Evidence-based Indications for Vertebral Body Tethering in Spine Deformity.

Posterior spinal fusion has long been established as an effective treatment for the surgical management of spine deformity. However, interest in nonfusion options continues to grow. Vertebral body tethering is a nonfusion alternative that allows for the preservation of growth and flexibility of the spine. The purpose of this investigation is to provide a practical and relevant review of the literature on the current evidence-based indications for vertebral body tethering. Early results and short-term outcomes show promise for the first generation of this technology. At this time, patients should expect less predictable deformity correction and higher revision rates. Long-term studies are necessary to establish the durability of early results. In addition, further studies should aim to refine preoperative evaluation and patient selection as well as defining the benefits of motion preservation and its long-term effects on spine health to ensure optimal patient outcomes.

Intervertebral Disk Health Following Vertebral Body Tethering for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Preliminary Study.

BACKGROUND: Interest in vertebral body tethering (VBT) as an alternative to posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) continues to grow. The purpose of this study was to prospectively assess intervertebral disk health on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 1 year following VBT in AIS patients. METHODS: AIS patients were enrolled in a prospective surgeon-sponsored Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) Study and underwent MRI at 1-year following VBT. All spanned disks and the untethered disks immediately adjacent to the upper instrumented vertebra and lowest instrumented vertebra levels were evaluated according to Pfirrmann grading criteria. Associations between patient factors and preoperative and postoperative disk health and patient-reported outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were enrolled with a postoperative MRI (25 curves, 188 disks), and 7 patients (7 curves) had both preoperative and postoperative MRIs (67 disks). The mean age was 12.7 years. Most were Risser 0 (65%) and either Sanders Skeletal Maturity Score 3 (35%) or 4 (53%). In the 7 patients with preoperative and postoperative MRI, the mean Pfirrmann grade of the disks spanned by the tether was 1.88 preoperatively and 2.31 postoperatively ( P =0.0075). No statistically significant differences in preoperative versus postoperative Pfirrmann grade were identified in the disks adjacent to the upper or lower instrumented vertebrae. No association was found between patient-reported outcomes and Pfirrmann grade. CONCLUSION: At 1 year postoperatively, increased degenerative changes in disks spanned by the tether was identifiable on MRI without evidence of adjacent segment disk disease. These changes were not associated with patient-reported outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Cervical myelopathy in a patient with Klippel-Feil syndrome treated with a patient-specific custom cervical spine locking plate.

INTRODUCTION: Klippel-Feil Syndrome is the congenital fusion of at least two cervical vertebrae. Often asymptomatic, though in rare cases it may lead to severe cervical spine deformity and neurologic injury. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of a 48-year-old woman with a history of Klippel-Feil Syndrome and congenital scoliosis who developed progressive cervical myelopathy. She was surgically treated with anterior C5 corpectomy and arthrodesis. Pre-operative evaluation was facilitated by 3D printed models. The surgical decompression and spinal reconstruction was completed with the use of a patient-specific, custom-made cervical spine locking plate. DISCUSSION: Pre-operative evaluation with 3D printing technology was useful in understanding the patient's complex curve pattern and in designing a patient specific implant. Custom designed implant is a reasonable option to treat cervical myelopathy associated with complex cervical deformity.

Average Lumbar Hounsfield Units Predicts Osteoporosis-Related Complications Following Lumbar Spine Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Study. OBJECTIVE: To compare methods of assessing pre-operative bone density to predict risk for osteoporosis related complications (ORC), defined as proximal junctional kyphosis, pseudarthrosis, accelerated adjacent segment disease, reoperation, compression fracture, and instrument failure following spine fusions. METHODS: Chart review of primary posterior thoracolumbar or lumbar fusion patients during a 7 year period. Inclusion criteria: preoperative dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) test within 1 year and lumbar CT scan within 6 months prior to surgery with minimum of 1 year follow-up. Exclusion criteria: <18 years at time of index procedure, infection, trauma, malignancy, skeletal dysplasia, neuromuscular disorders, or anterior-posterior procedures. RESULTS: 140 patients were included. The average age was 67.9 years, 83 (59.3%) were female, and 45 (32%) had an ORC. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics between those with and without an ORC. Multilevel fusions were associated with ORCs (46.7% vs 26.3%, p = 0.02). Patients with ORCs had lower DXA t-scores (-1.62 vs -1.10, p = 0.003) and average Hounsfield units (HU) (112.1 vs 148.1, p ≤ 0.001). Multivariable binary logistic regression analysis showed lower average HU (Adj. OR 0.00 595% CI 0.0001-0.1713, p = 0.001) was an independent predictor of an ORC. The odds of an ORC increased by 1.7-fold for every 25 point decrease in average HU. CONCLUSIONS: The gold standard for assessing bone mineral density has been DXA t-scores, but the best predictor of ORC remains unclear. While both lower t-scores and average HU were associated with ORC, only HU was an independent predictor of ORC.

