Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Crit Care Med ; 47(12): 1759-1765, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31567345

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Current international guidelines offer a conditional recommendation to consider a single dose of IV desmopressin (DDAVP) for antiplatelet-associated intracranial hemorrhage based on low-quality evidence. We provide the first comparative assessment analyzing DDAVP effectiveness and safety in antiplatelet-associated intracranial hemorrhage. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Single tertiary care academic medical center. PATIENTS: Adult patients taking at least one antiplatelet agent based on presenting history and documented evidence of intracranial hemorrhage on cerebral CT scan were included. Patients were excluded for the following reasons: repeat cerebral CT scan not performed within the first 24 hours, noncomparative repeat cerebral CT scan, chronic anticoagulation, administration of fibrinolytic medications, concurrent ischemic stroke, and neurosurgical intervention. In total, 124 patients were included, 55 received DDAVP and 69 did not. INTERVENTIONS: DDAVP treatment at recognition of antiplatelet-associated intracranial hemorrhage versus nontreatment. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Primary effectiveness outcome was intracranial hemorrhage expansion greater than or equal to 3 mL during the first 24 hospital hours. Primary safety outcomes were the largest absolute decrease from baseline serum sodium during the first 3 treatment days and new-onset thrombotic events during the first 7 days. DDAVP was associated with 88% decreased likelihood of intracranial hemorrhage expansion during the first 24 hours ([+] DDAVP, 10.9% vs [-] DDAVP, 36.2%; p = 0.002; odds ratio [95% CI], 0.22 [0.08-0.57]). Largest median absolute decrease from baseline serum sodium ([+] DDAVP, 0 mEq/L [0-5 mEq/L] vs [-] DDAVP, 0 mEq/L [0-2 mEq/L]; p = 0.089) and thrombotic events ([+] DDAVP, 7.3% vs [-] DDAVP, 1.4%; p = 0.170; odds ratio [95% CI], 5.33 [0.58-49.16]) were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: DDAVP was associated with a decreased likelihood of intracranial hemorrhage expansion during the first 24 hours. DDAVP administration did not significantly affect serum sodium and thrombotic events during the study period.


Assuntos
Desamino Arginina Vasopressina/uso terapêutico , Hemostáticos/uso terapêutico , Hemorragias Intracranianas/induzido quimicamente , Hemorragias Intracranianas/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Desamino Arginina Vasopressina/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Hemostáticos/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Undersea Hyperb Med ; 41(5): 393-7, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25558548

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Middle ear barotrauma (MEB) is a common complication of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) therapy. The purpose of this study was to determine the overall incidence of MEB and evaluate for differences in the incidence of MEB at different rates of compression (ROC). The study also sought to identify other potential risk factors for MEB. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on patients undergoing HBO2 at an academic regional level 1 trauma center. The MEB overall incidence as well as incidence at different ROC were determined. RESULTS: 236 patients representing 4,981 treatments were analyzed. The overall incidence of MEB was 43.2%. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of MEB at different ROC. There was a statistically significant higher incidence of TEED 4 MEB in intubated patients (p < 0.0001). The vast majority of MEB was minor when considering severity based on overall lower TEED scores of 1 or 2 (84%). DISCUSSION: The overall incidence of MEB in this study is consistent with those previously reported. It is important to note that a vast majority of MEB was minor. This supports HBO2 as a safe treatment modality with minimal overall risk. The current study supports standardization of most treatment protocols to a ROC of 2 psi/minute.


Assuntos
Pressão Atmosférica , Barotrauma/epidemiologia , Orelha Média/lesões , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/efeitos adversos , Barotrauma/etiologia , Sedação Consciente , Estado de Consciência , Feminino , Humanos , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/estatística & dados numéricos , Incidência , Intubação/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pressão/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
4.
Undersea Hyperb Med ; 41(5): 379-85, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25558546

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) therapy uses different maximum treatment pressures. A side effect of HBO2 is oxygen toxicity seizure. The purpose of this study was to determine the overall incidence of oxygen toxicity seizure and assess risk at different treatment pressures. METHOD: A retrospective chart review was performed on patients who underwent HBO2 at a university hospital and at an outpatient center. Statistical analysis was performed to determine overall incidence of seizure and identify risk factors including maximum treatment pressure. RESULTS: A total of 931 patients were identified representing a total of 23,328 treatments. The overall incidence of seizure was one in 2,121 treatments (five per 10,000). There were zero per 10,000 at 2.0 atmospheres absolute/atm abs (0/16,430), 15 per 10,000 at 2.4/2.5 atm abs (1/669) and 51 per 10,000 at 2.8 atm abs (1/197). There was a statistically significant difference for seizure between the different pressures (χ2 (2, 23,540) = 31.38, p < .001). DISCUSSION: The overall incidence of oxygen toxicity seizure in this study is consistent with recent reports. This study demonstrated a statistically significant increased risk of seizure with increasing treatment pressure. Treatment at higher pressure should be chosen based on demonstrable benefit with a clear understanding of increased risk with higher pressure.


Assuntos
Pressão Atmosférica , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/efeitos adversos , Oxigênio/intoxicação , Convulsões/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Ar , Intoxicação por Monóxido de Carbono/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/estatística & dados numéricos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pressão/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Convulsões/etiologia , Fatores de Tempo
5.
J Am Coll Clin Wound Spec ; 5(1): 14-8, 2013 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26199884

RESUMO

We present the case of a 69 year-old gentleman with non-healing ulcers of the bilateral medial malleoli as a result of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). The patient discussed was diagnosed with stage IV mantle cell lymphoma. Over the course of 4 years the patient was treated with autologous stem cell transplant, later reduced-intensity allogeneic stem cell transplant, and finally donor lymphocyte infusion due to recurrence. Following these therapies, the patient developed extensive GvHD that resulted in bilateral non-healing ulcers of the medial malleoli. The patient was seen in the wound care center, and his ulcers were treated with standard care that included off-loading, minor outpatient debridement, macrovascular assessment, and local moist wound healing. Despite this care, the ulcers failed to heal over a 6 month period. The patient underwent adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO). He healed both ulcers within a month of completing HBO. It is our goal to discuss the pathophysiologic mechanism of non-healing wounds in the setting of GvHD and discuss the potential role of HBO in their treatment.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA