Neonatal outcomes in term and preterm infants following adjunctive azithromycin antibiotic prophylaxis for non-elective cesarean delivery.

OBJECTIVE: It is currently unknown whether adjunctive azithromycin prophylaxis at the time of non-elective cesarean has differential effects on neonatal outcomes in the context of prematurity. The objective of this study was to compare whether neonatal outcomes differ in term and preterm infants exposed to adjunctive azithromycin prophylaxis before non-elective cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: A planned secondary analysis of a multi-center randomized controlled trial that enrolled women with singleton pregnancies ≥24 weeks gestation undergoing non-elective cesarean delivery (during labor or ≥4 h after membrane rupture). Women received standard antibiotic prophylaxis and were randomized to either adjunctive azithromycin (500 mg) or placebo. The primary composite outcome was neonatal death, suspected or confirmed neonatal sepsis, and serious neonatal morbidities (NEC, PVL, IVH, BPD). Secondary outcomes included NICU admission, neonatal readmission, culture positive infections and prevalence of resistant organisms. Odds ratios (OR) for the effect of azithromycin versus placebo were compared between gestational age strata (preterm [less than 37 weeks] versus term [37 weeks or greater]). Tests of interaction examined homogeneity of treatment effect with gestational age. RESULTS: The analysis includes 2,013 infants, 226 preterm (11.2%) and 1,787 term. Mean gestational ages were 34 and 39.5 weeks, respectively. Within term and preterm strata, maternal and delivery characteristics were similar between the azithromycin and placebo groups. There was no difference in the odds of composite neonatal outcome between those exposed to azithromycin versus placebo in preterm neonates (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.48-1.41) and in term neonates (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.77-1.46), with no difference between gestational age strata (p = 0.42). Analysis of secondary outcomes also revealed no differences in treatment effects within or between gestational age strata. CONCLUSION: Exposure to adjunctive azithromycin antibiotic prophylaxis for non-elective cesarean delivery does not increase neonatal morbidity or mortality in term or preterm infants. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01235546.

Outcomes in low-risk patients before and after an institutional policy offering 39-week elective induction of labor.

OBJECTIVE: Elective induction of labor versus expectant management at 39 weeks gestation in low-risk nulliparous patients was shown in the ARRIVE randomized trial of over 6000 patients to decrease risks of cesarean delivery without significant change in the composite perinatal outcome. We aimed to pragmatically analyze the effect of offering elective induction of labor (eIOL) to all low-risk patients. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of low-risk nulliparous and multiparous patients delivering live, non-anomalous singletons at a single center at greater than or equal to 39 0/7 weeks gestational age. Those with prior or planned cesarean delivery, ruptured membranes, medical comorbidities, or contraindications to vaginal delivery were excluded. Patients were categorized as before (pre-eIOL; 1/2012-3/2014) or after (post-eIOL; 3/2019-12/2021) an institution-wide policy offering eIOL at 39 0/7 weeks. Births occurring April 2014 to December 2018 were allocated to a separate cohort (during-eIOL) given increased exposure to eIOL as our center recruited participants for the ARRIVE trial. The primary outcome was cesarean birth. Secondary outcomes included select maternal (e.g. chorioamnionitis, operative delivery, postpartum hemorrhage) and neonatal morbidities (e.g. birthweight, small- and large-for gestational age, hypoglycemia). Characteristics and outcomes were compared between the pre and during-eIOL, and pre and post-eIOL groups; adjusted OR (95% CI) were calculated using multivariable regression. Subgroup analysis by parity was planned. RESULTS: Of 10,758 patients analyzed, 2521 (23.4%) were pre-eIOL, 5410 (50.3%) during-eIOL, and 2827 (26.3%) post-eIOL. Groups differed with respect to labor type, age, race/ethnicity, marital and payor status, and gestational age at care entry. Post-eIOL was associated with lower odds of cesarean compared to pre-eIOL (aOR 0.83 [95% CI 0.72-0.96]), which was even lower among those specifically undergoing labor induction (aOR 0.58 [0.48-0.70]. During-eIOL was also associated with lower odds of cesarean compared to pre-eIOL (aOR 0.79 [0.69-0.90]). Both during and post-eIOL groups were associated with higher odds of chorioamnionitis, operative delivery, and hemorrhage compared to pre-eIOL. However, only among post-eIOL were there fewer neonates weighing ≥4000 g, large-for-gestational age infants, and neonatal hypoglycemia compared to pre-IOL. CONCLUSION: An institutional policy offering eIOL at 39 0/7 to low-risk patients was associated with a lower cesarean birth rate, lower birthweights and lower neonatal hypoglycemia, and an increased risk of chorioamnionitis and hemorrhage.

