Quantification of Visceral Fat at the L5 Vertebral Body Level in Patients with Crohn's Disease Using T2-Weighted MRI.

The umbilical or L3 vertebral body level is often used for body fat quantification using computed tomography. To explore the feasibility of using clinically acquired pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for visceral fat measurement, we examined the correlation of visceral fat parameters at the umbilical and L5 vertebral body levels. We retrospectively analyzed T2-weighted half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) MR axial images from Crohn's disease patients who underwent MRI enterography of the abdomen and pelvis over a three-year period. We determined the area/volume of subcutaneous and visceral fat from the umbilical and L5 levels and calculated the visceral fat ratio (VFR = visceral fat/subcutaneous fat) and visceral fat index (VFI = visceral fat/total fat). Statistical analyses involved correlation analysis between both levels, inter-rater analysis between two investigators, and inter-platform analysis between two image-analysis platforms. Correlational analysis of 32 patients yielded significant associations for VFI (r = 0.85; p < 0.0001) and VFR (r = 0.74; p < 0.0001). Intraclass coefficients for VFI and VFR were 0.846 and 0.875 (good agreement) between investigators and 0.831 and 0.728 (good and moderate agreement) between platforms. Our study suggests that the L5 level on clinically acquired pelvic MRIs may serve as a reference point for visceral fat quantification.

Using natural language processing to compare task-specific verbal cues in coached versus noncoached cardiac arrest teams during simulated pediatrics resuscitation.

OBJECTIVES: Coaches improve cardiopulmonary (CPR) outcomes in real-world and simulated settings. To explore verbal feedback that targets CPR quality, we used natural language processing (NLP) methodologies on transcripts from a published pediatric randomized trial (coach vs. no coach in simulated CPR). Study objectives included determining any differences by trial arm in (1) overall communication and (2) metrics over minutes of CPR and (3) exploring overall frequencies and temporal patterns according to degrees of CPR excellence. METHODS: A human-generated transcription service produced 40 team transcripts. Automated text search with manual review assigned semantic category; word count; and presence of verbal cues for general CPR, compression depth or rate, or positive feedback to transcript utterances. Resulting cue counts per minute (CPM) were corresponded to CPR quality based on compression rate and depth per minute. CPMs were compared across trial arms and over the 18 min of CPR. Adaptation to excellence was analyzed across four patterns of CPR excellence determined by k-shape methods. RESULTS: Overall coached teams experienced more rate-directive, depth-directive, and positive verbal cues compared with noncoached teams. The frequency of coaches' depth cues changed over minutes of CPR, indicating adaptation. In coached teams, the number of depth-directive cues differed among the four patterns of CPR excellence. Noncoached teams experienced fewer utterances by type, with no adaptation over time or to CPR performance. CONCLUSION: NLP extracted verbal metrics and their patterns in resuscitation sessions provides insight into communication patterns and skills used by CPR coaches and other team members. This could help to further optimize CPR training, feedback, excellence, and outcomes.

Machine learning to extract communication and history-taking skills in OSCE transcripts.

OBJECTIVES: Observed Structured Clinical Exams (OSCEs) allow assessment of, and provide feedback to, medical students. Clinical examiners and standardised patients (SP) typically complete itemised checklists and global scoring scales, which have known shortcomings. In this study, we applied machine learning (ML) to label some communication skills and interview content information in OSCE transcripts and to compare several ML methodologies by performance and transferability. METHODS: One-hundred and twenty-one transcripts of two OSCE scenarios were manually annotated per utterance across 19 communication skills and content areas. Utterances were converted to two types of numeric sentence vector representations and were paired with three types of ML algorithms. First, ML models (MLMs) were evaluated using a five K-fold cross-validation technique on all transcripts in one scenario to generate precision and recall, and their harmonic mean, F1 scores. Second, ML models were trained on all 101 transcripts from scenario 1 and tested for transferability on 20 scenario 2 transcripts. RESULTS: Performance testing in the K-fold cross-validation demonstrated relatively high mean F1 scores: median 0.87 and range 0.53-0.98 across all 19 labels. Transferability testing demonstrated success: F1 median 0.76 and range 0.46-0.97. The combination of a bi-directional long short-term memory neural network (biLSTM) algorithm with GenSen numeric sentence vector representations was associated with greater F1 scores across both performance and transferability (P < .005). CONCLUSIONS: We report the first application of ML in the context of student-SP OSCEs. We demonstrated that several MLMs automatically labelled OSCE transcripts for a range of interview content and some clinical communications skills. Some MLMs achieved greater performance and transferability. Optimised MLMs could provide automated and accurate assessment of OSCEs with potential to track student progress and identify areas for further practice.