What do we know about why women bleed and what do we not know?

Women or people with a uterus are vulnerable to both normal and abnormal bleeding. During the reproductive years, the uterus is prepared physiologically to accept an embryo and support its growth and development during pregnancy, or in the absence of implantation of an embryo, recycle through the process of menstruation and accept an embryo a month or so later. If fertilization takes place and an embryo or embryos implant in the uterus, the fetal trophoblast, or outer cell layer of the embryo, invades and dilates the maternal spiral arteries and forms the placenta. No matter when in gestation a pregnancy ends, at the conclusion of pregnancy, the placenta should separate from the wall of the uterus and be expelled. Abnormal bleeding occurs during pregnancy or after delivery when the normal uteroplacental interface has not been established or is interrupted; during miscarriage; during ectopic pregnancy; during premature separation of the placenta; or during postpartum hemorrhage. Heavy menstrual bleeding, a subset of abnormal menstrual bleeding, can be quantitatively defined as >80 mL of blood loss per cycle. Unlike postpartum hemorrhage, heavy menstrual bleeding is significantly associated with an underlying bleeding disorder. While there is other reproductive tract bleeding in women, notably bleeding at the time of ovulation or with a life-threatening ruptured ectopic pregnancy, the unique bleeding that women experience is predominantly uterine in origin. Many of the unique aspects of uterine hemostasis, however, remain unknown.

The common VWF variant p.Y1584C: detailed pathogenic examination of an enigmatic sequence change.

BACKGROUND: As knowledge of the human genome has advanced, so too has the recognition that interpretation of the pathogenic nature of sequence variants can be challenging. The von Willebrand factor (VWF) gene exhibits a significant degree of sequence variability, and the first VWF variant associated with type 1 von Willebrand disease (VWD), c.4751 A>G, p.Y1584C, was described in 2003. However, since that time, the pathogenic nature of this variant has remained unclear, being assigned properties ranging from a risk factor to a pathogenic variant. OBJECTIVES: To provide additional evaluation on the interpretation of pathogenicity for this common VWF variant. METHODS: Fifty-eight subjects with only the p.Y1584C variant were recruited from 2 cohort studies (the Zimmerman Program and the Canadian type 1 VWD study). Clinical and laboratory phenotypes were assessed. RESULTS: The prevalence of the p.Y1584C variant in our cohorts was 23- to 27-fold higher than that in large normal population databases. Significantly more p.Y1584C subjects had an abnormal bleeding score when compared to Y1584 individuals. In comparison with a group of 35 subjects without the p.Y1584C variant, subjects with the variant had lower mean VWF:antigen and VWF:ristocetin cofactor values and significantly higher VWF propeptide/VWF:antigen ratios suggestive of enhanced clearance. CONCLUSION: Collectively, the results of this analysis suggest that p.Y1584C is likely pathogenic, however, due to influences such as incomplete penetrance, variable expressivity, and other genetic modifiers like ABO blood group, the straightforward assignment of pathogenicity to this variant is inevitably challenging.

New and emerging therapies for women, girls, and people with the potential to menstruate with VWD.

Innovation in therapies for patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD) has lagged far behind that for hemophilia, creating inequity in the bleeding disorder community. Although currently existing treatments of antifibrinolytics, desmopressin, and plasma-derived von Willebrand factor replacement are considered effective, multiple studies report poor quality of life in patients with VWD, especially those with heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). This disconnect underscores the need for novel therapies that are safe and effective and that consider a patient's specific contraceptive and reproductive needs. Recombinant von Willebrand factor is the most recent new therapy for VWD; the data specific to women are reviewed. We also present emerging data on emicizumab for the treatment of VWD, BT200 (rondoraptivon pegol), generalized hemostatic therapies (VGA039 and HMB-011), as well as treatments based on nanotechnology (platelet-inspired nanoparticles and KB-V13A12). We are optimistic as we move toward pivotal clinical trials for these elegant and innovative treatments.

Patient-centered care in von Willebrand disease: are we there yet?