Is there consensus on the perioperative management of Xa inhibitors in patients undergoing elective spine surgery?-A survey of current spine surgeon practices.

BACKGROUND: Factor Xa inhibitors (Xai) are an increasingly common consideration in perioperative anticoagulation management. However, there no existing guidelines established for use in Spine Surgery. This survey study aims to capture current practice trends regarding the perioperative management of Xai among spine surgeons. METHODS: An 11-question survey was sent to all surgeon members of 3 spinal surgery societies. Responses were remitted anonymously. Questions characterized the background and experience of the respondent and inquired into their current perioperative Xai and other anticoagulant management. Questions were all single-best option, multiple-choice. RESULTS: A total of 116 surveys were received. Twenty-six (22.4%) were from neurosurgeons and 90 (77.6%) were from orthopedic surgeons. Practiced preoperative Xai hold length tended to be longer than recommended by the respondent's medical colleagues. Only 65.2% (P≤0.0001) of respondents practiced in agreement with the recommendations of their medical colleagues. Postoperative Xai holds trended toward longer holds than that of other anticoagulants with 37.9% (P=0.0125) of respondents showed differences within their own practice between length of Xai hold and length of other anticoagulant holds. One out of four respondents reported noticing a change in the rate of perioperative bleeding complications among Xai patients. Despite reported increased bleeding issues, only 39% of those who noted this increase in bleeding complications reported they would hold a Xai longer than other anticoagulants. CONCLUSIONS: There exists a wide range of recommended and practiced chronic anticoagulant hold lengths. This inconsistency likely highlights conflicting risk aversion among surgeons, between complications which are viewed as medical (i.e., thromboembolism and stroke) vs. surgical (i.e., compressive hematoma). Yet, survey responses suggest the length of Xai hold times did not necessarily reflect the surgeon's experience with postoperative bleeding complications in Xai patients. These inconsistent practices highlight the need for further research that can establish guidelines for perioperative management of Xai patients undergoing spine surgery. KEYWORDS: Anticoagulants; factor Xa inhibitors (factor Xai); spine; orthopedic surgery; neurosurgery.

Incidence of Symptomatic Pediatric Tarsal Coalition in Olmsted County: A Population-Based Study.

BACKGROUND: Tarsal coalitions are an important reason for foot pain in children. Early estimates placed the prevalence at up to 2%, while more recent data suggest that it is as high as 11% to 13%. To our knowledge, there have been no population-based studies to determine the true incidence of symptomatic tarsal coalitions in a pediatric population. METHODS: A population-based database was used to identify all new diagnoses of symptomatic tarsal coalitions in children 18 years old or younger between 1966 and 2018. Patient records were reviewed for clinical data, and comparisons were made between the types and characteristics of the coalitions identified to determine differences in the affected populations. The annual age-specific, sex-specific, and type-specific incidence rates were estimated. RESULTS: During the study period, 58 patients with a total of 79 symptomatic tarsal coalitions were identified (annual incidence = 3.5 per 100,000 children). There were 43 calcaneonavicular (CN) coalitions (annual incidence = 1.9 per 100,000 children), 27 talocalcaneal (TC) coalitions (annual incidence = 1.2 per 100,000 children), as well as 9 other coalitions (7 talonavicular, 1 naviculocuboid, and 1 naviculocuneiform) (annual incidence = 0.4 per 100,000 children). The overall incidence peaked between the ages of 10 and 14 years for both boys and girls (8.1 per 100,000 and 7.4 per 100,000 children, respectively). Statistical differences were identified between the types of tarsal coalitions. TC coalitions present at an older age relative to CN and other coalitions (mean,13.9, 12.7, and 11.4 years, respectively; p = 0.02). While CN and TC coalitions were similar in composition (23% and 30%, respectively, were osseous as opposed to fibrocartilaginous), other coalitions were more likely to be osseous (78%) (p = 0.0035). Other coalitions were also less likely to require surgery than CN and TC coalitions (11%, 74%, and 56%, respectively; p = 0.0015). CONCLUSIONS: This population-based study demonstrates differences in the clinical presentation of tarsal coalitions and provides an estimate of the true incidence of symptomatic tarsal coalitions in a pediatric population.

