase I; 20 in Phase II). In the phase I dose-escalation, there were 2 DLTs; grade 3 altered mental status lasting <24 h and grade 3 infusion reaction. The Plinabulin RP2D was determined to be 30 mg/m2. Common TRAEs were vomiting (44 %), nausea (42 %), and infusion reaction (36 %); 6 % of patients had a ≥grade 3 TRAE. Five patients (14 %) had ≥grade 3 irAEs; there were no cases of immune-related pneumonitis. In the efficacy analysis in 27 patients, the median PFS was 1.6 months (95 % CI 1.2 to 2.7) and the trial did not meet the pre-specified target median PFS of 3.5 months. Four patients treated at 30 mg/m2 had PR (confirmed 1, unconfirmed 3); 5 patients had SD with a CBR of 33 %. Two of 8 patients treated in phase I at the lower 20 mg/m2 dose had confirmed PR, with 1 patient on the drug regimen for >90 cycles. The median OS and follow-up time were 5.5 months and 2.5 months respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Plinabulin in combination with nivolumab and ipilimumab was tolerable at the dose of 30 mg/m2. While the clinical responses in PD-1 resistant SCLC were limited, some patients had a long duration of response. The number of ≥grade 3 irAE with the combination were lower than expected.

A Phase I Trial of Atezolizumab and Varlilumab in Combination With Radiation in Patients With Metastatic NSCLC.

Introduction: Anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) immunotherapy is the standard of care for metastatic NSCLC but many tumors develop resistance. We hypothesized that combining a T-cell agonist such as varlilumab (anti-CD27 antibody) with checkpoint inhibition may be synergistic and this synergy may be potentiated further by using targeted radiation (RT). Methods: We conducted an open-label, single-center, phase I trial (NCT04081688) to determine the safety and clinical benefit of the atezolizumab and varlilumab in combination with palliative RT in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC with progression on prior programmed cell death ligand 1therapy. On day 1 of each 21-day cycle, patients received varlilumab followed by atezolizumab on day 2. RT to a lung lesion was administered between cycle 1 and cycle 2. Results: A total of 15 patients were enrolled (one patient did not start treatment). The median age was 64 years; 10 patients were female. Eight patients (57%) had at least one treatment-related adverse event (AE) and 7 (50%) had at least one grade III or worse treatment-related AE. There was only one grade III immune-related AE requiring steroids (1 diarrhea and colitis); there were no treatment-related deaths. Of the 12 patients evaluable for efficacy, three patients had stable disease (2 with stable disease > 4 mo) and the clinical benefit rate was 25%. The median progression-free survival was two months and the median overall survival was 6.4 months. Conclusions: Varlilumab in combination with atezolizumab and RT was safe and well tolerated; no additional signal was identified for toxicity. Clinical activity for the combination was modest with 25% of patients with stable disease as the best response.

