Clinical Course and Outcomes of COVID-19 in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Introduction: Kidney transplant recipients (KTR) are at increased risk of morbidity and mortality due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study aimed to explore the clinical characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 in KTR. Methods: We reviewed the clinical profile, outcomes, and immunological responses of recipients admitted with COVID-19. We determined the risk factors for mortality and severe COVID-19. Results: Out of 452 recipients on follow-up, 60 were admitted with COVID-19. Prevalent comorbidities were hypertension (71%), diabetes (40%), lung disease (17%). About 27% had tuberculosis. The median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score at presentation was 3 (interquartile range [IQR] 1-5). There was a high incidence of diarrhea (52%) and anemia (82%). Treatment strategies included antimetabolite withdrawal (85%), calcineurin inhibitor decrease or withdrawal (64%), increased steroids (53%), hydroxychloroquine (21%), remdesivir (28.3%), and tocilizumab (3.3%). Severe COVID-19 occurred in 34 (56.4%) patients. During a median follow-up of 42.5 days (IQR 21-81 days), 83% developed acute kidney injury (AKI) and eight (13%) died. Mortality was associated with the baseline graft dysfunction, hypoxia at admission, lower hemoglobin and platelets, higher transaminases, higher C reactive protein, diffuse radiological lung involvement, hypotension requiring inotropes, and Kidney Diseases Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) stage 3 AKI (univariate analysis). Around 57% of patients remained RT-PCR positive at the time of discharge. By the last follow-up, 66.6% of patients developed IgM (immunoglobulin M) antibodies and 82.3% of patients developed IgG antibodies. Conclusion: COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients is associated with a high risk of AKI and significant mortality.

Recovery of kidney function after AKI because of COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients.

Evidence on the evolution of graft function in kidney transplant recipients recovering from coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is lacking. This multicenter observational study evaluated the short-term clinical outcomes in recipients with acute kidney injury (AKI) secondary to COVID-19. Out of 452 recipients following up at five centers, 50 had AKI secondary to COVID-19. 42 recipients with at least 3-month follow-up were included. Median follow-up was 5.23 months [IQR 4.09-6.99]. Severe COVID-19 was seen in 21 (50%), and 12 (28.6%) had KDIGO stage 3 AKI. Complete recovery of graft function at 3 months was seen in 17 (40.5%) patients. Worsening of proteinuria was seen in 15 (37.5%) patients, and 4 (9.5%) patients had new onset proteinuria. Graft failure was seen in 6 (14.3%) patients. Kidney biopsy revealed acute tubular injury (9/11 patients), thrombotic microangiopathy (2/11), acute cellular rejection (2/11), and chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (3/11). Patients with incomplete recovery were likely to have lower eGFR and proteinuria at baseline, historical allograft rejection, higher admission SOFA score, orthostatic hypotension, and KDIGO stage 3 AKI. Baseline proteinuria and the presence of orthostatic hypotension independently predicted incomplete graft recovery. This shows that graft recovery may remain incomplete after AKI secondary to COVID-19.

Late-Onset Cytomegalovirus Gastritis in Low-Risk Renal Allograft Recipients.

OBJECTIVES: Skin grafting has been evolving as an important application in reconstructive surgery. Mixed reports about the survival of allogeneic and xenogeneic keratinocytes require further substantiation to determine the role of these cells in wound healing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Rabbit and rat skins were recovered and cultured in vitro. Full-thickness wounds were created on the dorsum of rabbits (2 cm × 2 cm; n = 4). Cultured epithelial autograft, allograft, and xenograft cells were sprayed onto 3 freshly created wounds, with 1 wound acting as a control. The wounds were monitored every 2 days for 4 weeks. After 4 weeks, the rabbits were killed; skin biopsies were taken from each healed wound and stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and epidermal thickness was measured. RESULTS: All examined grafts showed favorable healing outcomes because the wounds appeared similar to normal skin upon healing. The only observed significant difference was the thickness of the epidermis layer, which was thinner in the xenograft (P = .002) than the autograft or allograft. Morphologic evaluation of the skin surface showed that the rat skin was thinner than the rabbit skin. The graft that achieved the best result was the autograft because the thickness was similar to and mimicked normal skin. CONCLUSIONS: All 3 grafts (autograft, allograft, and xenograft) have the potential to reconstitute epithelial defects. This approach can overcome the limitation of autologous skin donor sites, especially in burn cases.

Subcutaneous hyalohyphomycosis caused by Fusarium in a kidney transplant recipient.

Fusarium is a filamentous opportunistic pathogenic fungus responsible for superficial as well as invasive infection in immunocompromized hosts. Net state of immunosuppression and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection appear to predispose to this disease which is life-threatening when disseminated. Though infections with Fusarium have been widely described in hematological malignancies and hematopoietic stem cell transplant cases, they have been reported to be rare in solid organ transplant recipients, are often localized and carry a favorable prognosis. We here describe a rare case of subcutaneous non-invasive infection with Fusarium in a renal allograft recipient two and half years after transplantation. Patient had a previous history of CMV infection along with multiple other recurrent co-infections. Diagnosis was based on culture of tissue specimens yielding Fusarium species. The infection had a protracted course with persistence of lesions after treatment with voriconazole alone, requiring a combination of complete surgical excision and therapy with the anti-fungal drug.

Earlier-start versus usual-start dialysis in patients with community-acquired acute kidney injury: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Optimum timing of the initiation of dialysis therapy in acute kidney injury is not clear. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, open label, 2-arm, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 208 adults with acute kidney injury with progressively worsening azotemia at the artificial kidney dialysis unit of a tertiary-care referral center in western India. INTERVENTION: Earlier-start dialysis was initiated when serum urea nitrogen and/or creatinine levels increased to 70 and 7 mg/dL, respectively, whereas the usual-start dialysis patients (control group) received dialysis when clinically indicated as judged by treating nephrologists. OUTCOMES: Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and dialysis dependence at 3 months. Secondary outcome in patients receiving dialysis was time to recovery of kidney function, computed from time of enrollment to the last dialysis session. RESULTS: Of 585 screened patients, 102 were assigned to earlier-start dialysis, and 106 to usual-start dialysis. Baseline characteristics were similar between randomized groups. 93 (91.1%) and 88 (83.1%) participants received dialysis in the intervention and control groups, respectively. Mean serum urea nitrogen and serum creatinine levels at dialysis therapy initiation were 71.7 ± 21.7 (SD) and 7.4 ± 5.3 mg/dL, respectively, in the intervention group versus 100.9 ± 32.6 and 10.41 ± 3.3 mg/dL in the control group. Data on primary outcome were available for all patients. In-hospital mortality was 20.5% and 12.2% in the intervention and control groups, respectively (relative risk, 1.67; 95% CI, 0.88-3.17; P = 0.2). 4.9% and 4.7% of patients in the intervention and control groups, respectively, were dialysis dependent at 3 months (relative risk, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.29-3.7; P = 0.9). LIMITATIONS: Study was not double blind, event rate (ie, mortality) was less than predicted, wide CIs preclude definitive findings. CONCLUSIONS: Our data do not support the earlier initiation of dialysis therapy in community-acquired acute kidney injury.