Characteristics and reoperation rates of paediatric tarsal coalitions: a population-based study.

PURPOSE: Tarsal coalitions are congenital fusions of two or more tarsal bones and can lead to foot pain and stiffness. Few studies examine the long-term reoperation rates following paediatric tarsal coalition surgery. METHODS: A population-based database, linking medical records at all medical centres to capture the entire medical history of the full population of a Midwest county, was used to identify tarsal coalitions in children between 1966 and 2018. Records were reviewed for clinical data, surgical records and followed up to identify any subsequent surgical interventions. RESULTS: A total of 58 patients (85 coalitions) were identified; 46 calcaneonavicular (CN) coalitions, 30 talocalcaneal (TC) coalitions and nine other coalitions (seven talonavicular, one naviculocuboid, one naviculocuneiform). In all, 46 coalitions were treated surgically (43 coalition resections, three arthrodeses) and 39 were treated nonoperatively. Patients treated surgically were less likely to report ongoing symptoms at final follow-up compared with patients managed nonoperatively (33% versus 67%; p = 0.0017). With a median 14.4 years (interquartile range 9.3 to 19.7) follow-up, there was an overall re-operation rate of 8.7% (4/46). Differences in reoperation rates by initial surgery (resection versus arthrodesis; p = 0.2936), coalition type (CN versus TC versus Other; p = 0.6487) or composition (osseous versus fibrocartilaginous; p = 0.29) did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: This is the first population-based study demonstrating the durability of surgical management of tarsal coalitions in a paediatric population. At final follow-up, patients treated surgically are less likely to report persistent symptoms compared with patients managed nonoperatively. Long-term reoperation rates appear to be low (8.7%). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Osteoporosis in spine surgery patients: what is the best way to diagnose osteoporosis in this population?

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to compare different recognized definitions of osteoporosis in patients with degenerative lumbar spine pathology undergoing elective spinal fusion surgery to determine which patient population should be considered for preoperative optimization. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients in whom lumbar spine surgery was planned at 2 academic medical centers was performed, and the rate of osteoporosis was compared based on different recognized definitions. Assessments were made based on dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), CT Hounsfield units (HU), trabecular bone score (TBS), and fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX). The rate of osteoporosis was compared based on different definitions: 1) the WHO definition (T-score ≤ -2.5) at total hip or spine; 2) CT HU of < 110; 3) National Bone Health Alliance (NBHA) guidelines; and 4) "expanded spine" criteria, which includes patients meeting NBHA criteria and/or HU < 110, and/or "degraded" TBS in the setting of an osteopenic T-score. Inclusion criteria were adult patients with a DXA scan of the total hip and/or spine performed within 1 year and a lumbar spine CT scan within 6 months of the physician visit. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-four patients were included. The mean age was 68.3 years, with 70.5% female, 96.7% Caucasian, and the mean BMI was 28.8. Fracture history was reported in 53.8% of patients. The proportion of patients identified with osteoporosis on DXA, HUs, NBHA guidelines, and the authors' proposed "expanded spine" criteria was 25.4%, 36.5%, 75%, and 81.9%, respectively. Of the patients not identified with osteoporosis on DXA, 31.3% had osteoporosis based on HU, 55.1% had osteoporosis with NBHA, and 70.4% had osteoporosis with expanded spine criteria (p < 0.05), with poor correlations among the different assessment tools. CONCLUSIONS: Limitations in the use of DXA T-scores alone to diagnose osteoporosis in patients with lumbar spondylosis has prompted interest in additional methods of evaluating bone health in the spine, such as CT HU, TBS, and FRAX, to inform guidelines that aim to reduce fracture risk. However, no current osteoporosis assessment was developed with a focus on improving outcomes in spinal surgery. Therefore, the authors propose an expanded spine definition for osteoporosis to identify a more comprehensive cohort of patients with potential poor bone health who could be considered for preoperative optimization, although further study is needed to validate these results in terms of clinical outcomes.