PIK3/Akt/mTOR pathway alterations in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Alterations in the PIK3/Akt/mTOR pathway are commonly seen in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC), however their role in outcomes is unknown. We aim to evaluate the prognostic significance as well as the genetic landscape of PIK3/Akt/mTOR pathway alteration in mCSPC. METHODS: Fourhundred and seventy-two patients with mCSPC were included who underwent next generation sequencing. PIK3/Akt/mTor pathway alterations were defined as mutations in Akt1, mTOR, PIK3CA, PIK3CB, PIK3R1, PTEN, TSC1, and TSC2. Endpoints of interests were radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), time to development of castration resistant prostate cancer (tdCRPC), and overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed and Cox regression hazard ratios (HR) were calculated. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-two (31.9%) patients harbored a PIK3/Akt/mTOR pathway alteration. Median rPFS and tdCRPC were 23.7 and 21.0 months in PIK3/Akt/mTOR altered compared to 32.8 (p = 0.08) and 32.1 months (p = 0.002) in wildtype tumors. On multivariable analysis PIK3/Akt/mTOR pathway alterations were associated with tdCRPC (HR 1.43, 95% CI, 1.05-1.94, p = 0.02), but not rPFS [Hazard ratio (HR) 1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.90-1.60, p = 0.21]. PIK3/Akt/mTOR pathway alterations were more likely to be associated with concurrent mutations in TP53 (40% vs. 28%, p = 0.01) and TMPRSS2-ERG (37% vs. 26%, p = 0.02) than tumors without PIK3/Akt/mTOR pathway alterations. Concurrent mutations were typically associated with shorter median times to rPFS and tdCRPC. DAVID analysis showed p53 signaling and angiogenesis pathways were enriched in PIK3/Akt/mTOR pathway altered tumors while beta-catenin binding and altered BRCA pathway were enriched in PIK3/Akt/mTOR pathway wildtype tumors. CONCLUSIONS: PIK3/Akt/mTOR pathway alterations were common in mCSPC and associated with poorer prognosis. The genetic landscape of PIK3/Akt/mTOR pathway altered tumors differed from wildtype tumors. Additional studies are needed to better understand and target the PIK3/Akt/mTOR pathway in mCSPC.

Analysis of Circulating Tumor DNA Predicts Outcomes of Short-Course Consolidation Immunotherapy in Unresectable Stage III NSCLC.

INTRODUCTION: The current standard of care for patients with inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer includes chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by 1 year of checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy. Nevertheless, the optimal duration of consolidation CPI remains unknown. Here, we characterized the relationship between circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) minimal residual disease (MRD) and clinical outcomes of patients with unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated on a phase 2 trial of short-course consolidation immunotherapy after CRT, with the goal of testing whether ctDNA may be able to identify patients who do not require a full year of treatment. METHODS: Plasma samples for ctDNA analysis were collected from patients on the Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium LUN 16-081 trial after completion of CRT, before day 1 of cycle 2 (C2D1) of CPI (i.e., 1 mo after treatment start), and at the end of up to 6 months of treatment. Tumor-informed ctDNA MRD analysis was performed using cancer personalized profiling by deep sequencing. Levels of ctDNA at each time point were correlated with clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Detection of ctDNA predicted significantly inferior progression-free survival after completion of CRT (24-mo 29% versus 65%, p = 0.0048), before C2D1 of CPI (24-mo 0% versus 72%, p < 0.0001) and at the end of CPI (24-mo 15% versus 67%, p = 0.0011). In addition, patients with decreasing or undetectable ctDNA levels after 1 cycle of CPI had improved outcomes compared with patients with increasing ctDNA levels (24-mo progression-free survival 72% versus 0%, p < 0.0001). Progression of disease occurred within less than 12 months of starting CPI in all patients with increasing ctDNA levels at C2D1. CONCLUSIONS: Detection of ctDNA before, during, or after 6 months of consolidation CPI is strongly associated with inferior outcomes. Our findings suggest that analysis of ctDNA MRD may enable personalizing the duration of consolidation immunotherapy treatment.

Local Excision for Early-Stage Rectal Adenocarcinomas.

ABSTRACT: Although total mesorectal excision (TME) remains the standard of care for rectal cancer, including early-stage T1/T2 rectal adenocarcinoma, local excision may be warranted for these early-stage tumors in a select group of patients who may decline surgery or may be nonoptimal surgical candidates. Operative approaches for transanal local excision include transanal endoscopic microsurgery or transanal minimally invasive surgery for tumors <4 cm, occupying <40% of the rectal circumference and <10 cm from the dentate line. The use of preoperative chemoradiation therapy may help to downstage tumors and allow for more limited resections, and chemoradiation may also be employed postoperatively. Local excision approaches appear to result in improved quality of life compared with TME, but limited resections may also compromise survival rates compared with TME. Multidisciplinary management and shared decision-making can allow for the desired patient outcomes.

Executive Summary of the American Radium Society on Appropriate Use Criteria for Nonoperative Management of Rectal Adenocarcinoma: Systematic Review and Guidelines.

For patients with rectal cancer, the standard approach of chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery (trimodality therapy) is associated with significant long-term toxicity and/or colostomy for most patients. Patient options focused on quality of life (QOL) have dramatically improved, but there remains limited guidance regarding comparative effectiveness. This systematic review and associated guidelines evaluate how various treatment strategies compare to each other in terms of oncologic outcomes and QOL. Cochrane and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology were used to search for prospective and retrospective trials and meta-analyses of adequate quality within the Ovid Medline database between January 1, 2012, and June 15, 2023. These studies informed the expert panel, which rated the appropriateness of various treatments in 6 clinical scenarios through a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi). The search process yielded 197 articles that advised voting. Increasing data have shown that nonoperative management (NOM) and primary surgery result in QOL benefits noted over trimodality therapy without detriment to oncologic outcomes. For patients with rectal cancer for whom total mesorectal excision would result in permanent colostomy or inadequate bowel continence, NOM was strongly recommended as usually appropriate. Restaging with tumor response assessment approximately 8 to 12 weeks after completion of radiation therapy/chemoradiation therapy was deemed a necessary component of NOM. The panel recommended active surveillance in the setting of a near-complete or complete response. In the setting of NOM, 54 to 56 Gy in 27 to 31 fractions concurrent with chemotherapy and followed by consolidation chemotherapy was recommended. The panel strongly recommends primary surgery as usually appropriate for a T3N0 high rectal tumor for which low anterior resection and adequate bowel function is possible, with adjuvant chemotherapy considered if N+. Recent data support NOM and primary surgery as important options that should be offered to eligible patients. Considering the complexity of multidisciplinary management, patients should be discussed in a multidisciplinary setting, and therapy should be tailored to individual patient goals/values.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on brachytherapy and cancer patient outcomes: A systematic review.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): To assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the use of brachytherapy in patients with gynecologic and prostate cancers including treatment delays, increased burden of mortality, and associated clinical outcomes. MATERIALS/METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Databases were searched for studies published through September 2023 using MeSH terms and keywords related to "COVID and brachytherapy." Inclusion criteria included all studies reporting on the impact of COVID-19 on treatment delay, treatment omission, recurrence rates, and clinical outcomes in patients requiring brachytherapy for prostate or gynecologic cancers from December 2019 to September 2023. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers (LH, IV). RESULTS: Of the 292 screened records, 10 studies (9 retrospective, 1 prospective single-arm exploratory noninferiority) were included. Hypofractioned regimens were the preferred approach in radiation treatment (RT) centers, with 6 of 10 studies noting shift towards hypofractionation. For cervical cancer, intracavitary brachytherapy was limited to 3-4 fractions, reducing personnel and patient exposure. Treatment delays influenced by COVID-19 ranged between 19% and 53% and treatment omissions ranged between 2% and 28%. These disruptions arose from factors such as patient fear of contracting COVID-19, COVID-19 infection, barriers to accessing care, and operating room closures. Three studies reported on a single-application (SA) rather than a multiple application (MA) approach for cervical cancer. They reported excellent local control, shorter overall treatment time at the expense of higher grade ≥2 vaginal, genitourinary, and gastrointestinal events. For cervical cancer patients, overall treatment time (OTT) was significantly impacted by COVID-19 as reported by 2 studies from India. OTT > 60 days occurred in 40-53% of patients. CONCLUSION: This is the first systematic review to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on brachytherapy in patients with gynecologic and prostate cancers. Although many expert consensus recommendations have been published during the pandemic regarding radiation therapy, few studies evaluated its clinical impact on brachytherapy delivery and patient outcomes. The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in treatment delays, omissions in brachytherapy, and further adoption of hypofractionated regimens. Early results demonstrate that despite increased toxicities, local control rates with hypofractionated treatment are similar to standard fractionation. The impact of the pandemic on gynecologic and prostate cancers is yet to be determined as well as the long-term outcomes on patients treated during the lockdown period.

