The effect of RAAS blockade on markers of renal tubular damage in diabetic nephropathy: u-NGAL, u-KIM1 and u-LFABP.

AIM: Blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) affects both the glomerulus and tubules. We aimed to investigate the effect of irbesartan on the tubular markers: urinary (u) neutrophil gelatinase associated protein (NGAL), Kidney injury molecule 1 (KIM1) and liver-fatty acid-binding protein (LFABP). METHODS: A substudy of a double-masked, randomized, cross-over study including 52 patients with type 2 diabetes, hypertension and microalbuminuria. After 2 months washout of all antihypertensive medication except bendroflumethiazid, patients were treated in random order with irbesartan 300, 600 and 900 mg for 2 months. END POINTS: Urinary tubular markers at baseline and after each treatment period (ELISA), 24-h blood pressure, glomerular filtration rate (GFR, (51)CrEDTA) and 24-h urine albumin excretion (UAER). RESULTS: Fifty-two patients completed the study (41 male). Age (mean (SD)): 58(10) years and diabetes duration 13(8) years. Baseline GFR was 101(24) and UAER (geometric mean [95%CI]) 133 (103-172) mg/24 h. With increasing doses of irbesartan (300, 600, 900 mg) u-KIM1 was reduced with 15%, 10% and 15% (p = 0.07 between 300 mg vs. baseline and no difference between doses). Patients with high u-KIM1 at baseline (above median) had a 32% reduction in u-KIM1 during treatment (p = 0.01). No significant decline in U-NGAL compared to baseline. U-LFABP increased during treatment (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Irbesartan treatment reduced levels of the tubular marker u-KIM1 in patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria. u-NGAL changed insignificantly and u-LFABP increased. More studies with longer follow up are needed to determine the role of tubular markers in monitoring treatment effect and prediction of prognosis in diabetic nephropathy.

Nephropathy in type 1 diabetes is associated with increased circulating activated platelets and platelet hyperreactivity.

Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have increased platelet activation compared to non-diabetic controls. Platelet hyperreactivity has been associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes in Type 2 DM, and with diabetic nephropathy. We investigated the relationship between platelet activation and nephropathy in Type 1 DM. Patients with Type 1 DM and diabetic nephropathy (n = 35), age- and sex-matched Type 1 DM patients with persistent normoalbuminuria (n = 51), and healthy age- and sex-matched controls (n = 30) were studied. Platelet surface P-selectin, platelet surface activated GPIIb/IIIa, monocyte-platelet aggregates (MPAs) and neutrophil-platelet aggregates (NPAs) were measured by whole blood flow cytometry as markers of platelet activation. Platelet reactivity was assessed in response to exogenously added ADP and thrombin receptor activating peptide (TRAP). Platelet surface P-selectin (basal and in response to 0.5 or 20 microM ADP) was higher in nephropathy patients compared with normoalbuminuric patients (P = 0.027), and non-diabetic controls (P = 0.0057). NPAs were higher in nephropathy patients compared to normoalbuminuric patients (P = 0.0088). MPAs were higher in nephropathy patients compared to non-diabetic controls (P = 0.0075). There were no differences between groups in activated GPIIb/IIIa or in response to TRAP at any end-point. More patients with nephropathy received aspirin (71.4%) compared to normoalbuminuric patients (27.4%) (P < 0.0001). Type 1 diabetic nephropathy, as compared with normoalbuminuria, is associated with circulating activated platelets and platelet hyperreactivity to ADP, despite the confounding variable of more nephropathy patients receiving aspirin. This platelet activation is likely to contribute to the known increased risk of cardiovascular events in patients with diabetic nephropathy.

