Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Risk Factors for Recurrence and Long-Term Outcome.

OBJECTIVES: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. Due to the insufficient efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs and their adverse side effects, there has been considerable interest in the interventional treatment of AF, including both catheter ablation and surgical ablation. Surgical ablation or the maze procedure is a treatment option for patients with AF undergoing concomitant or isolated cardiac surgery. DESIGN: We performed a retrospective study of prospectively collected data to investigate short- and long-term outcomes of patients who underwent the surgical ablation of AF. Outcome variables included freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmias and mortality at 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-year follow-ups. We also identified risk factors for arrhythmia recurrence and mortality. SETTING: Israel's largest university tertiary care center. PARTICIPANTS: The study population comprised 668 patients operated on between January 1, 2006, and June 30, 2022. All patient data were extracted from our departmental database. INTERVENTIONS: Concomitant or stand-alone surgical AF ablation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The mean duration of follow-up was 106 ± 66.7 months. Freedom from AF was 97.6% (n = 615) and mortality was 3% (n = 20) at the 1-year follow-up, 95.3% (n = 574) and 6.1% (n = 45) at 3 years, 90.1% (n = 396) and 9.1% (n = 61) at 5 years, and 77.5% (n = 308) and 10.8% (n = 72) at 7 years. According to logistic regression analysis, age and female sex determined the 7-year freedom from AF, and risk factors for 7-year mortality included diabetes mellitus, age, and valve surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical ablation had a high success rate, with freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmia at 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-year follow-ups. Age and female sex were factors determining the 5- and 7-year recurrence of AF.

Surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation: impact of Diabetes Mellitus type 2.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) type 2 is an independent risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF). Surgical ablation or "maze procedure" is an option for patients with AF undergoing concomitant or isolated cardiac surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of DM type 2 on early and long-term outcomes of patients following surgical AF ablation. METHODS: We performed an observational cohort study in Israel's largest tertiary care center. All data of patients who underwent surgical AF ablation, between 2006 and 2021 were extracted from our departmental database. Patients were divided into Group I (non-diabetic patients) and Group II (DM type 2 patients). We compared the two groups with respect to freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmia, and mortality rate. RESULTS: The study population included 606 patients. Group I (non-DM patients), consisting of 484 patients, and Group II (DM type 2 patients), comprised 122 patients. Patients with DM were older, had more hypertension and incidence of cerebrovascular accident (CVA)/transient ischemic attack (TIA), higher EuroSCORE (p < .05 for all), and a longer bypass time-130 ± 40 vs. 122 ± 36 min (p = 0.028). The mean follow-up duration was 39.0 ± 22.7 months. Freedom from atrial fibrillation was similar between the non-DM and DM type 2 groups after a 1-year follow-up, 414 (88.2%) vs. 101 (87.1%) (p = 0.511), after a 3-year follow-up, 360 (86.3%) vs. 84 (79.9%) (p = 0.290) and after a 5-year follow-up, 226 (74.1%) vs. 55 (71.5%) (p = 0.622) respectively. Furthermore, 1- and 3-year mortality was similar between non-DM and DM type 2 groups, 2.5% vs. 4.9%, (p = 0.226) and 5.6% vs. 10.5% (p = 0.076) respectively. 5-year mortality was higher in Group II (DM type 2 patients) compared with Group I (non-DM patients), 11.1% vs. 23.4% (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Surgical ablation had a high success rate, with freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmia at 1- 3- and 5- years follow-up in both the DM type 2 and non-DM groups. Furthermore,1- and 3-year mortality after surgical ablation was also similar in both groups. However, 5-year mortality was higher in the DM type 2 group.

Early tracheostomy after cardiac surgery improves intermediate- and long-term survival.

