Survival and Surgical Complications in Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer Patients After Completed Multimodal Treatment.

BACKGROUND/AIM: This study aimed to examine survival and surgical complications in patients with anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) after multimodal treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Since 2002, the recommended treatment strategy for ATC at our centre has been hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (HART) with high doses to the neck (64 Gy), combined with weekly doxorubicin, and surgery after 4-8 weeks, if feasible. RESULTS: Between 2002 and 2014, 14 patients completed HART and thyroid surgery. Eight patients had preoperative HART, and six postoperative HART. Median survival was 20 months (range=4-110 months) in all patients, 51 months (range=4-110 months) and 18.5 months (range=9-56 months) in the preoperative and postoperative HART groups, respectively. Six patients survived for more than two years, and four patients survived for more than five years. Seven patients had postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: In this series of selected patients, an improved survival after aggressive, multimodal treatment was observed. Preoperative HART may promote survival although complications may be more frequent.

Definitive chemoradiotherapy plus cetuximab for cancer in the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction.

BACKGROUND: Chemoradiotherapy is standard treatment for localized oesophageal cancer unsuitable for surgery. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of cetuximab in combination with chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: This non-randomised multicentre phase II trial recruited patients aged 18-75 with WHO performance status 0-2 having squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma in the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction, T2-4, N0-3, M0 not suitable for surgery. Chemotherapy was three 21-day cycles of fluorouracil 750 mg/m2 D1-5 and oxaliplatin D1 (cycle 1:130mg/m 2, cycle 2-3:85 mg/m 2). Radiotherapy was 50Gy in 2Gy/fraction, 5 days a week, concurrent with cycle 2 and 3 and weekly cetuximab. The primary objective was loco-regional control at one year. RESULTS: 52 patients were included. 51 were eligible for toxicity and survival analysis and 46 for recurrence analysis. Full radiotherapy dose was delivered to 80%, 75% received all three cycles of chemotherapy and 75% received four or more doses of cetuximab. The most common related grade III-IV adverse events were gastro-intestinal(16), hypersensitivity(6) and infection(5). There were two drug-related deaths. Within six months from the end of treatment, six patients died from complications from fistulas. The loco-regional control rate at one year was 47.3%(95%CI 30.9%-62.1%). Overall survival at three years was 29.1%(95% CI 17.4-41.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Oxaliplatin and fluorouracil given concurrent with radiotherapy and cetuximab had an acceptable safety profile and showed a clinical response in patients with locoregionally advanced oesophageal cancer unsuitable for surgery. However, the primary end-point was not met, and the addition of cetuximab to definitive chemoradiotherapy cannot be recommended.

Anaplastic thyroid cancer and hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (HART) with and without surgery.

Anaplastic carcinoma of the thyroid gland (ATC) is one of the most aggressive cancers in humans. With insufficient treatment, the disease most often leads to death in suffocation. From 2002, our treatment strategy has been hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (HART) with high doses (64 Gy) to the neck, followed by surgery 4-8 weeks later if feasible, with the aim to gain control in the neck. After a pathology review, 51 patients were diagnosed with ATC in the period 2002-2014 in the south-east of Norway. Thirty-one received HART, and we present a study of these patients, with death in suffocation as the primary endpoint and survival as the second. No patients treated with HART died in suffocation. Six had a tracheostomy during their course of disease, of whom four were dependent on a tracheal cannula when they died. The best median survival, 19 months, was obtained in the 13 patients where both radiotherapy and surgery were possible as primary treatments. Only surgery came out as a prognostic factor for survival in multivariate analysis. Patients surviving more than 2 years were characterised by having surgery with R0 resection and no or small residual foci of ATC in the specimens. Stage 4C patients survived 3 months only.

Improved treatment decisions in patients with esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with esophageal cancer seldom achieve long-term survival. This prospective cohort study investigated the selection of patients likely to benefit from curative treatment and whether information on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQL) would assist treatment decisions in the multidisciplinary team. METHODS: Consecutive patients completed HRQL assessments and clinical data were collected before start of treatment. Logistic regression analyses identified clinical factors associated with treatment intent in patients with stage-III disease. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analyses and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the impact of clinical factors and HRQL on survival in patients planned for curative treatment. RESULTS: Patients with curative treatment intent (n = 90) were younger, had better WHO performance status and less fatigue than patients with palliative treatment intent (n = 89). Median survival for the total cohort (n = 179) and patients with palliative or curative treatment intent was nine, five and 19 months, respectively. In multivariate Cox regression analyses, performance status (0-1 favorable) and comorbidity (ASA I favorable) were factors of importance for survival, whereas measures of HRQL were not. CONCLUSIONS: Patients performance status and comorbidity must be considered in addition to stage of disease to avoid extensive curative treatment in patients with short life expectancy. This study did not provide evidence to support that information on patients HRQL adds value to the multidisciplinary team's treatment decision process.