Intercalary Allograft Reconstruction of the Proximal Tibia With and Without a Free Fibula Flap in Pediatric Patients.

BACKGROUND: Limb salvage of the proximal tibia can be difficult due to the growth potential of and functional demands of the pediatric patients. Multiple reconstruction techniques exist, however, the ideal form of reconstruction is yet to be elucidated. The purpose of the current study is to evaluate outcomes in patients with an intercalary resection of the proximal tibia reconstructed with an allograft with or without a free vascularized fibula flap (FVF). METHODS: Seventeen pediatric patients (9 males, 8 females) underwent lower extremity limb salvage with the use of intercalary cadaveric allograft at a mean age of 12±4 years. The most common diagnoses were osteosarcoma (n=6) and Ewing sarcoma (n=6). Patients were reconstructed with an allograft alone (n=6) or supplemented with an FVF (n=11). RESULTS: All surviving patients had at least 2 years of clinical follow-up, with the mean follow-up of 12±7 years. The mean time to union of the allograft was 11±4 months, with 6 patients requiring additional bone grafting. There was no difference in the need for an additional bone graft (odds ratio=1.14, P=1.0) between patients with an FVF and those without. Four patients underwent an amputation, all with an allograft alone, due to disease recurrence (n=2) and due to infection (n=2). As such, there was a higher 10-year overall limb-salvage rate when the allograft was combined with an FVF compared with an allograft alone (100% vs. 33%, P=0.001). At last follow-up, the mean Mankin and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society rating was 86%, with a higher mean score in patients reconstructed with an FVF (94% vs. 70%, P=0.002). CONCLUSION: Use of an intercalary allograft supplemented with an FVF to reconstruct the proximal tibia provides a durable means of reconstruction with an excellent functional outcome following oncologic proximal tibia resection in a pediatric population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-therapeutic level.

Simulation Training of Orthopaedic Residents for Distal Radius Fracture Reductions Improves Radiographic Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Most distal radius fractures can be treated with closed reduction and casting in pediatric patients. These skills are traditionally developed treating real patients, however, there is growing interest in the use of simulation training to supplement traditional learning strategies. METHODS: Seventy-eight children with distal radius fractures that underwent closed reduction and casting by novice orthopaedic surgery residents were retrospectively reviewed. Radiographic measures of patients treated by simulation-trained residents were compared with patients treated by residents without simulation training. RESULTS: Patients treated by simulation-trained residents had less residual angulation in the anteroposterior radiograph (3.7 vs. 6.3 degrees, P=0.006) and translation on the lateral (14% vs. 21%, P=0.040) and anteroposterior radiograph (10% vs. 16%, P=0.029). Patients treated by simulation-trained residents also had lower rates of redisplacement (50% vs. 79%, P=0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Loss of reduction is common, particularly when novice trainees perform their first independent reductions. Residents who underwent simulation training had lower rates of loss of reduction, thus simulation training has potential as a supplement to the traditional apprentice model of medical education. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

The Surgical Management of Tibial Spine Fractures in Children: A Survey of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA).

BACKGROUND: Tibial spine fractures are rare, complex injuries. Management remains varied given a lack of consensus about the optimal approach. Thus, the purpose of this study is to determine prevailing strategies among pediatric orthopaedists and establish areas of agreement and ongoing controversy in the management of tibial spine fractures. METHODS: An electronic survey was distributed to the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA) membership. Surgeon demographics, experience, and responses to clinical vignettes were collected. Surgeons were grouped according to how frequently they treat tibial spine fractures and responses were compared. RESULTS: Of the 180 POSNA members who completed the survey, all were attending surgeons and nearly all (90.4%) had academic affiliations, treated mostly skeletally immature patients (88.5%), and 3 or fewer fractures per year (62.4%). In younger patients, respondents were more likely to treat type II fractures closed and less likely to cross the physis. Arthrofibrosis was the most commonly reported complication and postoperative duration of immobilization was identified as a risk factor by most. However, high-frequency surgeons identified this risk factor more often (P=0.015) and recommended immobilization for <2 weeks more frequently (P=0.018). There was, however, considerable discrepancy regarding the duration of immobilization. Although there were areas of agreement on general principles, there continues to be disagreement regarding specific treatment strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons within POSNA agree on general principles of treatment for tibial spine fractures. Members, regardless of high-volume or low-volume caseload, are all less likely to pursue surgical options when treating younger patients and treating arthrofibrosis during the first 2 postoperative months. The most commonly reported adverse outcome after treatment was arthrofibrosis, for which high-frequency surgeons identified length of immobilization as a significant risk factor more often and thus, recommended shorter periods of immobilization. Although surgeons may agree on general principles in some cases, there continues to be disagreement regarding specific strategies suggesting that a prospective multicenter study of this topic is warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Comparison of Anderson-Green Growth-Remaining Graphs and White-Menelaus Predictions of Growth Remaining in the Distal Femoral and Proximal Tibial Physes.

