Analysis of dendrimer-protein interactions and their implications on potential applications of dendrimers in nanomedicine.

This work addresses how G5.5 PAMAM dendrimers form complexes with bovine serum albumin (BSA). Analytical techniques, such as UV-vis spectrophotometry, dynamic light scattering, electrophoretic mobility, quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation monitoring (QCM-D), circular dichroism (CD), and contact angle were used to analyze the properties of the dendrimers systems. The binding of protein to dendrimers can alter the structure, mobility, conformation and functional activity of the dendrimer. The results show that BSA interactions with G5.5 dendrimer carriers are driven both by electrostatic and hydrophobic forces. Dendrimer surface charge is reduced upon contact with the protein. The protein shell formed on the surface of the carrier is very stable as evidenced by the QCM-D measurements. On the other hand, the CD spectra indicates a change in the secondary structure of the protein. The size of the changes is significantly dependent on the ratio of protein to dendrimer. Understanding the mechanism of interaction of potential carriers with proteins is important for their internalization into the cell.

The success of virtual clinics during COVID-19: A closed loop audit of the British orthopaedic association (BOAST) guidelines of outpatient orthopaedic fracture management.

COVID-19 has had profound management implications for orthopaedic management due to balancing patient outcomes with clinical safety and limited resources. The BOAST guidelines on outpatient orthopaedic fracture management took a pragmatic approach. At Great Western Hospital, Swindon, a closed loop audit was performed looking at a selection of these guidelines, to assess if our initial changes were sufficient and what could be improved. METHOD: An audit was designed around fracture immobilisation, type of initial fracture clinic assessment, default virtual follow up clinic and late imaging. Interventions were implemented and re-audited. RESULTS: Initially 223 patients were identified over 4 weeks. Of these, 100% had removable casts and 99% did not have late imaging. 96% of patients were initially assessed virtually or had initial orthopaedic approval to be seen in face to face clinic. 97% had virtual follow up or had documented reasons why not. The 26 patients who were initially seen face to face were put through a simulated virtual fracture clinic. 22 appointments and 13 Xray attendances could have been avoided. We implemented a change of requiring all patients to be assessed at consultant level before having a face to face appointment. The re-audit showed over 99% achievement in all areas. CONCLUSION: Virtual fracture clinics, both triaging new patients and follow-up clinics have dramatically changed our outpatient management, helping the most appropriate patients to be seen face to face. Despite their limitations, they have been well tolerated by patients and improved patient safety and treatment.