Predicting peripartum infection in laboring patients at high risk in Cameroon, Africa.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a predictive model for peripartum infection among high risk laboring patients in Cameroon, Africa. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a secondary analysis of the Cameroon Antibiotic Prophylaxis Trial (NCT03248297), a multicenter 3-arm double-blind randomized controlled trial of oral azithromycin ± amoxicillin among term pregnancies with prolonged labor or rupture of membranes in Cameroon 1/2018-5/2020. Patients with chorioamnionitis prior to randomization, study drug contraindications, or planned cesarean were excluded. The outcome of interest was a composite of maternal peripartum infection (chorioamnionitis, endometritis, sepsis by World Health Organization criteria, wound infection/abscess) diagnosed up to 6 weeks postpartum. Potential predictors were compared between patients with and without the composite outcome, and evaluated at a 0.05 alpha level. Statistically significant exposures were analyzed using multivariable regression (to generate adjusted odds ratios and 95 % confidence intervals) with backwards selection to generate a parsimonious model. Receiver operating characteristic curves with associated area under the curve assessed the model's predictive ability. A nomogram based on the final best fit multivariable model was constructed. RESULTS: Of 756 patients in the parent trial, 652 were analyzed: 45 (7 %) had peripartum infection. Those with infection were more likely to be nulliparous, lower education level, higher gestational age, receive antibiotics per hospital protocols, and undergo cesarean. In our best-fit multivariable model, none/primary education (vs university), cesarean birth, and antibiotic receipt per physician discretion (vs for cesarean prophylaxis) were significantly associated with increased infection risk. This model was moderately predictive (AUC = 0.75, 95 % CI 0.67-0.82). When using this 3 factor model, for a patient with a cesarean birth, receipt of antibiotics per physician discretion, and university education, the probability of peripartum infection was 35 % (95 % CI 0.11-0.73). CONCLUSIONS: While several variables such as parity are associated with infectious morbidity within 6 weeks among high risk laboring patients in Cameroon, only education level, antibiotic indication, and cesarean birth were independently associated, and a model including these 3 factors was moderately predictive. Validation of our findings in a larger population is warranted.

Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes at Periviable Gestation throughout Delivery Admission.

OBJECTIVE: The threshold of viability, as well as cutoffs for delivery interventions and neonatal resuscitation, vary by hospital and involve complex counseling. With improvements in neonatal resuscitation and intensive care, the threshold of viability has been decreasing. Decisions regarding delivery planning and neonatal resuscitation efforts should be based on the best available evidence. Our objective was to characterize survival rates and neonatal outcomes following periviable birth at different milestones beginning with prenatal admission through 1 year of life in a contemporary cohort. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all inborn infants without major congenital anomalies who delivered at the University of Alabama at Birmingham from 2013 to 2019 at gestational ages 22+0/7 to 25+6/7. Our primary outcome was to compared survival milestones throughout the pre- and postdelivery periods and neonatal complications in surviving newborns through 1 year of life at each gestational age. RESULTS: The survival rate to 1 year of life was 49% (48-56%, 95% confidence interval [CI]) for the entire cohort and varied according to gestational age at delivery (22 weeks 15% [10-23%, 95% CI], 23 weeks 48% [43-58%, 95% CI], 24 weeks 57% [52-67%, 95% CI], 25 weeks 71% [67-82%, 95% CI]). Overall for the entire cohort, the rate of lung disease requiring respiratory support at discharge was 51%, intraventricular hemorrhage was 42%, retinopathy of prematurity was 74%, pulmonary hypertension was 30%, and concerns for cerebral palsy at 1 year of life was 25%. All outcomes improved with advancing gestational age at delivery. Of infants who delivered during the 22nd week of gestation, 50% received antenatal corticosteroids. Infants exposed to antenatal corticosteroids had more interventions, less pulmonary hypertension, and improved survival to 1 year of life. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of maternal complications, longitudinal survival rates, and neonatal outcomes of periviable deliveries according to gestational age throughout the admission enhances obstetric and perinatal counseling after hospital admission. KEY POINTS: · Periviable birth outcomes at different delivery milestones is important for counseling.. · Providing contemporary outcomes for periviable deliveries is critical for accurate counseling.. · Administration of antenatal corticosteroids at 22 weeks' gestation appears beneficial overall..

