Impact of Treatable Traits on Asthma Control and Quality of Life.

BACKGROUND: Many adult patients with asthma have uncontrolled disease and impaired quality of life, despite current asthma-specific drug therapies. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of 9 traits in patients with asthma, their associations with disease control and quality of life, and referral rates to nonmedical health care professionals. METHODS: Retrospectively, data from patients with asthma were collected in 2 Dutch hospitals (Amphia Breda and RadboudUMC Nijmegen). Adult patients without exacerbation <3 months who were referred for a first-ever elective, outpatient, hospital-based diagnostic pathway were deemed eligible. Nine traits were assessed: dyspnea, fatigue, depression, overweight, exercise intolerance, physical inactivity, smoking, hyperventilation, and frequent exacerbations. To assess the likelihood of having poor disease control or decreased quality of life, the odds ratio (OR) was calculated per trait. Referral rates were assessed by checking patients' files. RESULTS: A total of 444 adults with asthma were studied (57% women, age: 48 ± 16 years, forced expiratory volume in 1 second: 88% ± 17% predicted). Most patients (53%) were found to have uncontrolled asthma (Asthma Control Questionnaire ≥1.5 points) and decreased quality of life (Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire <6 points). Generally, patients had 3.0 ± 1.8 traits. Severe fatigue was most prevalent (60%) and significantly increased the likelihood of having uncontrolled asthma (OR: 3.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.9-4.7) and decreased quality of life (OR: 4.6, 95% CI: 2.7-7.9). Referrals to nonmedical health care professionals were low; most referrals were to a respiratory-specialized nurse (33%). CONCLUSION: Adult patients with asthma with a first-ever referral to a pulmonologist frequently exhibit traits justifying the deployment of nonpharmacological interventions, especially in those with uncontrolled asthma. However, referrals to appropriate interventions appeared infrequent.

Patient Activation During the First 6 Months After the Start of Stroke Rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE: To examine patient activation from the start of stroke rehabilitation and its course up until the 6-month follow-up. DESIGN: Inception cohort study with a follow-up of 6 months. SETTING: Multidisciplinary rehabilitation facility. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 478 patients (N=478) with stroke who received inpatient or outpatient rehabilitation, with a median age of 63.0 years (interquartile range, 56.0-70.0 years) with 308 (64.2%) being men. The study was completed by 439 patients (91.8%). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient activation was measured with the Patient Activation Measure (PAM) (score 0-100, 4 levels, where a higher score and level denotes more patient activation). The PAM was measured at the start of the rehabilitation (baseline) and 3 and 6 months thereafter and was analyzed using the multivariate mixed model analysis. RESULTS: At baseline, the mean PAM score was 60.2±14.3, with the number of patients in PAM levels 1, 2, 3, and 4 being 76 (17.8%), 85 (19.9%), 177 (41.4%), and 90 (21.0%), respectively. The multivariate mixed-model analysis demonstrated that the PAM score increased over time (baseline 60.2±14.3 vs 3 months 60.7±14.8 vs 6 months 61.9±18.0; P.007). Between baseline and 6 months, 122 patients (41.4%) remained at the same PAM level, 105 patients (35.6%) increased, and 68 patients (23.1%) decreased. At all time points, >35% of patients were in level 1 or 2. CONCLUSIONS: PAM scores increased slightly over time from the start of rehabilitation up to the 6-month follow-up. However, more than one-third of patients remained at low levels (ie, level 1 and 2) of patient activation, which indicates that specific interventions during rehabilitation to increase patient activation might be of value.