Enhanced renoprotective effects of ultrahigh doses of irbesartan in patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the renoprotective effect as reflected by short-term changes in albuminuria of ultrahigh doses of irbesartan in type 2 diabetic patients with microalbuminuria. METHODS: This double-masked randomized crossover trial included 52 (41 males) hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients with microalbuminuria on ongoing antihypertensive medication. At inclusion, previous antihypertensive treatment was discontinued and replaced with bendroflumethiazide, 5 mg once daily, for the entire study. Following 2 months wash-out (baseline), patients were treated randomly with irbesartan 300, 600, and 900 mg once daily, each dose for 2 months. End points evaluated at the end of each study period included urinary albumin excretion rate (UAE) (mean of three 24-hour collections), 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure, and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) [chromium 51 ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (51Cr-EDTA)]. RESULTS: Baseline values were: 24-hour UAE [geometric mean (95% CI)] 134 (103 to 170) mg/24 hours, ambulatory blood pressure [mean (SD)] 140 (10)/77 (7) mm Hg, and GFR 103 (19) mL/min/1.73 m2. All doses of irbesartan significantly reduced UAE, ambulatory blood pressure, and GFR from baseline. Reductions in UAE from baseline were 52% (46% to 57%), 49% (43% to 54%), and 59% (54% to 63%) with increasing doses of irbesartan (P < 0.01). UAE was reduced significantly more by irbesartan 900 mg compared with lower doses with an additional reduction in UAE of 15% (2% to 26%) by irbesartan 900 mg compared with 300 mg (P = 0.02). The greater reduction in albuminuria by irbesartan 900 vs. 300 mg was more pronounced in patients with UAE during irbesartan 300 mg above vs. below the median [31% (18% to 42%) vs. -9% (-25% to 6%), respectively (P < 0.05)]. With increasing doses systolic ambulatory blood pressure was reduced from baseline by 8 (4 to 12), 9 (5 to 13), and 9 (5 to13) mm Hg, and diastolic ambulatory blood pressure by 6 (4 to 7), 7 (6 to 9), and 7 (6 to 9) mm Hg (NS between doses). CONCLUSION: Ultrahigh dosing of irbesartan (900 mg once daily) is generally safe and offers additional renoprotection independent of changes in systemic blood pressure and GFR in comparison to the currently recommended dose of 300 mg.

Dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin system versus maximal recommended dose of ACE inhibition in diabetic nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: Albuminuria and hypertension are predictors of poor renal and cardiovascular outcome in diabetic patients. We tested whether dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) with both an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor and an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) is superior to maximal recommended dose of ACE inhibitor in type 1 diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN). METHODS: We performed a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial with 8 weeks treatment with placebo and irbesartan 300 mg (once daily), added on top of enalapril 40 mg (once daily). We included 24 type 1 patients with DN. At the end of each treatment period, albuminuria, 24-hour blood pressure, and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were measured. RESULTS: Values on ACE inhibitors + placebo were: albuminuria [mean (95% CI)], 519 (342 to 789) mg/24 hours; blood pressure [mean (SEM)], 131 (3)/74 (1) mm Hg, and GFR [mean (SEM)], 65 (5) mL/min/1.73 m2. Dual blockade of the RAS induced a reduction in albuminuria [mean (95% CI)] of 25% (15, 34) (P < 0.001), a reduction in systolic blood pressure of 8 mm Hg (4, 12) (P = 0.002), and a reduction of 4 mm Hg (2, 7) (P = 0.003) in diastolic blood pressure. GFR and plasma potassium remained unchanged during both treatment regimes. Dual blockade was safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Dual blockade of the RAS is superior to maximal recommended dose of ACE inhibitors with regard to lowering of albuminuria and blood pressure in type 1 patients with DN. Long-term trials are needed to further establish the role of dual blockade of the RAS in renal and cardiovascular protection.

Additive effect of ACE inhibition and angiotensin II receptor blockade in type I diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy.

Albuminuria and hypertension are predictors of poor renal and cardiovascular outcome in diabetic patients. This study tested whether dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) with both an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (ACE-I) and an Angiotensin-II receptor blocker (ARB) is superior to either drug alone in type I diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN). A randomized double-blind crossover trial was performed with 8-wk treatment with placebo, 20 mg of benazepril once daily, 80 mg of valsartan once daily, and the combination of 20 mg of benazepril and 80 mg of valsartan. Twenty type I diabetic patients with DN were included. At the end of each treatment period, albuminuria, 24-h BP, and GFR were measured. Eighteen patients completed the study. Placebo values were: albuminuria [mean (95% CI)], 701 (490 to 1002) mg/24 h; BP [mean (SEM)], 144 (4)/79 (2) mmHg, and GFR [mean (SEM)], 82 (7) ml/min per 1.73 m(2). Treatment with benazepril, valsartan, or dual blockade significantly reduced albuminuria and BP compared with placebo. Benazepril and valsartan were equally effective. Dual blockade induced an additional reduction in albuminuria of 43 % (29 to 54 %) compared with any type of monotherapy, and a reduction in systolic BP of 6 (0 to 13) mmHg and 7 (1 to 14) mmHg (versus benazepril and valsartan, respectively) and a reduction of 7 (4 to 10) mmHg diastolic compared with both monotherapies. GFR was reversibly reduced on dual blockade compared with monotherapy and placebo. All treatments were safe and well tolerated. In conclusion, dual blockade of the RAS may offer additional renal and cardiovascular protection in type I diabetic patients with DN.