Outpatient Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor in Obese Nulliparous Patients: A Secondary Analysis of OFFSITE II Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: In the OFFSITE II randomized controlled trial, outpatient cervical ripening with a Foley catheter (CF) in nulliparous patients undergoing elective induction of labor (eIOL) shortened the time from admission to delivery. Given that patients with obesity have protracted labor and higher rates of failed IOL, we sought to determine if outpatient ripening with a CF may be even more beneficial for this high-risk group. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a secondary analysis of the OFFSITE II randomized controlled trial. For this analysis, all patients from the primary trial were classified by their intervention assignment (inpatient vs. outpatient) and also by their admission body mass index (BMI) class (BMI ≥ 30 and BMI < 30 kg/m2). The primary outcome was time from labor and delivery (L&D) admission to delivery. Secondary outcomes included cesarean delivery, time from admission to hospital discharge, and rates of clinically diagnosed chorioamnionitis and endometritis. RESULTS: In patients with BMI ≥ 30, the primary outcome, time from admission to delivery, (18.0 [13.5-20.9] vs. 20.4 [16.6-31.3] hours, p = 0.01), as well as total hospitalization length (3.2 [2.5-3.3] vs. 3.4 [3.1-4.3] days, p = 0.02) were shorter in the outpatient group. There were no differences in rates of chorioamnionitis or endometritis in outpatient compared with inpatient CF. Furthermore, in those with a BMI ≥ 30, the cesarean rate was significantly lower with outpatient CF (19.4% vs. 44.7%, p = 0.03); it was not statistically different in patients with BMI < 30. CONCLUSION: In this exploratory retrospective secondary analysis of the OFFSITE II randomized control trial, we found that in patients with BMI ≥ 30 undergoing eIOL, outpatient CF was associated with a lower time from L&D admission until delivery. This was also associated with a shorter time of total hospital duration and decreased the rate of cesarean, a benefit not detected in the overall analysis presented in the primary study. In nulliparas undergoing induction of labor, ripening with outpatient cervical Foley may even more significantly reduce labor duration, total hospital duration, and the rate of cesarean in patients with obesity. KEY POINTS: · Outpatient CF was associated with a lower time from L&D admission until delivery in obese nulliparas.. · Outpatient CF was associated with a shorter time of total hospital duration in obese nulliparas.. · Outpatient CF was associated with a decreased rate of cesarean birth in obese nulliparas..

Participation in obstetrical studies is associated with improved pregnancy outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The association between pregnant patients participating in obstetrical studies and pregnancy outcomes is understudied. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the association between participation in obstetrical studies and maternal and neonatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients delivering at a single center from 2013 to 2018. Patients with pregnancy loss at <13 weeks of gestation or major fetal anomalies were excluded. Patients who enrolled in one or more obstetrical studies were categorized as "study participants" and were compared with patients who did not enroll in an obstetrical study, that is, "study nonparticipants." The primary outcome was a composite of maternal morbidity diagnosed up to 6 weeks after delivery. The secondary outcomes included composite neonatal morbidity and other perinatal outcomes. Bivariate analyses compared baseline demographics and outcomes between groups. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Subgroup analyses by study design (trial or observational) were planned. RESULTS: Of 19,569 patients included in this analysis, 3848 (19.7%) were study participants, and 15,721 (80.3%) were study nonparticipants. Among study participants, 3023 (78.6%) enrolled in a trial, and 825 (21.4%) enrolled in an observational study. The study participants had higher body mass index and were more likely to be younger, non-Hispanic Black, publicly insured, nulliparous, and undergo cesarean delivery than study nonparticipants. Compared with study nonparticipants, the study participants had significantly lower odds of composite maternal morbidity (9.2% vs 8.7%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.73-0.95) and composite neonatal morbidity (27.5% vs 18.6%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.58). In addition, the odds of fetal death, 5-minute Apgar score of <5, neonatal death, maternal and neonatal intensive care unit admissions, and lengths of stay were lower for study participants than for study nonparticipants. In stratified analyses, maternal morbidity was only significantly decreased among trial participants; however, there was a significantly reduced odds of neonatal morbidity, regardless of study design (trial or observational vs no study). CONCLUSION: Participation in obstetrical studies was associated with decreased maternal and neonatal morbidities after adjusting for potential confounders. This underscored the importance of pregnant patients enrolling in obstetrical clinical studies and potentially benefiting from the additional surveillance. Further study of how study participation exerts this effect on pregnancy outcomes is warranted.

Early Gestational Diabetes Screening Based on ACOG Guidelines.

OBJECTIVE: A recent randomized controlled trial suggested that early gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) screening in patients with obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥30 kg/m2) does not improve perinatal outcomes. The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology currently recommends early screening for gestational diabetes in patients who are overweight with one or more additional risk factors. We evaluated the effect of screening based on the number of additional risk factors for development of gestational diabetes. STUDY DESIGN: This was a secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial of obese patients with singleton nonanomalous fetuses comparing early (14-20 weeks' gestation) with routine (24-28 weeks' gestation) GDM screening. Exclusion criteria were pregestational diabetes, major medical illnesses, bariatric surgery, chronic steroid use, and prior cesarean. Early versus routine GDM screening groups were compared and stratified by the number of additional risk factors for GDM (0, 1, 2, and ≥3). The primary outcome was an adverse perinatal composite outcome composed of: macrosomia, primary cesarean delivery, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, shoulder dystocia, neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, and neonatal hypoglycemia. Analyses examined effects of early versus routine screening by the number of additional risk factors and their possible interaction on the incidences of the primary outcome and GDM. RESULTS: Of 913 patients, 5% had 0, 52% had 1, 33% had 2, and 10% had ≥3 additional risk factors. Baseline characteristics, including the number and type of risk factors, were similar between early and routine screening groups. Breslow-Day test for interaction between early versus routine screening and the number of additional risk factors was not significant for either the primary outcome (p = 0.37) or the diagnosis of GDM (p = 0.28). The incidence of GDM and the adverse perinatal composite outcome increased as the number of risk factors increased (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients with BMI ≥30 kg/m2 and additional risk factors, early GDM screening does not prevent adverse outcomes. KEY POINTS: · The ACOG currently recommends early screening for gestational diabetes if patients have risk factors.. · Even in patients with multiple risk factors, early screening for GDM does not improve outcomes.. · Patients with three or more risk factors may have worse outcomes if they undergo early screening..