BACKGROUND: Epiphysiodesis of the distal femoral and/or proximal tibial physes is commonly performed in children and adolescents to treat lower-limb length discrepancy. It is important to determine the amount of growth remaining in the physes of these patients. Two main methods are used to make this determination: the White-Menelaus arithmetic method, which assumes a consistent amount of growth per year until skeletal maturity, and the Anderson-Green growth-remaining charts, which diagram average growth per year ± 2 standard deviations. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate these apparently disparate predictions of growth remaining in a cohort of patients managed with epiphysiodesis. METHODS: From a database of patients managed with epiphysiodesis for lower-limb length discrepancy, we identified all healthy, unoperated leg segments with follow-up to skeletal maturity. We compared the amount of observed growth with the growth predicted by the White-Menelaus method and the Anderson-Green growth-remaining graphs, for both skeletal and chronological ages. RESULTS: A total of 441 healthy segments (201 femora and 240 tibiae) in 221 patients (105 boys and 116 girls) with an age range of 9.0 to 16.5 years at the time of epiphysiodesis were analyzed. We observed no relationship between the length percentile of the leg segments at the time of epiphysiodesis and the amount of growth that actually occurred. Growth in the distal femoral and proximal tibial physes was relatively constant (9 and 6 mm per year of skeletal growth, respectively). Skeletal age was a better predictor of growth remaining than chronological age for both methods of estimation. Although the distribution of growth remaining in the present study resembled the Anderson-Green growth-remaining charts, that distribution was not associated with the initial length of leg segments. CONCLUSIONS: The White-Menelaus method predicted the amount of growth remaining more accurately than the Anderson-Green growth-remaining charts. The distribution of growth remaining observed in the present study resembled that of the Anderson-Green growth-remaining graphs but was not predicted by the initial bone segment length. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The present study found no positive association between the length percentile of leg segments and the amount of growth that occurred in an epiphysiodesis-age group. This finding can explain the comparative accuracy of the White-Menelaus method and the possible source of prediction errors in the straight-line graph and multiplier methods.

Is Routine Spine MRI Necessary in Skeletally Immature Patients With MHE? Identifying Patients at Risk for Spinal Osteochondromas.