Combinatorial Approaches for Chemotherapies and Targeted Therapies With Radiation: United Efforts to Innovate in Patient Care.

Combinatorial therapies consisting of radiation therapy (RT) with systemic therapies, particularly chemotherapy and targeted therapies, have moved the needle to augment disease control across nearly all disease sites for locally advanced disease. Evaluating these important combinations to incorporate more potent therapies with RT will aid our understanding of toxicity and efficacy for patients. This article discusses multiple disease sites and includes a compilation of contributions from expert Red Journal editors from each disease site. Leveraging improved systemic control with novel agents, we must continue efforts to study novel treatment combinations with RT.

Defining Minimum Treatment Parameters of Ablative Radiation Therapy in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Expert Consensus.

PURPOSE: External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is a highly effective treatment in select patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer system does not recommend the use of EBRT in HCC due to a lack of sufficient evidence and intends to perform an individual patient level meta-analysis of ablative EBRT in this population. However, there are many types of EBRT described in the literature with no formal definition of what constitutes "ablative." Thus, we convened a group of international experts to provide consensus on the parameters that define ablative EBRT in HCC. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fundamental parameters related to dose, fractionation, radiobiology, target identification, and delivery technique were identified by a steering committee to generate 7 Key Criteria (KC) that would define ablative EBRT for HCC. Using a modified Delphi (mDelphi) method, experts in the use of EBRT in the treatment of HCC were surveyed. Respondents were given 30 days to respond in round 1 of the mDelphi and 14 days to respond in round 2. A threshold of ≥70% was used to define consensus for answers to each KC. RESULTS: Of 40 invitations extended, 35 (88%) returned responses. In the first round, 3 of 7 KC reached consensus. In the second round, 100% returned responses and consensus was reached in 3 of the remaining 4 KC. The distribution of answers for one KC, which queried the a/b ratio of HCC, was such that consensus was not achieved. Based on this analysis, ablative EBRT for HCC was defined as a BED10 ≥80 Gy with daily imaging and multiphasic contrast used for target delineation. Treatment breaks (eg, for adaptive EBRT) are allowed, but the total treatment time should be ≤6 weeks. Equivalent dose when treating with protons should use a conversion factor of 1.1, but there is no single conversion factor for carbon ions. CONCLUSIONS: Using a mDelphi method assessing expert opinion, we provide the first consensus definition of ablative EBRT for HCC. Empirical data are required to define the a/b of HCC.

The Next Chapter in Immunotherapy and Radiation Combination Therapy: Cancer-Specific Perspectives.

Immunotherapeutic agents have revolutionized cancer treatment over the past decade. However, most patients fail to respond to immunotherapy alone. A growing body of preclinical studies highlights the potential for synergy between radiation therapy and immunotherapy, but the outcomes of clinical studies have been mixed. This review summarizes the current state of immunotherapy and radiation combination therapy across cancers, highlighting existing challenges and promising areas for future investigation.

Gender and the Receipt of the Association of Residents in Radiation Oncology Educator of the Year Award.

Purpose: We hypothesized that there may be a gender disparity in the receipt of the Association of Residents in Radiation Oncology (ARRO) Educator of the Year Award and sought to elucidate factors that contribute to differences in award receipt. Methods and Materials: Using a database provided by the American Society for Radiation Oncology, award recipients were identified from 2010 to 2022. Publicly available websites were accessed to obtain data regarding gender, years since residency graduation, percentage of female faculty, size of residency program, and program director designation. A 1-sample Z-test was used to assess whether the proportion of female ARRO award winners, defined as the proportion of female radiation oncology faculty members in the nominating universities that year, was significantly less than the population average. Secondary analyses used univariable binary logistic regression to identify global associations between gender, year since gradation, or program size. Results: The lowest proportion of female awardees occurred in 2013 (14.3%) and the greatest proportion in 2022 (30.6%). Compared with the proportion of female faculty members in nominating programs for the respective year, there were significantly fewer female awardees in 2010 (18% female awardees vs 32% female faculty members; P = .02) and 2013 (14% female awardees vs 31% female faculty members; P = .01). There was a statistically significant increase in female awardees during the study period (P < .01). On logistic regression analysis, large program size (≥10 residents) (odds ratio [OR], 6.86; 95% CI, 2.71-23.1; P < .001) and medium program size (5-9 residents) (OR, 4.05; 95% CI, 1.60-13.7; P < .001) were associated with a greater proportion of female awardees compared with small program size (1-4 residents). There was no association between awardee gender and years since graduation. Conclusions: A gender disparity was present in the receipt of ARRO Educator Awards. Residency chiefs, program directors, and chairs should work to ensure that a diverse slate of faculty is considered annually for the ARRO Educator Award.

Adaptive Lung Radiation Therapy in the Era of Immunotherapy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Purpose: Treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer consists of concurrent chemoradiation followed by immunotherapy. Though this combination has been shown to have a benefit in both progression-free survival and overall survival, treatment is often limited by the development of pneumonitis. One way to mitigate toxicity is through adaptive radiation therapy, which does not currently have a standardized implementation in clinical practice. Methods and Materials: A single-center retrospective review of patients with locally advanced stage III or oligometastatic stage IV non-small cell lung cancer who were treated with chemoradiation with concurrent or subsequent immunotherapy from 2015 to 2020 was performed. Patients were stratified based on having 1 or more offline adapted plan. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between dose-volume histogram values and common toxicities experienced during this treatment, including pneumonitis and esophagitis. Results: Twenty-five patients were included in the final analysis: 10 with adapted plans (AP), and 15 with nonadapted plans (NAP). Mean age at onset was 74 years. The most common histology was adenocarcinoma (N = 13). Five patients experienced pneumonitis: 2 in AP and 3 in NAP. Mann-Whitney U test of gross tumor volume sizes between AP (346.2 ± 269.7 cm3) and NAP (153.1 ± 99.6 cm3) was significant (P = .019). Multiple linear regression analysis with adjustment for covariates of pneumonitis versus plan adaptation (P = .106) and esophagitis versus plan adaptation (P = .59) did not demonstrate a significant difference in toxicity between the adapted and nonadaptive patients. Conclusions: Despite similar toxicities in both groups, the gross tumor volume size in the AP was more than double compared with NAP, suggesting that adaptive techniques provide a method for patients with larger target volumes to be treated without an observed difference in pneumonitis rates. These results suggest adaptive radiation therapy may have a role in mitigating toxicity experience from chemoradiation and immunotherapy and warrants further investigation.

TP53 structure-function relationships in metastatic castrate-sensitive prostate cancer and the impact of APR-246 treatment.

PURPOSE: Despite well-informed work in several malignancies, the phenotypic effects of TP53 mutations in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) progression and metastasis are not clear. We characterized the structure-function and clinical impact of TP53 mutations in mCSPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed an international retrospective review of men with mCSPC who underwent next-generation sequencing and were stratified according to TP53 mutational status and metastatic burden. Clinical outcomes included radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS) evaluated with Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression. We also utilized isogenic cancer cell lines to assess the effect of TP53 mutations and APR-246 treatment on migration, invasion, colony formation in vitro, and tumor growth in vivo. Preclinical experimental observations were compared using t-tests and ANOVA. RESULTS: Dominant-negative (DN) TP53 mutations were enriched in patients with synchronous (vs. metachronous) (20.7% vs. 6.3%, p < 0.01) and polymetastatic (vs. oligometastatic) (14.4% vs. 7.9%, p < 0.01) disease. On multivariable analysis, DN mutations were associated with worse rPFS (hazards ratio [HR] = 1.97, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.31-2.98) and overall survival [OS] (HR = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.14-3.68) compared to TP53 wild type (WT). In vitro, 22Rv1 TP53 R175H cells possessed stronger migration, invasion, colony formation ability, and cellular movement pathway enrichment in RNA sequencing analysis compared to 22Rv1 TP53 WT cells. Treatment with APR-246 reversed the effects of TP53 mutations in vitro and inhibited 22Rv1 TP53 R175H tumor growth in vivo in a dosage-dependent manner. CONCLUSIONS: DN TP53 mutations correlated with worse prognosis in prostate cancer patients and higher metastatic potential, which could be counteracted by APR-246 treatment suggesting a potential future therapeutic avenue.