Early screening for gestational diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: Current evidence is conflicting on whether early screening and treatment for gestational diabetes mellitus improve pregnancy outcomes. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials aimed to assess the rate of adverse pregnancy outcomes among participants with early screening and treatment for gestational diabetes mellitus vs those with routine care. DATA SOURCES: A systematic review of the literature was conducted using MEDLINE, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, the Cochrane Library at the Central Register of Controlled Trials, and SciELO from inception to November 2021. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies were eligible for inclusion if they described randomized controlled trials comparing early screening with routine care for gestational diabetes mellitus to assess the effects of early screening and treatment on pregnancy outcomes. METHODS: All randomized controlled trials comparing early vs standard screening of gestational diabetes mellitus assessing the effect of early screening (defined as a screening at <20 weeks of gestation) vs routine screening (defined as a screening at ≥20 weeks of gestation) on pregnancy outcomes were included. The primary outcome was defined as large for gestational age, as defined by the trial. The secondary maternal and neonatal outcomes were also evaluated. Subgroup analyses were performed on the basis of screening strategy and methods. RESULTS: After exclusion, 8 randomized clinical trials (1920 participants) of early screening and treatment vs standard care were included. There were a total of 746 participants with early gestational diabetes mellitus. The risk of large for gestational age at birth did not differ between early screening and treatment for gestational diabetes mellitus and routine care among all included trials (8.1 vs 9.0%; relative risk, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.73-1.22). Trials with a protocol of universal screening of participants at their first prenatal visit (>80% screened with HbA1c) and receiving early treatment if the screening test returned positive had a lower risk of large for gestational age (2.3 vs 9.1%; relative risk, 0.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.90) than those who had routine screening and care. CONCLUSION: Overall, early screening and treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus did not reduce the risk of large for gestational age at birth. However, trials that screened all participants at their first visit and treated early, most for an HbA1c of 5.7% to 6.4%, had a reduced risk of large for gestational age at birth compared with routine care, suggesting a possible benefit of screening all pregnant patients. However, future well-designed trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Timing of Maternal Discharge after Cesarean Delivery and Risk of Maternal Readmission.

OBJECTIVE: Despite legislation and hospital policies (present in some institutions) mandating a minimum length of stay in an effort to decrease the frequency of hospital readmissions, the effectiveness of this approach remains uncertain.We hypothesized that following cesarean delivery (CD), the rates of maternal readmission or unscheduled health care visits are lower in patients discharged on postoperative day (POD) 3 or ≥4 as compared with those discharged earlier on POD 2. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized trial comparing adjunctive azithromycin for unscheduled CD to prevent infection. Groups were compared based on the duration of hospitalization measured in days from delivery (POD 0) to day of discharge and categorized as POD 2, 3, and ≥4. The primary outcome was the composite of any maternal postpartum readmission, unscheduled clinic, or emergency room (ER) visit, within 6 weeks of delivery. Secondary outcomes included components of the primary outcome and neonatal readmissions. We excluded women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and infections diagnosed prior to POD 2. RESULTS: A total of 1,391 patients were included. The rate of the primary outcome of any readmission increased with POD at discharge: 5.9% for POD 2, 9.4% for POD 3, and 10.9% for POD ≥4 group (trend for p = 0.03). The primary outcome increased with later discharge (POD ≥4 when compared with POD 2). Among components of the composite, ER and unscheduled clinic visits, but not maternal readmissions, increased with the timing of discharge for patients discharged on POD ≥4 when compared with POD 2. Using logistic regression, discharge on POD 3 and on POD ≥4 was significantly associated with the composite (adjusted odds ratios [aOR] 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.3-5.3]; aOR 2.9, 95% CI [1.3-6.4], respectively) compared with POD 2. CONCLUSION: The risk of maternal readmission composite following uncomplicated but unscheduled CD was not lower in patients discharged home on POD 3 or ≥4 compared with patients discharged earlier (POD 2). KEY POINTS: · Risk of maternal readmission is higher in patients discharged on POD 3 or 4 compared with POD 2.. · No significant differences by the timing of discharge were observed for any neonatal readmissions.. · Timing of discharge should include an individualized approach with the option of discharge by POD 2..

Contemporary Test Performance of the Random Urine Protein-to-creatinine Ratio.

OBJECTIVE: The random urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) is a screening test used for predicting clinically significant proteinuria (urine protein ≥ 300 mg) during pregnancy. No consensus exists on the optimal random UPCR cutoff for performing follow-up 24 hour urine (24H) total protein collection. We aim to evaluate the test performance of random UPCR in predicting proteinuria in a contemporary cohort. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of pregnant patients at our institution from 2014 to 2018 with a random UPCR and follow-up 24H protein collection. The primary analysis estimated the test characteristics (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values) of using random UPCR for the detection of proteinuria defined as urine protein ≥300 mg on 24H protein collection. UPCR cutoffs from 0.10 to 0.30 mg/dL were evaluated, receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed, and area under the curve (AUC) was determined. A secondary analysis examined the correlation between UPCR and 24H protein using least squares regression and Pearson correlation. RESULTS: Paired UPCR and 24H collection results were available for 1,120 patients. Mean gestational age at time of UPCR was 31.1 ± 5.1 weeks and 687 (61.3%) of patients had a 24H ≥300 mg. UPCR <0.10 mg/dL effectively excluded proteinuria ≥300 mg on 24H collection, while UPCR ≥0.18 mg/dL correctly classifies proteinuria with 91% sensitivity, 57% specificity, 77% positive predictive value, and 79% negative predictive value. UPCR ≥1.07 mg/dL had 100% specificity for 24 hour proteinuria. The area under ROC curve was 0.86. UPCR and 24H collection were highly correlated with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.85. After our institution lowered the threshold to obtain a 24H from UPCR ≥0.20 mg/dL to ≥0.10 mg/dL in May 2017, the percentage of patients meeting criteria for 24H collection increased from 57.8 to 84.4%. CONCLUSION: The AUC and Pearson correlation suggest random UPCR is a high performance test for the prediction of proteinuria on 24H. Optimal test performance is dependent upon clinical consideration and upon the implications of the disease or condition. A random UPCR screen positive threshold of 0.18 mg/dL maximizes sensitivity to identify clinically significant proteinuria. KEY POINTS: · Random urine protein to creatinine ratio is a high performance test for proteinuria.. · A random UPCR threshold of 0.18 mg/dL maximizes sensitivity to identify proteinuria.. · Optimal test performance is dependent on the disease or clinical condition..

Quantifying the additional maternal morbidity in women with preeclampsia with severe features in whom immediate delivery is recommended.

BACKGROUND: Preeclampsia with severe features when diagnosed at less than 34 weeks is associated with maternal morbidity and is managed by immediate delivery or inpatient expectant management. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare maternal morbidity in women with preeclampsia with severe features in whom the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends immediate delivery versus those eligible for expectant management. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of women with preeclampsia with severe features delivered between 23 to 34 weeks of gestation from 2013 to 2017 at a single tertiary center. Women were categorized into 2 groups: (1) those recommended by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists for immediate delivery, that is, ineligible for expectant management, and (2) those eligible for expectant management. The primary outcome was composite postpartum maternal morbidity, which included maternal intensive care unit admission, stroke, death, and other severe morbidities. The secondary outcomes included select adverse perinatal outcomes. Groups were compared and adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) calculated. RESULTS: Of the 1172 women with preeclampsia identified during the study period, 543 with preeclampsia with severe features were included for analysis: 211 (39%) were ineligible for expectant management and 332 (61%) were eligible for expectant management. Baseline characteristics, including age, body mass index, race and ethnicity, parity, marital status, and gestational age at preeclampsia diagnosis, were similar between the 2 groups. Women ineligible for expectant management had significantly higher composite postpartum maternal morbidity (adjusted odds ratio, 5.02 [95% confidence interval, 1.35-18.69]). In addition, those ineligible for expectant management were more likely to have postpartum intensive care unit admission (adjusted odds ratio, 4.19 [95% confidence interval, 1.09-16.16]) and postpartum hemoglobin level of <7 g/dL (adjusted odds ratio, 5.07 [95% confidence interval, 1.35-19.08]). There was no demonstrable difference in neonatal outcomes between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Women with preeclampsia with severe features who were ineligible for expectant management per the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines had a 5-fold increased risk of maternal morbidity, confirming the need for escalation of care and delivery without delay.

Value of HbA1c in Obese Women with Gestational Diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the association of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) with adverse perinatal outcomes in obese women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). STUDY DESIGN: This was a secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial assessing early (14-20 weeks) versus routine (24-28 weeks) screening for GDM in obese women. Women were included if they were diagnosed with GDM at either time during pregnancy and had a HbA1c result available. The primary exposure was HbA1c at 24 to 28 weeks. The primary outcome was a composite of macrosomia, primary cesarean, pregnancy-induced hypertension, shoulder dystocia, neonatal hypoglycemia, or hyperbilirubinemia. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were used to assess the association of HbA1c with the composite outcome. The Liu method was used to select an optimal HbA1c cutoff, and the incidence of the outcome compared. RESULTS: Of 125 women with GDM, 93 (74%) had a HbA1c at 24 to 28 weeks and 103 (82.4%) had a HbA1c at 14 to 20 weeks. Baseline characteristics were balanced between groups above and below the cutoff. The area under the ROC curve for HbA1c and its association with the adverse perinatal composite outcome was 0.6 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.5-0.7). The frequency of the primary outcome was similar among women with low and high HbA1c at 24 to 28 weeks (adjusted relative risk, 1.12, 95% CI: 0.97-1.29). Compared with women with a decreasing HbA1c during pregnancy, women with a stable or increasing HbA1c did not have a significant increase in the primary adverse perinatal composite outcome. However, the frequency of preterm delivery was higher among women with stable or increasing HbA1c compared with those with a decreasing HbA1c (26.1 vs. 6.7%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: A single HbA1c in women with GDM is not associated with a composite perinatal adverse outcome, but a HbA1c that increases or remains stable between 14 to 20 and 24 to 28 weeks is associated with an increase in preterm delivery. KEY POINTS: · A single HbA1c in GDM is not associated with a composite perinatal adverse outcome.. · HbA1c that increases or remains stable may be associated with an increase in preterm delivery.. · HbA1c at 24 to 28 weeks was not significantly associated with the adverse perinatal composite outcome..

Outcomes before and after Adopting Guidelines for Expectant Management of Severe Preeclampsia.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with severe preeclampsia before and after implementation of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) taskforce hypertensive guidelines. STUDY DESIGN: Single-center retrospective cohort study of women with severe preeclampsia delivering live nonanomalous singletons 23 to 342/7 weeks from 2013 to 2017. In 2015, the ACOG guidelines for expectant management of severe preeclampsia were implemented at our institution. Based on this, patients were categorized as preguideline (January 2013-December 2015) or postguideline adoption (January 2016-December 2017). Primary outcomes included composite maternal morbidity and composite neonatal morbidity; secondary outcomes included composite components, length of stay, birth weight, and delivery gestational age. Groups were compared with Student's t-test, Chi-square, and Wilcoxon's rank-sum tests; adjusted odds ratios (aOR; 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) were calculated. Yearly composite outcomes were compared using the Cochran-Armitage trend test. We estimated a sample size of 250 per group would provide 80% power at α = 0.05 to detect a 50% reduction in neonatal morbidity from a baseline rate of 21.5%. RESULTS: From 2013 to 2017, a total of 543 women with severe preeclampsia were identified: 278 (51%) preguideline and 265 (49%) postguideline. Baseline characteristics were overall similar between groups. There were no significant differences in maternal (aOR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.6-1.41) or neonatal (aOR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.61-1.28) composite morbidity between groups. Furthermore, there were no differences in composite maternal or neonatal morbidity over time. CONCLUSION: Perinatal outcomes were similar before and after implementation of severe preeclampsia management guidelines at our institution. Studies to evaluate if benefits are limited to subsets of this population, such as earlier gestational ages, are needed. KEY POINTS: · Expectant management of severe preeclampsia has yet to be fully evaluated outside of trial conditions.. · We did not see a significant improvement in neonatal composite morbidity/mortality.. · We also did not see a worsened composite maternal morbidity/mortality..

The Effects of Antepartum Depressive Symptoms on Postcesarean Opioid Consumption.

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to test the hypothesis that higher Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) scores are associated with increased pain scores and opioid use during postpartum hospitalization following cesarean section. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort of English or Spanish-speaking women ≥18 years who had prenatal care for a singleton gestation and delivered by cesarean at ≥36 weeks within a tertiary center during 2017. Exclusions included women with fetal anomalies, intrauterine fetal demise, sickle cell disease, previously diagnosed pain disorders (e.g., chronic pain or fibromyalgia), substance use disorder (based on documented prescription or use of methadone or buprenorphine), or reoperation during hospital stay. Women without an EPDS recorded antenatally were also excluded. Major depressive symptoms (MDS) were defined as a documented antenatal EPDS ≥12. Women with and without MDS were compared, and multivariable linear regression models were generated to evaluate associations between MDS status and both pain scores and opioid use. RESULTS: Of the 891 women meeting other inclusion criteria, 676 (76%) had documented antenatal EPDS scores, and 104 (15.4%) of those had MDS. Women with MDS were more likely to be use tobacco and have general anesthesia for cesarean delivery, but groups were otherwise similar. Women with MDS reported higher daily and average pain scores postpartum (2.4 vs. 1.7 average; p < 0.001). Women with MDS used more morphine milligram equivalents (MME) each day during their postpartum hospitalization, leading to a higher total MME use (121 mg [60.5-214.5] vs. 75 mg [28.5-133.5], p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: We found an association between antepartum depressive symptoms and acute pain after cesarean delivery leading to increased opioid use. Given the current focus on opioid stewardship, further research into this association, exploration of tailored pain control, and determining whether treatment of antepartum MDS reduces postpartum pain, and therefore opioid use, will be of the utmost priority. KEY POINTS: · Women with MDS report higher pain scores postcesarean.. · Women with MDS use more opioids postcesarean.. · Future studies are needed for the treatment of MDS..

Skin preparation type and post-cesarean infection with use of adjunctive azithromycin prophylaxis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the frequency of postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) by type of skin preparation used for unscheduled cesarean in the setting of adjunctive azithromycin prophylaxis. METHODS: Secondary analysis of a multi-center randomized controlled trial of adjunctive azithromycin (500 mg intravenous) versus placebo in women who were ≥24 weeks gestation and undergoing unscheduled cesarean (i.e. during labor or ≥4 h after membrane rupture). Type of skin preparation used was identified based on the protocol at the hospital at the time of delivery: iodine-alcohol, chlorhexidine, chlorhexidine-alcohol, or the combination of chlorhexidine-alcohol and iodine. The primary outcome of this analysis was incidence of post-operative SSI, as defined by CDC criteria. Multivariable logistic regression was applied for adjustments. RESULTS: All 2013 women in the primary trial were included in this analysis. Women were grouped according to type of skin preparation received: iodine-alcohol (n = 193), chlorhexidine (n = 733), chlorhexidine-alcohol (n = 656), and chlorhexidine-alcohol and iodine combined sequentially (n = 431). The unadjusted rates of wound infection ranged from 2.9% to 5.7%. Using iodine-alcohol as the referent, the adjusted odds ratios for wound SSI were 0.71 (95% CI 0.30-1.66) for chlorhexidine, 0.97 (95% CI 0.41-2.28) for chlorhexidine-alcohol, and 0.88 (95% CI 0.36-2.20) for chlorhexidine-alcohol with iodine combination. CONCLUSION: In women undergoing unscheduled cesarean delivery in a trial of adjunctive azithromycin, the type of skin preparation used did not appear to be associated with the frequency of wound SSI.

The Association of Cesarean Skin Incision Length and Postoperative Wound Complications.

OBJECTIVE: This study was aimed to evaluate the relationship between cesarean skin incision length and wound complications. STUDY DESIGN: Planned secondary analysis of a multicenter double-blind randomized trial of adjunctive azithromycin versus placebo (in addition to standard cefazolin) in women ≥24 weeks undergoing cesarean delivery during labor or ≥4 hours after membrane rupture. Skin incision length (cm) was measured just prior to skin closure. The primary outcome was a composite of wound complications (wound infection, separation, seroma, hematoma, or dehiscence) up to 6 weeks of postpartum. Individual components of the composite were examined as secondary outcomes. Outcomes were compared between groups defined by the lowest (≤25th), middle (25-75th) and highest (>75th) incision length quartiles. Logistic regression was used to adjust for potential confounding variables. RESULTS: Of the 2,013 women enrolled in the primary trial, 1,916 had recorded incision lengths and were included in this secondary analysis. The overall rate of composite wound complications was 7.8%. Median incision length was 15.0 cm (interquartile range: 14.0-16.5) with the lowest quartile defined as ≤14, middle as >14 to ≤16.5, and highest as >16.5 cm. Mean BMI, parity, use of staples, and duration of surgery differed significantly between the three incision length groups. In unadjusted analysis, the longest incision lengths were associated with an increased risk of the wound composite and wound infections (odds ratio [OR] = 2.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.43-3.60 and OR = 2.30, 95% CI: 1.27-4.15, respectively) compared with the shortest incision lengths. However, after multivariable adjustments, these associations were nullified. Additional analyses considering incision length as a continuous variable and using 10th/90th percentile cut-offs still did not suggest any associations with outcomes. CONCLUSION: Increasing skin incision length is not independently associated with an increased risk of postoperative wound complications. KEY POINTS: · After multivariable adjustments, skin incision length was not independently associated with an increased risk of postoperative wound complications.. · A reasonable incision length needed to safely perform the procedure should be used..

Single Dose of Oral Azithromycin With or Without Amoxicillin to Prevent Peripartum Infection in Laboring, High-Risk Women in Cameroon: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of single-dose azithromycin, with or without amoxicillin, with placebo to prevent peripartum infection in laboring women. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, three-group, double-blind randomized controlled trial of women with viable term nonanomalous pregnancies with either prolonged labor of 18 hours or longer or rupture of membranes for 8 hours or longer in Cameroon. Women with chorioamnionitis before randomization, study drug contraindications, or planned cesarean births were excluded. Women were randomized to oral azithromycin 1 g-placebo (group 1), oral azithromycin 1 g-oral amoxicillin 2 g (group 2), or placebo-placebo (group 3). All groups received usual care, including antibiotics given at the health care professional's discretion. The primary outcome was a composite of maternal peripartum infection or death from any cause up to 6 weeks postpartum. Two primary comparisons (group 1 vs group 3 and group 2 vs group 3) were planned. We estimated that 241 women per group (planning for 750 total) would provide 80% power at two-sided α=0.05 (0.025 per comparison) to detect a 50% effect size assuming 20% baseline composite infection rate. RESULTS: From January 6, 2018, to May 15, 2020, 6,531 women were screened, and 756 (253 in group 1, 253 in group 2, and 250 in group 3) were randomized. Baseline characteristics (including body mass index, duration of rupture of membranes or labor, and parity) were balanced across groups, except for maternal age. More than 60% of women in each group received usual-care antibiotics: more than 90% penicillin and approximately 50% for prolonged rupture of membranes across all study groups. Composite outcome incidences were similar in antibiotic groups 1 (6%) and 2 (7%) compared with placebo group 3 (10%) (RR 0.6, 95% CI 0.3-1.2; 0.7, 95% CI 0.4-1.3, respectively). Chorioamnionitis and wound infection were significantly lower in group 2 (3.2% vs 0.4% and 4% vs 0.8% respectively, both P=.02) compared with group 3. There were no differences in other maternal or neonatal outcomes including neonatal infection. CONCLUSION: A single dose of oral azithromycin with or without amoxicillin for prolonged labor or rupture of membranes at term did not reduce maternal peripartum or neonatal infection. Observed lower than expected infection rates and frequent usual-care antibiotic use may have contributed to these findings. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03248297. FUNDING SOURCE: Merck for Mothers Investigator Studies Program grant.