INTRODUCTION: Von Willebrand Disease is the most common inherited bleeding disorder. Paradoxically, affected individuals are often misdiagnosed and experience substantial diagnostic delay. There are sex-specific health disparities in VWD rooted in the stigmatization of vaginal bleeding, which leads to symptom dismissal, lack of timely access to care and lower health-related quality of life. AREAS COVERED: Following the core elements of patient-centered care - respect for patient preferences, values, and needs, we describe the current state of VWD care. Challenges of diagnostic delay, serial misrecognition of abnormal bleeding, and symptom dismissal are barriers that disproportionately affect women with VWD. These negative effects are further amplified in individuals living in low- and middle-income countries. We describe the importance of coordinated multidisciplinary care, as well as the need for patient education and empowered self-advocacy. EXPERT OPINION: While tremendous work has been done to improve the diagnosis and management of VWD, timely and high-quality research is urgently needed to address care gaps. Systemic changes such as resource investment, dedicated research funding for novel treatment modalities, and effective knowledge translation strategies to address structural barriers are needed to facilitate effective patient-centered care for VWD.

Von Willebrand Disease: Gaining a global perspective.

INTRODUCTION: Recent guidelines for von Willebrand Disease (VWD) highlighted the challenges in diagnosis and management. Identifying the number of persons with VWD (PwVWD) internationally will help target support to aid diagnosis of PwVWD. AIM: To examine international registration rates of PwVWD, the influence of income status, geographical region and the age and sex profile. Cumulatively, these data will be used to inform future strategy from the World Federation of Haemophilia (WFH) to address unmet clinical and research needs. METHODS: Data from the 2018/2019 WFH Annual Global Survey (AGS) were analysed, providing a global perspective on VWD registration. RESULTS: Registration rates are lowest in South Asia (0.6/million population) and highest in Europe/Central Asia (50.9/million population, 0.005%), but below the expected prevalence rate (0.1%). National economic status impacted VWD registration rates, reflecting variation in access to optimal healthcare infrastructure. Females represented the majority of PwVWD globally, however, in low-income countries (LIC) males predominated. Age profile varied, with markedly higher rates of paediatric registrations in North America, Middle East and North Africa and South Asia. Rates of type 3 VWD registrations were significantly influenced by economic status (81% of VWD diagnoses in LIC), suggesting only the most severe VWD types are diagnosed in resource limited settings. CONCLUSION: Significant variation in registration rates of PwVWD exist internationally and is influenced by income status and the presence of HTC networks. Improved understanding of registration rates will enable targeting of advocacy to improve awareness, diagnosis and support for PwVWD internationally. KEY POINTS: Registration rates of People with Von Willebrand Disease (PwVWD) vary internationally and are influenced by national income status Although females represent the majority of PwVWD globally, in low income countries (LIC) males predominated, possibly related to stigma surrounding gynaecological bleeding. Rates of type 3 VWD registration were significantly influenced by economic status (81% of VWD diagnoses in LIC), suggesting only the most severe VWD types are diagnosed in resource limited settings.

Challenges in the management of women with type 2B von Willebrand disease during pregnancy and the postpartum period: evidence from literature and data from an international registry and physicians' survey-communication from the Scientific and Standardization Committees of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

BACKGROUND: Management of women with type 2B von Willebrand disease (VWD) during pregnancy is challenging because of dysfunctional von Willebrand factor (VWF) and the complexity resulting from discrepant VWF/factor VIII (VWF/FVIII) levels, impaired platelet-dependent VWF activity, progressive thrombocytopenia, and risks associated with the use of desmopressin. There is a lack of high-quality evidence to support clinical decision making. OBJECTIVES: In this study, we examined the current diagnostic and management approaches and outcomes in women with VWD during pregnancy. METHODS: Data were collected via 3 avenues: literature review, an international registry, and an international survey on physicians' practices for the management of pregnancy in women with VWD. The registry and survey were supported by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. RESULTS: Data on clinical and laboratory features, management and bleeding complications, and pregnancy outcomes of a total of 55 pregnancies from 49 women across the globe (literature: 35, registry: 20) and data reported by 112 physicians were analyzed. We describe the largest dataset on pregnancies in women with type 2B VWD available to date. The data highlight the following key issues: a) bleeding complications remain a concern in these patients, b) the target safe VWF level and the ideal monitoring approach are unknown, c) there is a wide range of hemostatic management practices in the type and timing of treatment, and d) physicians have diverse views on the mode of delivery and use of neuraxial anesthesia. CONCLUSION: We conclude that an international consensus and guidance are critically required for better care and improved outcomes in this patient cohort.