BACKGROUND: Multiple hereditary exostoses (MHE) is an autosomal dominant condition leading to development of osteochondromas throughout the body. Although long bones are most often affected, spine involvement may occur and usually requires advanced imaging for diagnosis. However, the high cost of detection, infrequent occurrence, and very low likelihood of spinal cord compression and neurological injury, create a management conundrum. The purpose of our investigation is to identify patients at greatest risk for spinal lesions and refine indications for advanced imaging. METHODS: All MHE patients in a 24-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Skeletally immature patients with advanced imaging of the spine were further evaluated. The demographic characteristics, family history, clinical presentation, past surgical history, tumor burden, and distribution of patients with spinal lesions were compared with those without. RESULTS: In total, 227 MHE patients were identified and 21 underwent advanced spinal imaging. Spinal lesions were found in 8 of the 21 screened patients (38.1%, 3.5% overall), of which 4 were intracanal and 1 was symptomatic (4.8%, 0.4% overall). Only the symptomatic patient underwent excision of the spinal lesion. Patients with spinal lesions had higher tumor burden than those without (median, 28.5 vs. 19 locations; P=0.010). There was a significant association with rib (P=0.018) and pelvic (P=0.007) lesions, which may serve as "harbinger" lesions. The presence of both a rib and a pelvic lesion used as a screening tool for spinal lesions produces a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 69%. CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic spinal involvement in children with MHE is rare and tends to occur in patients with higher tumor burden. We recommend limiting advanced spine imaging to children with neurological symptoms or with rib and pelvic "harbinger" lesions. Patients without these findings are unlikely to have spine involvement needing intervention. This approach offers an opportunity to avoid unnecessary testing and substantially reduce costs of diagnostic imaging. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Timing of Epiphysiodesis to Correct Leg-Length Discrepancy: A Comparison of Prediction Methods.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of different methods used to predict ultimate leg lengths and residual leg-length discrepancy in a group of patients treated with epiphysiodesis at our institution. METHODS: Seventy-seven patients with adequate preoperative radiographs, no postoperative complications, and follow-up to skeletal maturity composed the study group. We compared the predicted lengths of both legs and residual leg-length discrepancy at maturity with actual outcomes using the White-Menelaus, Anderson-Green, Moseley, and multiplier methods. RESULTS: Skeletal age varied >1 year from chronological age in 61 (26%) of 231 observations, including 19 patients (25%) whose average skeletal age from 3 determinations differed by >1 year from chronological age. The prediction accuracy of each method was improved by using skeletal, rather than chronological, age. Error in prediction of the length of the short leg varied from a mean (and standard deviation) of 1.8 ± 1.2 cm for the straight-line graph to 2.5 ± 2.0 cm for the multiplier method. Prediction error for the long leg (after epiphysiodesis) varied from a mean of 1.2 ± 1.1 cm for the straight-line graph to 1.7 ± 1.5 cm for the multiplier method. Leg-length-discrepancy prediction error ranged from a mean of 0.7 ± 0.6 cm for the White-Menelaus method incorporating a growth inhibition factor to 1.1 ± 0.9 cm for the multiplier method. The multiplier method was the least accurate of all. All differences were significant. CONCLUSIONS: Determination of skeletal age is clinically relevant in patients being considered for epiphysiodesis to manage leg-length inequality. The multiplier method was the least accurate of the prediction methods in this patient population, which may have implications in calculating the appropriate timing of epiphysiodesis.

Two for One: A Change in Hand Positioning During Low-Dose Spinal Stereoradiography Allows for Concurrent, Reliable Sanders Skeletal Maturity Staging.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective survey. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the reliability of low-dose stereoradiography compared to standard hand bone age films for assessing Sanders skeletal maturity stage in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The Sanders skeletal maturity staging system is a valuable tool in the care of juvenile and adolescent spine scoliosis, but obtaining dedicated hand films adds additional time, radiation, and expense to the clinic visit. A change in patient hand positioning for routine full-length PA spine low-dose stereoradiography may offer a viable alternative. METHODS: A survey consisting of 30 standard bone age hand films and 26 posteroanterior spine low-dose stereoradiography images (magnified view of hands only) was created in REDCap and distributed to two pediatric spine surgeons and two fellows. The graders were asked to classify the images according to the Sanders skeletal maturity classifications. Images were graded in two trials conducted one week apart. Inter- and intraobserver reliability was assessed using the mean linearly weighted kappa to provide an overall index of agreement. RESULTS: In Trial 1, the interobserver reliability was similar for both the standard bone age films (κ = 0.82) and for the low-dose stereoradiography films (κ = 0.79) (p = .501). In Trial 2, reliability was similar between imagine modalities and slightly improved for both standard bone age films (κ = 0.85) and low-dose stereoradiography films (κ = 0.82) (p = .192). Intraobserver reliability was strong for both standard films (κ=0.89) and low-dose stereoradiography films (κ = 0.86) (p = .446). CONCLUSION: A simple change in patient hand positioning for low-dose stereoradiography allows clinicians to simultaneously assess a patient's spinal deformity and skeletal maturity with excellent reliability. Given the frequency of scoliosis surveillance visits, this simple change could lead to significant savings of time, money, and radiation exposure for the growing child. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Intraoperative Traction May Be a Viable Alternative to Anterior Surgery in Cerebral Palsy Scoliosis ≥100 Degrees.