OBJECTIVE: Complicated post-cardiac surgery course, can lead to both prolonged ICU stay and ventilation, and may require a tracheostomy. This study represents the single-center experience with post-cardiac surgery tracheostomy. The aim of this study was to assess the timing of tracheostomy as a risk factor for early, intermediate, and late mortality. The study's second aim was to assess the incidence of both superficial and deep sternal wound infections. DESIGN: Retrospective study of prospectively collected data. SETTING: Tertiary hospital. PATIENTS: Patients were divided into 3 groups, according to the timing of tracheostomy; early (4-10 days); intermediate (11-20 days) and late (≥21 days). INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST: The primary outcomes were early, intermediate, and long-term mortality. The secondary outcome was the incidence of sternal wound infection. RESULTS: During the 17-year study period, 12,782 patients underwent cardiac surgery, of whom 407 (3.18%) required postoperative tracheostomy. 147 (36.1%) had early, 195 (47.9%) intermediate, and 65 (16%) had a late tracheostomy. Early, 30-day, and in-hospital mortality was similar for all groups. However, patients, who underwent early- and intermediate tracheostomy, demonstrated statistically significant lower mortality after 1- and 5-year (42.8%; 57.4%; 64.6%; and 55.8%; 68.7%; 75.4%, respectively; P < .001). Cox model demonstrated age [1.025 (1.014-1.036)] and timing of tracheostomy [0.315 (0.159-0.757)] had significant impacts on mortality. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a relationship between the timing of tracheostomy after cardiac surgery and mortality: early tracheostomy (within 4-10 days of mechanical ventilation) is associated with better intermediate- and long-term survival.

Impact of pre-existing right or left bundle branch block on patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement.

OBJECTIVES: Contemporary data on the prognostic impact of pre-existing left or right bundle branch block on clinical outcomes after aortic valve (AV) replacement are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of pre-existing bundle branch block on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing AV replacement. METHODS: Data from patients who underwent AV replacement surgery between 2004 and 2020 were obtained from our departmental database. RESULTS: Of the 2704 study patients, 203 (7.5%) had pre-existing bundle branch block and 2501 (92.5%) had normal atrioventricular conduction. The mean age was 68 (13) years, 1697 (63%) were male and 683 (25%) had a unicuspid or bicuspid AV. The in-hospital mortality rate was higher in patients with pre-existing bundle branch block compared to those without on admission (5.9% vs 2.9%, P = 0.032), and more frequent in patients with left compared with right bundle branch block (11.9% vs 4.3%, P = 0.003). New pacemaker implantation was most frequent in those patients with pre-existing left bundle branch block, followed by right and no bundle branch block on admission (28.6% vs 7.5% vs 2.8% respectively, P < 0.001; odds ratio 4.96 95% confidence interval 2.96-8.08, P < 0.001). The 10-year cumulative survival rate was lower in patients with bundle branch block compared with patients with no bundle branch block (76.8% vs 82.8%, log-rank P < 0.001; hazard ratio 0.73, confidence interval 0.54-0.99, P = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that patients with pre-existing bundle branch block have a higher incidence of pacemaker implantation and all-cause mortality after AV replacement compared with patients without a conduction disturbance.

The impact of diabetes on short-, intermediate- and long-term mortality following left ventricular assist device implantation.

OBJECTIVES: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is a frequent comorbidity among patients suffering from advanced heart failure necessitating a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implant. The goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of type 2 DM on early and long-term outcomes of patients following an LVAD implant. METHODS: We performed an observational cohort study in a large tertiary care centre in Israel. All data of patients who underwent a continuous flow LVAD implant between 2006 and 2020 were extracted from our departmental database. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group I (patients without diabetes) and group II (patients with diabetes). We compared short-term (30-day and 3-month) mortality, intermediate-term (1- and 3-year) mortality and long-term (5 year) mortality between the 2 groups. RESULTS: The study population included 154 patients. Group I (patients without diabetes) comprised 88 patients and group II (patients with diabetes) comprised 66 patients. The mean follow-up duration was 38.2 ± 30.3 months. Short- and intermediate-term mortality (30 days, 1 year and 3 years) was higher in the group with DM compared with the group without DM but did not reach any statistically significant difference: 16.1% vs 9.8% (P = 0.312), 24.2% vs 17.3% (P = 0.399) and 30.6% vs 21.9% (P = 0.127) respectively. Long-term 5-year mortality was significantly higher in the group with DM compared to the group without: 38.7% vs 24.4% (P = 0.038). Furthermore, predictors of long-term mortality included diabetes (hazard ratio 2.09, confidence interval 1.34-2.84, P = 0.004), as demonstrated by regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with diabetes and those without diabetes have similar 30-day and short- and intermediate-term mortality rates. The mortality risk of diabetic patients begins to increase 3 years after an LVAD implant. Diabetes is an independent predictor of long-term, 5-year mortality after an LVAD implant. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Ethical Committee of Sheba Medical Centre, Israel, on 2 December 2014, Protocol 4257.