Beyond the guidelines: how we approach challenging scenarios in the diagnosis and management of von Willebrand disease.

Although von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder, its diagnosis and management are often challenging. Clinical practice guidelines, developed through systematic review of the medical literature and considering the best available evidence, provide guidance for common clinical scenarios. However, in the clinical setting, patients often present with characteristics and nuances that may fall outside the realm of available evidence and guidelines, and hence, shared decision-making will be essential in the evaluation and management of these patients. The challenges in the diagnosis of VWD are mainly attributable to the heterogeneity of the disorder, limitations of laboratory assays, and the significant impact of various physiologic processes on von Willebrand factor. The impact of physiologic normalization of von Willebrand factor, which may occur in various settings such as pregnancy, inflammation, or aging, remains uncertain, as is the optimal management in these scenarios. Multidisciplinary and individualized care, based on evolving evidence supported by clinicians, patients, caregivers, and stakeholders, will be needed to ensure the highest quality care for those who live with VWD.

Variability in International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis-Scientific and Standardization Committee endorsed Bleeding Assessment Tool (ISTH-BAT) score with normal aging in healthy females: contributory factors and clinical significance.

BACKGROUND: Bleeding assessment tools are key screening tests used in the evaluation of patients with suspected inherited bleeding disorders. The International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis-Scientific and Standardization Committee endorsed Bleeding Assessment Tool (ISTH-BAT) has differing reference ranges for adult males (0-3), adult females (0-5), and children (0-2), reflecting differing bleeding symptoms and exposure to hemostatic challenges in these healthy population subgroups. Age is known to markedly impact bleeding score in individuals with von Willebrand disease. However, the influence of age on bleeding score in healthy adult controls is poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess variability in ISTH-BAT score with age among healthy control females. METHODS: We used the legacy "Merging Project" dataset of normal healthy controls upon which current ISTH-BAT normal ranges are based. We included women, totaling 646 individuals. The normal range (middle 95th percentile) of total ISTH-BAT and grouped subdomain scores between age quartiles was assessed. RESULTS: The normal range of ISTH-BAT scores increased with age, ranging from 0 to 4 in the youngest quartile (age range, 18-30) to 0 to 6 in the oldest (age range, 52-88). This increased variability with aging was related both to high menorrhagia domain scores in older women and an increase in postprocedural bleeding with accumulated exposure to hemostatic challenges. CONCLUSIONS: Cumulatively, our data highlight that normal aging leads to increased variability in bleeding scores in healthy adult females. Further refinement of the ISTH-BAT with age-adjusted reference ranges may improve the sensitivity and specificity of the tool among females.

Enhanced VWF clearance in low VWF pathogenesis: limitations of the VWFpp/VWF:Ag ratio and clinical significance.

Increased von Willebrand factor (VWF) clearance plays a key role in the pathogenesis of type 1 and type 2 von Willebrand disease (VWD). However, the pathological mechanisms involved in patients with mild to moderate reductions in plasma VWF:Ag (range, 30-50 IU/dL; low VWF) remain poorly understood. In this study, we investigated the hypothesis that enhanced VWF clearance may contribute to the pathobiology of low VWF. Patients with low VWF were recruited to the LoVIC study after ethics approval and receipt of informed consent. Desmopressin was administered IV in 75 patients, and blood samples were drawn at baseline and at the 1-hour and 4-hour time points. As defined by recent ASH/ISTH/NHF/WFH guidelines, 20% of our low-VWF cohort demonstrated significantly enhanced VWF clearance. Importantly, from a clinical perspective, this enhanced VWF clearance was seen after desmopressin infusion, but did not affect the steady-state VWF propeptide (VWFpp)-to-VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) ratio (VWFpp/VWF:Ag) in most cases. The discrepancy between the VWFpp/VWF:Ag ratio and desmopressin fall-off rates in patients with mild quantitative VWD may have reflected alteration in VWFpp clearance kinetics. Finally, bleeding scores were significantly lower in patients with low VWF with enhanced VWF clearance, compared with those in whom reduced VWF biosynthesis represented the principle pathogenic mechanism. This trial was registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03167320.

Special considerations in GI bleeding in VWD patients.

Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in von Willebrand disease (VWD). It has been noted that GI bleeding caused by angiodysplasia is overrepresented in VWD patients compared to other causes. The bleeding from angiodysplasia is notoriously difficult to treat; recurrences and rebleeds are common. A growing body of basic science evidence demonstrates that von Willebrand factor negatively regulates angiogenesis through multiple pathways. VWD is clinically highly associated with angiodysplasia. The predisposition to angiodysplasia likely accounts for many of the clinical difficulties related to managing GI bleeding in VWD patients. Diagnosis and treatment are challenging with the current tools available, and much further research is needed to further optimize care for these patients with regard to acute treatment, prophylaxis, and adjunctive therapies. In this review we provide an overview of the available literature on GI bleeding in VWD and explore the molecular underpinnings of angiodysplasia-related GI bleeding. Considerations for diagnostic effectiveness are discussed, as well as the natural history and recurrence of these lesions and which therapeutic options are available for acute and prophylactic management.

Longitudinal bleeding assessment in von Willebrand disease utilizing an interim bleeding score.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of bleeding phenotype is critically important in the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD). Despite advances in bleeding assessment tools (BATs), standardized tools to evaluate bleeding following diagnosis (interim bleeding) are lacking. OBJECTIVES: We assessed the clinical utility of an interim bleeding protocol in a multicenter, international study involving patients with VWD. METHODS: The enrolment ISTH BAT formed the original bleeding score (0 BS). At follow-up, the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis BAT was repeated but included only interval bleeding (Interim BS, 1 BS). Both scores were annualized (0 BS/yr, 1 BS/yr). BS were analyzed by VWD subtype, plasma VWF level, sex, and age. RESULTS: Interim BS discriminated by subtype, with significantly increased 0 BS and 1 BS in patients with type 3 VWD. In patients with type 1 VWD, a positive or negative 0 BS did not predict future bleeding, with similar 1 BS/yr (median 1.0 vs. 0.7, p = .2). Despite significantly higher 0 BS in females with type 1 VWD than males (median 7 vs. 5, p = .0012), 1 BS were not significantly different (median 4 vs. 4, p = .16). While 0 BS were lower in children than adults with type 1 VWD, interim BS were similar (median 5 vs. 3, p = .5; 1BS/yr, median 1 vs. 0.8, p = .7). Interestingly, in those with plasma von Willebrand factor:ristocetin cofactor levels >50 IU/dl, interim BS rates were similar to those 30-50 IU/dl (1 BS/yr 0.8 vs. 1.3, p = .5). CONCLUSION: This study provides both a new approach to longitudinal bleeding assessment and insights into the evolution of bleeding in VWD.

Novel cysteine substitution p.(Cys1084Tyr) causes variable expressivity of qualitative and quantitative VWF defects.

von Willebrand factor (VWF) is an extremely cysteine-rich multimeric protein that is essential for maintaining normal hemostasis. The cysteine residues of VWF monomers form intra- and intermolecular disulfide bonds that regulate its structural conformation, multimer distribution, and ultimately its hemostatic activity. In this study, we investigated and characterized the molecular and pathogenic mechanisms through which a novel cysteine variant p.(Cys1084Tyr) causes an unusual, mixed phenotype form of von Willebrand disease (VWD). Phenotypic data including bleeding scores, laboratory values, VWF multimer distribution, and desmopressin response kinetics were investigated in 5 members (2 parents and 3 daughters) of a consanguineous family. VWF synthesis and secretion were also assessed in a heterologous expression system and in a transient transgenic mouse model. Heterozygosity for p.(Cys1084Tyr) was associated with variable expressivity of qualitative VWF defects. Heterozygous individuals had reduced VWF:GPIbM (<0.40 IU/mL) and VWF:CB (<0.35 IU/mL), as well as relative reductions in high-molecular-weight multimers, consistent with type 2A VWD. In addition to these qualitative defects, homozygous individuals also displayed reduced factor VIII (FVIII):C/VWF:Ag, leading to very low FVIII levels (0.03-0.1 IU/mL) and reduced VWF:Ag (<0.40 IU/mL) and VWF:GPIbM (<0.30 IU/mL). Accelerated VWF clearance and impaired VWF secretion contributed to the fully expressed homozygous phenotype with impaired secretion arising because of disordered disulfide connectivity.