Fixed and random effect selections in generalized linear mixed models.

Generalized linear mixed models are commonly used to describe relationships between correlated responses and covariates in medical research. In this paper, we propose a simple and easily implementable regularized estimation approach to select both fixed and random effects in generalized linear mixed model. Specifically, we propose to construct and optimize the objective functions using the confidence distributions of model parameters, as opposed to using the observed data likelihood functions, to perform effect selections. Two estimation methods are developed. The first one is to use the joint confidence distribution of model parameters to perform simultaneous fixed and random effect selections. The second method is to use the marginal confidence distributions of model parameters to perform the selections of fixed and random effects separately. With a proper choice of regularization parameters in the adaptive LASSO framework, we show the consistency and oracle properties of the proposed regularized estimators. Simulation studies have been conducted to assess the performance of the proposed estimators and demonstrate computational efficiency. Our method has also been applied to two longitudinal cancer studies to identify demographic and clinical factors associated with patient health outcomes after cancer therapies.

Executive Summary of the American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria for Neoadjuvant Therapy for Nonmetastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Systematic Review and Guidelines.

For patients with locoregionally confined pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), margin-negative surgical resection is the only known curative treatment; however, the majority of patients are not operable candidates at initial diagnosis. Among patients with resectable disease who undergo surgery alone, the 5-year survival remains poor. Adjuvant therapies, including systemic therapy or chemoradiation, are utilized as they improve locoregional control and overall survival. There has been increasing interest in the use of neoadjuvant therapy to obtain early control of occult metastatic disease, allow local tumor response to facilitate margin-negative resection, and provide a test of time and biology to assist with the selection of candidates most likely to benefit from radical surgical resection. However, limited guidance exists regarding the relative effectiveness of treatment options. In this systematic review, the American Radium Society multidisciplinary gastrointestinal expert panel convened to develop Appropriate Use Criteria evaluating the evidence regarding neoadjuvant treatment for patients with PDAC, including surgery, systemic therapy, and radiotherapy, in terms of oncologic outcomes and quality of life. The evidence was assessed using the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, and Study (PICOS) design framework and "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses" 2020 methodology. Eligible studies included phases 2 to 3 trials, meta-analyses, and retrospective analyses published between January 1, 2012 and December 30, 2022 in the Ovid Medline database. A summary of recommendations based on the available literature is outlined to guide practitioners in the management of patients with PDAC.

Role of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)is a common type of liver cancer with a poor prognosis, especially in patients with advanced stages or underlying liver disease. While surgical resection, liver transplantation, and ablation therapies have traditionally been the mainstay of treatment for HCC, radiation therapy has become increasingly recognized as an effective alternative, particularly for those who are not surgical candidates. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) is a highly precise form of radiation therapy that delivers very high doses of radiation to the tumor while sparing surrounding healthy tissue. Several studies have reported favorable outcomes with SBRT in HCC treatment. Moreover, SBRT can be used to treat recurrent HCC after prior treatment, offering a potentially curative approach in select cases. While SBRT has demonstrated its efficacy and safety in treating HCC, future studies are needed to further investigate the potential role of SBRT in combination with other treatments for HCC.