Elevated liver enzymes at the time of deceased donor organ donation do not affect recipient or pancreas allograft survival following pancreas transplantation.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of data on the impact of donor liver function tests (LFTs) on pancreas transplantation outcomes. Understanding their contribution could expand the donor pool. METHODS: Using the UNOS database, data from January 2010-2022 was retrospectively analyzed. Multivariable cox regressions were performed to evaluate the association between LFTs (AST, ALT and total bilirubin levels), graft failure and mortality up to three years post-transplant. RESULTS: 9138 pancreas transplants were completed. Multivariate analysis showed no association between donor AST values > 500 U/L and increased rates of graft failure (p = 0.826) or mortality (p = 0.836). Similar findings were noted for donor ALT values > 500 U/L (p = 0.522 and p = 0.997, respectively). There was no correlation with graft failure (p = 0.322) or mortality (p = 0.423) for total bilirubin levels >3 mg/dL. CONCLUSION: LFTs in the deceased pancreas donor did not increase risk of graft failure or mortality following pancreas transplantation. Elevated LFTs should not serve as absolute contraindications to transplant.

Unintentional Injury Death Among Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: Trends and Risk Factors.

Unintentional injury death (UID) is a leading cause of mortality worldwide, and individuals with chronic diseases are at higher risk. Though organ transplant can improve the lives of those with chronic disease, these individuals remain in suboptimal physical and mental health after surgery that predisposes them to UID. To quantify the scale of UID among solid organ transplant recipients, we performed a retrospective analysis using United Network of Organ Sharing data from adults who underwent kidney, liver or pancreas transplant between 2000-2021. Our study aimed to identify risk factors for UID in this cohort by comparing basic patient, donor, and transplant characteristics of the groups (UID or all other cause death). The largest proportion of UID was seen in the kidney group (.8%), followed by liver (.7%) and then pancreas (.3%). Male sex was the most significant risk factor among kidney and liver recipients. Whites had a higher risk for UID relative to their non-White counterparts in the kidney and liver groups. In both groups, advancing age conferred a protective effect, whereas higher functional status was a risk factor. Our findings shed new light on a significant source of mortality within the transplant population.

Increased CMV disease and "severe" BK viremia with belatacept vs. sirolimus three-drug maintenance immunosuppression.

OBJECTIVES: Belatacept may provide benefit in delayed graft function, but its association with infectious complications is understudied. We aim to assess the incidence of CMV and BK viremia in patients treated with sirolimus or belatacept as part of a three-drug immunosuppression regimen after kidney transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Kidney transplant recipients from 01/01/2015 to 10/01/2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Maintenance immunosuppression was either tacrolimus, mycophenolate and sirolimus (B0) or tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and belatacept (5.0 mg/kg monthly) (B1). Primary outcomes of interest were BK and CMV viremia which were followed until the end of the study period. Secondary outcomes included graft function (serum creatinine, eGFR) and acute rejection through 12 months. RESULTS: Belatacept was initiated in patients with a higher mean kidney donor profile index (B0:0.36 vs. B1:0.44, p = .02) with more delayed graft function (B0:6.1% vs. B1:26.1%, p < .001). Belatacept therapy was associated with more "severe" CMV viremia >25,000 copies/mL (B0:1.2% vs. B1:5.9%, p = .016) and CMV disease (B0:0.41% vs. B1:4.2%, p = .015). However, there was no difference in the overall incidence of CMV viremia >200 IU/mL (B0:9.4% vs. B1:13.5%, p = .28). There was no difference in the incidence of BK viremia >200 IU/mL (B0:29.7% vs. B1:31.1%, p = .78) or BK-associated nephropathy (B0:2.4% vs. B1:1.7%, p = .58), but belatacept was associated with "severe" BK viremia, defined as >10,000 IU/mL (B0:13.0% vs. B1:21.8%, p = .03). The mean serum Cr was significantly higher with belatacept therapy at 1-year follow up (B0:1.24 mg/dL vs. B1:1.43 mg/dL, p = .003). Biopsy-proven acute rejection (B0:1.2% vs. B1:2.6%, p = .35) and graft loss (B0:1.2% vs. B1:0.84%, p = .81) were comparable at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Belatacept therapy was associated with an increased risk of CMV disease and "severe" CMV and BK viremia. However, this regimen did not increase the overall incidence of infection and facilitated comparable acute rejection and graft loss at 12-month follow up.