von Willebrand factor levels in the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is associated with significant morbidity as a result of excessive mucocutaneous bleeding. Early diagnosis and treatment are important to prevent and treat these symptoms. We systematically reviewed the accuracy of diagnostic tests using different cutoff values of von Willebrand factor antigen (VWF:Ag) and platelet-dependent von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity assays in the diagnosis of VWD. We searched Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and Embase databases for eligible studies. We pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity and reported patient-important outcomes when relevant. This review included 21 studies that evaluated VWD diagnosis. The results showed low certainty in the evidence for a net health benefit from reconsidering the diagnosis of VWD vs removing the disease diagnosis in patients with VWF levels that have normalized with age. For the diagnosis of type 1 VWD, VWF sequence variants were detected in 75% to 82% of patients with VWF:Ag < 0.30 IU/mL and in 44% to 60% of patients with VWF:Ag between 0.30 and 0.50 IU/mL. A sensitivity of 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-0.94) and a specificity of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.76-0.97) were observed for a platelet-dependent VWF activity/VWF:Ag ratio < 0.7 in detecting type 2 VWD (moderate certainty in the test accuracy results). VWF:Ag and platelet-dependent activity are continuous variables that are associated with an increase in bleeding risk with decreasing levels. This systematic review shows that using a VWF activity/VWF:Ag ratio < 0.7 vs lower cutoff levels in patients with an abnormal initial VWD screen is more accurate for the diagnosis of type 2 VWD.

Gynecologic and obstetric management of women with von Willebrand disease: summary of 3 systematic reviews of the literature.

von Willebrand disease (VWD) disproportionately affects women because of the potential for heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB), delivery complications, and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). To systematically synthesize the evidence regarding first-line management of HMB, treatment of women requiring or desiring neuraxial analgesia, and management of PPH. We searched Medline and EMBASE through October 2019 for randomized trials, comparative observational studies, and case series comparing the effects of desmopressin, hormonal therapy, and tranexamic acid (TxA) on HMB; comparing different von Willebrand factor (VWF) levels in women with VWD who were undergoing labor and receiving neuraxial anesthesia; and measuring the effects of TxA on PPH. We conducted duplicate study selection, data abstraction, and appraisal of risk of bias. Whenever possible, we conducted meta-analyses. We assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. We included 1 randomized trial, 3 comparative observational studies, and 10 case series. Moderate-certainty evidence showed that desmopressin resulted in a smaller reduction of menstrual blood loss (difference in mean change from baseline, 41.6 [95% confidence interval, 16.6-63.6] points in a pictorial blood assessment chart score) as compared with TxA. There was very-low-certainty evidence about how first-line treatments compare against each other, the effects of different VWF levels in women receiving neuraxial anesthesia, and the effects of postpartum administration of TxA. Most of the evidence relevant to the gynecologic and obstetric management of women with VWD addressed by most guidelines is very low quality. Future studies that address research priorities will be key when updating such guidelines.

Surgical management of patients with von Willebrand disease: summary of 2 systematic reviews of the literature.

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder. The management of patients with VWD who are undergoing surgeries is crucial to prevent bleeding complications. We systematically summarized the evidence on the management of patients with VWD who are undergoing major and minor surgeries to support the development of practice guidelines. We searched Medline and EMBASE from inception through October 2019 for randomized clinical trials (RCTs), comparative observational studies, and case series that compared maintaining factor VIII (FVIII) levels or von Willebrand factor (VWF) levels at >0.50 IU/mL for at least 3 days in patients undergoing major surgery, and those with options for perioperative management of patients undergoing minor surgery. Two authors screened and abstracted data and assessed the risk of bias. We conducted meta-analyses when possible. We evaluated the certainty of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. We included 7 case series for major surgeries and 2 RCTs and 12 case series for minor surgeries. Very-low-certainty evidence showed that maintaining FVIII levels or VWF levels of >0.50 IU/mL for at least 3 consecutive days showed excellent hemostatic efficacy (as labeled by the researchers) after 74% to 100% of major surgeries. Low- to very-low-certainty evidence showed that prescribing tranexamic acid and increasing VWF levels to 0.50 IU/mL resulted in fewer bleeding complications after minor procedures compared with increasing VWF levels to 0.50 IU/mL alone. Given the low-quality evidence for guiding management decisions, a shared-decision model leading to individualized therapy plans will be important in patients with VWD who are undergoing surgical and invasive procedures.