Effect of dietary protein restriction on prognosis in patients with diabetic nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: Recent data suggest that dietary protein restriction improves survival and delays the progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in non-diabetic nephropathies. The purpose of our study was to determine the effect of dietary protein restriction on survival and progression to ESRD in diabetic nephropathy. METHODS: A four-year prospective, controlled trial with concealed randomization was performed comparing the effects of a low-protein diet (0.6 g/kg/day) with a usual-protein diet. The study included 82 type 1 diabetic patients with progressive diabetic nephropathy [pre-study mean decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) 7.1 mL/min/year (95% CI, 5.8 to 8.5)]. The main outcome measures were decline in GFR and development of ESRD or death. RESULTS: During the follow-up period the usual-protein diet group consumed 1.02 g/kg/day (95% CI; 0.95 to 1.10) as compared with 0.89 (0.83 to 0.95) in the low-protein diet group (P = 0.005). The mean declines in GFR were 3.9 mL/min/year (2.7 to 5.2) in the usual-protein diet group and 3.8 (2.8 to 4.8) in the low-protein diet group. ESRD or death occurred in 27% of patients on a usual-protein diet as compared with 10% on a low-protein diet (log-rank test; P = 0.042). The relative risk of ESRD or death was 0.23 (0.07 to 0.72) for patients assigned to a low-protein diet, after an adjustment at baseline for the presence of cardiovascular disease (P = 0.01). Blood pressure and glycemic control were comparable in the two diet groups during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Moderate dietary protein restriction improves prognosis in type 1 diabetic patients with progressive diabetic nephropathy in addition to the beneficial effect of antihypertensive treatment.

Dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin system in diabetic nephropathy: a randomized double-blind crossover study.

OBJECTIVE: Many patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN) have levels of albuminuria > 1 g/day and blood pressure >135/85 mmHg, despite antihypertensive combination therapy, including recommended doses of ACE inhibitors, e.g., lisinopril/enalapril at 20 mg daily. We tested the concept that such patients might benefit from dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a randomized double-blind crossover study of 2 months treatment with candesartan cilexetil 8 mg once daily and placebo in addition to previous antihypertensive treatment. We included 18 type 2 diabetic patients with DN fulfilling the above-mentioned criteria. All received recommended doses of ACE inhibitor and, in addition, 15 patients received diuretics, 11 received a calcium channel antagonist, and 3 received a beta-blocker. At the end of each treatment period, we measured the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), 24-h blood pressure, albuminuria, and IgGuria. RESULTS: The addition of candesartan to usual antihypertensive therapy induced a mean (95% CI) reduction in albuminuria of 25% (2-58), P = 0.036 (geometric mean [95% CI] from 1,764 mg/24 h [1,225-2,540] to 1,334 mg/24 h [890-1,998]). It also produced a mean reduction of 35% (9-53) in the fractional clearance of albumin (P = 0.016), a reduction of 32% (1-54) in fractional clearance of IgG (P = 0.046), a reduction in 24-h systolic blood pressure of 10 mmHg (2-18) (P = 0.019) (mean +/- +/- SE) from 148 +/- 3 to 138 +/- 5 mmHg, and a mean reduction in GFR of 5 ml. min(-1). 1.73 m(-2) (0.1-9) (P = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Dual blockade of the RAS reduces albuminuria and blood pressure in type 2 diabetic patients with DN responding insufficiently to previous antihypertensive therapy, including ACE inhibitors in recommended doses.

Diurnal variations of glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria in diabetic nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to evaluate the diurnal variation in glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and the potential mechanisms responsible for such variations in GFR and albuminuria in diabetic nephropathy. METHODS: In three 24-hour urine samples, divided into a night- and daytime portion, diurnal variation in albuminuria (ELISA) was assessed. Furthermore, during recumbency changes in albuminuria, GFR (51Cr-EDTA plasma clearance) and arterial blood pressure (TM2420) from nighttime (00:00 to 05:00 hours) to subsequent daytime (08:00 to 13:00 hours) were examined in 20 type 1 diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy. RESULTS: The 24-hour urine collections showed an average rise in albuminuria from night- to daytime of 51% (95% CI; 16 to 95; P < 0.01). During recumbency a non-significant rise was recorded from night- to daytime in albuminuria (22%, -8 to 61, P=0.15), simultaneously with an increase in GFR of 9.0% (3.4 to 14.5, P < 0.005) and mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) of 8.0% (4.3 to 11.7, P < 0.0001). No diurnal variation in fractional clearance of albumin was found. Significant associations between MABP and albuminuria were demonstrated during night- (R2=0.50; P < 0.001) and daytime (R2=0.48; P < 0.005). A linear regression analysis between diurnal variations in MABP and GFR showed that an increase in MABP (of 10%) from night- to daytime was associated with a significant increase in GFR (of 8.0%, 0.2 to 4.1, P < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed diurnal variations in GFR, albuminuria and MABP in diabetic nephropathy, with lowest values during sleep at night. The observed diurnal variation in albuminuria seems to be explained partly by mechanisms related to orthostasis, and partly by the diurnal variation in GFR and serum albumin concentration. The diurnal variation of blood pressure seems to play a role for the diurnal changes in GFR and albuminuria.