Palliative brachytherapy with or without primary stent placement in patients with oesophageal cancer, a randomised phase III trial.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether a combination of self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) and brachytherapy provided more rapid and prolonged effect on dysphagia without increased pain compared to brachytherapy alone in patients with incurable oesophageal cancer. METHODS: 41 Patients were randomised to SEMS followed by brachytherapy, 8 Gy×3 (n=21) or brachytherapy alone, 8 Gy×3 (n=20). Change in dysphagia and pain three and seven weeks after randomisation (FU1 and FU2) was assessed by patient-reported outcome. Dysphagia, other symptoms and health-related quality of life were assessed every four weeks thereafter. The study was closed before the estimated patient-number was reached due to slow recruitment. RESULTS: Patients receiving SEMS followed by brachytherapy had significantly improved dysphagia at FU1 compared to patients receiving brachytherapy alone (n=35). Difference in pain was not observed. At FU2, patients in both arms (n=21) had less dysphagia. Four patients in the combined treatment arm experienced manageable complications, no complications occurred after brachytherapy alone. CONCLUSION: For the relief of dysphagia, SEMS followed by brachytherapy is preferable and safe for patients in need of immediate alleviation, while brachytherapy with or without preceding SEMS provides relief within a few weeks after treatment.

Patient-reported outcomes evaluating palliative radiotherapy and chemotherapy in patients with oesophageal cancer: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and assessments of treatment-related toxicity provide important information on the effect of palliative chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to review the effect of palliative radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy on symptoms and quality of life assessed by PROs and measurement of toxicity for patients with oesophageal cancer. METHODS: The Central, Medline and Embase databases (1990 to November 2011) were systematically searched for prospective studies of palliative chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy in patients with advanced oesophageal cancer with PRO- and/or toxicity outcomes. The risks of bias were assessed. RESULTS: Of 2677 records identified, only 32 included PROs, of which eight were randomised controlled trials. In studies with sufficient standard of PRO (n = 18), either Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) (n = 14) or patient-reported dysphagia (n = 4), were assessed. Docetaxel added to cisplatin + fluorouracil (CF) improved HRQL compared to CF only, even though toxicity increased. Epirubicin added to CF resulted in longer preserved HRQL than its comparator in two trials, and non-inferiority in one. All phase II chemotherapy studies reported maintained HRQL or improved dysphagia combined with low level of toxicity. Brachytherapy resulted in better HRQL compared to stent placement in two trials, and external radiotherapy relieved dysphagia. The quality of the HRQL methodology and the interpretation and presentation of the PRO results varied, and clinical significance was seldom discussed. CONCLUSION: PRO endpoints are seldom used and further studies of homogenous patient groups with valid measures and methodology of PROs should be encouraged in the evaluation of palliative treatment. Brachytherapy, external radiotherapy and combination chemotherapy improved HRQL and dysphagia in the few identified studies with sufficient PRO methodology.

Hospital volume and prognosis among Norwegian breast cancer patients enrolled in adjuvant trials.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have reported an association between breast cancer unit volume and prognosis. We hypothesize that this may be due to inappropriate coping with the recommended guidelines for adjuvant therapy rather than improper breast cancer surgery provided at smaller units. METHODS: A cohort of 1131 patients with operable breast cancer (pT(1-2) and positive axillary lymph nodes, stage II) enrolled between 1984 and 1994 were analyzed. The women had participated in one of three prospective trials on adjuvant endocrine treatment and were enrolled from 50 centers in Norway. The hospitals were categorized into four groups according to the annual number of surgically treated breast cancer patients reported to the national discharge database in 1990. The hospitals were also stratified according to whether they are university or non-university hospitals. To assess the effect of unit size on patient outcome, local recurrence rates and overall survival were compared in women treated at units with different patient volumes. RESULTS: The median time from study enrolment to the end of the study was 10.5 years. Relapse-free survival and overall survival did not differ significantly between the hospital groups based on the surgical workload or between university and non-university hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Patient volume or teaching status of a hospital did not have any impact on the prognosis of pre- or postmenopausal stage II breast cancer patients included in the adjuvant endocrine trials. Our data support the hypothesis that differences in survival related to patient volume at the treatment units may be explained by inappropriate adjuvant systemic treatment.

Radical treatment for oesophageal cancer patients unfit for surgery and chemotherapy. A 10-year experience from the Norwegian Radium Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Over a 10-year period from 1990, 445 patients with carcinoma of the oesophagus were admitted to the Norwegian Radium Hospital and 184 of these patients received treatment with curative intent. Even though surgery is the treatment of choice for these patients, many of them suffer from medical conditions that increase the risk for postoperative mortality and morbidity. In a retrospective study, the effect of the curative treatment offered to patients was explored with a particular focus on patients unfit for surgery. METHODS: Medical data of the 184 patients treated with curative intent were reviewed and additional clinical information was retrieved from local hospitals and general practitioners. Preoperative radiotherapy followed by surgery was the standard curative treatment for operable patients. Medically inoperable patients were offered radical split-course hyperfractionated radiotherapy followed by a brachytherapy boost. RESULTS: More than 50% (103/184) received non-surgical treatment only. Patients who received radical surgery (n = 81) were younger, had better performance status, less weight loss and dysphagia compared to patients treated with radical radiotherapy (n = 102). One patient received only photodynamic therapy. The 3-year survival was 29% for patients treated with radical surgery, and 8% for patients who received radical radiotherapy. The overall median crude survival for the two groups of patients were 20 months and seven months respectively. CONCLUSION: The hyperfractionated radiotherapy provided symptom relief without extensive toxicity and with a possibility for cure for patients with oesophageal cancer who are unfit for surgery and chemoradiotherapy. The literature supports the curative potential of high dose accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy even though the optimal radiotherapy regimen still needs to be explored.