Secondary chordal resection with septal myectomy for treatment of symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

OBJECTIVES: Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction causes symptoms of heart failure in most patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Resection of the secondary mitral valve (MV) chordae has recently been shown to move the MV apparatus posteriorly, thereby eradicating the outflow gradient. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether secondary chordal resection concomitant to septal myectomy improves outcomes. METHODS: Between 2005 and 2020, a total of 165 patients underwent septal myectomy without MV repair or replacement in our Medical Center. Secondary MV chordal resection was performed in 60 patients, and their outcomes were compared with those of the remaining 105 patients who did not undergo chordal resection (controls). Mean age was 61 ± 13 and 58 ± 16 years, respectively (P = 0.205). RESULTS: There were no in-hospital deaths throughout the entire cohort. Of those patients who underwent secondary chordal resection, New York Heart Association functional class decreased from 3 (interquartile range 2-3) preoperatively to 1 (interquartile range 1-2) postoperatively (P < 0.001), and resting outflow gradient decreased from 91 ± 39 mmHg to 13 ± 8 mmHg (86% change, P < 0.001). Compared with controls, patients who underwent secondary chordal resection had a significant lower resting outflow gradient at follow-up (14 ± 7 mmHg vs 21 ± 15 mmHg, P = 0.002). The rate of moderate or more than moderate mitral regurgitation at 5 years was 2% in the secondary chordal resection group and 5% in the controls (hazard ratio 1.05, confidence interval 0.11-10.32; P = 0.965). CONCLUSIONS: In this observational study, we report that secondary chordal resection concomitant to septal myectomy for left ventricular outflow tract obstruction is safe, relieves heart failure symptoms and reduces left ventricular outflow tract gradient in appropriately selected patients.

Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for electrical injury induced cardiogenic shock support: a case report.

BACKGROUND: High voltage electrical injury (HVEI) of more than 1000 V is a potentially devastating form of a multisystem injury associated with high morbidity and mortality. We present the first case of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) as a life saving device for treating a patient with severe cardiogenic shock after a high voltage electrical injury. CASE PRESENTATION: A 26-year-old male sustained HVEI while working with a concrete mixer pump that came in contact with a high voltage cable of 10,000 V. He was immediately disconnected from the mixer pump, underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation and was transported to the nearest medical centre with severe cardiogenic shock with an ejection fraction (EF) of < 10%. Upon arrival, he was in critical condition, sedated and mechanically ventilated, haemodynamically unstable and supported by intravenous (IV) inotropes after a few events of ventricular fibrillation, with an electrical entry point on the left hand and an exit point located on his right leg. Blood pH was 6.8, PCO2 53 mmHg, PaO2 of 57 mmHg, lactate 8 mmol/L, and Troponin 38,000 ng/dl. The EF was 10% with global severe left ventricular dysfunction. During cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), including cardiac massage and few electrical shocks, he was immediately connected to the VA-ECMO via open right femoral approach with distal arterial leg perfusion. He was treated with IV broad spectrum antibiotics, and high volume fluids to prevent rhabdomyolysis-induced acute kidney injury, total parenteral nutrition, topical silver sulfadiazine cream, and Granuflex for severe electrical burns. He was gradually weaned from inotropes over the next 3 days, during which his clinical condition and bloodwork improved tremendously. His EF gradually increased to 50% and he was weaned from the VA-ECMO, and underwent decannulation 86 h after initialization. He was discharged on day 27 without any sequelae. CONCLUSION: The VA-ECMO treatment can be a lifesaving device for treating severe cardiogenic shock caused by high voltage electrical injury, and should be considered while treating these "high-mortality risk" patients.