The Use of Vasopressors During Deceased Donor Pancreas Procurement Decreases the Risk of Pancreas Transplant Graft Failure.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to identify the effect of various vasopressors on pancreas graft failure and patient survival. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing database was performed between 2000 and 2019. Patient and graft survival rates were analyzed up to 5 years posttransplant. RESULTS: The data included 17,348 pancreas transplant recipients: 12,857 simultaneous pancreas-kidney, 1440 pancreas transplant alone, and 3051 pancreas-after-kidney transplant recipients. Use of dopamine during deceased donor procurement increased graft failure by 18% (hazard ratio [HR], 1.18; P < 0.001). Absence of vasopressor caused graft failure to rise by 8% (HR, 1.08; P = 0.09). Dopamine increased the mortality rate by 37% (HR, 1.37; P < 0.001) and the absence of vasopressor increased the mortality rate by 14% (HR, 1.14; P = 0.02). Phenylephrine and norepinephrine reduced the mortality rate by 10% (HR, 0.90; P = 0.05) and 11% (HR, 0.89; P = 0.10), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The absence of vasopressor use or the use of dopamine is associated with a higher risk of both pancreas transplant graft failure and recipient mortality. The use of phenylephrine and norepinephrine reduces the risk of mortality. This information should guide deceased donor hemodynamic support management in anticipation of pancreas procurement for future transplantation.

Suicide amongst transplant recipients: Trends and unique risk factors.

INTRODUCTION: There are higher rates of depression and suicidal ideation among those with chronic diseases, including end-stage renal disease, diabetes mellitus and liver disease. Suicide is the tenth leading cause of death worldwide and is more prevalent among transplant recipients. Although transplantation has the potential to improve quality of life, many transplant recipients commit suicide each year. The extent to which sex, race, age, type of insurance coverage, time on waitlist, comorbidities, immunosuppressive regimen and graft loss contribute to suicide risk in this population remains understudied. METHODS: We queried UNOS data collected between 1990 and 2019 to determine what risk factors contribute to suicide in the transplant population. Suicide mortality rate was calculated by determining the fraction of organ recipients who died by suicide since 1990 and was expressed as deaths per 100 000. Two groups (suicide and all other cause mortality) were compared via univariate and multivariate statistical analysis. Time to graft loss was estimated using a Kaplan Meier Product Limit method. A propensity score analysis was performed to match patients who committed suicide to those who did not, allowing us to balance the relatively small sample of size of the suicide cohort with the larger all other cause mortality group to minimize the effect of confounding variables. We estimated years of organ life lost using the restricted mean. Statistical significance was defined by p < .05. RESULTS: The data included 135 432 transplant deaths in total; the majority were kidney recipients-82 305 (61%). We determined suicide rates of .28%, .31%, and .44% for kidney, liver and pancreas, respectively, with an overall rate of .3%. Across all three organs the most significant risk factor was male sex. Non-Hispanic whites were also at elevated risk (OR = 2.16, p < .003). In the liver and kidney transplant groups, the odds of committing suicide were reduced by 4% with advancing age. The odds of taking one's own life was inversely related to BMI in the kidney and pancreas groups. We observed a doubling of suicide rates from .3% in 2014 to .6% in 2018. There were no other statistically significant correlations. CONCLUSION: Suicide is more prevalent among transplant recipients than in the general population. White males in particular are most at risk. The highest rate of suicide was in pancreas recipients. Advancing age and increasing BMI conferred some protective effect. There were no significant associations between suicide incidence and glucocorticoid use, type of insurance coverage, time on waitlist or graft loss. The phenomenon has become more prevalent in recent years.

Transplant surgery departmental leaders do not represent workforce demographics especially among women and underrepresented minorities - A retrospective analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The diversity among surgical directors for liver, kidney, and pancreas transplant departments has not been previously evaluated. We aim to quantify the sex and racial demographics of transplant department leaders and assess the impact on patient outcomes. METHODS: Demographics were collected for 116 liver, 192 kidney, and 113 pancreas transplant directors using Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) directory and program websites. Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) 5-tier program outcomes rankings were obtained for each program and matched to leader demographics. A retrospective analysis of transplant recipients from 2010 to 2019 was performed using the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. RESULTS: 91.5% of transplant surgical directors were male. 55% of departments had a Non-Hispanic White leader. Asian, Hispanic and Black transplant chiefs were at the helm of 23.3%, 9%, and 5% of divisions respectively. Multivariate cox regression analysis did not identify any differences in patient outcomes by transplant director demographics. CONCLUSION: There is a paucity of female and URM leaders in transplant surgery. Initiatives to promote research, mentorship, and career advancement opportunities for women and URM are necessary to address the current leadership disparity.