Efficacy and safety of a 12-week outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program in Post-PE Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The Post-Pulmonary Embolism Syndrome (PPES) comprises heterogeneous entities, including chronic thromboembolic disease with/without pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH/CTEPD), and deconditioning. OBJECTIVES: To assess underlying physiological determinants of PPES, and efficacy and safety of rehabilitation training in these patients. METHODS: 56 consecutive PE patients with persistent dyspnea and/or functional limitations despite ≥3 months of anticoagulation underwent standardized diagnostic work-up including exercise testing as part of routine practice. All diagnostic (imaging and cardiopulmonary function) tests were interpreted by a core group of experienced clinicians. A subgroup of patients without CTEPH or other treatable conditions was referred for a 12-week personalized rehabilitation program, studying changes in physical condition and patient-reported outcome measures. RESULTS: Persistent vascular occlusions were observed in 21/56 patients (38%) and CTEPH was confirmed in ten (18%). Regarding those without CTEPH, impaired cardiopulmonary responses were evident in 18/39 patients with available CPET data (46%), unrelated to chronic thrombi. Rehabilitation was completed by 27 patients after excluding 29 (patients with CTEPH or treatable comorbidities, refusal, ineligibility, or training elsewhere). Training intensity, PE-specific quality of life (PEmb-QoL) and fatigue (CIS) improved with a median difference of 20 W (p = 0.001), 3.9 points (p < 0.001) and 16 points (p = 0.003), respectively. Functional status (Post-VTE Functional Status Scale) improved ≥1 grade in 18 (67%) patients, and declined in one (3.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that abnormal cardiopulmonary responses to exercise are common in patients with PPES and are not limited to those with chronic thrombi. Offering pulmonary rehabilitation to patients not treated otherwise seems safe and promising.

"Can Do" Versus "Do Do" in Patients with Asthma at First Referral to a Pulmonologist.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacotherapy is key in asthma control, including preventing lung function decline, in primary care. However, patients' physical functioning (eg, physical capacity [PC] [=can do] and physical activity [PA] [=do do]) correlates poorly with lung function. Therefore, a better insight into the physical function of patients with asthma is needed, using the "can do, do do" concept. OBJECTIVE: To explore the "can do, do do" concept in adult patients with asthma at referral for the first time to an outpatient consultation of a pulmonologist. METHODS: PC was measured using the six-minute walk test and PA by using an accelerometer. Patients were classified into quadrants: low PC (6-minute walking distance <70% predicted), low PA (<7000 steps/d, "'can't do, don't do"); preserved PC, low PA ("can do, don't do"); low PC, preserved PA ("'can't do, do do"); or preserved PC, preserved PA ("can do, do do"). RESULTS: A total of 479 patients with asthma had a median (interquartile range) 6-minute walking distance of 74% (66%-82%) predicted, and walked 6829 (4593-9075) steps/d. Only 29% were classified as "can do, do do," whereas 30% were classified as "can't do, don't do." The Asthma Control Questionnaire and the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire scores were worst in the "can't do" groups. CONCLUSIONS: Low PC and/or PA was found in most patients with asthma at the index referral to a pulmonologist. An impaired PC is accompanied by a significantly reduced asthma control and disease-specific quality of life. This justifies further studies on safety and efficacy of nonpharmacological interventions, such as physiotherapy.

Outcomes of Pulmonary Rehabilitation After Treatment for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Stages I to IIIa: AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY.

PURPOSE: Although rehabilitation after treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was found to have a beneficial effect on exercise capacity in a number of studies, insight into its effect on quality of life (QoL) and fatigue is limited. The aim of this study was to examine the outcome of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) regarding fatigue, QoL, and exercise capacity in adult patients curatively treated for NSCLC stages I to IIIa. METHODS: Study data were prospectively and routinely gathered in daily practice in patients taking part in an outpatient PR program after treatment for NSCLC stages I to IIIa. PR consisted of 12 weeks of supervised exercises 3 times a week, supplemented with scheduled visits with members of a multidisciplinary team. Data were gathered at initial assessment and discharge. Outcomes included fatigue (the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue and the fatigue domain of the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire); QoL (total CRQ score), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung, and the Short Form 36; and exercise capacity (cardiopulmonary exercise testing). RESULTS: Fifty patients started the program out of the 70 patients referred to PR and 43 (86%) completed the program. Significant (P ≤ .01) and clinically relevant improvements were observed for all outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: Rehabilitation after treatment for NSCLC stages I to IIIa showed promising improvements regarding patient fatigue, QoL, and exercise capacity. PR should be considered for patients after treatment for NSCLC stages I to IIIa.