Assessing quality of life in a randomized clinical trial: correcting for missing data.

BACKGROUND: Health-related quality of life is a topic of current interest. This paper considers a randomized phase III study of radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy (docetaxel) versus radiation therapy alone in non-small cell lung cancer, stage III A/B. Longitudinal data on quality of life have been obtained through repeated administration of a multi-item questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) developed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Missingness in the data is owing to patients having failed to complete the questionnaire at some of the scheduled filling-in times. METHODS: We have analysed a monotone (in terms of missingness) subset of the data as regards estimation of the mean score of a summary measure of self-reported quality of life in a hypothetical drop-out-free population at different points in time. Missingness is a difficult issue of great importance. We have therefore chosen to compare three different methods that are relatively easy to implement: the linear-increments method, the inverse-probability-weighting method and the Markov-process method. Single imputation has been applied in a supplementary analysis to fill in for all the non-consecutive missing score values prior to the execution of the estimation procedure. RESULTS: For the response in focus, the observed mean score at a certain time is larger than the estimated mean scores, which implies that the true mean score is easily overestimated unless the missingness is appropriately adjusted for. Comparison of the treatment arms shows a significant difference in mean score at the end of treatment. CONCLUSION: Use of proper methodology developed for analysing data subject to missingness is necessary to reduce potential estimation bias. The quality of life of patients receiving radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy (docetaxel) appears somewhat worse than that of patients receiving radiation therapy alone in the period during which treatment is given. The conclusions are robust for the choice of statistical methods.

Tobramycin once versus three times daily, given with penicillin G, to febrile neutropenic cancer patients in Norway: a prospective, randomized, multicentre trial.

OBJECTIVES: Penicillin G with an aminoglycoside is the standard initial empirical treatment in febrile neutropenia in Norway. It has been argued that giving the aminoglycoside once daily to neutropenic patients with Gram-negative bacteraemia may be hazardous when penicillin G is the beta-lactam antibiotic. We questioned this argument and hypothesized that tobramycin once daily was as efficacious as three times daily. METHODS: We conducted a randomized prospective multicentre study, comparing the efficacy of tobramycin 6 mg/kg once (arm A) versus three times (arm B) daily, plus penicillin G 5 million IU x 4, in febrile neutropenic cancer patients. PRIMARY OUTCOME: modification of the antibiotic regimen. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-four patients were evaluable for intention-to-treat analyses. One hundred and fifty-five patients had lymphoma or leukaemia as the underlying cancer diagnosis. In arm A, 35 of 88 patients and in arm B, 34 of 86 patients, that is 40% in both arms had no modification of the antibiotic regimen. No patients died while participating in the study. Upon modification of the antibiotic regimen, all patients were successfully treated. The increase in serum creatinine was modest and similar in the two treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: When administered with penicillin G, tobramycin given once daily was as efficacious and safe as tobramycin given three times daily in cancer patients with febrile neutropenia in Norway, provided the regimen was modified according to the clinical response.

Weekly docetaxel and prednisolone versus prednisolone alone in androgen-independent prostate cancer: a randomized phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Due to its palliative effect and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decrease, many clinicians have considered prednisolone monotherapy to be the standard systemic treatment in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC). This approach should be compared with docetaxel (Taxotere)+prednisolone. METHODS: A total of 109 eligible patients were entered into a randomized phase II study (arm A: Taxotere+prednisolone [30 mg m(-2) weekly during 5 of 6 wk+prednisolone 5 mg x 2 per os daily]; arm B: prednisolone [5 mg x 2 per os daily]). Biochemical response (confirmed > or = 50% PSA reduction of the baseline level at 6 wk) was the primary endpoint with subjective progression, quality of life, and progression-free and overall survival as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Biochemical response at 6 wk was recorded in 29 of 54 evaluable patients in arm A (54%; 95% CI: 40-67%) and 13 of 50 patients in arm B (26%; 95% CI: 14-38%), with similar response rates at 12 wk and if based on all eligible patients. Median progression-free survival was 11 mo (95% CI: 5.8-16.2 mo) in arm A and 4 mo in arm B (95% CI: 2.4-5.6 mo). Median overall survival was 27 mo in arm A (95% CI: 19.8-34.1 mo) and 18 mo in arm B (95% CI: 15.2-20.8 mo). Pain relief and quality-of-life assessment indicated superiority of the arm A treatment, without unacceptable toxicity. CONCLUSION: Docetaxel+prednisolone should become the first-line systemic standard treatment for AIPC as a more effective treatment than prednisolone monotherapy. Weekly applications of docetaxel are well tolerated.