Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Surg ; 223(4): 626-632, 2022 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34116794

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study aims to compare PTSD prevalence between seven medical specialties and to identify potential risk factors for PTSD. METHODS: A cross-sectional national survey of attending physicians (n = 2216) was conducted and screened for PTSD using the Primary Care PTSD Screen. Stepwise multivariable regression analysis with backward elimination identified potential risk factors. RESULTS: Overall prevalence of PTSD was 14% and ranged from 7% to 18% for psychiatrists and OBGYNs, respectively (p = 0.004). Six potential risk factors for PTSD included: emotional exhaustion, job dissatisfaction, lack of autonomy, working >60 h per week, poor camaraderie, and female gender (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of PTSD in attending physicians is more than double that of the general population. Higher risk specialties include OBGYN and general surgery. Specialty-specific interventions targeted at reducing physician burnout and improving the physician work-environment are needed to improve physician wellness and reduce PTSD.


Assuntos
Esgotamento Profissional , Médicos , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos , Esgotamento Profissional/psicologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Satisfação no Emprego , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar , Médicos/psicologia , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/etiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
Am Surg ; 85(2): 127-135, 2019 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30819287

RESUMO

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among trauma surgeons is three times that of the general population, and physician burnout (PBO) among surgeons is rising. Given that PTSD and PBO are both stress-based syndromes, we aim to identify the prevalence and risk factors for PTSD among trauma and nontrauma surgeons, and determine if a relationship exists. A cross-sectional survey of surgeons was conducted between September 2016 and May 2017. Respondents were screened for PTSD and PBO. Traumatic stressors were identified, and 20 potential risk factors were assessed. The respondents (n = 1026) were grouped into trauma (n = 350) and nontrauma (n = 676). Between the cohorts, there was no significant difference in prevalence of screening positive for PTSD (17% vs 15%) or PBO (30% vs 25%). A relationship was found between PTSD and PBO (P < 0.001). The most common traumatic stressor was overwhelming work responsibilities. Potential risk factors for PTSD differed, but overlapping risk factors included hospital culture, hospital support, and salary (P < 0.05). Our findings of an association between PTSD and PBO is concerning. Interventions to reduce rates of PTSD should target changing the existing culture of surgery, improving hospital support, and ensuring equitable pay.


Assuntos
Esgotamento Profissional/epidemiologia , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/epidemiologia , Traumatologia , Adulto , Idoso , Esgotamento Profissional/complicações , Esgotamento Profissional/psicologia , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Satisfação no Emprego , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Salários e Benefícios , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/complicações , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/psicologia , Estados Unidos , Carga de Trabalho
3.
Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev ; 1: 14043, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26015981

RESUMO

The impact of nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEFs) on gene electrotransfer has not been clearly demonstrated in previous studies. This study was conducted to evaluate the influence of nsPEFs on the delivery of plasmids encoding luciferase or green fluorescent protein and subsequent expression in HACAT keratinocyte cells. Delivery was performed using millisecond electric pulses (msEPs) with or without nsPEFs. In contrast to reports in the literature, we discovered that gene expression was significantly increased up to 40-fold by applying nsPEFs to cells first followed by one msEP but not in the opposite order. We demonstrated that the effect of nsPEFs on gene transfection was time restricted. The enhancement of gene expression occurred by applying one msEP immediately after nsPEFs and reached the maximum at posttreatment 5 minutes, slightly decreased at 15 minutes and had a residual effect at 1 hour. It appears that nsPEFs play a role as an amplifier without changing the trend of gene expression kinetics due to msEPs. The effect of nsPEFs on cell viability is also dependent on the specific pulse parameters. We also determined that both calcium independent and dependent mechanisms are involved in nsPEF effects on gene electrotransfer.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA