Patterns of Vasoactive Agent Initiation Among Children With Septic Shock in the Pediatric Emergency Department.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to describe patterns of initiation (and factors associated with delayed initiation) of vasoactive agents among pediatric emergency patients with septic shock. METHODS: Patients with septic shock from November 2013 to September 2016 who had a vasoactive agent initiated for documented hypotension were classified as "guideline adherent" (hypotensive following the final fluid bolus and had vasoactive agents initiated within 60 minutes) or "delayed initiation" (hypotensive after the final bolus and were initiated on vasoactive agents after >60 minutes). Patient-level factors (demographics, presence of underlying condition including central venous catheter, and markers of disease severity) and outcomes (mortality, length of stay) were compared between groups. RESULTS: Of the 37 eligible patients, 17 received vasoactive agents within "guideline adherent" timelines and 10 were "delayed initiation." An additional group was identified as "transient responders"; these patients were normotensive after a final fluid bolus but developed hypotension and were initiated on a vasoactive agent within 2 hours after admission (n = 10). We found no significant difference between the "guideline adherent" and "delayed initiation" groups according to patient-level factors or outcomes; "transient responders" were more likely than other groups to have a central venous catheter and had longer lengths of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Although there are perceived barriers to vasoactive agent initiation, we found no significant difference in patient-level factors between the timely and delayed groups. This study also identified a group of patients labeled as transient responders, who initially appeared volume responsive but who required vasoactive support within several hours. This cohort requires further study.

Standardization of Feeding Advancement After Neonatal Gastrointestinal Surgery: Does It Improve Outcomes?

BACKGROUND: Postabdominal intestinal surgery (PAIS) infants pose many complex management issues. Utilization of feeding guidelines has been shown to improve outcomes in preterm and low-birth-weight infants. We propose that standardization of feeding for PAIS infants is safe. METHODS: We identified 163 PAIS infants: 93 prior to and 70 after implementation of a feeding guideline. The primary outcome was time to full enteral nutrition (EN). A propensity score-matched analysis was performed. RESULTS: The preimplementation and postimplementation PAIS infants were similar at baseline. No significant differences were seen in matched groups for time to full EN, parenteral nutrition days, or time to discharge, but cholestasis was less severe in the postimplementation group and breast milk use increased. Good compliance (67%) to daily guideline use was achieved during the initial 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of a feeding guideline is safe and standardizes care within an institution, improving compliance to evidence-based practices and outcomes.