Immediate dental rehabilitation in fibula free flaps for malignancy: Is it feasible?

BACKGROUND: Fibula free flap reconstruction has revolutionized maxillofacial reconstruction. While immediate dental rehabilitation with dental implants and teeth has shown benefits, it remains uncommon, especially for patients with malignancy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study at a single institution explored immediate dental rehabilitation in fibula flaps for patients with malignant disease. Thirteen patients with malignancies that underwent immediate fibula free flap reconstruction with dental implants and dental prosthesis were included with a minimum of 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: Forty eight implants replaced 90 teeth in 13 patients. All implants were integrated at 3 months, with an overall success rate of 87.5%. Two patients experienced delayed (>3 months postoperatively) implant loss due to osteoradionecrosis and infection. Peri-mucositis occurred in three patients which resolved with treatment. Skin paddles were used in 11 patients and radiation therapy was not delayed for any patient. CONCLUSION: With proper patient selection, diagnosis of malignancy and the need for osteocutaneous flap reconstruction does not exclude the ability to place immediate implants and deliver an immediate dental prosthesis in head and neck reconstruction.

The effect of free flap surgery for oral cancer on laryngeal grade and intubation difficulty.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the change in laryngeal grade and intubation difficulty at subsequent surgery in patients with prior free flap reconstruction for oral cancer. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective case series included patients with a diagnosis of oral cancer who underwent free flap reconstruction (FFR) (S1) followed by a subsequent surgery (S2) which required intubation. The primary predictor variable was FFR. The primary outcome variable was the change in laryngeal grade, based on the classification of Cormack and Lehane, after FFR. Secondary outcomes were intubation difficulty and number of intubation attempts. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were included in the study. At S1, the average laryngeal grade was 1.1. There were 5 difficult intubations. The average time to S2 was 19 months. At S2, average laryngeal grade was 1.4. There were 17 difficult intubations. Analysis showed a significant association between FFR and a more obstructed view of the glottis at S2 (P = .007; 95% CI 0.101-0.808). FFR increased the odds of having >1 intubation attempt nearly 7-fold (OR 6.74; 95% CI 1.35-33.75), and the odds of a difficult intubation nearly 6-fold (OR 5.95; 95% CI 1.84-19.19) at S2, both of which were significant (P = .011 and P = .002, respectively) CONCLUSIONS: This investigation found an association between FFR for patients with oral cancer and a higher laryngeal grade - that is, a more obstructed view of the glottis - at subsequent surgery, in addition to increased intubation difficulty and greater number of intubation attempts.

Immediate Teeth in Fibulas Versus Standard Fibula Free Flap: A Comparison of Donor Surgical Site Infections.

BACKGROUND: Immediate placement of dental implants with dental restoration at the leg donor site requires implant components and prosthetic materials that are not packaged sterile. PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine if there was a difference in donor surgical site infection between patients that received a fibula free flap with dental implants and immediate teeth (ITFFF: immediate teeth fibula free flap) before flap transfer to the defect site when compared to standard fibula free flaps (SFFFs) without dental implant placement. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: A retrospective cohort study was designed and implemented. The study population was composed of patients who underwent free fibula flap transfer for the treatment of benign or malignant conditions of the head and neck from 2015 to 2022. Patients who received immediate dental implants without teeth were excluded, since those implants are sterile and buried under soft tissue. PREDICTOR VARIABLE: The surgical treatment with either ITFFF or SFFF was treated as the primary predictor variable. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE: The primary outcome variable was postoperative donor surgical site infection. COVARIATES: There were 12 covariate variables including age, sex, diabetes diagnosis, immunosuppression/prior chemotherapy treatment, body mass index, smoking status, pack year history, pathology treated, technique for fibula donor site closure, skin paddle harvest, skin paddle area (cm2), and negative pressure wound therapy. ANALYSES: For the effect of the covariates on the primary predictor variable, χ2 analyses and t-tests were used. The effect of the primary predictor variable on the primary outcome was evaluated using χ2 analysis. A P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: There were 37 patients in the ITFFF group and 47 in the SFFF group. The donor site infection rate for the entire study population was 2.38%. In the ITFFF group, there was 1 donor surgical site infection (2.70%), and in the SFFF group there was also 1 donor surgical site infection (2.13%). There was no significant difference in donor surgical site infection between the groups (P = .86). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: This study found no difference in donor surgical site infection rates between patients who received ITFFF versus SFFF. The overall donor surgical site infection rate following fibula free flap is low.

Clinical outcomes following intraoperative pedicle disruption in fibula free flaps.

