Clinical and Hemodynamic Improvement in Pulmonary Hypertension After Switching to Sacubitril/Valsartan in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

ABSTRACT: Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and pulmonary hypertension have poor survival, and established medical therapies for both conditions are not available. In this retrospective study of 69 patients with HFpEF and either isolated postcapillary pulmonary hypertension (IpcPH, n = 53) or combined postcapillary and precapillary pulmonary hypertension (CpcPH, n = 16), we investigated the effects of sacubitril/valsartan on pulmonary hypertension measured using right heart catheterization at baseline (ie, presacubitril/valsartan) and 99 (94-123) days after switching to sacubitril/valsartan. After switching to sacubitril/valsartan, right heart catheterization showed significantly lower pulmonary artery pressures (systolic/diastolic/mean) in both patient groups compared with presacubitril/valsartan [IpcPH: 44 (38-52)/15 (12-19)/28 (22-33) mm Hg vs. 47 (40-55)/18 (15-23)/31 (26-35) mm Hg, P < 0.01; CpcPH: 54 (43-57)/18 (12-23)/34 (30-36) mm Hg vs. 61 (50-79)/24 (19-30)/40 (31-53) mm Hg, P < 0.05]. The median sacubitril/valsartan dose at follow-up was 24/26 (24/26-49/51) mg twice daily in both patients with IpcPH and CpcPH. Clinically, the New York Heart Association functional class improved by at least 1 class in 32 of 69 patients ( P < 0.01). In conclusion, sacubitril/valsartan therapy improves pulmonary hypertension in patients with HFpEF and either IpcPH or CpcPH. Further prospective randomized trials are needed for confirmation of our results.

Reduction of Pulmonary Hypertension After Transition to Sacubitril/Valsartan in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Objectives: Although the PARAGON-HF trial failed to reach its primary endpoint, subgroups of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) still appear to benefit from Sacubitril/Valsartan therapy. As HFpEF patients with pulmonary hypertension display a specifically high mortality and morbidity, we evaluated the effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan in this subgroup of HFpEF patients. Methods: In this retrospective case-series of 18 patients with HFpEF and pulmonary hypertension, right heart catheterisation (RHC) for determination of invasive pulmonary pressure were performed at baseline (pre-Sacubitril/Valsartan) and 99 (71-156) days after transition from angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers to Sacubitril/Valsartan (post-Sacubitril/Valsartan). Results are given as median and interquartile range. Results: After conversion to Sacubitril/Valsartan, RHC showed significantly reduced pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) and mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) compared to pre-Sacubitril/Valsartan [PAP systolic/diastolic/mean 44 (38-55)/15 (11-20)/27 (23-33) mm Hg vs. 51 (41-82)/22 (13-29)/33 (28-52) mm Hg, p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively; PCWP 16 (12-20) mm Hg vs. 22 (15-27) mm Hg, p < 0.05]. Median Sacubitril/Valsartan dosage was 24/26 mg BID (24/26 BID-49/51 mg BID). Clinically, New York Heart Association functional class improved in 12 of the 18 patients (p < 0.01) after conversion to Sacubitril/Valsartan. Echocardiographic parameters of left ventricular function and cardiovascular co-medication did not differ markedly between pre- and post-Sacubitril/Valsartan. Conclusion: Sacubitril/Valsartan therapy is associated with an improvement of pulmonary hypertension in HFpEF patients.

"Brass Knuckle"-Like Right Coronary Artery.

A 60-year-old asymptomatic woman was admitted to hospital for an invasive evaluation of a patent foramen ovale and a suspected formation within the right atrium. Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography excluded both, but instead unveiled a huge "brass knuckle"-like ectasia of the right coronary artery meandering down the lateral wall of the right atrium. Coronary anomalies are common and mostly discovered incidentally. Thus, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches should be guided by the clinical scenario of the patient.