RESUMO
Background and Aims: Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy causes numerous immune-related adverse events, including autoimmune pancreatic injury (AIPI), which results in rapid organ atrophy. We profiled the clinico-radiological features, short-term natural history, and response to steroids of AIPI. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 229/11,165 (2.1%) adult patients with AIPI. One hundred and ten out of 229 (48%) had abdominal computerized tomography (CT) scan at lipase elevation; data of 110 without pancreatic metastases were analyzed. We analyzed serial CT-based pancreas volumetry data in 48 patients with AIPI (32 with normal CT and 16 with pancreatitis on CT at lipase elevation). We examined impact of steroids on pain and disease course. Results: In AIPI (n = 229), median lipase elevation was 4x upper limit of normal (range: 3-40x). The injury was more often asymptomatic than painful (143/229 (62%) vs 86/229 (38%), P < .000). Majority (83/110 (75%) had normal CT, often in painless vs painful disease: 51/57 (90%) vs 32/53 (60%), P < .001) 25% had interstitial pancreatitis. On serial pancreas volumetry, marked volume (cc) loss occurred 1 year after vs 3 months before lipase elevation in both normal CT (median 81.6 vs 61.3, P = .00) and pancreatitis on CT groups (91.8 vs 60.5, P = .00), ≥20% volume loss occurred in 47% vs 73%, respectively (P = .08). Steroids, when used did not mitigate pain, biochemical relapse, pancreas volume loss or 1-year diabetes incidence (7.2%). Conclusion: Autoimmune pancreatic injury (AIPI) is uniquely characterized by painless lipase elevation, normal pancreas on CT and rapid pancreatic volume loss on follow-up. Steroids do not appear to have a role in management.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: People with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) with and without hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection had poor outcomes after liver transplant (LT). Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) and direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have changed the treatment landscape for HIV and HCV, respectively, but their impact on LT outcomes remains unclear. METHODS: This retrospective analysis of adults with HIV monoinfection (n = 246) and HIV/HCV coinfection (n = 286) who received LT compared mortality in patients with HIV who received LT before versus after approval of INSTIs and in patients with HIV/HCV coinfection who received LT before versus after approval of DAAs. In secondary analysis, we compared the outcomes in the different eras with those of propensity score-matched control cohorts of LT recipients without HIV or HCV infection. RESULTS: LT recipients with HIV monoinfection did not experience a significant improvement in survival between the pre-INSTI and INSTI recipients with HIV (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.70 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .36-1.34]). However, recipients with HIV/HCV coinfection in the DAA era had a 47% reduction (aHR, 0.53 [95% CI, .31-9.2] in 1-year mortality compared with coinfected recipients in the pre-DAA era. Compared to recipients without HIV or HCV, HIV-monoinfected recipients had higher mortality during the pre-INSTI era, but survival was comparable between groups during the INSTI era. HIV/HCV-coinfected recipients also experienced comparable survival during the DAA era compared to recipients without HCV or HIV. CONCLUSIONS: Post-LT survival for people with HIV monoinfection and HIV/HCV coinfection has improved with the introduction of INSTI and DAA therapy, suggesting that LT has become safer in these populations.