Adolescent emergency contraception usage, knowledge, and perception.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe the current usage patterns, knowledge regarding, and perception of emergency contraception in adolescent patients. STUDY DESIGN: We surveyed female patients ages 14 to 21 seen at the Pediatric and Gynecology Clinic regarding emergency contraception. We posed questions to understand adolescent awareness, personal usage, and means of obtaining emergency contraception. We also explored respondent knowledge of emergency contraception and potential barriers to access. RESULTS: Of 261 patients approached, 253 completed the survey with a mean age of 16.7 ± 1.7 years. The majority of respondents (80.2%) had heard of oral emergency contraceptive pills. Among sexually active adolescents, 25.6 % reported personal use. Older adolescents (≥18 years) were more likely to have heard of emergency contraceptive pills, to know someone who used them, and to have used it themselves compared to younger adolescents (all p < 0.05). A minority of respondents knew that emergency contraception could be bought over the counter regardless of age or gender (44.3%) and that parental consent is not required (27.7%). Having ever been sexually active was associated with an increased odds of being correct with regards to the availability and timing of LNG EC. A history of LNG EC use was associated with an increased likelihood of understanding the mechanism of action and side effects of LNG EC. CONCLUSIONS: Though adolescents in our population were aware of emergency contraception, only a small portion had used it themselves. Misunderstandings regarding the availability and safety of emergency contraception were common in our population. IMPLICATIONS: Educating adolescents on the availability, safety, and mechanism of action of LNG EC may improve utilization of LNG EC in this population.

Patient Satisfaction with Outpatient Cervical Ripening in Parous Women.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess whether patient satisfaction differs between women beginning cervical ripening in the outpatient versus inpatient setting. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a planned secondary analysis evaluating patient satisfaction randomized to outpatient versus inpatient cervical ripening. In the original randomized controlled trial, low-risk parous women ≥39 weeks who required cervical ripening for induction and had reassuring fetal heart rate monitoring were included and randomized to inpatient versus outpatient ripening with a transcervical Foley's catheter. All women were then admitted to the labor ward on the following day. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using three separate surveys. The first two surveys, Six Simple Questions and Lady-X, were previously validated. The third survey used visual analog scales to assess overall pain experienced during Foley's placement, overall pain experienced during labor, how likely they would be to choose the same type of care for their next pregnancy, and how likely they would be to recommend their method of cervical ripening to friends/family. RESULTS: From May 2016 to October 2017, 129 women were randomized (outpatient, 65; inpatient, 64). Based on survey results, there was no difference in satisfaction between outpatient and inpatient cervical ripening with transcervical Foley's catheterization, with high satisfaction in both groups. Patients in both the outpatient and inpatient groups would choose the same type of care for their next pregnancy (on a scale of 1-7, median (25th-75th percentile): 7 [7-7] vs. 7 [6-7], respectively, p = 0.75) and would be very likely to recommend their method of induction to a friend or family member (on a scale of 0-100, 99 [80-100] vs. 99 [65-100], respectively, p = 0.60). CONCLUSION: Parous women's satisfaction does not differ between inpatient and outpatient cervical ripening with transcervical Foley's catheterization. KEY POINTS: · Outpatient cervical ripening may allow providers to incorporate the benefits of electively inducing women as well as decrease the time spent in the labor and delivery unit.. · Parous women's satisfaction does not differ between inpatient and outpatient cervical ripening with transcervical Foley.. · Additional prospective evaluation is warranted to further characterize patient preferences in relation to the location of cervical ripening..

Epidemiology of readmissions in early infancy following nonelective cesarean delivery.

OBJECTIVE: Determine incidence and risk factors for readmissions in early infancy. STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of data from the Cesarean Section Optimal Antibiotic Prophylaxis trial. All unplanned revisits (unplanned clinic, ER visits, and hospital readmissions) and hospital readmissions (initial discharge to 3-month follow-up) were analyzed. RESULTS: 295 (15.9%) of 1850 infants had revisits with risk factors being ethnicity (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.6 for Hispanic), maternal postpartum antibiotics (1.89), azithromycin treatment (1.22), small for gestational age (1.68), apnea (3.82), and hospital stay after birth >90th percentile (0.49). 71 (3.8%) of 1850 infants were readmitted with risk factors being antenatal steroids (aOR 2.49), elective repeat C/section (0.72), postpartum maternal antibiotics (2.22), O2 requirement after delivery room (2.82), and suspected/proven neonatal sepsis (0.55). CONCLUSION(S): Multiple risk factors were identified, suggesting potential impact on the neonatal microbiome (maternal postpartum antibiotics) or issues related to access/cost of care (Hispanic ethnicity associated with fewer revisits).