Effectiveness of therapeutic heparin versus prophylactic heparin on death, mechanical ventilation, or intensive care unit admission in moderately ill patients with covid-19 admitted to hospital: RAPID randomised clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of therapeutic heparin compared with prophylactic heparin among moderately ill patients with covid-19 admitted to hospital wards. DESIGN: Randomised controlled, adaptive, open label clinical trial. SETTING: 28 hospitals in Brazil, Canada, Ireland, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, and US. PARTICIPANTS: 465 adults admitted to hospital wards with covid-19 and increased D-dimer levels were recruited between 29 May 2020 and 12 April 2021 and were randomly assigned to therapeutic dose heparin (n=228) or prophylactic dose heparin (n=237). INTERVENTIONS: Therapeutic dose or prophylactic dose heparin (low molecular weight or unfractionated heparin), to be continued until hospital discharge, day 28, or death. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was a composite of death, invasive mechanical ventilation, non-invasive mechanical ventilation, or admission to an intensive care unit, assessed up to 28 days. The secondary outcomes included all cause death, the composite of all cause death or any mechanical ventilation, and venous thromboembolism. Safety outcomes included major bleeding. Outcomes were blindly adjudicated. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 60 years; 264 (56.8%) were men and the mean body mass index was 30.3 kg/m2. At 28 days, the primary composite outcome had occurred in 37/228 patients (16.2%) assigned to therapeutic heparin and 52/237 (21.9%) assigned to prophylactic heparin (odds ratio 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.43 to 1.10; P=0.12). Deaths occurred in four patients (1.8%) assigned to therapeutic heparin and 18 patients (7.6%) assigned to prophylactic heparin (0.22, 0.07 to 0.65; P=0.006). The composite of all cause death or any mechanical ventilation occurred in 23 patients (10.1%) assigned to therapeutic heparin and 38 (16.0%) assigned to prophylactic heparin (0.59, 0.34 to 1.02; P=0.06). Venous thromboembolism occurred in two patients (0.9%) assigned to therapeutic heparin and six (2.5%) assigned to prophylactic heparin (0.34, 0.07 to 1.71; P=0.19). Major bleeding occurred in two patients (0.9%) assigned to therapeutic heparin and four (1.7%) assigned to prophylactic heparin (0.52, 0.09 to 2.85; P=0.69). CONCLUSIONS: In moderately ill patients with covid-19 and increased D-dimer levels admitted to hospital wards, therapeutic heparin was not significantly associated with a reduction in the primary outcome but the odds of death at 28 days was decreased. The risk of major bleeding appeared low in this trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04362085.

Bleeding assessment tools in the diagnosis of VWD in adults and children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of test accuracy.

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) can be associated with significant morbidity. Patients with VWD can experience bruising, mucocutaneous bleeding, and bleeding after dental and surgical procedures. Early diagnosis and treatment are important to minimize the risk of these complications. Several bleeding assessment tools (BATs) have been used to quantify bleeding symptoms as a screening tool for VWD. We systematically reviewed diagnostic test accuracy results of BATs to screen patients for VWD. We searched Cochrane Central, MEDLINE, and EMBASE for eligible studies, reference lists of relevant reviews, registered trials, and relevant conference proceedings. Two investigators screened and abstracted data. Risk of bias was assessed using the revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies and certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework. We pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity. The review included 7 cohort studies that evaluated the use of BATs to screen adult and pediatric patients for VWD. The pooled estimates for sensitivity and specificity were 75% (95% confidence interval, 66-83) and 54% (29-77), respectively. Certainty of evidence varied from moderate to high. This systematic review provides accuracy estimates for validated BATs as a screening modality for VWD. A BAT is a useful initial screening test to determine who needs specific blood testing. The pretest probability of VWD (often determined by the clinical setting/patient population), along with sensitivity and specificity estimates, will influence patient management.

Approach to the Patient with Bleeding.

Approach to the patient with bleeding begins with a thorough bleeding, medical, and family history to determine the nature of bleeding and severity of bleeding symptoms. Use of a Bleeding Assessment Tool allows the clinician to obtain a comprehensive bleeding history and ultimately determine the individual bleeding score that reflects bleeding severity and is classifiable as either normal or abnormal. In the absence of significant findings within patient history or presenting symptoms clearly pointing to a specific bleeding pathology, an approach to laboratory investigation is presented that proceeds through first-line, second-line, and third-line testing.