Impact of Establishing a Pain Clinic in a Rural Cancer Centre Based on the Knowledge and Experience of the Pain of Cancer Patients - A Prospective, Questionnaire-Based Study.

Objectives: Unrelieved pain significantly affects the quality of life of cancer patients. In rural settings, cancer patients do not have information or knowledge about how to control their pain because of a lack of resources or awareness. We conducted an interventional, questionnaire-based prospective study in a rural tertiary care oncological centre to look for the impact of establishing a pain clinic based on the knowledge and experience of cancer patients regarding their cancer pain. Material and Methods: The patient pain questionnaire was filled by 380 random non-surgical patients complaining of pain who visited our centre for the treatment of cancer. The information generated was used for setting up a pain clinic covering all aspects of cancer pain. After 3 months of starting the pain clinic services, all these patients who visited the pain clinic at least once were again surveyed similarly. Out of 380 patients, we could only follow up with 348 patients and other patients were lost to follow-up. Results: After visiting the pain clinic the mean value of the response for most of the questions decreased suggesting that the responses became more favourable as the knowledge improved and the experience of the pain became less distressing for the patients. The mean value of the responses to all the questions related to the overall knowledge of cancer pain before visiting a pain clinic was 4.22 ± 1.58 and after visiting a pain clinic was 3.83 ± 0.95 which was statistically significant (P = 0.000). The mean value of the responses to the questions related to the overall experience of the pain before visiting the pain clinic was 3.81 ± 1.42 and after visiting the pain clinic was 2.14 ± 1.05 which was highly significant (P = 0.000). We found out that the patients who had a higher mean value of the responses (8-10) suggesting the most unfavourable responses benefitted the most and the number of patients having the most unfavourable responses decreased after visiting the pain clinic. Conclusion: In a rural tertiary healthcare cancer centre, the establishment of a pain clinic increased the general understanding and experience of cancer patients regarding their pain and pain management.

Assessing the Patient Outcomes and Performance of a Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery (CTVS) Unit During Its First Two Years in a Tier-2 City in India: A Comprehensive Audit and Analysis.

This detailed article presents a comprehensive overview of the initial two-year experience in establishing a new cardiothoracic vascular surgery (CTVS) facility in a tier-2 city in India. The article discusses various aspects of setting up and operating a specialized healthcare facility. The first two years of developing the CTVS facility were included in the study period. The manpower included one cardiothoracic vascular surgeon, one cardiac anesthesiologist, two perfusionists, and two physician assistants, along with four other ancillary staff to assist in the smooth functioning of the operation theater. The CTVS recovery staff included 15 nursing officers. There was only one modular operation theater reserved for cardiothoracic vascular surgeries, along with a five-bed recovery room (CTVS intensive care unit). One-hundred-seventy-two procedures were done, including 122 open heart surgeries, 36 vascular procedures, and 14 thoracic procedures. The majority of patients were discharged by the seventh day postoperatively. Overall complication and mortality rates were 8% and 4.6%, respectively. This article also discusses relevant hospital policy, challenges faced, and future recommendations for similar endeavors. The findings highlight the successful implementation of the facility and its impact on providing specialized cardiac care to the local population.

Correlating the Depth of Sedation Between the Ramsay Sedation Scale and Bispectral Index Using Either Intravenous Midazolam or Intravenous Propofol in Elderly Patients Under Spinal Anaesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Supplementation of spinal anaesthesia with sedatives or anxiolytics has emerged as a standard protocol to alleviate patients' anxiety and to produce amnesia during the surgical procedure. Thus, judicious use of sedation can make surgeries under spinal anaesthesia more comfortable and acceptable for the elderly patient, the surgeon, and the anaesthesiologist. However, over-sedation may jeopardise the safety of the patient. Appropriate sedation helps reduce physiological stress, which leads to a better result. Therefore, monitoring the depth of sedation becomes essential. The Ramsay sedation scale (RSS) and bispectral index (BIS) both are used widely to assess the depth of sedation. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of the study was to assess and correlate the depth of sedation between the BIS and RSS in elderly patients using midazolam and propofol under spinal anaesthesia. The secondary objectives were to observe any difference in the commencement of sedation between the two groups and to observe haemodynamic changes between the two groups. METHODS: A total of 60 elderly patients undergoing urological procedures under spinal anaesthesia were randomly assigned to receive either midazolam (Group A, n=30) or propofol (Group B, n=30) for sedation. In Group A, patients were given an initial bolus of midazolam 0.03 mg/kg and a maintenance incremental bolus of 0.01 mg/kg up to a maximum of 2.5 mg in 10-minute intervals. Group B used propofol with an initial bolus dose of 0.5 mg/kg over two minutes and a maintenance bolus of 10-20 mg as required for the maintenance of sedation depth. Sedation was titrated to achieve a BIS score of 70-80 and an RSS score of 3-4. Heart rate, non-invasive systolic, diastolic, mean arterial blood pressure, oxygen saturation (SPO2), and the correlation coefficient between the BIS and RSS were measured at 0 (baseline), 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 minutes of interval. RESULTS: The correlation coefficient between the BIS and RSS scores in Group A at various time intervals indicate a strong correlation coefficient of -0.76 at five minutes, -0.64 at 20 minutes, -0.78 at 30 minutes, -0.56 at 40 minutes, and -0.39 at 50 minutes. In Group B, the correlation coefficient between the BIS and RSS scores at various time intervals indicate a strong correlation coefficient of -0.75 at five minutes, -0.76 at 20 minutes,-0.64 at 30 minutes, -0.89 at 40 minutes, and -0.46 at 50 minutes of interval. We also observed that the BIS drops to a lower level in patients receiving propofol (Group B) with a significant difference depicting early onset of sedation with propofol. In Group B, HR and MAP were significantly less than those of Group A. There was no significant difference in terms of mean age, sex, and body weight in the patients of both groups. CONCLUSION: The BIS and RSS scores indicate a strong correlation with a magnitude of 70%-80%, but more in Group B (propofol) than Group A (midazolam). Therefore, the characteristics of each sedative drug can influence the level of sedation during spinal anaesthesia. Clinicians should use a combination of BIS values and other objective sedative methods to determine the degree of sedation, rather than relying exclusively on BIS values.