BACKGROUND: For large scoliosis, 2 strategies to maximize correction include intraoperative traction and/or anterior release. It is unclear which patients will benefit the most form either approach. The purpose of our study is to compare the radiographic, perioperative clinical outcomes, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes of 2 approaches when used in severe neuromuscular scoliosis in the setting of cerebral palsy (CP). METHODS: In total, 23 patients with minimum 2-year follow-up, major curves ≥100 degrees, and in whom treatment included posterior spinal fusion were evaluated. Eighteen were treated with posterior spinal fusion with intraoperative traction and 5 with anterior/posterior spinal fusion (APSF). The baseline characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and preoperative and 2-year follow-up data for HRQoL and radiographic measures were compared. RESULTS: The groups had similar age, sex, nutritional and seizure status, GMFCS level, and change in CPCHILD scores. The groups had similar curve magnitude (120 vs. 105 degrees, P=0.330) and flexibility (28% vs. 40%, P=0.090), but the APSF group had less pelvic obliquity (POB) (24 vs. 42 degrees, P=0.009). There were similar postoperative major curves (37 vs. 40 degrees, P=0.350), but greater correction in POB (33.5 vs. 14 degrees of correction, P=0.007) in the traction group. The APSF group had longer anesthesia times (669 vs. 415 min, P=0.005), but similar hospital stays, intensive care unit and days intubated, estimated blood loss, cell saver, and red blood cells used. Although the APSF group had twice the rate of complications (22% vs. 40%) during the first 90 days postoperatively, this did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Both intraoperative traction and anterior surgery were used to aid correction in severe CP scoliosis. Anterior surgery did not offer superior correction or better HRQoL, and was associated with increased operative times, whereas intraoperative traction was associated with greater correction of POB. Intraoperative traction may be a viable alternative to an anterior release in severe CP scoliosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Inappropriately Timed Pediatric Orthopaedic Referrals From the Emergency Department Result in Unnecessary Appointments and Financial Burden for Patients.

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal injuries are among the most common reasons for emergency department (ED) visits in the pediatric population. Many such injuries can be managed with a single follow-up outpatient visit. However, untimely (ie, premature) referrals by emergency physicians to orthopaedic surgeons are common and may inadvertently create need for a second visit, generating unnecessary expenditures. We sought to elucidate the cost of premature musculoskeletal follow-up visits to the patients, families, and the health care system. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of pediatric patients with acute musculoskeletal injuries referred from our ED (without a formal orthopaedic consult) to our outpatient clinic. Patients were retrospectively reviewed in a consecutive fashion. The appropriateness of the recommended follow-up time interval was determined for each patient, and the direct and indirect cost of the inappropriate services were calculated utilizing a combination of traditional cost accounting techniques and time-driven activity-based costing. The characteristics of patients with appropriate and untimely follow-up referrals were compared. RESULTS: Two hundred consecutive referrals from the ED were reviewed. Overall, 96.5% of the follow-up visits recommended by the ED were premature, which led 106 (53%) patients to require a second visit to complete their clinical care. Patients who required a second visit were significantly younger (P=0.005), more likely to be male (P=0.042), more likely to have a fracture (P<0.001), and less likely to have a sprain (P<0.001) or dislocation/subluxation (P<0.001). Over 40% of second visits were accounted for by 3 diagnoses (distal radius buckle fractures, nondisplaced Salter-Harris 1 fractures of the ankle, and buckle fractures of the finger). Across the whole cohort, the total financial impact of untimely visits was $36,265.78, representing an average cost of $342.93 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Untimely referrals for follow-up of acute pediatric musculoskeletal conditions are very common and represent a significant financial burden to patients, families, and the health care system. Over 40% of unnecessary visits resulted from just 3 diagnoses. Improved orthopaedic follow-up guidelines, particularly for these readily recognizable conditions, and feedback to referring providers may reduce poorly timed clinic visits and decrease costs in the treatment of common orthopaedic injuries in pediatric patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Musculoskeletal complications following total body irradiation in hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients.

Total body irradiation (TBI) is commonly used in conditioning regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) to treat benign and malignant disease. Though life-saving, these therapies place patients at risk for important side effects, including musculoskeletal complications such as short stature, osteonecrosis, slipped capital femoral epiphysis, and the development of benign and malignant bone tumors. With an increasing number of HSCT survivors, there is a growing need for awareness of the musculoskeletal complications of HSCT and TBI.