Exploring Perspectives on Stroke Standard Set Data Collection: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The International Consortium on Health Outcome Measurement developed a standard set for stroke (SSS) that includes patient-reported outcome measures to help capture patients' perspectives on their poststroke recovery. The objective of this study was to explore the experiences and perspectives of individuals who collected SSS data from patients who were admitted to hospital for a stroke. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive approach was taken. Semistructured, audio-recorded interviews were conducted with individuals employed at 2 acute neurological inpatient units in Southwestern Ontario, Canada. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and written text responses were analyzed directly. Transcripts were coded line by line and then organized into 5 overarching themes: adoption, acceptance, appropriateness, feasibility, and sustainability. RESULTS: Six interviews were conducted with participants from varying roles (eg, nurses, manager, web developer, social worker, medical clerk). Participants reported that patients were receptive to completing the SSS. Follow-up phone calls provided a significant opportunity to monitor patients' recovery postdischarge. Many patients requested medical guidance and help navigating health and social resources for unmet stroke-related needs. Barriers to consistent SSS assessment included high employee turnover and lack of time, space, or capacity for follow-up. To sustain data collection, a dedicated, financially supported neurological nursing role was suggested. CONCLUSION: Participants were supportive of SSS data collection that could provide monitoring, oversight, and follow-up of stroke patients after discharge from acute care. However, the utility of the dataset is heavily dependent on having the data collection process properly resourced.

Overview of randomized controlled trials of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Given the complexity of post-TBI medical, surgical, and rehabilitative care, research is critical to optimize interventions across the continuum of care and improve outcomes for persons with moderate to severe TBI. OBJECTIVE: To characterize randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the literature. METHOD: Systematic searches of MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE and PsycINFO for RCTs up to December 2022 inclusive were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: 662 RCTs of 91,946 participants published from 1978 to 2022 met inclusion criteria. The number of RCTs published annually has increased steadily. The most reported indicator of TBI severity was the Glasgow Coma Scale (545 RCTs, 82.3%). 432 (65.3%) RCTs focused on medical/surgical interventions while 230 (34.7%) addressed rehabilitation. Medical/surgical RCTs had larger sample sizes compared to rehabilitation RCTs. Rehabilitation RCTs accounted for only one third of moderate to severe TBI RCTs and were primarily conducted in the chronic phase post-injury relying on smaller sample sizes. CONCLUSION: Further research in the subacute and chronic phases as well as increasing rehabilitation focused TBI RCTs will be important to optimizing the long-term outcomes and quality of life for persons living with TBI.

Comparing Randomized Controlled Trials of Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Lower to Middle Income Countries Versus High Income Countries.

Outcomes from traumatic brain injury (TBI) including death differ significantly between high-, middle-, and low-income countries. Little is known, however, about differences in TBI research across the globe. The objective of this article was to examine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of moderate-to-severe TBI in high-income countries (HICs) compared with low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), as defined by the World Bank income per capita cutoff of $13,205 US dollars. A systematic review was conducted for articles published in the English language to December 2022 inclusive using MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PsycINFO in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Inclusion criteria: (1) human participants with a mean age of ≥18 years; (2) ≥50% of the sample had moderate to severe TBI; and (3) the study design was a RCT. Data extracted included author, year, country, sample size, primary focus (medical/surgical management or rehabilitation), injury etiology, time post-injury, and indicator(s) used to define TBI severity. There were 662 RCTs (published 1978-2022) that met inclusion criteria comprising 91,946 participants. There were 48 countries represented: 30 HICs accounting for 451 RCTs (68.1%) and 18 LMICs accounting for 211 RCTs (31.9%). The 62.6% of RCTs from LMICs were conducted in the acute phase post-injury (≤1 month) compared with 42.1% of RCTs from HICs. Of RCTs from LMICs, 92.4% focused on medical/surgical management compared with 52.5% from HICs. Since 2016, more RCTs have been conducted in LMICs than in HICs, indicating the importance of better understanding this pattern of research output.