Systematic geriatric assessment for older patients with frailty in the emergency department: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive geriatric assessment provided in hospital wards in frail patients admitted to hospital has been shown to reduce mortality and increase the likelihood of living at home later. Systematic geriatric assessment provided in emergency departments (ED) may be effective for reducing days in hospital and unnecessary hospital admissions, but this has not yet been proven in randomised trials. METHODS: We conducted a single-centre, randomised controlled trial with a parallel-group, superiority design in an academic hospital ED. ED patients aged ≥ 75 years who were frail, or at risk of frailty, as defined by the Clinical Frailty Scale, were included in the trial. Patients were recruited during the period between December 11, 2018 and June 7, 2019, and followed up for 365 days. For the intervention group, systematic geriatric assessment was added to their standard care in the ED, whereas the control group received standard care only. The primary outcome was cumulative hospital stay during 365-day follow-up. The secondary outcomes included: admission rate from the index visit, total hospital admissions, ED-readmissions, proportion of patients living at home at 365 days, 365-day mortality, and fall-related ED-visits. RESULTS: A total of 432 patients, 63 % female, with median age of 85 years, formed the analytic sample of 213 patients in the intervention group and 219 patients in the control group. Cumulative hospital stay during one-year follow-up as rate per 100 person-years for the intervention and control groups were: 3470 and 3149 days, respectively, with rate ratio of 1.10 (95 % confidence interval, 0.55-2.19, P = .78). Admission rates to hospital wards from the index ED visit for the intervention and control groups were: 62 and 70 %, respectively (P = .10). No significant differences were observed between the groups for any outcomes. CONCLUSION: Systematic geriatric assessment for older adults with frailty in the ED did not reduce hospital stay during one-year follow-up. No statistically significant difference was observed for any secondary outcomes. More coordinated, continuous interventions should be tested for potential benefits in long-term outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number and date NCT03751319 23/11/2018).

Ischaemic stroke patients with heterozygous factor V Leiden present with multiple brain infarctions and widespread atherothrombotic disease.

Factor V Leiden (FVL) mutation is a risk factor for venous and, to a degree, arterial thrombosis. It is unknown whether and how FVL affects the manifestations of ischaemic stroke (IS). We assessed the clinical, laboratory, radiological, and prognostic characteristics in an observational study with adult IS patients having FVL. We tested 860 patients with first-ever IS for FVL and found 48 FVL positive patients. Detailed clinical, laboratory, and radiological evaluation were compared with that of 144 (1:3) gender and age matched IS patients without FVL. All patients underwent a prognostic evaluation at an average of five years follow-up. Despite the relatively young age (mean 48.5 years, range 44-54 years) of the FVL positive IS patients, peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD), coronary artery disease (CAD), and previous transient cerebrovascular event occurred more frequently compared with controls. Family history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and multiple silent brain infarctions were revealed in half of the FVL positive patients, whereas these were seldom encountered among controls. Stroke severity, long-term recovery, and recurrence rates seemed similar irrespective of FVL status. Our findings indicate that the clinical profile of IS patients with FVL associated with wider manifestation of atherothrombosis, positive family history of arterial thrombosis, and presence of multiple silent infarctions on brain images.

Day of the week and ischemic stroke: is it Monday high or Sunday low?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The study aim was to examine the incidence of ischemic stroke (IS) by day of the week and its relationship with age, sex, and socioeconomic status (SES). METHODS: A total of 12,801 IS events in men and women aged 25 to 99 years was recorded in a population-based stroke register (FINMONICA), which was functioning in Finland from 1982 to 1992. We analyzed the weekly variation in IS incidence by pooling the data and stratifying by sex and age. Taxable income and level of education were used as indicators of SES. RESULTS: We observed a significant weekly variation in IS occurrence, but the analysis by age group demonstrated a difference by weekday only in the age group 60 to 74, both in men and women (P<0.001 and P=0.02, respectively). The increase in the number of IS events from Sunday to Monday was pronounced in men (29.2% increase from Sunday to Monday). When stratifying by age, Monday excess in IS incidence was associated with lower SES among persons >59 years of age. No Monday excess was observed in persons with high SES. CONCLUSIONS: Because the incidence of IS is much higher in persons with low SES than in those with high SES, the Monday excess in persons with low SES is of substantial public health interest. This finding may suggest reasons for the higher IS incidence in persons with low socioeconomic positions and open up some possibilities for prevention.