OBJECTIVES: Iatrogenic injury of the fibula free flap pedicle is rare. Postoperative flap survival and reconstructive outcomes following intraoperative pedicle severance are unknown. This study assesses free flap outcomes following accidental severance of the peroneal vessels. METHODS: Multi-institutional retrospective chart review from 2000 to 2020. RESULTS: Of 2975 harvested fibula free flaps, 26 had a history of pedicle severance during surgical reconstruction. Reasons for intraoperative pedicle severance included transection during muscular dissection 10/26 (39%), accidental severance with the bone saw 12/26 (46%), and other 4/26 (15.6%). The surgeon responsible for pedicle severance included residents 5/26 (19%), fellows 10/26 (39%), attendings 10/26 (39%), and unknown 1/26 (3.9%). The pedicle artery and vein were severed 10/26 (39%), artery 8/26 (31%), and vein 8/26 (31%). Truncated pedicle vessels were used 3/26 (11.7%), intraoperative anastomoses were performed 23/26 (89%). Postoperative revision in the OR within 7 days of surgery was required 6/26 (23%); 4 flaps were salvaged and 2 flaps failed, both arterial thrombosis. Flap failure was attributed to vascular thrombosis. Long-term flap survival and successful reconstructions were reported 24/26 (92%). CONCLUSION: Accidental severance of fibula free flap pedicle vessels can be corrected with intraoperative repair, without affecting long-term flap survival or reconstructive outcomes. Protecting the flap vessels while using the bone saw and during intramuscular dissection prevents accidental severance.

Early Stage Melanoma of the Vermillion with Mucosal Melanoma in Situ: A Clinical Conundrum.

BACKGROUND: Melanoma is a predominantly cutaneous malignancy associated with sun exposure. Mucosal melanoma is rare and carries a distinct pathogenesis from cutaneous tumors. The vermillion of the lip is a unique site that divides cutaneous from mucosal tissues. Tumors arising on the dry aspect are classified as cutaneous and those of the wet aspect are mucosal. The distinction is importation in tumor staging as all mucosal melanomas are classified as T3-T4b under the current 8th edition American Joint Committee of Cancer (AJCC) guidelines. METHODS: We describe a case of early stage melanoma of the vermillion with associated mucosal melanoma in situ. We discuss nuances of management at this site and the distinctions between cutaneous versus mucosal melanomas with a review of the literature. RESULTS: Our patient was treated surgically with 2-3 cm margins. Residual melanoma in situ was present at the mucosal margin on final pathology which required a second surgery for margin revision. The case was discussed at tumor board with recommendation for no further treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The nuances between the vermillion and mucosal lip must be understood for appropriate staging and treatment of melanomas. The paucity of literature on melanomas affecting this site render management decisions challenging. Multidisciplinary discussion is essential for guiding care.

Utilizing a Nasal Speculum in Maxillofacial Trauma and Deep Space Neck Infections: A Technical Note.

Maxillofacial trauma and odontogenic infections demand surgical access to sites often distant from wounds or incisions. We describe a simple, cost-effective, safe, and easy-to-implement technique of using a nasal speculum to facilitate surgical access in deep wounds of the head and neck region. This manuscript will describe 2 common indications and the technique for employing the nasal speculum as an adjunctive tool in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

An Endonasal Incision Adds a Second Vector of Manipulation During Percutaneous Reduction of Fractures Involving the Frontonasal Region.

STUDY DESIGN: A case report. OBJECTIVE: To describe a modification of percutaneous reduction of frontal sinus and/or naso-orbito-ethmoid (NOE) fractures, adding an endonasal intercartilaginous incision to provide a second vector of manipulation. METHODS: Case report with particular attention paid to surgical technique, followed by a brief review of relevant literature. RESULTS: Technique: A Carroll-Girard screw is used to engage the thickest part of the anterior wall of the frontal bone through a stab incision just superior to the frontonasal junction. An endonasal intercartilaginous incision is then made and a Cottle elevator is introduced to manipulate the fracture from the inferior aspect of the frontonasal junction. The percutaneous screw and the endonasal elevator provide perpendicular vectors for manipulation, thereby improving ability to reduce fractures when percutaneous traction alone is not successful. The technique is described here in a patient with anterior table frontal sinus fractures combined with posteriorly displaced Markowitz type 1 NOE fractures. CONCLUSION: While percutaneous reduction of frontal sinus fractures has been previously described, this report adds a subtle but important modification both in indication and technique for optimizing reduction while maintaining surgical simplicity and minimizing morbidity.